whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Video Conferencing · Alternatives

Pexip alternatives

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates alfaview (3/5), Tixeo (3/5) and Nextcloud Talk (3/5) highest among the other 27 Video Conferencing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is alfaview (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

Pexip’s own page → All Video Conferencing products →

European alternatives to Pexip

European by provenance (EU-made, EU origin with foreign ownership, or UK and wider Europe). Data hosting is stated only where the vendor’s own pages prove it.

  1. alfaview

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    alfaview is a German video-conferencing platform from a Karlsruhe contracting entity, and the bench finds it strongest in the meeting itself: meeting core scored a flat 7 on published per-room capacities of 100, 300 and 500 participants, fifty breakout rooms and per-participant moderation, and reach and accessibility scored 7-8 on live transcription, screen-reader and braille support and sign-language interpreter handling in all plans.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages

    alfaview in detail →

  2. Nextcloud Talk

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    Nextcloud Talk is a self-hosted, open-source video conferencing platform from Nextcloud GmbH of Stuttgart; this bench scored it strongest where deployment control matters and weakest on the meeting itself.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages

    Nextcloud Talk in detail →

  3. Whereby

    UK / wider Europe

    Panel rating

    The judges scored Whereby, a browser-based video-conferencing product from Whereby AS of Norway, strongest on encryption and access at 6 to 7 and on reach and accessibility at 6 to 7: media uses DTLS-SRTP, TLS 1.2 in transit and AES256 at rest, an opt-in small-meeting mode offers end-to-end encryption, dial-in carries country numbers, and captions cover 32 languages.

    • Data hosting: Default not stated; pages mention Ireland

    Whereby in detail →

  4. Wire

    EU-Made

    Panel rating

    Wire, a video-conferencing and messaging product from Wire Swiss GmbH of Zug, Switzerland, splits the bench sharply.

    • Data hosting: not stated on the vendor’s pages
    • Free plan: yes, per the vendor’s page captured 19 Oct 2026

    Wire in detail →

Other alternatives

  1. Tixeo

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Tixeo is secure video conferencing from a self-described independent French company hosting in Europe.

    Tixeo in detail →

  2. eyeson

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    eyeson is a video conferencing service from eyeson GmbH.

    eyeson in detail →

  3. Jitsi Meet

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Jitsi Meet is 8x8's free, open-source conferencing stack, and judges score it highest where its engineering is published: encryption and access at 7-8 — optional end-to-end encryption whose extra layer is stated as never removable at the server, over default DTLS-SRTP — and integrations at 6-8, built on an Apache 2.0 licence, a Docker install documented at 15 minutes, and XMPP and REST control.

    Jitsi Meet in detail →

  4. FreeConference

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    FreeConference is a video conferencing service operated by Iotum Inc.

    FreeConference in detail →

  5. Zoom

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Zoom scores highest where its documentation is deepest: meeting core at 6-7, on per-plan capacity (100 participants by default, 300 on Business, up to 5,000 with the Large Meeting add-on) and breakout rooms documented across five roles; integrations at 6-7, on documented REST APIs, calendar OAuth scopes, webhooks and single sign-on with managed domains from the Business tier; and pricing transparency at 6-7, with Pro at €13.33 /user/month and Business at €17.49 /user/month, billed annually excluding VAT.

    Zoom in detail →

  6. BigBlueButton

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom whose strongest scores are in reach and accessibility — a flat 7 — resting on a WCAG 2.0 Level AA statement validated in September 2023 by external CPWA expert David Berman, JAWS screen-reader support, live closed captions, and one-click browser joining without accounts.

    BigBlueButton in detail →

  7. Webex

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Webex is a video conferencing product from Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Webex in detail →

  8. RingCentral Video

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    RingCentral Video is a video conferencing product from RingCentral, Inc.

    RingCentral Video in detail →

  9. Livestorm

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Livestorm is a browser-based webinar platform from Livestorm SAS, delivered over WebRTC with no downloads.

    Livestorm in detail →

  10. Dialpad Meetings

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Dialpad Meetings shows best on reach and accessibility, scored a flat 7: guests join by browser link or SMS invite with no app or account, dial-in lists international access numbers for Belgium, Finland and the Czech Republic, and a dedicated accessibility page documents TTY, RTT and hearing-device support.

    Dialpad Meetings in detail →

  11. GoTo Meeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    GoTo Meeting in detail →

  12. Digital Samba

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Digital Samba is browser-based video conferencing from Digital Samba S.L., a Spanish company.

    Digital Samba in detail →

  13. LiveWebinar

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    LiveWebinar is a cloud-based video conferencing and webinar product.

    LiveWebinar in detail →

  14. ClickMeeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    ClickMeeting is a browser-based webinar and meeting platform whose strength is entry: joining needs no install from a desktop browser, mobile app or mobile browser, with real-time live transcription, screen-reader support on web and mobile, and adjustable chat font sizes; reach and accessibility scores run 5 to 6, the highest here.

    ClickMeeting in detail →

  15. Lifesize

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Lifesize's published pages score strongest as an organisation-wide conferencing service tied to its own room hardware: recording governance sits at a flat 4 — Record and Share enabled at account level, admins managing the recordings library, sharing restricted to specific users — and integrations score 4-5, with Icon systems prompting to join from the calendar named the bright spot.

    Lifesize in detail →

  16. Microsoft Teams

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Microsoft Teams is video conferencing from Microsoft Corporation, a US vendor in Redmond, Washington.

    Microsoft Teams in detail →

  17. Demio

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Demio is a webinar platform built for marketers.

    Demio in detail →

  18. Google Meet

    Rest of world

    Panel rating

    Google Meet's strongest evidence is pricing transparency, the bench's highest at 5–6 (the educator alone at 6): three of four tiers carry public per-user euro prices — Starter €5.44/€6.80, Standard €6.80/€13.60, Plus €10.55/€21.10 per user per month — with a stated 16% saving on a one-year commitment, participant capacities of 100 to 1000 per plan and a 24-hour maximum meeting length; meeting core scores 4–6, the IT administrator alone at 6.

    Google Meet in detail →

  19. LoopUp Meetings

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    LoopUp Meetings is strongest on reach and accessibility, where international dial-in, account-free guest joining, mobile apps and soft-phone or VoIP joining are all documented, and weakest on sovereignty and encryption and access (a flat 2).

    LoopUp Meetings in detail →

  20. TeamViewer Meeting

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    TeamViewer Meeting's public case rests on corporate identity and certifications, and the bench scores it accordingly: sovereignty is the strongest category at 4-5, built on German contracting entities — TeamViewer Germany GmbH (Ulm HRB 534075) and TeamViewer SE, both at Bahnhofsplatz 2, Göppingen — and published ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 and 3, HIPAA/HITECH conformance, though the stated EU-based storage on Microsoft Azure appears only on the AI add-on page and the general subprocessor list is a PDF link that was not examined.

    TeamViewer Meeting in detail →

  21. Vectera

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Vectera is a video conferencing product built around customer meetings that guests join by booking link.

    Vectera in detail →

  22. Adobe Connect

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Adobe Connect arrives at this bench as a developer-documented meeting platform whose strength is extensibility: integrations scored 3-4, led by a custom pods SDK with methods, properties, events and code samples, pods built in HTML, JavaScript and CSS, and a developer distribution channel; meeting core followed at 2-4, with five of six judges at 4 citing documented breakout rooms, host, presenter and participant roles, and participant statuses such as raise hand.

    Adobe Connect in detail →

  23. Amazon Chime

    Provenance unknown

    Panel rating

    Judged from its own captured pages, Amazon Chime sits at the bottom: the homepage, legal, privacy and security pages describe the AWS cloud platform, not a meeting product.

    Amazon Chime in detail →