Property & WEG Management
facilioo
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by facilioo GmbH · facilioo.de
Compare with casavi → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
facilioo positions itself as CRM software for real estate professionals, and the bench's scores follow that line with tight clustering. It is strongest on maintenance and defects, a flat 6: defects documented with photos, contractor control, meter, maintenance and elevator management, and a SchadenFUX24 interface syncing cost estimates and insurance approvals. Assembly and resolutions scores 5-6 for the meeting itself — invitations, agendas, realtime voting with exact capture of proxies and voting groups, minutes secured — while owner self-service holds a flat 5. WEG accounting is weakest at 0-1: no public information appears on a business plan, an annual settlement in legally required form, distribution keys or the reserve fund held separately, the spread turning on crediting consumption-data monitoring as adjacent. Documents and handover scores 4-5, showing a file-archive endpoint and a DocuWare master-data export but no public information on a loadable handover package, and sovereignty scores 3-4, pairing a German contracting entity with no public information on hosting location. Pricing transparency scores 1, with no public price beyond a free demo and free trial.
Speaks for it
- Defects are documented with photos and worked structurally, with contractor control and meter, maintenance and elevator management among the named modules.
- The SchadenFUX24 interface, available since January 2025, synchronises damage photos and cost estimates and shows insurance approvals directly in the system.
- The meeting module runs invitations, agendas, realtime voting with exact capture of proxies and voting groups, and secured minutes across in-person, hybrid and online modes.
- A customer app for iOS and Android delivers documents, meeting protocols, consumption monitoring and photo-supported damage reporting under a realtime status overview.
- The contracting entity is verifiably German — facilioo GmbH, Kurfürstendamm 92, Berlin, registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg under HRB 163309.
Held against it
- WEG accounting scores 0-1, with no public information on a business plan, an annual settlement in legally required form, distribution keys or the reserve fund held separately.
- On assembly and resolutions, no public information appears on majority arithmetic per resolution type or a maintained resolution register with amendment and invalidation notes.
- Documents and handover scores 4-5, with no public information on full-text search, version history or a defined handover package a successor administrator could actually load.
- Sovereignty scores 3-4, with no public information on hosting location and only a website privacy policy dated 25.05.2018 citing Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses for US processors.
- Pricing transparency scores 1, with no public per-unit or per-community price beyond a free demo, a free trial and the SchadenFUX24 interface stated as free for Hausverwaltungen.
Best for
- You need to run owners' meetings digitally — invitations, agendas, realtime voting with exact capture of proxies and voting groups, in in-person, hybrid or online modes — with protocols delivered into the owner app.
- Your daily load is defect intake and insurance claims, where photo-backed reporting, contractor control and the SchadenFUX24 round trip keep the whole claim history visible.
- You want owners and tenants reading documents, meeting protocols and consumption data in an iOS and Android app rather than by post.
- You produce the annual settlement in a separate system and want facilioo as the CRM layer around it.
Avoid if
- You need the statutory WEG financial cycle in one system — the pages position facilioo as CRM software for property professionals, and WEG accounting scores 0-1 with no public information on a business plan, annual settlement, distribution keys or the reserve.
- Your community's records must move to a successor administrator as one loadable package — documents and handover shows a per-file archive endpoint and a DocuWare master-data export, but no public information on a defined handover package.
- You must verify hosting location and a current processor chain for platform data before signing — sovereignty scores 3-4, and the only published processors appear in a website privacy policy dated 25.05.2018.
- Your owners must see per-owner statements or arrears by unit — the customer app as shown covers documents, protocols, consumption data and damage reporting, with no public information on statements or arrears.
The scores
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The statutory financial cycle: business plan, annual settlement in the form the law and the BGH require, distribution keys, and the separate handling of reserve funds held in trust for the community.
0 — General bookkeeping only; no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, reserves treated as ordinary balances.
3 — Templates that help a human produce the documents, with distribution keys entered by hand and no separation of the Rücklage.
5 — Wirtschaftsplan and Jahresabrechnung generated from the ledger with configurable distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), and reserves booked separately.
8 — Settlement in the post-2021 BGH form with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, Vermögensbericht produced, heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV integrated, owner-change apportionment mid-year handled, and Hausgeld arrears tracked with dunning.
10 — The whole financial year is discharged inside the system: multi-community bookkeeping with strict per-WEG separation, trust accounting for reserves with its own reporting, settlement documents an accountant would sign, and the arithmetic auditable back to individual postings.
The WEG Administrator
The vendor presents itself as CRM software for property professionals, and I found no public information on a business plan, an annual settlement, distribution keys or separate trust handling of the reserve — the March settlement run would have to happen entirely outside this system. The only adjacent capability is active monitoring of consumption data, which is an input to a settlement, not a settlement. 1 6
The Advisory Board Member
I looked for anything on the Wirtschaftsplan, the Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys or the separate handling of the Rücklage and found no public information. The published module list reads as a CRM for property professionals — tasks, insurance claims, contractor and meter management — with nothing on the statutory financial cycle, so an owner wanting to retrace the settlement to individual postings has nothing to retrace. 1 6
The Accountant
The captured pages position the product as CRM software for property professionals and show meter, maintenance and consumption-data management, but I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, on a Jahresabrechnung in the form the courts require with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, on distribution keys, or on the Rücklage being segregated as trust money. From my chair that gap sits close to the bottom of the scale; the consumption-data monitoring alone keeps it off the floor. 1 6
The Portfolio Manager
Everything captured positions this as CRM software for property professionals — tasks, claims, contractor control, meter and maintenance management — and we found no public information on a business plan, an annual settlement in the legally required form, distribution keys, or reserve funds held separately from ordinary balances. 1 6
The Data Protection Officer
The captured pages position facilioo as CRM software for property professionals — tasks, claims, contractor, meter and elevator management — and we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys, or any separate handling of the reserve fund. Consumption data is actively monitored, but nothing published shows settlement arithmetic or a reserve held in trust for the community. 1 6
The Skeptic
The captured pages position this as a CRM for property professionals with meter, maintenance and elevator modules plus active consumption monitoring, and we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the form the BGH requires, distribution keys, or any separate handling of the Rücklage. Meter and consumption data are the raw material for an apportionment, not the apportionment itself. 1 6
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Convening, running and recording the owners' meeting — including the resolution register the law requires the administrator to maintain, and the majority arithmetic that decides whether a resolution stands.
0 — No meeting support; invitations and minutes are written elsewhere and the Beschluss-Sammlung is a document somewhere.
3 — Invitation templates and a place to store minutes, but no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained resolution register.
5 — Agenda-driven invitations respecting the notice period, attendance and proxy recording, voting with the common majority types, and a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a numbered register.
8 — Quorum and majority computed per resolution type including MEA-weighted and qualified majorities, proxies and voting restrictions handled, minutes generated from the recorded votes, and the register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.
10 — The meeting is conducted in the system: hybrid or written circulation procedures supported with their own legal rules, contested resolutions flagged within the challenge period, the register complete and exportable as evidence, and every entry traceable to the meeting that produced it.
The WEG Administrator
The meeting workflow itself is genuinely evidenced: sending invitations, building agendas, realtime voting with immediate results, minutes secured in the platform, precise capture of voting groups and proxies, and presence, hybrid or online modes. What I found no public information on is quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type and a maintained resolution register with amendment and invalidation notes — the register the law makes me keep. 4 5 1
The Advisory Board Member
The meeting itself is clearly run in the platform: invitations, agendas, realtime voting, proxies and voting groups, in Präsenz, hybrid or online form, with 5,000 Versammlungen claimed and protocols handed to the customer app. What I found no public information on is the notice period being enforced, the majority arithmetic per resolution type, and — the part owners actually rely on later — a continuously maintained Beschluss-Sammlung as a numbered register with amendment and invalidation notes. 4 5 1
The Accountant
The meeting module genuinely runs meetings: invitations, agenda points with prepared resolutions displayed in the platform, real-time voting with immediate results, exact capture of Abstimmungsgruppen and Vollmachten, in Präsenz, hybrid or online formats, with minutes secured and protocols transferred into the system and the Kundenapp. I found no public information on quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type or on a maintained, numbered Beschluss-Sammlung with amendment and invalidation notes, which is what would earn more. 1 4 5
The Portfolio Manager
Meeting throughput is clearly real: invitations, agendas, real-time voting with exact capture of proxies and voting groups, minutes secured, presence, hybrid and online modes, five thousand meetings run, and protocols delivered straight into the owner app. What holds it back is that we found no public information on majority arithmetic per resolution type or a resolution register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes. 4 5 1
The Data Protection Officer
Invitations, agendas, real-time voting, exact capture of proxies and voting groups, and secured minutes run in one system across in-person, hybrid and online meetings, which is genuine meeting conduct. We found no public information on majority computation per resolution type or a resolution register maintained with amendment and invalidation notes, so the statutory backbone is not evidenced. 4 5 1
The Skeptic
The Eigentümerversammlung pages do show the meeting itself: sending invitations, building agendas, realtime voting, exact capture of Vollmachten and Abstimmungsgruppen, presence/hybrid/online modes, and protocols stored and pushed into the owner app. What I do not find is the arithmetic that decides whether a Beschluss stands — quorum or majority computed per resolution type — or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung with amendment and invalidation notes; the evidence stops at securing Protokolle. 4 5 1
Owner & tenant self-service
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How an owner exercises their right to see the records, and how much routine correspondence the portal removes: statements, documents, meeting papers, defect reporting.
0 — No portal; every request is answered by email or post.
3 — A document download area with no per-owner scoping — everyone sees the same folder, or access is by emailed link.
5 — Per-owner login showing their own statements, documents and meeting papers, with a defect or request form that reaches the administrator.
8 — Owners and tenants scoped separately with correct visibility, meeting papers and voting available in the portal, defect reports with status visible to the reporter, and consumption or arrears shown per unit.
10 — The portal discharges the disclosure duty: every record an owner is entitled to see available on demand with an access log, tenant and owner views strictly separated, notifications for statutory deadlines, and enough self-service that routine correspondence largely disappears.
The WEG Administrator
A customer app for iOS and Android is evidenced with document management, protocols delivered into the app, damage reporting with photo upload, a realtime status overview and consumption-data monitoring. I found no public information on per-owner statements, arrears per unit, a separately scoped tenant view, or an access log that would discharge the disclosure duty. 6 5
The Advisory Board Member
There is a genuine customer app: documents, meeting protocols, active consumption monitoring, and defect reports with photo upload under a real-time status view, so routine reporting moves into the portal. But I found no public information on whether owners and tenants are scoped separately, on per-owner statements or arrears by unit, or on any access log that would let me check the records without asking the administrator. 6 5
The Accountant
The Kundenapp puts documents, meeting protocols and damage reporting with photo upload in owners' hands, alongside active monitoring of consumption data and a realtime status overview with transparent communication. I found no public information on per-owner scoping of statements, strict separation of tenant and owner visibility, or an access log that would discharge the statutory disclosure duty. 5 6
The Portfolio Manager
The customer app puts documents, meeting protocols, damage reporting with photo upload, a realtime status view and consumption monitoring in an owner's pocket, tailored per customer. We found no public information on per-owner statements, on tenants and owners being scoped separately, or on voting being available in the portal. 6 5
The Data Protection Officer
A customer app delivers documents, protocols, consumption data and a defect form with photo upload, with a real-time status overview for transparent communication. We found no public information on strictly separate scoping of owner and tenant views, an access log over what an owner has seen, or per-unit arrears — the visibility separation this buyer requires is not evidenced on the pages. 6 5 1
The Skeptic
A Kundenapp exists with digital document management, protocols, photo-supported Schadensmeldung, structured Mängel documentation and consumption monitoring, which covers documents, meeting papers and a request path to the administrator. We found no public information on per-owner scoping, separate owner and tenant views, per-unit arrears, or defect status visible to the reporter — that is as far as the evidence takes it. 5 6
Maintenance, defects & contractors
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The building side: defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, and the evidence trail when something goes wrong.
0 — Defects arrive by phone and live in a notebook; no maintenance schedule.
3 — A ticket or note list per property, contractors contacted outside the system, no recurring maintenance calendar.
5 — Defect records per unit or property with status and photos, contractor assignment with a work order, and a recurring maintenance schedule with reminders.
8 — Warranty and Gewährleistung periods tracked against the responsible trade, statutory inspections (lift, heating, fire safety, drinking-water) scheduled with proof of completion stored, quotes and invoices linked to the defect, and cost allocated to the correct account.
10 — A defensible operating record: every obligation, inspection and defect with its evidence and dates, contractor performance visible, budget consumption against the Wirtschaftsplan tracked live, and a history that answers the question of what the administrator knew and when.
The WEG Administrator
Defect intake with photos, structured handling of defects, contractor control, and meter, maintenance and elevator management are named modules, and the SchadenFUX24 round trip is concrete — cost estimates synchronized, insurance approvals visible in the system, the whole damage history from first report to settlement viewable. The statutory side is thinner: I found no public information on warranty periods per trade, scheduled statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or allocation of costs to the correct account. 8 1 5 6
The Advisory Board Member
Defect intake with photos, structured processing of Mängel, contractor management and meter, maintenance and elevator management are all in the module list, and the SchadenFUX24 link carries each claim from first report to settlement with synced damage images and cost estimates and insurance approvals visible in the system — a proper trail on the insurance side. I found no public information on Gewährleistung periods tracked per trade or on statutory inspections scheduled with proof of completion stored. 8 1 5
The Accountant
Defects are documented and worked in a structured way, with photos and Kostenvoranschläge synchronised to SchadenFUX24, insurance approvals visible directly in the system, and the entire damage history from first report to settlement retrievable at any time; a contractor-management module and meter, maintenance and elevator management appear in the module list. I found no public information on statutory inspections scheduled with stored proof of completion, warranty periods tracked against trades, or cost allocated against a business plan. 1 5 6 8
The Portfolio Manager
Defects come in with photos, are documented and worked structurally, and the SchadenFUX24 link synchronises damage photos and cost quotes while insurance approvals and the full history from first report to settlement stay visible — with contractor control plus meter, maintenance and elevator management as named modules. For my statutory-inspection requirement we found no public information on scheduling with proof of completion stored, warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade, or costs posted to the right account. 8 6 5 1
The Data Protection Officer
Defects are documented with photos and structured handling, the entire damage history from first report to settlement stays viewable, contractor control and meter, maintenance and elevator management sit in the core modules, and insurance approvals sync back from the damage interface. Warranty and Gewährleistung tracking, proof of statutory inspections, and posting of costs to the correct account are not evidenced in the captured material. 6 5 1 8
The Skeptic
Defects are documented with photos and structured processing, contractor control (Handwerkersteuerung) is a listed module, and Zähler-, Wartungs- und Aufzugsmanagement with automatic follow-ups covers recurring obligations. The SchadenFUX24 interface even syncs damage photos and cost estimates and keeps the entire claim history visible, but we found no public information on Gewährleistung periods tracked per trade, statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or costs allocated to accounts. 1 5 6 8
Documents, retention & handover
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The archive and the exit. A Verwalter's appointment is finite by law, and the records belong to the community — so handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.
0 — Documents live on a shared drive; no retention rules, and handover means copying folders.
3 — Central document storage per property with folders and upload, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export.
5 — Structured document management per property and unit with search, retention periods stated, and a documented export of a community's records.
8 — Full-text search across the archive, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, and a complete handover package (ledger, register, documents, master data) in open formats.
10 — Handover is a first-class feature rather than an obstacle: a complete, structured export a successor administrator can actually load, retention executed per statutory period, an access log over the archive, and no commercial friction placed in the way of a community leaving.
The WEG Administrator
Digital document management is claimed, the developer documentation shows a file archive endpoint plus DocuWare export of master data and document import, and the privacy policy states six-year and ten-year retention obligations. I found no public information on full-text search, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, or a handover package a successor administrator could actually load — and for me handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket. 6 9 10 3
The Advisory Board Member
Documents are managed digitally, a published developer API offers a per-file archive export together with a DocuWare master-data export, and retention obligations of six and ten years are stated in the privacy terms. That is not yet a handover: I found no public information on version history, full-text search, or a defined export package — ledger, register, documents, master data — that a successor administrator could actually load. 6 9 10 3
The Accountant
Digital document management exists in the Kundenapp, the privacy policy states statutory retention of 6 years under the HGB and 10 years under the AO, and a documented export path is visible on the developer pages — a file archive endpoint and a DocuWare export of master data. I found no public information on full-text search, version history, or a complete handover package a successor administrator could actually load, so the statutory exit event remains unproven. 3 6 9 10
The Portfolio Manager
Documents are managed digitally, there is a documented interface to archive files and export master data to DocuWare, and statutory retention periods of six and ten years are cited. We found no public information on versioning, full-text search, or a defined handover package a successor administrator could actually load — and handover of a community's records is a statutory event, not a support ticket. 6 9 10 3
The Data Protection Officer
Digital document management is offered, the files-archive interface is restricted to administrator and property-management roles, a DocuWare export of master data exists, and retention periods of six and ten years are stated in the privacy notice. We found no public information on versioning, full-text search, an access log over the archive, or a defined handover export of a community's records — the exit path for a change of administrator is not evidenced, and retention is stated rather than shown executing. 6 9 10 3
The Skeptic
Digital document management is claimed, and a public API offers a file-archive endpoint plus a DocuWare export of master data — the beginnings of an export path, but master data is not a community's records. We found no public information on full-text search, versioning, retention executed for community documents, or a defined handover package a successor administrator could actually load; the statutory retention periods quoted come from the website privacy policy, not a product feature. 6 9 10 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the community's financial and personal records live, who the contracting entity is, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — document OCR, AI features, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — German or EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and an export that keeps the community compliant for the full retention period after the appointment ends.
The WEG Administrator
The contracting entity is verifiably German — facilioo GmbH on Kurfürstendamm in Berlin, registered at the Charlottenburg court — and the privacy policy names its processors with legal bases and an Art. 28 processing-contract arrangement. But the named processors are website and marketing services, several of them US firms, with the 2018-dated policy citing Privacy Shield among its safeguards, and I found no public information on where the platform's community data is hosted or who owns the vendor. 2 3
The Advisory Board Member
The contracting entity is plainly German — facilioo GmbH at Kurfürstendamm 92, Berlin, registered under HRB 163309 — and the website's processors are named. But we found no public information on where the platform's records are hosted, the privacy policy explicitly excludes the platform itself in favour of its own separate policy, and the transfers it does describe rest on the Privacy Shield in a text dated 2018 — so I cannot tell a neighbour where our settlement data actually sits. 3 2
The Accountant
The contracting entity is facilioo GmbH, Kurfürstendamm 92, Berlin, with a Handelsregister entry at Charlottenburg, and the privacy policy names its subprocessors — US processors such as Google and LinkedIn alongside XING in Hamburg and Sendinblue in Paris — with transfers resting on Standardvertragsklauseln and the Privacy Shield in a policy dated 25.05.2018. I found no public information on where the platform's data is hosted or on the ownership structure, and the app has its own privacy policy whose contents are not shown here. 2 3
The Portfolio Manager
The contracting entity is facilioo GmbH in Berlin with a German commercial register entry, and subprocessors are named — but the list includes US processors such as Google and LinkedIn relying on standard contractual clauses, and the captured privacy policy is dated May 2018 and cites Privacy Shield. We found no public information on where the platform's data is hosted. 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is a Berlin GmbH with full register details and the platform is reached on German-domain endpoints, but we found no public information on hosting location, on where the AI telephone assistant processes callers and their concerns, or on a subprocessor list for the platform itself. The only published processors appear in a privacy notice dated 25 May 2018 that names US services and cites Privacy Shield as a safeguard, which is information I cannot treat as a current chain of custody. 2 3 9 1
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is solidly German — facilioo GmbH at Kurfürstendamm, Charlottenburg register, German VAT ID — with a named data protection officer. But we found no public information on where the platform hosts community data, and the platform's own privacy policy is not among the captured pages; the website policy, dated 25.05.2018, names US processors (Google, LinkedIn, PayPal) with safeguards citing Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses. 2 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether an administrator can compute the real annual cost for the units under management — including modules, per-community fees and setup — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every quote is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-unit or per-community headline exists, but modules, minimum terms, setup or migration fees are unstated.
5 — Per-unit or per-community prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (portal, accounting module, document storage) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-unit maths, minimum term, setup and migration costs and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of units and communities including every module, with no per-seat surprises and any exit or export fee stated outright.
The WEG Administrator
No product price is published anywhere I can see — only a free demo, a free trial, and the statement that the SchadenFUX24 interface stands free of cost to Hausverwaltungen. I cannot compute an annual cost for forty communities from these pages, so every real quote is a sales conversation. 1 4 8
The Advisory Board Member
Beyond a free trial, a free demo request, and a partner damage interface offered kostenfrei to property managers, we found no public prices at all — no per-unit figure, no module prices, no minimum term, no setup or migration costs. An administrator cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from these pages; every quote is a sales conversation. 1 4 8
The Accountant
The pages advertise a trial marked "KOSTENFREI TESTEN", a free demo, and the SchadenFUX24 interface stated as free for property managers — but beyond those free items I found no public per-unit or per-community price, no billing period, and no setup, migration or module pricing. An administrator cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from public pages alone; that is close to the floor of the scale. 1 4 8
The Portfolio Manager
A free trial, a free demo and a cost-free SchadenFUX24 interface are public, but we found no public information on any price — no per-unit or per-community figure, no module, setup or migration costs — so I cannot compute the annual invoice for several thousand units from these pages. 1 4 8
The Data Protection Officer
No per-unit or per-community price appears anywhere in the captured material; the only pricing-adjacent facts are a free trial, a free demo and the statement that the damage interface stands at no cost to property managers. An administrator cannot compute a real annual cost from these public pages. 1 4 8
The Skeptic
The only cost statements on the captured pages are a kostenlose Demo, a kostenfrei test offer, and the SchadenFUX24 interface at no charge for Hausverwaltungen. We found no public price for the software itself — no per-unit or per-community figure, billing period, minimum term, setup or migration cost — so an administrator cannot compute an annual invoice from public pages. 1 4 8
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in DE | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 8 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (10)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage facilioo.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Imprint facilioo.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy facilioo.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Maintenance, defects & contractors — found from sitemap facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Documents, retention & handover — found from sitemap developers.facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Documents, retention & handover — found from sitemap developers.facilioo.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →