whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Time Tracking & Attendance

My Hours

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by My Hours d.o.o. · myhours.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

My Hours: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai My Hours: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

My Hours at a glance

Vendor
My Hours d.o.o.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 3 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates My Hours 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. My Hours, from Spica International in Ljubljana, Slovenia, is strongest at project and billing, scoring 8 with no spread: a clients-projects-tasks-tags hierarchy, rates per user, task, project or single time log, budgets in hours, billable amount or costs with alerts, and numbered invoices from logged hours. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources

My Hours alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Operations Lead

Weighted verdict

Runs a 200-person operation with office, workshop and field staff, and has to record all of them since the BAG ruling. Wants capture that fits each of those groups and a roster that reflects reality. Unmoved by a beautiful desktop timer that half the workforce cannot use.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Operations Lead

Panel median The Operations Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Operations Lead
Capture in the real workplace 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Working-time law & audit record 2 of 5 2 of 5
Absence & shift planning 2 of 5 2 of 5
Project, cost-centre & billing 4 of 5 4 of 5
Payroll handoff 2 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5

Capture in the real workplace

How this is scored

How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.

0 — Not a time-recording tool; working time cannot be captured in the product.

3 — Clocking in and out or a timer in the browser or an app, with manual entries; offline use, shared terminals and corrections are basic or not described.

5 — Web and mobile apps for clocking in and out, a shared kiosk, terminal or badge option or offline capture that syncs, and corrections requested by the employee and approved by a manager.

8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.

10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Clocking is documented across mobile apps, browser, timeclock terminals and Bluetooth beacons, with a customizable kiosk and offline entry that auto-syncs on reconnect — that speaks to my field and workshop crews. An audit log of all actions and changes, filterable by period, user or team, gives the who-changed-what record. We found no public information on GPS or geofenced check-in with stated limits, or on employee-requested corrections in bulk. 1 3 4 10

Report an error

Working-time law & audit record

How this is scored

Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.

0 — A project or task timer that keeps no attendance record of working time (start, end, breaks).

3 — Start, end and break times recorded per day with a working-time report per employee; ArbZG checks and retention are basic or not described.

5 — Start, end and breaks recorded for the recording duty (BAG 2022 or ArbZG named), automatic break rules, warnings on the daily maximum or the rest period, and overtime balances.

8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, a change log on entries, and an export built for an inspection.

10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Attendance from clock-in events with lunch breaks, overtime and flexitime balances, daily/weekly/monthly locking of timesheets, and an audit log exportable in XLS "ready to present to auditors" are all documented. The compliance framing on the captured pages is American — rounding tied to FLSA and the standard 40-hour week — and we found no public information naming the German recording duty, ArbZG rest or daily-maximum enforcement, or statutory retention beyond up to 90 days after account closure. The raw record is there; the German legal scaffolding around it is not evidenced. 2 4 6 8 10

Report an error

Absence & shift planning

How this is scored

Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.

0 — Neither absence handling nor shift planning is part of the product.

3 — Vacation requests with approval and an absence calendar, or a basic shift plan; entitlement rules and rostering are basic or not described.

5 — Absence management with entitlement balances, sickness recording and an absence calendar, plus shift or duty planning with templates or employee availability.

8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement and carry-over, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.

10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Absences are handled by creating a project titled 'Absences' with sick leave, annual leave, maternity leave and national holidays as tasks — a workable construct, but a project tracker's answer to absence, not an entitlement engine. Vacation quota monitoring, employee absence requests with an approval hierarchy, and a calendar overview of absences and shifts are documented. We found no public information on holiday calendars per location, carry-over, substitution and swap workflows, or shift templates with availability. 4 6 7

Report an error

Project, cost-centre & billing

How this is scored

Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.

0 — Attendance only; the product records time without any project, task or cost-centre dimension.

3 — Time booked to projects or clients with a report per project; rates and billable status are basic or not described.

5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag, hourly rates, reports per project and client, and an export or integration toward invoicing.

8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.

10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

This is the product's centre of gravity: clients, projects and tasks with tags, rates at person, task and project level with labor costs kept separate from billable amounts, budgets in hours, billable amount or costs with percentage alerts, cost-centre and CapEx/OpEx allocation reports, and numbered invoices created straight from logged hours. Approval before billing exists via timesheet submission to managers. We found no public information on a maintained handoff into named accounting systems or on how rates behave when changed mid-project. 1 4 8 9 10

Report an error

Payroll handoff

How this is scored

How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.

0 — Payroll is outside the product: it records client or project time only and prepares nothing for payroll.

3 — An export (CSV, Excel or PDF) of hours and absences for the payroll office; named formats and surcharges are basic or not described.

5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system (e.g. DATEV LODAS/Lohn und Gehalt), covering hours, absences and overtime.

8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.

10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Paid and unpaid hours, overtime, lunch breaks and work-from-home are calculated, absences can be exported to payroll, and reports go out in PDF, XLS and raw CSV/TSV "ready for payroll processing", with a period-specific time-entry report for upload into accounting systems. Connections to payroll run through Zapier and API keys to "any payroll provider" — we found no public information naming a specific system such as DATEV. For my German payroll office this is a build-it-yourself handoff, not a maintained connector. 4 6 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it. Dimensions not proven either way are unknown, not non-European.

0 — Vendor, contracting entity and hosting shown to be outside the EU, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist and one European element is proven (an EU contracting entity or representative, or EU hosting as an option); the rest of the chain is not stated.

5 — An EU contracting entity and EU hosting stated, with a data processing agreement; the subprocessor list is not published in full or includes non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, the full subprocessor list published with locations, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The vendor states it is based in the EU with HQ in Ljubljana, Slovenia, claims full GDPR compliance, and holds ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 certifications. Hosting is Microsoft Azure with the region not stated, the sub-processor list is available only on request, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement. One European element — the EU entity — is proven; the rest of the chain is not stated. 1 2 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A public "from" price per user or one priced tier; how cost scales with modules, hardware or minimum seats is unclear.

5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated and the main inclusions given; some pieces (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) may be unpriced.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Public and exact: free for teams of up to 5 users, a 14-day free trial with no credit card needed, and API access in every subscription. We found no public information on per-user prices for the paid tiers, and the pages invite teams of 20+ users to book a demo. I cannot compute an annual invoice for 200 heads from these pages. 1 3 5

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about My Hours

Is My Hours European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where My Hours is based.

Where does My Hours store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

Does My Hours have a free plan?

Yes. My Hours has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 3 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to My Hours?

As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates TimeTac (3.5/5), clockodo (3/5) and GFOS (3/5) highest among the other 27 Time Tracking & Attendance products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is TimeTac (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: My Hours alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about My Hours? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Privacy policy — found from the homepage myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap help.myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap help.myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →