Property & WEG Management
etg24
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by etg24 GmbH · www.etg24.de
Compare with Condomana → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
etg24 (etg24 GmbH, commercial register 757259 AG Mannheim) is a German owner portal and WEG administration platform with an uneven bench profile. Assembly and resolutions is the strength at 7–9: agenda items carry resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, counting runs automatically by heads, co-ownership shares or units, hybrid meetings use QR-code check-in, minutes are generated in the system and the Beschlusssammlung is kept in its own menu including court decisions, with the circulation procedure under § 23 Abs. 3 WEG covering offline owners by print and postal entry. Owner self-service scores 7, documents and handover 5–6, maintenance and defects 4. The weak poles are WEG accounting at 1–2 — Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear only as documents delivered to owners, and we found no public information on settlement generation, distribution keys or reserve-fund handling — and pricing transparency at 2, where the only euro figures are market costs of "zwischen 18 und 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich", expressly not etg24's own prices. Sovereignty spans 2–4, judges weighing the German entity against unnamed hosting and a policy warning of third-country transfers.
Speaks for it
- Assembly and resolutions scored 7–9, with agenda items carrying resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement and counting automated by heads, co-ownership shares or units.
- The circulation procedure under § 23 Abs. 3 WEG runs in the portal, with a print function and postal result entry for offline owners.
- Owner self-service scored 7, with personal documents visible only to contract parties and 24/7 portal and app access for owners, tenants, advisory boards and service providers.
- Documents and handover scored 5–6, with a structured archive across object, unit and contract levels and a digital handover of all entered data to a successor administrator described as a feature.
- The Basis version is free for three months, and online voting and the circulation-resolution tool are stated as included in Pro at no additional cost.
Held against it
- WEG accounting scored 1–2: Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear only as documents delivered to owners, with no public information on settlement generation, distribution keys or separate reserve-fund handling.
- Pricing transparency scored 2, with no figure for Pro or Enterprise in the captured pages and the only euro amounts being market costs of "zwischen 18 und 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich", expressly not etg24's own prices.
- Maintenance and defects scored 4, with structured defect forms and an inspection function but no public information on contractor work orders, statutory inspection proof or warranty tracking.
- Sovereignty scored 2–4: the privacy policy names Pipedrive for lead management and itself warns that no EU-comparable protection level can be guaranteed for third-country tools, and we found no public information on hosting location or a complete subprocessor list.
- We found no public information on version history, full-text search across the archive, or the format of the handover export a successor would receive.
Best for
- You run German WEG assemblies and circulation resolutions and want automated counting, hybrid meetings and a continuously maintained Beschlusssammlung including court decisions.
- You want owners and tenants to retrieve contract-scoped documents and vote through a browser portal and app around the clock.
- You manage a structured document archive across object, unit and contract levels and value a named digital handover to a successor administrator.
Avoid if
- You need the annual settlement and business plan produced in the system, with distribution keys, heating-cost apportionment and separate reserve-fund booking — the evidence shows only delivery of finished documents.
- You depend on contractor work orders, statutory inspection scheduling and warranty tracking; the bench scored maintenance and defects at 4 and judges called the building-side record thin.
- Your data-protection review requires a named hosting location and a complete subprocessor list before signature — sovereignty scores span 2–4 and the privacy policy itself warns of third-country transfers without EU-comparable protection.
- You must compute an annual cost from public prices — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The statutory financial cycle: business plan, annual settlement in the form the law and the BGH require, distribution keys, and the separate handling of reserve funds held in trust for the community.
0 — General bookkeeping only; no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, reserves treated as ordinary balances.
3 — Templates that help a human produce the documents, with distribution keys entered by hand and no separation of the Rücklage.
5 — Wirtschaftsplan and Jahresabrechnung generated from the ledger with configurable distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), and reserves booked separately.
8 — Settlement in the post-2021 BGH form with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, Vermögensbericht produced, heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV integrated, owner-change apportionment mid-year handled, and Hausgeld arrears tracked with dunning.
10 — The whole financial year is discharged inside the system: multi-community bookkeeping with strict per-WEG separation, trust accounting for reserves with its own reporting, settlement documents an accountant would sign, and the arithmetic auditable back to individual postings.
The WEG Administrator
The captured pages show Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen only as documents delivered to owners through the app, plus a receipt-checking module and accounting document categories with fiscal-year assignment — I found no public information on producing the settlement in the system, on distribution keys, or on separate handling of the Rücklage. For my March run the statutory arithmetic would still have to live outside this product. 4 7 8
The Advisory Board Member
The captured pages show Wirtschaftsplan and settlement documents only as files delivered to owners, and the module list names case processing, task management, invoice checking and CRM. I found no public information on settlement generation, distribution keys or separate reserve-fund accounting, nor on heating-cost apportionment, mid-year owner changes or arrears dunning. What is evidenced is filing accounting documents by fiscal year — a filing cabinet, not the settlement an accountant could sign. 4 7 8
The Accountant
Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear only as documents an owner retrieves in the app, and accounting documents can be filed by fiscal year — we found no public information on generating a business plan or settlement from a ledger, on distribution keys, on heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV, or on any separate handling of the Rücklage. The published module lists cover case processing, tasks, receipt checking and CRM, with no accounting module. 4 7 8
The Portfolio Manager
The owner portal carries Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen as per-contract documents and accounting-category files can be tagged to fiscal years, but what I see is delivery of finished documents rather than production. I found no public information on generating the business plan or annual settlement from the ledger, on distribution keys, or on separate booking of the reserve. 4 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
The captured pages present etg24 as a portal, meeting and document platform whose modules are case processing, task management, invoice checking, CRM and online voting — Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear only as documents owners can retrieve. We found no public information on generating a Jahresabrechnung, on distribution keys, on separate handling of the reserve fund, or on Hausgeld arrears with dunning. 3 4 7
The Skeptic
Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen appear in the evidence only as documents delivered through the portal, alongside invoice review by advisory boards and fiscal-year tagging of files in document categories. We found no public information on a settlement generated from a ledger in the post-2021 form, on distribution keys, or on reserve funds booked separately — the feature that would make the accounting claims true is simply not shown. 4 7 8 3
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Convening, running and recording the owners' meeting — including the resolution register the law requires the administrator to maintain, and the majority arithmetic that decides whether a resolution stands.
0 — No meeting support; invitations and minutes are written elsewhere and the Beschluss-Sammlung is a document somewhere.
3 — Invitation templates and a place to store minutes, but no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained resolution register.
5 — Agenda-driven invitations respecting the notice period, attendance and proxy recording, voting with the common majority types, and a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a numbered register.
8 — Quorum and majority computed per resolution type including MEA-weighted and qualified majorities, proxies and voting restrictions handled, minutes generated from the recorded votes, and the register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.
10 — The meeting is conducted in the system: hybrid or written circulation procedures supported with their own legal rules, contested resolutions flagged within the challenge period, the register complete and exportable as evidence, and every entry traceable to the meeting that produced it.
The WEG Administrator
This is where the product earns its keep: agenda items entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, votes weighted by Kopfprinzip, Miteigentumsanteile or units, hybrid meetings with QR-code admission, proxies handled in the portal and the protocol generated in the system, with the Beschlusssammlung kept in its own menu including court decisions. The Umlaufverfahren runs with its own legal rules under § 23 Abs. 3 WEG and includes postal voters via a print function; I found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period or on exporting the register as evidence. 5 6 4
The Advisory Board Member
Agenda items are entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, votes are counted automatically with weighting by heads, co-ownership shares or units, proxies run through the portal, minutes are generated from the recorded votes, and the resolution register is kept continuously in its own menu including court decisions. Hybrid meetings and the written circulation procedure each carry their own legal detail — unanimity versus simple majority, postal participants printed with their results re-entered. I found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period or exporting the register as evidence. 4 5 6
The Accountant
Agenda items are entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, weightings by head count, co-ownership share or unit and unanimity or simple majority per § 23 Abs. 3 WEG are computed automatically, and minutes are generated directly from the recorded votes. Powers of attorney run through the portal, hybrid meetings and written circulation each have their own procedure including offline owners by post, and the resolution register is kept continuously in its own menu including court decisions. We found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period. 5 6
The Portfolio Manager
Agenda items are entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, counting runs automatically by heads, units or co-ownership shares, and hybrid meetings run from digital invitation with opening proof and QR check-in through to minutes generated in the system, with the resolution register maintained continuously including court decisions. The circular-resolution procedure with a print function and postal result entry for offline owners is exactly the throughput I need. I found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period or exporting the register as evidence. 5 6
The Data Protection Officer
Agenda items carry title, resolution text, Stimmgewichtung and Mehrheitserfordernis; weighting by Kopfprinzip, Miteigentumsanteilen or Einheiten is automatic; proxies, QR-code check-in and hybrid voting via app are supported; and minutes plus a Beschlusssammlung including court decisions are generated in the system, with the Umlaufverfahren covering offline owners by print and postal entry. We found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period or on exporting the register as evidence. 5 6
The Skeptic
This is the vendor's strongest ground: agenda items with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, automated counting by heads, co-ownership shares or units, proxies, hybrid meetings, and the circulation procedure with unanimity or simple majority per § 23 Abs. 3 WEG, minutes generated afterwards and a Beschlusssammlung in its own menu including court decisions. We found no public information on qualified majorities, on amendment and invalidation notes in the register, or on challenge-period flagging, so it sits below the top anchors despite the impressive arithmetic. 5 6 4
Owner & tenant self-service
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How an owner exercises their right to see the records, and how much routine correspondence the portal removes: statements, documents, meeting papers, defect reporting.
0 — No portal; every request is answered by email or post.
3 — A document download area with no per-owner scoping — everyone sees the same folder, or access is by emailed link.
5 — Per-owner login showing their own statements, documents and meeting papers, with a defect or request form that reaches the administrator.
8 — Owners and tenants scoped separately with correct visibility, meeting papers and voting available in the portal, defect reports with status visible to the reporter, and consumption or arrears shown per unit.
10 — The portal discharges the disclosure duty: every record an owner is entitled to see available on demand with an access log, tenant and owner views strictly separated, notifications for statutory deadlines, and enough self-service that routine correspondence largely disappears.
The WEG Administrator
Personal documents sit at contract level so only the parties to the contract see them, owners, tenants, advisory boards and contractors each get round-the-clock portal or app access, and a defect report can carry a smartphone photo through a structured form with status updates on ongoing matters. Voting and current circular resolutions run in the same portal, which is exactly the correspondence I want off my desk. I found no public information on arrears or consumption figures being shown live per unit. 7 8 6
The Advisory Board Member
Owners and tenants get their own access, see only documents filed on their contract, vote in the portal or app, and submit damage reports with smartphone photos through structured forms that reach the administrator. Status updates on ongoing matters are published in the portal, though as general status messages rather than a per-report trail. I found no public information on per-unit consumption or arrears being shown to the owner. 1 6 7 8
The Accountant
Owners and tenants each get their own login, personal documents such as statements sit at contract level with access limited to contract parties, and read-only roles for owners, tenants and advisory boards are stated. Meeting papers, voting, structured request forms with smartphone photo attachment and status updates are available in the portal and app, but we found no public information on arrears or consumption shown per unit, nor on an access log evidencing the disclosure duty. 6 7 8
The Portfolio Manager
Owners and tenants get their own logins with personal documents such as settlements visible only to contract parties, meeting papers and circular resolutions with voting in browser or app, and structured request forms with smartphone photos. Status messages on ongoing matters appear in the app. I found no public information on per-unit consumption or arrears being shown, or on a defect report's status being visible to the person who filed it. 6 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
Owners and tenants reach the portal through their contract, with personal documents such as Abrechnungen visible only to the persons in that contract and read-only rights for invited users; meeting papers and voting run in portal and app, and damage reports go through structured forms with smartphone photos. We found no public information on the reporter seeing the status of their own defect case, on arrears or consumption shown live per unit, or on an access log over viewed records. 1 6 7 8
The Skeptic
Owners and tenants are scoped per contract — only contract parties reach personal documents such as statements, with meeting papers, current Umlaufbeschlüsse, defect forms accepting smartphone photos and status updates on processes, plus voting in the portal. We found no public information on arrears or consumption shown per unit, or on an access log covering the disclosure duty. 7 8 6 3
Maintenance, defects & contractors
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The building side: defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, and the evidence trail when something goes wrong.
0 — Defects arrive by phone and live in a notebook; no maintenance schedule.
3 — A ticket or note list per property, contractors contacted outside the system, no recurring maintenance calendar.
5 — Defect records per unit or property with status and photos, contractor assignment with a work order, and a recurring maintenance schedule with reminders.
8 — Warranty and Gewährleistung periods tracked against the responsible trade, statutory inspections (lift, heating, fire safety, drinking-water) scheduled with proof of completion stored, quotes and invoices linked to the defect, and cost allocated to the correct account.
10 — A defensible operating record: every obligation, inspection and defect with its evidence and dates, contractor performance visible, budget consumption against the Wirtschaftsplan tracked live, and a history that answers the question of what the administrator knew and when.
The WEG Administrator
Defect intake is structured — predefined request forms, photo attachment from the phone — and there is case processing, task management and an app function for property inspections, with contractors reachable as portal users. I found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, on work orders to trades, or on warranty-period and statutory-inspection tracking, which is what I need before the lift and fire-safety inspections come due. 7 3 4
The Advisory Board Member
Damage reports arrive through structured forms with photos, case processing and task management modules exist, an app function supports regular property inspections, and a property appointments overview is described. I found no public information on recurring maintenance obligations with reminders, contractor work orders, statutory inspection proof or warranty tracking, so the building-side record stays thin. 3 4 7
The Accountant
Defect intake runs through predefined forms with smartphone photos, case processing and task management modules exist, and an app function supports recurring property inspections with evaluation. We found no public information on contractor work orders, a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, statutory inspections, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade. 4 7
The Portfolio Manager
Damage reports arrive through structured forms with photos taken on the phone, backed by case processing, task management and an app function for the regular site walk-throughs. I found no public information on work orders assigned to the responsible trade, statutory inspections for lift, heating or fire safety scheduled with proof of completion stored, or warranty period tracking — the backbone of a defensible operating record. 3 4 7
The Data Protection Officer
Structured service-request forms with photo attachments, case and task modules, and an app function for Liegenschaftsbegehungen give the defect side a real shape. We found no public information on contractor assignment with work orders inside the system, on a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, or on tracking warranty periods and statutory inspections. 3 4 7
The Skeptic
Defects arrive through structured forms with photos and run as cases with status updates, and an app function supports recurring property inspections. We found no public information on work orders assigned to contractors, statutory inspection schedules with proof of completion stored, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade. 7 4 3
Documents, retention & handover
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The archive and the exit. A Verwalter's appointment is finite by law, and the records belong to the community — so handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.
0 — Documents live on a shared drive; no retention rules, and handover means copying folders.
3 — Central document storage per property with folders and upload, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export.
5 — Structured document management per property and unit with search, retention periods stated, and a documented export of a community's records.
8 — Full-text search across the archive, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, and a complete handover package (ledger, register, documents, master data) in open formats.
10 — Handover is a first-class feature rather than an obstacle: a complete, structured export a successor administrator can actually load, retention executed per statutory period, an access log over the archive, and no commercial friction placed in the way of a community leaving.
The WEG Administrator
The archive is genuinely structured — object, unit and contract levels, predefined categories with sub-markers, bulk upload auto-assigned to the right units, fiscal-year assignment for accounting — and the handover of all entered data for a managed object to a Nachverwalter is described as a feature, which is rare and matters to me. I found no public information on version history, on retention periods being executed, or on the format of the handover export a successor could actually load. 8 7
The Advisory Board Member
The archive is genuinely structured — object, unit and contract levels, predefined categories, subfolders, bulk upload with automatic assignment, fiscal-year filing and browser preview — and handing a managed object with all its data to a successor administrator is described as a feature of the product. I found no public information on version history, full-text search beyond keyword-tagged categories, retention periods for the archive, or the format of the handover export. Handover as a named capability earns credit; an export a successor could actually load is not evidenced. 5 8
The Accountant
Documents live in a structured cloud archive across object, unit and contract levels with predefined categories, subfolders, bulk upload auto-assigned to units, fiscal-year filing and preview metadata, and handover of a managed property with all entered data to a successor administrator is described as a feature. We found no public information on version history, full-text search across the archive, or the format of the handover export, and the privacy policy's retention statement covers personal data generally rather than statutory retention per document type. 3 8
The Portfolio Manager
The archive is structured at object, unit and contract level with predefined categories, keyword-tagged search, bulk upload automatically assigned to the right contracts, and a digital handover that passes a managed object with all entered data to a successor administrator. I found no public information on version history, full-text search, retention executed per statutory period, or the export format a successor outside the platform would receive. 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
The archive is structured across object, unit and contract levels with predefined categories, automatic assignment on bulk upload and fiscal-year tagging, and a digital handover of a managed object with all its data to a successor administrator is offered as a feature. Retention appears only as a general privacy statement that statutory retention duties remain unaffected; we found no public information on retention executing per period, version history, an access log over the archive, or the formats of a handover export. 3 7 8
The Skeptic
A structured archive across object, unit and contract levels with predefined categories, bulk upload with automatic assignment, browser previews, and a named digital handover of a community's data to a successor administrator — the exit is at least an advertised feature. We found no public information on version history, full-text search, retention executed per statutory period, or the formats of the handover export. 8 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the community's financial and personal records live, who the contracting entity is, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — document OCR, AI features, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — German or EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and an export that keeps the community compliant for the full retention period after the appointment ends.
The WEG Administrator
The imprint names a German GmbH with a Mannheim commercial register entry, so the contracting counterparty is domestic. Beyond that I found no public information on where community data is hosted or on a complete subprocessor list — the privacy policy names Pipedrive and references Google — and the policy itself warns that tools from the US may transfer data without an EU-comparable level of protection. 2 3
The Advisory Board Member
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with a Mannheim commercial register entry, German addresses and a published data protection officer contact. But I found no public information on where the platform is hosted, the only subprocessor I found named is Pipedrive for CRM, and the privacy policy itself warns that tools from unsafe third countries may transfer data with no EU-comparable protection. A German entity is the floor; the community's records deserve a named infrastructure and a complete processor list before I would sign. 2 3 5
The Accountant
The contracting entity is the German etg24 GmbH with a commercial register entry at AG Mannheim and a German VAT number, and a data protection officer is reachable. However, we found no public information on where the platform is hosted, and the privacy policy names Google and Pipedrive for website and CRM use while itself warning that no EU-comparable level of protection can be guaranteed for third-country tools; a complete subprocessor list for the platform is not shown. 2 3
The Portfolio Manager
A German GmbH registered at the Mannheim court with German addresses is evidenced in the imprint, and the privacy policy names Pipedrive for lead management while warning that third-country tools offer no EU-comparable level of protection. I found no public information on where the platform and its communities' records are hosted, or on a complete subprocessor list. 2 3 5
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is the German etg24 GmbH registered at AG Mannheim, and the privacy policy names Pipedrive for lead management while warning that tools from third countries may transfer personal data without an EU-comparable level of protection. We found no public information on where the cloud platform or the "KI denkt mit" features — including invoice review — process documents, on the hosting location, or on a complete subprocessor list. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with Mannheim commercial registration and German addresses, but the privacy policy names Pipedrive (Pipedrive OÜ/Pipedrive Inc.) for lead management and warns that no EU-comparable protection level can be guaranteed for some tools. We found no public information on where the platform hosts community data or on a complete subprocessor list. 2 3 5
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether an administrator can compute the real annual cost for the units under management — including modules, per-community fees and setup — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every quote is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-unit or per-community headline exists, but modules, minimum terms, setup or migration fees are unstated.
5 — Per-unit or per-community prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (portal, accounting module, document storage) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-unit maths, minimum term, setup and migration costs and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of units and communities including every module, with no per-seat surprises and any exit or export fee stated outright.
The WEG Administrator
Three named versions and a three-month free Basis tier are public, and the vendor states that a price page exists, but I found no public information on figures for Pro or Enterprise, on per-unit arithmetic, minimum terms, setup or VAT treatment — so I cannot compute a year's cost for my forty communities from these pages. The 18 to 40 Euro per unit figure quoted on the WEG page is expressly a market cost, not an etg24 price. 1 5 8 4
The Advisory Board Member
The captured pages name three tiers, offer a three-month free Basis version, and state that online voting costs nothing extra in Pro and Enterprise; a price page is referenced. But no figure for Pro or Enterprise appears — no per-unit maths, no minimum term, no setup or migration cost, no VAT treatment — and the only euro amounts captured are market costs for WEG administration generally, expressly not etg24's own prices. An administrator cannot compute the annual cost for a given portfolio from these pages. 4 5 6 8
The Accountant
The captured pages name the Basis, Pro and Enterprise tiers, describe the Basis version as free for three months, and state that online voting and the circulation-resolution tool are included at no additional cost in Pro. The vendor points to a separate price page, but the only other figure shown is market cost guidance of between 18 and 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich that the vendor itself marks as not an etg24 price — we found no public information on per-unit or per-community prices, billing periods, setup or migration fees. 4 5 6 8
The Portfolio Manager
Three tiers are named, the Basis version is free for three months, online voting is stated as included in Pro at no additional cost, and the vendor says its prices sit on a dedicated page — but no figures for Pro or Enterprise appear in the pages captured, no per-unit maths, term, setup or migration cost. The only unit-based number published is a market benchmark of "zwischen 18 und 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich", presented as general market cost for WEG administration rather than the vendor's price. 1 4 5 8
The Data Protection Officer
The only price we found is public and free: a three-month Basis version, with online voting and the Umlaufbeschluss tool stated to be included in Pro without additional costs, and a claim on the vendor's pages that prices are published. We found no public information on any figure for Pro or Enterprise — per-unit or per-community price, billing period, minimum term, setup or migration costs — so the annual cost is not derivable from the captured pages. 1 5 6 8
The Skeptic
Three versions are named, a three-month free Basis entry is public, voting is stated as included in Pro without extra cost, and the pages point to a separate price list — yet no figure for any tier appears in the evidence; the only number on the WEG page is a market cost of "zwischen 18 und 40 Euro je Wohneinheit zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer monatlich", explicitly not the vendor's own price. We found no public information on per-unit pricing, billing period, minimum term, setup or migration fees, or VAT treatment. 1 5 8 6 4
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 6 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (8)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Imprint www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Documents, retention & handover — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →