Property & WEG Management
Immoware24
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Immoware24 GmbH · www.immoware24.de
Compare with Condomana → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Immoware24 GmbH of Halle (Saale) sells browser-based WEG, rental and special-ownership administration; persona-weighted totals run 4.7 to 5.6, and every criterion's scores sit within one point of each other, so the picture is consistent rather than divided. Owner self-service leads at 7-8: Portal24 gives tenants and owners their own views of released documents, defect reports with photo upload and visible status, monthly consumption information per §6a HeizkostenV, and Apple and Android apps. WEG accounting follows at 6-7, with Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnung, Rücklagenabrechnung and Vermögensbericht per §28 WEG at a button press. Pricing transparency sits at 2: the basis is management units, active users and optional modules on a twelve-month minimum term, yet we found no published price figure. Documents and handover at 4 and maintenance and defects at 4-5 fall short on recurring operations and exit — we found no public information on a maintenance calendar, statutory inspections, version history, retention periods or a handover export. Sovereignty scores 4-5, pairing hosting stated exclusively in German ISO 27001 data centres with US tools disclosed in the privacy policy.
Speaks for it
- Owner self-service scores 7-8, with Portal24 releasing documents and contract data per user and delivering monthly consumption information per §6a HeizkostenV to residents.
- WEG accounting scores 6-7, producing Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnung, Rücklagenabrechnung and Vermögensbericht per §28 WEG with costs distributed automatically by defined keys.
- The assembly module creates and sends invitations, runs hybrid owners' meetings with online voting, and generates minutes and the resolution collection signed eIDAS-conform on smartphone or tablet.
- The ticket system runs a four-step workflow to archiving, with quotes from several contractors compared and the order awarded from inside the ticket, backed by vetted craftsmen via Craftware24.
- The contracting entity is the German Immoware24 GmbH under German law, with hosting stated exclusively in geo-redundant ISO 27001 certified data centres in Germany, an external data protection officer and a processing agreement on offer.
Held against it
- Pricing transparency scores 2: prices are tailored to individual requirements on a pay-per-use basis with no fixed packages, and we found no published figure for any unit, user or module.
- Maintenance and defects scores 4-5: we found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, statutory inspections stored with proof of completion, or warranty periods tracked per trade.
- Documents and handover scores 4: we found no public information on version history, retention periods executed per statutory rule, or a defined handover export a successor administrator could load.
- Sovereignty scores 4-5: we found no public information naming the hosting provider or a subprocessor list for the product itself, and the privacy policy discloses tools of US-based companies, with Microsoft holding tracking data on US servers for up to 180 days.
- Assembly legal depth is unevidenced: we found no public information on attendance and proxy recording, majority arithmetic per resolution type, or amendment and invalidation notes kept in the register.
Best for
- You administer WEG communities and want the statutory cycle — Wirtschaftsplan, Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnung, Rücklagenabrechnung and Vermögensbericht per §28 WEG — produced inside the system.
- You want owners and tenants serving themselves: released documents, defect reports with photos and visible status, and monthly consumption information per §6a HeizkostenV, with Apple and Android apps.
- You run hybrid owners' meetings and want invitations, online voting, minutes and the resolution collection handled in one module with eIDAS-conform signature.
- You administer thousands of units and rely on settlement throughput with SEPA direct debit, dunning and DATEV export.
Avoid if
- You need to budget before a sales conversation — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your buildings depend on recurring upkeep — a maintenance calendar, statutory inspections for lift, fire safety or drinking water with stored proof of completion, or warranty tracking per trade — where maintenance and defects scores 4-5.
- A change of administrator lies ahead and you need a defined, loadable handover export of a community's records, on which we found no public information.
- You must verify the full processing chain before signing: we found no public information naming the hosting provider or a subprocessor list for the product, and the privacy policy discloses US-based tools.
The scores
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The statutory financial cycle: business plan, annual settlement in the form the law and the BGH require, distribution keys, and the separate handling of reserve funds held in trust for the community.
0 — General bookkeeping only; no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, reserves treated as ordinary balances.
3 — Templates that help a human produce the documents, with distribution keys entered by hand and no separation of the Rücklage.
5 — Wirtschaftsplan and Jahresabrechnung generated from the ledger with configurable distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), and reserves booked separately.
8 — Settlement in the post-2021 BGH form with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, Vermögensbericht produced, heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV integrated, owner-change apportionment mid-year handled, and Hausgeld arrears tracked with dunning.
10 — The whole financial year is discharged inside the system: multi-community bookkeeping with strict per-WEG separation, trust accounting for reserves with its own reporting, settlement documents an accountant would sign, and the arithmetic auditable back to individual postings.
The WEG Administrator
The WEG settlement pages show Wirtschaftsplan, Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnung, Rücklagenabrechnung and the Vermögensbericht per § 28 WEG generated at a button press, costs distributed automatically by defined keys, BGH-conform form claimed, and Mahnwesen in the bookkeeping module — that carries my March run. I found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, on apportionment when an owner changes mid-year, or on the settlement arithmetic tracing back to individual postings, which is what separates a defensible settlement from a printable one. 6 7 10
The Advisory Board Member
The WEG pages show Jahresabrechnung, Wirtschaftsplan and Rücklagenabrechnung produced "BGH-konform" with a Vermögensbericht under §28 WEG, costs spread automatically by defined keys, and dunning sitting in the bookkeeping module alongside double-entry bookkeeping and DATEV export. That covers most of what I check before recommending a settlement to the assembly. I found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze broken out separately, on apportionment when an owner changes mid-year, or on how the reserve funds are held separately per community. 6 7 10
The Accountant
Jahresabrechnung, Wirtschaftsplan, Rücklagenabrechnung and the Vermögensbericht are generated per §28 WEG with costs spread automatically by defined keys, dunning in the accounting module, and a BGH-conformity claim stated, which takes this beyond a mere template set. But I found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze being shown separately, on the Rücklage being held as segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, on owner-change apportionment mid-year, or on the annual heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV beyond the automated monthly §6a consumption information. 6 7 10
The Portfolio Manager
The WEG pages show the statutory cycle largely done in-system: Jahresabrechnung per § 28 WEG with Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnungen, Rücklagenabrechnung and Vermögensbericht at a button press, a Wirtschaftsplan built from prior-year values, costs distributed automatically by defined keys, and Mahnwesen with SEPA and DATEV export behind it — the throughput I need across thousands of units. I found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, owner-change apportionment mid-year, or strict per-WEG trust-account separation with its own reporting, which is what the top band demands. 6 7 10
The Data Protection Officer
The WEG pages show Jahresabrechnung, Wirtschaftsplan and a separate Rücklagenabrechnung produced at the press of a button, described as BGH-konform and per §28 WEG, with costs distributed automatically by defined keys, a Vermögensbericht included, dunning for arrears, double-entry bookkeeping with DATEV export, and monthly consumption information per §6a HeizkostenV arriving automatically from the metering service. We found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, mid-year owner-change apportionment, or strict per-community trust accounting for the reserve, which is what separates good from complete. 6 7 10
The Skeptic
The WEG pages show Wirtschaftsplan, Gesamt- and Einzelabrechnung, Rücklagenabrechnung and the Vermögensbericht produced at a keystroke, per §28 WEG and claimed BGH-konform, with costs distributed automatically by defined keys, a Mahnwesen and dunning-ready bookkeeping. But the feature that makes such a claim true stays out of sight: we found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze being broken out separately, on mid-year owner-change apportionment, or on heating-cost apportionment beyond the monthly consumption notice under §6a HeizkostenV. 6 10 7
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Convening, running and recording the owners' meeting — including the resolution register the law requires the administrator to maintain, and the majority arithmetic that decides whether a resolution stands.
0 — No meeting support; invitations and minutes are written elsewhere and the Beschluss-Sammlung is a document somewhere.
3 — Invitation templates and a place to store minutes, but no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained resolution register.
5 — Agenda-driven invitations respecting the notice period, attendance and proxy recording, voting with the common majority types, and a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a numbered register.
8 — Quorum and majority computed per resolution type including MEA-weighted and qualified majorities, proxies and voting restrictions handled, minutes generated from the recorded votes, and the register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.
10 — The meeting is conducted in the system: hybrid or written circulation procedures supported with their own legal rules, contested resolutions flagged within the challenge period, the register complete and exportable as evidence, and every entry traceable to the meeting that produced it.
The WEG Administrator
A dedicated Eigentümerversammlung module is evidenced: invitations created and sent, the meeting conducted with online voting, minutes and the Beschlusssammlung generated, protocols signed eIDAS-conform on tablet or smartphone. We found no public information on notice periods, proxy and attendance recording, majority arithmetic per resolution type, or register maintenance with amendment and invalidation notes, so I stop short of trusting it for a contested resolution. 8 9 10 12
The Advisory Board Member
A dedicated assembly module is documented — invitation created and sent, the meeting conducted, minutes and Beschlusssammlung generated — and hybrid owners' meetings with online voting are offered. But I found no public information on proxy recording, on quorum or majority arithmetic per resolution type, or on the amendment and invalidation notes § 24 (7) demands of the register — and that register is the first thing I audit as an owner. 8 9 12
The Accountant
The module creates and sends the invitation, conducts the owners' meeting including hybrid form with online voting, and generates both the minutes and the Beschluss-Sammlung, which can be signed eIDAS-conform on the device. We found no public information on quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type, on proxies and voting restrictions, or on the register being maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires. 1 9 12 10
The Portfolio Manager
A genuine meeting module is evidenced: training material covers creating and sending the invitation, running the assembly, and generating both the Protokoll and the Beschluss-Sammlung, hybrid assemblies with online voting are advertised, and protocols are signed eIDAS-conformantly on smartphone or tablet. I found no public information on notice-period handling, attendance and proxy recording, quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type, or amendment and invalidation notes kept in the register, so safety on contested resolutions is unproven. 8 9 12 10
The Data Protection Officer
The meeting module demonstrably creates and sends the invitation, runs the assembly with online votes, and generates both the protocol and the Beschluss-Sammlung, with an eIDAS-conform signature applied directly on smartphone or tablet. We found no public information on majority arithmetic per resolution type, proxy handling, notice-period enforcement, or amendment and invalidation notes kept in the register, so the legal depth beyond convening, voting and recording is not evidenced. 8 9 10 12
The Skeptic
The module demonstrably creates and sends the invitation, runs the meeting — hybrid, with online votes — and generates both the Protokoll and the Beschlusssammlung. What decides whether a resolution stands is the part I cannot find: no public information on attendance and proxy recording, on quorum or MEA-weighted and qualified majorities computed per resolution type, or on amendment and invalidation notes kept in the register as the reformed law requires. 8 12 9 1
Owner & tenant self-service
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How an owner exercises their right to see the records, and how much routine correspondence the portal removes: statements, documents, meeting papers, defect reporting.
0 — No portal; every request is answered by email or post.
3 — A document download area with no per-owner scoping — everyone sees the same folder, or access is by emailed link.
5 — Per-owner login showing their own statements, documents and meeting papers, with a defect or request form that reaches the administrator.
8 — Owners and tenants scoped separately with correct visibility, meeting papers and voting available in the portal, defect reports with status visible to the reporter, and consumption or arrears shown per unit.
10 — The portal discharges the disclosure duty: every record an owner is entitled to see available on demand with an access log, tenant and owner views strictly separated, notifications for statutory deadlines, and enough self-service that routine correspondence largely disappears.
The WEG Administrator
Portal24 gives tenants and owners their own views with only their released contract data and documents, defect reports with photo upload and a transparent processing status that arrive as tickets, and the monthly consumption information per § 6a HeizkostenV delivered to residents in the portal. I found no public information on an access log behind the disclosure duty or on arrears shown per unit. 10 11 6 1
The Advisory Board Member
Portal24 releases only each user's own documents — statements, contracts, notices — with damage reports filed by online form including photo upload and a processing status the reporter can follow, and the monthly consumption information under § 6a HeizkostenV reaches residents in the portal. Training material shows separate views for management, tenants and owners, and apps exist for Apple and Android. I found no public information on arrears shown per unit, on an access log, or on notifications for statutory deadlines. 10 11 1
The Accountant
Portal24 gives tenants and owners per-login access to the contract data, statements and documents released to them, with defect reports including photo upload and a processing status the reporter can see, monthly heating-consumption information per § 6a HeizkostenV shown in the portal, and separate views demonstrated for tenants and owners. We found no public information on meeting papers or voting being available in the portal itself, or on arrears shown per unit. 10 11 1
The Portfolio Manager
Portal24 removes most of the routine correspondence I pay staff for: owners and tenants get their own views with only released contract data and documents, damage reports with photo upload and a status transparent to the reporter, monthly consumption information per § 6a HeizkostenV fed automatically from the metering service into the portal, plus iOS and Android apps, with meeting papers delivered digitally and voting run online. I found no public information on an access log over what an owner viewed or notifications for statutory deadlines, so the full disclosure duty is not evidenced. 10 11 6 12
The Data Protection Officer
Portal24 gives tenants and owners invited by email a per-user login to only the information released to them — statements, contracts, minutes, notice-board messages — with photo-capable defect reports whose status the reporter can follow, monthly HeizkostenV consumption information delivered per resident, and separate views for management, tenants and owners shown in the training material. We found no public information on an access log over what each owner has viewed or on arrears visibility per unit, so the disclosure duty is well served but not discharged in evidence. 10 11 1
The Skeptic
Portal24 is real self-service: per-user released documents and contract data after login, separate views for tenants and owners, defect and request forms with photo upload and a processing status visible to the reporter, monthly consumption information under §6a HeizkostenV delivered in the portal, plus Apple and Android apps. We found no public information on voting or the full meeting papers being available inside the portal itself, or on an access log over what an owner has viewed. 10 11 1
Maintenance, defects & contractors
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The building side: defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, and the evidence trail when something goes wrong.
0 — Defects arrive by phone and live in a notebook; no maintenance schedule.
3 — A ticket or note list per property, contractors contacted outside the system, no recurring maintenance calendar.
5 — Defect records per unit or property with status and photos, contractor assignment with a work order, and a recurring maintenance schedule with reminders.
8 — Warranty and Gewährleistung periods tracked against the responsible trade, statutory inspections (lift, heating, fire safety, drinking-water) scheduled with proof of completion stored, quotes and invoices linked to the defect, and cost allocated to the correct account.
10 — A defensible operating record: every obligation, inspection and defect with its evidence and dates, contractor performance visible, budget consumption against the Wirtschaftsplan tracked live, and a history that answers the question of what the administrator knew and when.
The WEG Administrator
The ticket system evidences defect capture with photos, a four-step workflow through to archiving, quote requests to several contractors with the award issued from the ticket, and vetted craftsmen via Craftware24. We found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders for the statutory inspections — lift, fire safety, drinking water — or on warranty period tracking, which across forty buildings is the part that ends up in court. 12 13 10 1 6
The Advisory Board Member
Defects arrive as tickets in a four-step workflow — capture, process and assign, handle and communicate, close and archive — with photo upload and visible status, and from a ticket you can request quotes from several contractors, compare them and award the work; an AI answering machine even opens tickets from phone calls. What I found no public information on is the recurring side: a maintenance calendar with reminders, statutory inspections with proof of completion, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade. 12 13 10 1
The Accountant
Defects arrive through online forms with photos and a transparent processing status, become tickets in a four-step workflow, and quotes can be requested from several contractors directly out of a ticket with the order then assigned, backed by vetted craftsmen through Craftware24. We found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, on Gewährleistung periods or statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or on cost allocation to the correct account. 12 13 10 1
The Portfolio Manager
Intake to archive is a real workflow — four steps, photos and transparent status coming in from the portal, an AI answering machine that turns calls into tickets, quote requests from several contractors with comparison and work-order assignment, and vetted trades via Craftware24. I found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, statutory inspections for lift, heating, fire safety or drinking water scheduled with proof of completion stored, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade, so the defensible operating record I need is not evidenced. 12 13 10 1
The Data Protection Officer
The ticket system runs a four-step workflow from intake to archiving, online defect forms accept photo uploads with a transparently viewable status, quotes can be requested from several contractors, compared and awarded inside the system, departments can keep separate ticket systems, and an AI answering machine opens tickets from calls. We found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, statutory inspection tracking with stored proof, or Gewährleistung periods per trade — the spine of a defensible operating record. 12 13 10
The Skeptic
The ticket system covers intake with photos and a transparent status, routes work to contractors — quotes requested from several trades, compared, and the order awarded from inside the ticket, with vetted craftsmen via Craftware24 — and archives when closed. The recurring side of the building is the gap: we found no public information on a maintenance calendar with reminders, statutory inspections stored with proof of completion, warranty periods tracked per trade, or costs allocated to the right account. 12 13 10 1
Documents, retention & handover
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The archive and the exit. A Verwalter's appointment is finite by law, and the records belong to the community — so handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.
0 — Documents live on a shared drive; no retention rules, and handover means copying folders.
3 — Central document storage per property with folders and upload, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export.
5 — Structured document management per property and unit with search, retention periods stated, and a documented export of a community's records.
8 — Full-text search across the archive, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, and a complete handover package (ledger, register, documents, master data) in open formats.
10 — Handover is a first-class feature rather than an obstacle: a complete, structured export a successor administrator can actually load, retention executed per statutory period, an access log over the archive, and no commercial friction placed in the way of a community leaving.
The WEG Administrator
The document management stores, tags and finds records, with AI classification of incoming invoices and import of PDF, XML and ZUGFeRD files. We found no public information on retention periods executed per statutory rule, on version history, or on a defined handover export a successor administrator could actually load — and the exit is where a Verwalter gets judged. 14 10 4
The Advisory Board Member
Documents are stored, tagged and findable, AI classifies incoming PDF, XML and ZUGFeRD files and extracts amount, date and invoice number, and settlements are released to owners through the portal or by post. I found no public information on retention periods, version history, or a defined handover export of a community's records — and handover to a successor administrator is a statutory event, not a folder copy. 14 6
The Accountant
The document module stores, tags and retrieves files with cloud access, AI classification of incoming documents and import of PDF, XML and ZUGFeRD, and the privacy policy names a data-portability right in a machine-readable format. We found no public information on retention periods or their statutory execution, version history, full-text search, or a defined handover export of a community's records to a successor administrator. 14 10 4
The Portfolio Manager
Document management with tagging and search, location-independent access, AI classification of imported files and custom filename rules for invoices is evidenced, and the ticket workflow ends in an archive step. I found no public information on version history, retention periods executed per statutory rule, or a defined export of a community's records that a successor administrator could actually load — the data-portability passage in the privacy policy is a legal right, not a handover feature. 14 4 12
The Data Protection Officer
Document management offers storage, tagging, finding and location-independent access, with AI classification and data extraction on incoming invoices plus custom filename rules, and settlement documents are checked and released to owners via the portal or post. We found no public information on version history, retention periods that execute for the archive, an access log, or a defined handover export a successor administrator could load — and the privacy notice's retention default of "until the purpose ceases" concerns the website, not the community's records; for people whose data sits here without ever choosing the vendor, that silence matters. 14 6 4
The Skeptic
Documents are stored, tagged and found, classified by the AI under custom filename rules, and delivered to owners digitally; a DATEV export exists for the bookkeeping side. The exit is the silence: we found no public information on version history, stated retention periods, or a defined handover export of a community's records a successor administrator could actually load — only the statutory portability right recited in the privacy notice. 14 10 6
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the community's financial and personal records live, who the contracting entity is, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — document OCR, AI features, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — German or EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and an export that keeps the community compliant for the full retention period after the appointment ends.
The WEG Administrator
The captured pages name a German entity under German law, hosting exclusively in ISO 27001 certified data centres in Germany, an external data protection officer and a DSGVO-conform processing agreement on offer. We found no public information naming the hosting infrastructure, on ownership, or on a complete product subprocessor list, and the privacy policy itself discloses US third-country tools — Microsoft Clarity and Bing with storage on US servers — alongside the German chain. 1 3 5 4
The Advisory Board Member
The contracting entity is German under German law, hosting is stated exclusively in ISO 27001 certified datacenters in Germany, and an external data protection officer and an agreement with the hoster are in place. But the hosting infrastructure itself goes unnamed, I found no public information on subprocessors of the actual product, and the vendor's own privacy policy discloses tools of companies based in the USA and other third countries — so the whole chain cannot be verified from public pages. 3 4 5
The Accountant
Hosting is stated exclusively in ISO 27001-certified data centres in Germany with geo-redundancy, the contracting entity is a German GmbH under German law, and an AVV and external data protection officer are offered. However, the privacy policy itself names US-based tools such as Microsoft tracking with data held up to 180 days in the USA, and we found no public information on the hosting provider's name, on a subprocessor list for the product chain including the AI document recognition, or on an explained safeguard for the third-country transfers. 1 4 5 3
The Portfolio Manager
The contracting entity is the German Immoware24 GmbH under German law, and the vendor's pages state that all data is hosted exclusively in ISO-27001-certified, geo-redundant datacenters in Germany with an external data protection officer and an Art. 28 agreement. The chain is not evidenced end to end: I found no published subprocessor list for the product itself, no named infrastructure, and the vendor's own website uses US tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Bing with data transferred to servers in the USA. 5 3 4
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is a German GmbH under German law with German liability insurance, and the security pages state all data is hosted exclusively in ISO-27001-certified data centres in Germany, with a GDPR data-processing agreement and an external data protection officer. However, we found no public information naming the hoster or a product subprocessor list; the privacy notice states that tools of companies seated in the USA and other third countries are used, with tracking data transferred to Microsoft servers in the USA, and we found no public information on where the AI document reader sends a community's invoices — a gap this buyer weighs heavily. 3 5 4 14
The Skeptic
Hosting is stated as exclusively in German, geo-redundant ISO 27001 certified datacenters, with a German contracting entity under German law, an external data protection officer and an AVV on offer. Against that, we found no public information naming the hosting provider, the ownership behind the GmbH, or a subprocessor list for the product itself, and the vendor states it uses tools of companies based in the USA — Microsoft tracking with data held on US servers for up to 180 days. 5 1 4 3
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether an administrator can compute the real annual cost for the units under management — including modules, per-community fees and setup — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every quote is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-unit or per-community headline exists, but modules, minimum terms, setup or migration fees are unstated.
5 — Per-unit or per-community prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (portal, accounting module, document storage) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-unit maths, minimum term, setup and migration costs and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of units and communities including every module, with no per-seat surprises and any exit or export fee stated outright.
The WEG Administrator
The pricing page describes the basis — administrative units, active users, optional modules — with a twelve-month minimum term, multi-year discounts, a thirty-day trial and prices plus VAT, but the model is individual and we found no published figure for any tier or module. No administrator can compute an annual cost for their units and communities from these pages without a sales conversation. 2 7 6
The Advisory Board Member
The pricing page names the basis — management units, active users and optional modules — together with a twelve-month minimum term, discounts for longer terms, a thirty-day free trial and prices stated as "zzgl. MwSt.". Not a single euro figure is published, so an annual invoice for a given portfolio cannot be computed from public pages alone. 2 7
The Accountant
The pricing page describes the calculation basis — Verwaltungseinheiten, active users and optional Zusatzmodule — and states a twelve-month minimum term with term-length discounts, a 30-day free trial and that prices are "zzgl. MwSt."; with prices "an Ihre individuellen Anforderungen" tailored and no fixed packages, we found no public per-unit or per-community figure, so an administrator cannot compute the real annual cost from the public pages alone. 2 7 14
The Portfolio Manager
The pricing pages give the shape of the bill but no figure on it: price by number of management units, active users and optional modules, pay-per-use with no fixed packages, a twelve-month minimum term with multi-year discounts, a thirty-day free trial, and all prices plus VAT. Not a single euro amount is published anywhere I can see, so for my unit count the annual cost is not computable from public pages without a sales conversation. 2 7 6
The Data Protection Officer
The pricing pages describe a model — cost by management units, active users and optional add-on modules, booked function by function, a twelve-month minimum term with multi-year discounts, and prices stated exclusive of VAT — while also saying prices are tailored to individual requirements, and we found no public price figures anywhere in the captured pages. An administrator therefore cannot compute an annual cost from public information alone; the 30-day free trial is the only number made public. 2 7 14
The Skeptic
The captured pricing pages describe a model — cost per Verwaltungseinheiten, active users and optional modules, pay-per-use with no fixed packages, a twelve-month minimum term, prices "zzgl. MwSt.", and a thirty-day trial — but no price figure appears anywhere. We found no public information on any per-unit amount, minimum invoice, or setup and migration fees, so an administrator cannot compute the annual cost for their units from these pages alone. 2 7 14
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in DE ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. The country is not spelled out; Germany is derived from the German register court (Amtsgericht Stendal), the HRB number and the DE VAT ID.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 34 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 11 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (14)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.immoware24.de Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing www.immoware24.de Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Imprint www.immoware24.de Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy www.immoware24.de Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Security / trust page www.immoware24.de Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 6 Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Maintenance, defects & contractors — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Maintenance, defects & contractors — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Documents, retention & handover — found from sitemap www.immoware24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →