Condomana vs etg24

Condomana

The Wirtschaftsplan computes each unit's advance payments and the Jahresabrechnung is drafted from the year's bookings and apportioned by the owner's keys, with Sonderumlagen handled — that earns the middle ground. But the evidence is silent on everything I check first: no Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, no Vermögensbericht, no HeizkostenV apportionment, and not one word that the Rücklage is segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, so rubric level 5's 'reserves booked separately' is unevidenced.

etg24

Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear only as documents an owner retrieves in the app, and accounting documents can be filed by fiscal year — we found no public information on generating a business plan or settlement from a ledger, on distribution keys, on heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV, or on any separate handling of the Rücklage. The published module lists cover case processing, tasks, receipt checking and CRM, with no accounting module.

Condomana

A real Abstimmungs-Engine where every agenda item carries its basis (per head or by ownership share) and its majority with computed results, plus a gapless, append-only Beschluss-Sammlung where challenges and corrections are annotated, never overwritten — that is the § 24 (7) register discipline. But the evidence says nothing about invitations and the notice period, proxy recording, quorum, or minutes generated from the recorded votes, which keeps it short of the 8 anchor.

etg24

Agenda items are entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, weightings by head count, co-ownership share or unit and unanimity or simple majority per § 23 Abs. 3 WEG are computed automatically, and minutes are generated directly from the recorded votes. Powers of attorney run through the portal, hybrid meetings and written circulation each have their own procedure including offline owners by post, and the resolution register is kept continuously in its own menu including court decisions. We found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period.

Condomana

Owners and tenants get a real portal: documents shared with exactly the entitled owners, photo defect reports whose status everyone can see, and requests that reach the Verwaltung, with tenants invited in by their owner. No evidence that an owner sees their own statement or arrears per unit, nor meeting papers or voting in the portal — the disclosure duty is not discharged on this sheet.

etg24

Owners and tenants each get their own login, personal documents such as statements sit at contract level with access limited to contract parties, and read-only roles for owners, tenants and advisory boards are stated. Meeting papers, voting, structured request forms with smartphone photo attachment and status updates are available in the portal and app, but we found no public information on arrears or consumption shown per unit, nor on an access log evidencing the disclosure duty.

Condomana

Defects tracked from open to done with photos and contractor assignment, recurring maintenance that raises its own ticket at due date, and a forward-only timeline that makes a defensible duty-of-care record. But Gewährleistung periods, statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, and quotes or invoices linked to the defect with the cost on the correct account are all silent — the difference between a list and an operating record.

etg24

Defect intake runs through predefined forms with smartphone photos, case processing and task management modules exist, and an app function supports recurring property inspections with evaluation. We found no public information on contractor work orders, a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, statutory inspections, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade.

Condomana

Volltextsuche over everything filed per building and unit, plus a complete CSV export in both directions and retention stated under § 257 HGB / § 147 AO at up to ten years. Version history and documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them are unevidenced, and the export is data, not a documented handover package of ledger, register and documents for a successor Verwalter.

etg24

Documents live in a structured cloud archive across object, unit and contract levels with predefined categories, subfolders, bulk upload auto-assigned to units, fiscal-year filing and preview metadata, and handover of a managed property with all entered data to a successor administrator is described as a feature. We found no public information on version history, full-text search across the archive, or the format of the handover export, and the privacy policy's retention statement covers personal data generally rather than statutory retention per document type.

Condomana

German contracting entity (nelo digitalagentur GmbH & Co KG, Amtsgericht Ulm) on named infrastructure — Hetzner in Gunzenhausen — with no third-country transfers except the social-media presence, and AI processing stated as EU-only under an Art. 28 AVV. The AI subprocessor is only 'einen weiteren Auftragsverarbeiter', unnamed, and the US-based Buffer is named but without the legal basis for that transfer, so the complete published list of the 8 anchor is not met, and no certification appears.

etg24

The contracting entity is the German etg24 GmbH with a commercial register entry at AG Mannheim and a German VAT number, and a data protection officer is reachable. However, we found no public information on where the platform is hosted, and the privacy policy names Google and Pipedrive for website and CRM use while itself warning that no EU-comparable level of protection can be guaranteed for third-country tools; a complete subprocessor list for the platform is not shown.

Condomana

I can compute the annual invoice from public pages alone: €10 per unit per year plus VAT, €2.50 for Stellplätze and Abstellräume, worked examples for 24 and 120 units, every feature in one price with no locked tiers, unlimited free users, annual billing with no automatic renewal. Only the rollout/migration service for large portfolios is unpriced — arguably genuinely custom — and there is no explicit statement that leaving or exporting costs nothing, which alone keeps it off the 10 anchor.

etg24

The captured pages name the Basis, Pro and Enterprise tiers, describe the Basis version as free for three months, and state that online voting and the circulation-resolution tool are included at no additional cost in Pro. The vendor points to a separate price page, but the only other figure shown is market cost guidance of between 18 and 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich that the vendor itself marks as not an etg24 price — we found no public information on per-unit or per-community prices, billing periods, setup or migration fees.