whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Time Tracking & Attendance

TimeTac

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by TimeTac GmbH · www.timetac.com

Compare with Papershift → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Operations Lead

Weighted verdict

Runs a 200-person operation with office, workshop and field staff, and has to record all of them since the BAG ruling. Wants capture that fits each of those groups and a roster that reflects reality. Unmoved by a beautiful desktop timer that half the workforce cannot use.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Operations Lead

Capture in the real workplace

How this is scored

How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.

0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.

3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.

5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.

8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.

10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

This is the part that matters to me: web, mobile apps, and three generations of RFID/fingerprint terminals from €29.90 a month, so the office, the workshop wall and the field crews all have a path. Mobile capture works offline and can stamp GPS/NFC position, and staff can correct their own bookings with or without supervisor approval. I hold it under an 8 because the evidence says nothing about bulk correction, no audit trail of who changed what, and no stated limits on the GPS locating. 1 2 4

Report an error

Working-time law & audit record

How this is scored

Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.

0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.

3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.

5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.

8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.

10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The vendor claims the record fulfils the BAG/EuGH recording duty and captures breaks 'rechtssicher', and there are configurable working-time models with target hours and surcharge rates plus automatic time accounts. But since the BAG ruling I need more than claims: nothing here evidences warnings on the 8/10-hour maximum or the 11-hour rest period, and there is no retention statement anywhere in the evidence. Absence of those checks and of any inspection-ready export keeps this between the flat-rule and configurable anchors. 1 2

Report an error

Absence & shift planning

How this is scored

Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.

0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.

3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.

5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.

8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.

10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Leave is well covered: vacation, time-off-in-lieu and sickness recording, automatic balance calculation, carry-over or expiry, international public-holiday templates, deputy forwarding and iCal sync. But there is not one word about shift or duty rostering, no templates, no rest checks on the plan, no coverage warnings — and with 200 people across workshop and field, the roster is half my attendance reality. That gap caps it below the anchor that includes basic shift planning. 1 2

Report an error

Project, cost-centre & billing

How this is scored

Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.

0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.

3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.

5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.

8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.

10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Project and order times can be booked with access rights, real-time status and meaningful project reports, also from the mobile app. What the evidence never shows is money: no billable flag, no rate per person or project (the 'Zuschlagssätze' are overtime surcharges, not billing rates), no cost centres, no budget tracking and no invoice-ready export. It sits between the note-only and the billable-flag anchors — recording yes, revenue no. 1

Report an error

Payroll handoff

How this is scored

How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.

0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.

3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.

5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.

8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.

10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

There is a genuine, vendor-stated DATEV interface: time data goes 'direkt und sicher' to DATEV without manual export or Excel workarounds, GDPR-conform, with digital payslips. That satisfies the named-integration anchor. I cannot go higher because the evidence never says the interface carries night/Sunday/holiday surcharges or time-account balances, and there is no lock or approval step before transmission — for a 200-head payroll, that silence matters. 1

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

TimeTac GmbH is an Austrian entity with a Graz register court and VAT number, ISO 27001 certified, hosting exclusively in EU data centres with the main server in Germany. That is a comfortable DACH setup for my HR data. What keeps it off the top anchors: the data-centre operator is never named, the subprocessor list is entirely absent, and ownership is unknown — I cannot verify the chain, only the flag. 2 3 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.

5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The pricing page does per-user, per-product maths with a monthly total, states net prices, and prices the hardware terminals openly (€29.90–€49.90 per month) with support and mobile apps included. Onboarding and the API are 'price on request', which I can live with as custom work. What stops a clean 8: no minimum term or contract period is stated anywhere in the evidence, so the real annual invoice is computable only down to the renewal terms. 4

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

2 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency EU only ⚠ unverified 3/3 pts 3 Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about TimeTac? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (17)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.timetac.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Time recording www.timetac.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy www.timetac.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pricing www.timetac.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Imprint www.timetac.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Pricing www.timetac.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Imprint www.timetac.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap www.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap help.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap www.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap support.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap help.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap support.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap www.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap support.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap www.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap www.timetac.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →