whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Time Tracking & Attendance

My Hours

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by My Hours d.o.o. · myhours.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

My Hours: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai My Hours: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

My Hours at a glance

Vendor
My Hours d.o.o.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 3 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates My Hours 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. My Hours, from Spica International in Ljubljana, Slovenia, is strongest at project and billing, scoring 8 with no spread: a clients-projects-tasks-tags hierarchy, rates per user, task, project or single time log, budgets in hours, billable amount or costs with alerts, and numbered invoices from logged hours. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources

My Hours alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Has read a great many pages claiming to be "BAG-konform" and wants to know which feature makes that true. Reads compliance claims for what they do not say: which module, at which tier, and whether the terminal in the photograph costs extra.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Panel median The Skeptic This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Skeptic
Capture in the real workplace 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Working-time law & audit record 2 of 5 2 of 5
Absence & shift planning 2 of 5 2 of 5
Project, cost-centre & billing 4 of 5 4 of 5
Payroll handoff 2 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5

Capture in the real workplace

How this is scored

How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.

0 — Not a time-recording tool; working time cannot be captured in the product.

3 — Clocking in and out or a timer in the browser or an app, with manual entries; offline use, shared terminals and corrections are basic or not described.

5 — Web and mobile apps for clocking in and out, a shared kiosk, terminal or badge option or offline capture that syncs, and corrections requested by the employee and approved by a manager.

8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.

10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Four capture paths are documented — mobile and web clocking, timeclock terminals and Bluetooth beacons — plus a customizable kiosk, and offline entries auto-sync once connectivity returns. Timesheets are submitted by employees and approved or rejected by managers, with a full audit log of all actions and changes filterable by period, user and team, exportable in XLS. We found no public information on GPS or geofenced check-in, or on bulk correction of past entries. 3 4 6 10

Report an error

Working-time law & audit record

How this is scored

Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.

0 — A project or task timer that keeps no attendance record of working time (start, end, breaks).

3 — Start, end and break times recorded per day with a working-time report per employee; ArbZG checks and retention are basic or not described.

5 — Start, end and breaks recorded for the recording duty (BAG 2022 or ArbZG named), automatic break rules, warnings on the daily maximum or the rest period, and overtime balances.

8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, a change log on entries, and an export built for an inspection.

10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Clock-in events, lunch breaks, overtime against weekly targets and flexitime balances are recorded, with daily/weekly/monthly locking and an exportable audit log behind them — but the one working-time rule the vendor names is American: FLSA rounding to the quarter hour. The security and privacy pages cite GDPR, CCPA, DCAA and SOC II; we found no public information naming the German recording duty, ArbZG break or rest rules, the daily maximum, or statutory retention. For a German inspection, the audit log is the only artifact aimed at auditors. 2 4 6 8 10

Report an error

Absence & shift planning

How this is scored

Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.

0 — Neither absence handling nor shift planning is part of the product.

3 — Vacation requests with approval and an absence calendar, or a basic shift plan; entitlement rules and rostering are basic or not described.

5 — Absence management with entitlement balances, sickness recording and an absence calendar, plus shift or duty planning with templates or employee availability.

8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement and carry-over, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.

10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Absence requests, an approval hierarchy, vacation quotas and a calendar overview of absences and shifts are documented — but the vendor's own help pages describe absence tracking as a convention the customer builds: create a project titled 'Absences' and add sick leave, annual leave and maternity leave as tasks to it. We found no public information on shift templates, employee availability, substitution or swap workflows, holiday calendars per location, or carry-over of entitlement. 4 6 7

Report an error

Project, cost-centre & billing

How this is scored

Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.

0 — Attendance only; the product records time without any project, task or cost-centre dimension.

3 — Time booked to projects or clients with a report per project; rates and billable status are basic or not described.

5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag, hourly rates, reports per project and client, and an export or integration toward invoicing.

8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.

10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Clients, projects, tasks and tags form a four-level hierarchy with cost centers via custom fields; rates can be set per user, project, task and individual time log with labor cost separated from the billable rate; budgets run in hours, billable amount or costs with automatic alerts; and numbered invoices are created straight from logged hours. Timesheets are approved before reports go out. We found no public information on how rates behave when changed mid-project, and the accounting handoff runs through Zapier and an API into unnamed 'popular accounting systems'. 4 8 9 10

Report an error

Payroll handoff

How this is scored

How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.

0 — Payroll is outside the product: it records client or project time only and prepares nothing for payroll.

3 — An export (CSV, Excel or PDF) of hours and absences for the payroll office; named formats and surcharges are basic or not described.

5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system (e.g. DATEV LODAS/Lohn und Gehalt), covering hours, absences and overtime.

8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.

10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Paid and unpaid hours, absences, overtime and morning/afternoon/night shift bonuses are calculated, reports export as PDF, XLS or CSV 'ready for payroll processing', and a per-period export of every categorized time entry is built for upload into accounting systems. We found no public information naming a payroll system — the route to 'any payroll provider' runs through Zapier and API keys. Time logs and timesheets can be locked by day, week or month, but we found no public information tying that lock to a transmission step or covering corrections after the close. 4 6 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it. Dimensions not proven either way are unknown, not non-European.

0 — Vendor, contracting entity and hosting shown to be outside the EU, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist and one European element is proven (an EU contracting entity or representative, or EU hosting as an option); the rest of the chain is not stated.

5 — An EU contracting entity and EU hosting stated, with a data processing agreement; the subprocessor list is not published in full or includes non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, the full subprocessor list published with locations, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The vendor states it is based in the EU with HQ in Ljubljana, Slovenia, claims GDPR compliance, and hosts on Microsoft Azure — but the Azure region is not stated, so EU hosting is proven neither way. The subprocessor list is available only by emailing support, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or on where the contracting entity is established beyond the stated HQ. 1 2 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A public "from" price per user or one priced tier; how cost scales with modules, hardware or minimum seats is unclear.

5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated and the main inclusions given; some pieces (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) may be unpriced.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The only public prices are that teams of up to 5 users are free and the trial runs 14 days with no credit card; we found no public per-user prices, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment for the paid tiers. Teams of 20 or more users are steered to a demo with product experts, and the timeclock terminals and Bluetooth beacons shown on the capture pages carry no price at all. 1 3 5

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about My Hours

Is My Hours European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where My Hours is based.

Where does My Hours store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

Does My Hours have a free plan?

Yes. My Hours has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 3 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to My Hours?

As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates TimeTac (3.5/5), clockodo (3/5) and GFOS (3/5) highest among the other 27 Time Tracking & Attendance products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is TimeTac (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: My Hours alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about My Hours? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Privacy policy — found from the homepage myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap help.myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap help.myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap myhours.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →