whats-best.ai

Video Conferencing · Alternatives

Microsoft Teams alternatives

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates alfaview (3/5), Tixeo (3/5) and Nextcloud Talk (3/5) highest among the other 27 Video Conferencing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is alfaview (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

Microsoft Teams’s own page → All Video Conferencing products →

European alternatives to Microsoft Teams

European by provenance (EU-made, EU origin with foreign ownership, or UK and wider Europe). Data hosting is stated only where the vendor’s own pages prove it.

  1. alfaview

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    alfaview is a German video-conferencing platform from a Karlsruhe contracting entity, and the bench finds it strongest in the meeting itself: meeting core scored a flat 7 on published per-room capacities of 100, 300 and 500 participants, fifty breakout rooms and per-participant moderation, and reach and accessibility scored 7-8 on live transcription, screen-reader and braille support and sign-language interpreter handling in all plans.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages

    alfaview in detail → Microsoft Teams vs alfaview →

  2. Nextcloud Talk

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    Nextcloud Talk is a self-hosted, open-source video conferencing platform from Nextcloud GmbH of Stuttgart; this bench scored it strongest where deployment control matters and weakest on the meeting itself.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages

    Nextcloud Talk in detail →

  3. Whereby

    UK / wider Europe

    Panel rating

    The judges scored Whereby, a browser-based video-conferencing product from Whereby AS of Norway, strongest on encryption and access at 6 to 7 and on reach and accessibility at 6 to 7: media uses DTLS-SRTP, TLS 1.2 in transit and AES256 at rest, an opt-in small-meeting mode offers end-to-end encryption, dial-in carries country numbers, and captions cover 32 languages.

    • Data hosting: Default not stated; pages mention Ireland

    Whereby in detail →

  4. Wire

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    Wire, a video-conferencing and messaging product from Wire Swiss GmbH of Zug, Switzerland, splits the bench sharply.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages
    • Free plan: yes, per the vendor’s page captured 19 Oct 2026

    Wire in detail →

Other alternatives

  1. Tixeo

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Tixeo is secure video conferencing from a self-described independent French company hosting in Europe.

    Tixeo in detail →

  2. eyeson

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    eyeson is a video conferencing service from eyeson GmbH.

    eyeson in detail →

  3. Jitsi Meet

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Jitsi Meet is 8x8's free, open-source conferencing stack, and judges score it highest where its engineering is published: encryption and access at 7-8 — optional end-to-end encryption whose extra layer is stated as never removable at the server, over default DTLS-SRTP — and integrations at 6-8, built on an Apache 2.0 licence, a Docker install documented at 15 minutes, and XMPP and REST control.

    Jitsi Meet in detail →

  4. FreeConference

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    FreeConference is a video conferencing service operated by Iotum Inc.

    FreeConference in detail →

  5. Zoom

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Zoom scores highest where its documentation is deepest: meeting core at 6-7, on per-plan capacity (100 participants by default, 300 on Business, up to 5,000 with the Large Meeting add-on) and breakout rooms documented across five roles; integrations at 6-7, on documented REST APIs, calendar OAuth scopes, webhooks and single sign-on with managed domains from the Business tier; and pricing transparency at 6-7, with Pro at €13.33 /user/month and Business at €17.49 /user/month, billed annually excluding VAT.

    Zoom in detail → Microsoft Teams vs Zoom →

  6. BigBlueButton

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom whose strongest scores are in reach and accessibility — a flat 7 — resting on a WCAG 2.0 Level AA statement validated in September 2023 by external CPWA expert David Berman, JAWS screen-reader support, live closed captions, and one-click browser joining without accounts.

    BigBlueButton in detail →

  7. Webex

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Webex is a video conferencing product from Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Webex in detail →

  8. RingCentral Video

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    RingCentral Video is a video conferencing product from RingCentral, Inc.

    RingCentral Video in detail →

  9. Livestorm

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Livestorm is a browser-based webinar platform from Livestorm SAS, delivered over WebRTC with no downloads.

    Livestorm in detail →

  10. Pexip

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Pexip AS is a video conferencing platform whose scores are highest on integrations, at 7–9, built on Outlook and Google Calendar scheduling, Active Directory, SSO with MFA, APIs and SDKs, registration of Cisco, Poly, Yealink, Avaya and Lifesize endpoints over SIP and H.323, and a self-hosted path with conferencing nodes deployable in data centers anywhere in the world.

    Pexip in detail →

  11. Dialpad Meetings

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Dialpad Meetings shows best on reach and accessibility, scored a flat 7: guests join by browser link or SMS invite with no app or account, dial-in lists international access numbers for Belgium, Finland and the Czech Republic, and a dedicated accessibility page documents TTY, RTT and hearing-device support.

    Dialpad Meetings in detail →

  12. GoTo Meeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    GoTo Meeting in detail →

  13. Digital Samba

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Digital Samba is browser-based video conferencing from Digital Samba S.L., a Spanish company.

    Digital Samba in detail →

  14. LiveWebinar

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    LiveWebinar is a cloud-based video conferencing and webinar product.

    LiveWebinar in detail →

  15. ClickMeeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    ClickMeeting is a browser-based webinar and meeting platform whose strength is entry: joining needs no install from a desktop browser, mobile app or mobile browser, with real-time live transcription, screen-reader support on web and mobile, and adjustable chat font sizes; reach and accessibility scores run 5 to 6, the highest here.

    ClickMeeting in detail →

  16. Lifesize

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Lifesize's published pages score strongest as an organisation-wide conferencing service tied to its own room hardware: recording governance sits at a flat 4 — Record and Share enabled at account level, admins managing the recordings library, sharing restricted to specific users — and integrations score 4-5, with Icon systems prompting to join from the calendar named the bright spot.

    Lifesize in detail →

  17. Demio

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Demio is a webinar platform built for marketers.

    Demio in detail →

  18. Google Meet

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Google Meet's strongest evidence is pricing transparency, the bench's highest at 5–6 (the educator alone at 6): three of four tiers carry public per-user euro prices — Starter €5.44/€6.80, Standard €6.80/€13.60, Plus €10.55/€21.10 per user per month — with a stated 16% saving on a one-year commitment, participant capacities of 100 to 1000 per plan and a 24-hour maximum meeting length; meeting core scores 4–6, the IT administrator alone at 6.

    Google Meet in detail →

  19. LoopUp Meetings

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    LoopUp Meetings is strongest on reach and accessibility, where international dial-in, account-free guest joining, mobile apps and soft-phone or VoIP joining are all documented, and weakest on sovereignty and encryption and access (a flat 2).

    LoopUp Meetings in detail →

  20. TeamViewer Meeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    TeamViewer Meeting's public case rests on corporate identity and certifications, and the bench scores it accordingly: sovereignty is the strongest category at 4-5, built on German contracting entities — TeamViewer Germany GmbH (Ulm HRB 534075) and TeamViewer SE, both at Bahnhofsplatz 2, Göppingen — and published ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 and 3, HIPAA/HITECH conformance, though the stated EU-based storage on Microsoft Azure appears only on the AI add-on page and the general subprocessor list is a PDF link that was not examined.

    TeamViewer Meeting in detail →

  21. Vectera

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Vectera is a video conferencing product built around customer meetings that guests join by booking link.

    Vectera in detail →

  22. Adobe Connect

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Adobe Connect arrives at this bench as a developer-documented meeting platform whose strength is extensibility: integrations scored 3-4, led by a custom pods SDK with methods, properties, events and code samples, pods built in HTML, JavaScript and CSS, and a developer distribution channel; meeting core followed at 2-4, with five of six judges at 4 citing documented breakout rooms, host, presenter and participant roles, and participant statuses such as raise hand.

    Adobe Connect in detail →

  23. Amazon Chime

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Judged from its own captured pages, Amazon Chime sits at the bottom: the homepage, legal, privacy and security pages describe the AWS cloud platform, not a meeting product.

    Amazon Chime in detail →