As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates 360Learning 1.5/5 and Docebo 1.5/5 in Talent Management. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 360Learning and 4 pick Docebo. 360Learning scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (Goals, OKRs & continuous feedback and Performance reviews & calibration). Docebo scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (Works council, visibility & AI disclosure, HRIS sync, integrations & data portability and Learning, skills & succession). Provenance — 360Learning: EU-Made; Docebo: EU origin, foreign-owned. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
360Learning and Docebo split this bench along one line. Docebo leads learning and development (means 7.5 vs 6.8, four judges lean Docebo, two tie), codetermination and privacy (3.7 vs 1.8, six lean Docebo), and integrations and portability (6.0 vs 4.7, six lean Docebo), on documented retention and anonymisation, and Workday sync with SAML 2.0 single sign-on. 360Learning leads performance reviews (0.8 vs 0.0, four lean 360Learning, two tie) via recurring skills self-assessment with manager validation, goals and feedback (2.5 vs 0.0, six lean 360Learning), and pricing transparency (3.2 vs 2.0, six lean 360Learning): its Team tier is 8 € per user per month for up to 100 users, while Docebo publishes no prices. Sovereignty ties at 3.2 vs 3.2 (one lean each way, four ties); 360Learning lists jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors as unknown, Docebo lists jurisdiction as IT. Of five published weighted totals, four lean Docebo, one leans 360Learning.
Choose 360Learning if
You need performance reviews in some form: four judges lean 360Learning and two tie (means 0.8 vs 0.0), on its recurring skills self-assessment with manager validation.
Your team sets goals and exchanges feedback inside the platform: six of six judges lean 360Learning (2.5 vs 0.0), with goals stopping at individual learning targets.
You need a published price to compare: the Team tier is 8 € per user per month for up to 100 users, and six of six judges lean 360Learning on pricing transparency (3.2 vs 2.0).
Choose Docebo if
You deliver standards-based e-learning: SCORM 1.2/2004, Tin Can/xAPI and AICC content plus a marketplace of over 30,000 courses; learning and development leans Docebo four judges to none, with two ties (7.5 vs 6.8).
You plan skills-driven career paths, internal mobility and workforce planning: Docebo's AI infers, normalises and validates skills to feed them, within its learning and development lead (7.5 vs 6.8).
Your works council reviews privacy documentation: retention and anonymisation are documented in depth, and codetermination and privacy leans Docebo six judges to none (3.7 vs 1.8).
You run Workday or require SAML 2.0 single sign-on: integrations and portability leans Docebo six judges to none (6.0 vs 4.7).
You need the vendor's legal entity in a named jurisdiction: Docebo's legal entity jurisdiction is IT, while 360Learning's is listed as unknown.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The People Analyst
Owns the skills model, the succession bench and the training budget. Wants skills profiles with gaps against role requirements, learning tied to those gaps rather than to a course catalogue, talent reviews per key role, and data that can be exported and analysed outside the tool.
360Learning
Docebo
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Performance reviews & calibration
360Learning
The captured pages position the product as a learning platform whose modules are LMS, LXP, Academies, Skills, AI for L&D and Integrations, and we found no public information on review templates, rating scales or calibration as product functionality. The performance-appraisal guide describes review models such as self-assessments, management by objectives and 360 reviews and the company's own quarterly cycle with peer and upward input, but this is editorial content rather than a documented review cycle in the tool. The nearest product feature is managers and admins reviewing and validating learner skills assessments.
Docebo
The captured product pages describe a learning platform — the modules listed are Learning Management and Skills Intelligence — and the tier feature lists name certification tracking, AI content creation and reporting without mentioning review cycles, rating scales or calibration. This is course delivery and skills intelligence, not a review product; we found no public information on review templates, 360° input or calibration views.
Goals, OKRs & continuous feedback
360Learning
Learners can define their own growth targets and track progress against job requirements and personal development plans, and employees can declare learning needs that in-house experts answer with courses, which together reach individual goals with progress tracking. We found no public information on company or team OKRs with alignment, check-ins, 1:1 agendas, or feedback pulled into a review.
Docebo
The pages describe learning plans built by AI workflows and a career coach pointing employees toward next-best roles, but we found no public information on goal or OKR tracking, alignment, check-ins, 1:1 agendas or feedback and recognition between colleagues.
Learning, skills & succession
360Learning
This is the heart of the product: skills profiles with assessment history, gap visualisation between current and required levels, career profiles showing role history, targets and skill gaps, AI-driven role suggestions against a job framework, learning paths and upskilling campaigns with skill growth tracking, a SCORM player, and a Skills API with ontology and assessment import. We found no public information on nine-box talent reviews, succession plans per key role, or internal mobility shown against open positions, which is why I stop short of the higher level.
Docebo
Skills are inferred, normalised and validated per employee from roles, experience, projects and learning activity, the Job Architect agent builds role and skills frameworks, and skill gaps, readiness and risk are reported across teams, with career paths and internal mobility as explicit use cases. On the learning side SCORM 1.2/2004, xAPI and AICC content is supported, a 30,000-course marketplace exists, and Elevate includes certification and compliance tracking. We found no public information on versioned skills data, nine-box talent reviews or exportable training records, which keeps it short of the top.
Works council, visibility & AI disclosure
360Learning
AI features are named and described by what they do — an AI Content Builder, AI course creation, automatic AI tagging of courses with skills, and content recommendations — which is a start on AI disclosure. We found no public information on visibility rules per role, anonymity thresholds for surveys or feedback, retention and deletion of data, access logging, an administrator switch for the AI features, or documentation aimed at works councils; a security-and-compliance FAQ topic and GDPR pages exist but yielded no confirmed content on these points.
Docebo
Retention and deletion are genuinely configurable — a GDPR retention periods table sets anonymisation per country, with scheduled recipes that anonymise expired users and move them to a dedicated branch — and customer content is stated not to be used to train the AI. But the AI agents are described only by function with unnamed service providers, and we found no public information on role-based visibility rules, access logging, anonymity minimums for surveys or materials aimed at a works agreement.
HRIS sync, integrations & data portability
360Learning
Personio is presented as a certified partner with automatic user data sync eliminating double entry, SAP SuccessFactors and Personio are bound directly during implementation, Slack is a certified integration delivering training notifications, and a Skills API plus ontology and assessment import are offered. We found no public information on SSO, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, published API limits, or a bulk export of the complete learning, skills and feedback history — the export silence matters to me since I need to analyse skills data outside the tool.
Docebo
Workday is documented in depth — automatic user import, employee and organisational data, segmentation by geography, department and level — alongside SAML 2.0 SSO with Okta, OneLogin and Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Teams among named integrations, over 400 connectors through Docebo Connect, and an Enterprise API published at 100 calls per minute. Only Workday is named as an HR system, and we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks or a bulk export of learning and skills history; the portability right in the privacy policy is a request channel, not a product export.
European sovereignty
360Learning
The imprint names 360Learning GmbH in Karlsruhe with a commercial register entry (HRB741484) and a German VAT ID, and the vendor describes itself as founded in Paris, so a European contracting entity is shown. We found no public information on where performance, feedback and skills data is hosted, on the subcontractors including any AI providers behind the AI features, or on the content of a data processing agreement; the captured privacy policy page yielded no confirmed facts on data location.
Docebo
A privacy policy and a data processing addendum are published, and an Italian entity (Docebo S.p.A., Biassono) appears as the legal contact — though the policy defines Docebo as that company and/or any of its corporate affiliates, with entities also listed in Canada, the US, the UK, Australia and the UAE. No EU hosting is stated, and the US entity's Data Privacy Framework certifications plus standard contractual clauses show transfers outside the EEA are part of the chain.
Pricing transparency
360Learning
The pricing page publishes one tier exactly as 'Team Bis zu 100 Nutzer 8 € / Nutzer pro Monat' with a free trial and a free 15-minute demo, while Business and Enterprise are both listed as 'Individuell'. A buyer above 100 users or wanting the full module mix cannot compute the annual cost from public pages alone.
Docebo
No price figure is public — "Custom pricing tailored to your organization's needs" — so an annual invoice cannot be computed from the pages. The structure is unusually open, though: two tiers with named feature sets, three pricing bases (monthly, yearly and registered active users), a one-year minimum term with typical 3-5 year contracts, a 250+ learner recommendation, per-user charges on overage with an upgrade hint at about 30%, setup fees scoped in sales, and Docebo Connect activation carrying possible costs via the account manager.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
360Learning
Docebo
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Questions about 360Learning and Docebo
Which is better, 360Learning or Docebo?
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates both 1.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 360Learning and 4 pick Docebo. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is 360Learning or Docebo European?
360Learning is European (EU-Made). Docebo is European (EU origin, foreign-owned). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.