360Learning vs Docebo

360Learning

The published product is a learning platform: the modules listed are LMS, LXP, Academies, Skills, AI for L&D and Integrations. The performance-review statements I find sit on a guide page describing the vendor's own company practice — "Peer and upward review is part of the performance review process at 360Learning" — and I found no public information on review templates, rating scales, calibration, or who may see a rating. Nothing here is a documented review cycle I could put before a works council.

Docebo

The captured pages describe an AI-powered learning platform whose two modules are learning management and skills intelligence; performance appears only as a use-case heading about turning skill gaps into performance gains through learning. We found no public information describing review cycles, rating scales or calibration, so questions such as who may read a rating and how long it is kept have nothing to attach to yet.

360Learning

What is documented is learner growth goals — people "define their own growth targets" and track progress against job requirements and personal development plans — plus learning needs that employees declare themselves and in-house experts answer with courses. I found no public information on company- or team-level objectives with alignment, 1:1 agendas, colleague feedback or recognition, or anything carried into a year-end review.

Docebo

We found no public information on goals or OKRs, progress check-ins, 1:1 meetings or feedback and recognition between colleagues on the pages we read; they describe course delivery, learning formats and skills intelligence. The career-coaching agent guides employees toward next-best roles, but no goal-tracking or continuous feedback record is described.

360Learning

This is the core of the product: skills profiles with current-versus-required gaps, career profiles with role history and target jobs, learning paths and onboarding courses, scheduled self-assessments with manager validation, upskilling campaigns with growth tracking, and a SCORM player. I found no public information on talent reviews such as a nine-box, succession plans per key role, or mandatory training and completion tracking, which is what would complete the picture for us.

Docebo

This is the product's centre of gravity: SCORM, xAPI and AICC content, a marketplace of over 30,000 courses and certifications, compliance and certification tracking, and a skills layer where AI infers, normalises and validates skills against role frameworks, feeding career paths, internal mobility and workforce readiness and risk views. We found no public information on versioned skills data, succession plans per key role or exportable training records, which keeps it below the top level.

360Learning

To draft a works agreement I need to know who can read a manager's note, the minimum group size before results stop being anonymous, how long records are kept, and what every AI feature ingests — I found no public information on any of this. The AI features are at least described by what they do (tagging courses with skills, recommending content, AI-driven role suggestions, a chatbot that builds the skills library), but no model provider, input list or admin off-switch is documented.

Docebo

Retention is genuinely configurable — anonymisation recipes with per-country GDPR retention periods and a fixed-day variant run automatically, and the privacy policy states backup copies are isolated from further use until deletion is possible. For a works agreement, though, the pages answer none of my first questions: we found no public information on visibility rules per role, a stated minimum group size for anonymous results, access logging, or an administrator option to switch the AI agents off; the agents that infer and validate employees' skills are named, but their inputs, their model providers and whether a human decides anything are not disclosed, though the vendor states customer content is not used to train its AI.

360Learning

Personio is a certified partner with automatic user data sync, SAP SuccessFactors and Personio are named as connected tools, Slack is certified for training notifications, and a Skills API plus skills-ontology and assessment imports are documented. I found no public information on SSO, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, published API limits, or an export of the learning, skills and assessment history — the part that decides whether our people's data leaves with us at contract end.

Docebo

Workday integration is documented in depth — automatic user import plus employee and organisational data used to segment learning by geography, department and level — alongside SAML 2.0 single sign-on with Okta, OneLogin and Microsoft Entra ID named, Microsoft Teams among more than 400 integrations, and an API with a published limit of 100 calls per minute on the Enterprise tier. We found no public information on SCIM provisioning or a bulk export of the complete user history, which is what I would want secured in writing before agreeing to any migration.

360Learning

The legal notice names 360Learning GmbH in Karlsruhe, with a commercial-register entry and a German VAT ID, and privacy-policy and GDPR pages were captured. Beyond that I found no public information on where learning and skills data is hosted, on subprocessors — including whoever runs the AI chatbot and the recommendations — or on a data processing agreement covering employee performance and learning data.

Docebo

A privacy policy and a data processing addendum are published, and the policy is issued by the Italian entity Docebo S.p.A. together with its corporate affiliates. We found no public information stating EU hosting, however: the policy relies on standard contractual clauses for transfers out of the EEA and flags Australia, and the US entity holds EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework certification under FTC oversight. We found no public information on subprocessors and their locations, or on where the AI features process employee skills data.

360Learning

Exactly one tier is priced publicly — "Team", "Bis zu 100 Nutzer", "8 € / Nutzer pro Monat" — while the Business and Enterprise tiers are marked "Individuell" and a free trial is offered. I found no public information on which modules sit in which tier, the minimum term, VAT treatment or add-on prices, so a buyer cannot compute the annual cost.

Docebo

The pricing page publishes a lot of structure — two tiers, Elevate and Enterprise, with their feature lists, three user models (monthly, yearly and registered active users), a one-year minimum term with most customers signing for three to five years, a minimum recommendation of 250+ learners, per-user charges when the limit is exceeded, and unlimited cloud storage — but the price itself is a custom quote, setup fees are scoped in the sales process, and activating Docebo Connect may carry costs arranged with the account manager. A buyer can describe the basis of the invoice but cannot compute any part of it from public pages.