As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates 360Learning 1.5/5 and Docebo 1.5/5 in Talent Management. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 360Learning and 4 pick Docebo. 360Learning scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (Goals, OKRs & continuous feedback and Performance reviews & calibration). Docebo scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (Works council, visibility & AI disclosure, HRIS sync, integrations & data portability and Learning, skills & succession). Provenance — 360Learning: EU-Made; Docebo: EU origin, foreign-owned. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
360Learning and Docebo split this bench along one line. Docebo leads learning and development (means 7.5 vs 6.8, four judges lean Docebo, two tie), codetermination and privacy (3.7 vs 1.8, six lean Docebo), and integrations and portability (6.0 vs 4.7, six lean Docebo), on documented retention and anonymisation, and Workday sync with SAML 2.0 single sign-on. 360Learning leads performance reviews (0.8 vs 0.0, four lean 360Learning, two tie) via recurring skills self-assessment with manager validation, goals and feedback (2.5 vs 0.0, six lean 360Learning), and pricing transparency (3.2 vs 2.0, six lean 360Learning): its Team tier is 8 € per user per month for up to 100 users, while Docebo publishes no prices. Sovereignty ties at 3.2 vs 3.2 (one lean each way, four ties); 360Learning lists jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors as unknown, Docebo lists jurisdiction as IT. Of five published weighted totals, four lean Docebo, one leans 360Learning.
Choose 360Learning if
You need performance reviews in some form: four judges lean 360Learning and two tie (means 0.8 vs 0.0), on its recurring skills self-assessment with manager validation.
Your team sets goals and exchanges feedback inside the platform: six of six judges lean 360Learning (2.5 vs 0.0), with goals stopping at individual learning targets.
You need a published price to compare: the Team tier is 8 € per user per month for up to 100 users, and six of six judges lean 360Learning on pricing transparency (3.2 vs 2.0).
Choose Docebo if
You deliver standards-based e-learning: SCORM 1.2/2004, Tin Can/xAPI and AICC content plus a marketplace of over 30,000 courses; learning and development leans Docebo four judges to none, with two ties (7.5 vs 6.8).
You plan skills-driven career paths, internal mobility and workforce planning: Docebo's AI infers, normalises and validates skills to feed them, within its learning and development lead (7.5 vs 6.8).
Your works council reviews privacy documentation: retention and anonymisation are documented in depth, and codetermination and privacy leans Docebo six judges to none (3.7 vs 1.8).
You run Workday or require SAML 2.0 single sign-on: integrations and portability leans Docebo six judges to none (6.0 vs 4.7).
You need the vendor's legal entity in a named jurisdiction: Docebo's legal entity jurisdiction is IT, while 360Learning's is listed as unknown.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Head of HR
Runs the annual review cycle for four hundred people and has to defend every rating in it. Wants criteria fixed before the cycle starts, calibration across departments, reminders that chase managers so HR does not have to, and a review history the employee can see and sign.
360Learning
Docebo
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Performance reviews & calibration
360Learning
The product modules the vendor names are LMS, LXP, Academies, Skills, AI for L&D and Integrations; the performance-review material on the site is a guide to how 360Learning itself runs quarterly reviews with self-assessments, objectives and peer and upward input, and the closest product capability is managers reviewing and validating skills self-assessments. I found no public information on configurable review cycles, rating scales, calibration views across teams, employee sign-off, or review history kept per employee.
Docebo
I run the annual review for four hundred people and this product does not run it: the captured pages present Docebo as an AI-powered learning platform with skills intelligence, and we found no public information on review cycles, templates, rating scales, self or peer input, employee sign-off or calibration.
Goals, OKRs & continuous feedback
360Learning
Learners can define their own growth targets and track progress against job requirements and personal development plans, which covers the individual-goal part. The peer and upward review I read describes the vendor's own practice rather than a product feature, and I found no public information on goal alignment across company and team, check-ins or 1:1 agendas, or feedback and recognition between colleagues feeding a year-end review.
Docebo
Nothing here does the work between reviews — we found no public information on goals or OKRs, check-ins, 1:1 agendas, or feedback and recognition, and the pages document a learning platform and skills-intelligence modules rather than continuous performance management.
Learning, skills & succession
360Learning
This is the product's centre of gravity: skills profiles with current-versus-required gaps, career profiles with role history and targets, target-job mapping against a job framework, learning paths and onboarding courses, a SCORM player, scheduled self-assessments with manager validation, and AI tagging of courses to skills. I found no public information on talent reviews such as a nine-box, succession plans per key role, internal mobility shown against open positions, or exportable training records and certificates, which is what would take it into the top band.
Docebo
This is their home ground: a marketplace of more than 30,000 courses and certifications, SCORM 1.2 and 2004, Tin Can/xAPI and AICC support, certification and compliance tracking, AI-inferred skills profiles, a Job Architect building role and skills frameworks, a Career Coach pointing people to next-best roles, and a Strategic Workforce Planner showing skill gaps, readiness and risk. We found no public information on talent reviews such as a nine-box, succession plans per key role, or exportable training records, which is what holds it below the top.
Works council, visibility & AI disclosure
360Learning
The AI features are described by what they do — AI Content Builder, AI-supported course creation, automatic skills tagging, content recommendations, SkillsGPT, AI-driven role suggestions — with no stated model provider, inputs or admin option to switch them off, and the pages carry user administration and manager/admin validation but no visibility rules per role. I found no public information on a stated minimum group size for anonymous results, access logging, retention or deletion configuration, or documentation aimed at a works council or works agreement.
Docebo
The data lifecycle I would need for a works agreement is documented — retention periods configurable per country with automatic anonymization of expired users, a stated data-processor role, and AI features described by what they do with a commitment that customer content is not used to train them. We found no public information on visibility and access rules per role for people data, minimum group sizes for anonymous results, access logging, or an administrator option to switch the AI features off.
HRIS sync, integrations & data portability
360Learning
Personio is a certified partner with automatic user-data sync, SAP SuccessFactors and Personio are bound during implementation, Slack is a certified integration pushing training notifications with one-click access, and a Skills API plus a SCORM player are listed. I found no public information on SSO, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, published API limits, or a bulk export of the complete review, goal and feedback history.
Docebo
Workday sync is concrete — automatic user import, employee and organizational data feeding onboarding, and segmentation by geography, department and level — alongside SAML 2.0 single sign-on for Okta, OneLogin and Microsoft Entra ID, a Microsoft Teams integration, and an API with a published limit of 100 calls per minute on the Enterprise plan. Workday is the only HR system actually named, however, and we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks, or a bulk export of the full history.
European sovereignty
360Learning
The imprint shows a German entity offering the service — 360Learning GmbH, Stephanienstr. 94, 76133 Karlsruhe, HRB 741484, USt-ID DE347104493 — and a privacy policy page is captured, which is the level the published facts reach. I found no public information on where performance and learning data is hosted, the subprocessor list including AI providers, or a data processing agreement covering employee performance data; the independently sourced dimensions are marked unknown, not non-European.
Docebo
A privacy policy and a Data Processing Addendum are published, standard contractual clauses and an intra-group agreement govern transfers, and Docebo S.p.A. of Biassono appears in the legal notice alongside Toronto and Athens entities — but the privacy policy's "We" means Docebo S.p.A. and/or any corporate affiliate, so I cannot tell who contracts with me. EU hosting is not shown, and we found no public information on a published subprocessor list or where the AI providers run.
Pricing transparency
360Learning
One tier is priced publicly with its basis and billing period — Team at 8 € per user per month, capped at 100 users — while Business and Enterprise are marked "Individuell", i.e. on request, and a free trial is offered. For a 400-person organisation like mine only the custom-quoted tiers remain, so the real annual cost is not computable from public pages alone.
Docebo
The pricing page quotes "Custom pricing tailored to your organization's needs" and publishes no figures for either tier, and even activating Docebo Connect runs through the account manager with possible associated costs. The structure is disclosed — two named tiers, monthly, yearly and registered active user models, a one-year minimum contract with 3-5 year terms typical, 250+ recommended learners, overage charges and setup fees scoped in sales — but I cannot put a figure on any of it.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
360Learning
Docebo
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Questions about 360Learning and Docebo
Which is better, 360Learning or Docebo?
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates both 1.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 360Learning and 4 pick Docebo. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is 360Learning or Docebo European?
360Learning is European (EU-Made). Docebo is European (EU origin, foreign-owned). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.