whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Property & WEG Management

etg24

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by etg24 GmbH · www.etg24.de

Compare with Condomana → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The WEG Administrator

Weighted verdict

Manages forty communities and personally carries the duties the WEG places on the Verwalter. Wants the statutory year — Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung, Versammlung, Beschluss-Sammlung — discharged inside one system. Judges a product by the March settlement run, not the demo.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The WEG Administrator

Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage

How this is scored

The statutory financial cycle: business plan, annual settlement in the form the law and the BGH require, distribution keys, and the separate handling of reserve funds held in trust for the community.

0 — General bookkeeping only; no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, reserves treated as ordinary balances.

3 — Templates that help a human produce the documents, with distribution keys entered by hand and no separation of the Rücklage.

5 — Wirtschaftsplan and Jahresabrechnung generated from the ledger with configurable distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), and reserves booked separately.

8 — Settlement in the post-2021 BGH form with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, Vermögensbericht produced, heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV integrated, owner-change apportionment mid-year handled, and Hausgeld arrears tracked with dunning.

10 — The whole financial year is discharged inside the system: multi-community bookkeeping with strict per-WEG separation, trust accounting for reserves with its own reporting, settlement documents an accountant would sign, and the arithmetic auditable back to individual postings.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

The captured pages show Wirtschaftspläne and Abrechnungen only as documents delivered to owners through the app, plus a receipt-checking module and accounting document categories with fiscal-year assignment — I found no public information on producing the settlement in the system, on distribution keys, or on separate handling of the Rücklage. For my March run the statutory arithmetic would still have to live outside this product. 4 7 8

Report an error

Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung

How this is scored

Convening, running and recording the owners' meeting — including the resolution register the law requires the administrator to maintain, and the majority arithmetic that decides whether a resolution stands.

0 — No meeting support; invitations and minutes are written elsewhere and the Beschluss-Sammlung is a document somewhere.

3 — Invitation templates and a place to store minutes, but no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained resolution register.

5 — Agenda-driven invitations respecting the notice period, attendance and proxy recording, voting with the common majority types, and a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a numbered register.

8 — Quorum and majority computed per resolution type including MEA-weighted and qualified majorities, proxies and voting restrictions handled, minutes generated from the recorded votes, and the register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.

10 — The meeting is conducted in the system: hybrid or written circulation procedures supported with their own legal rules, contested resolutions flagged within the challenge period, the register complete and exportable as evidence, and every entry traceable to the meeting that produced it.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

This is where the product earns its keep: agenda items entered with resolution text, voting weight and majority requirement, votes weighted by Kopfprinzip, Miteigentumsanteile or units, hybrid meetings with QR-code admission, proxies handled in the portal and the protocol generated in the system, with the Beschlusssammlung kept in its own menu including court decisions. The Umlaufverfahren runs with its own legal rules under § 23 Abs. 3 WEG and includes postal voters via a print function; I found no public information on flagging contested resolutions within the challenge period or on exporting the register as evidence. 5 6 4

Report an error

Owner & tenant self-service

How this is scored

How an owner exercises their right to see the records, and how much routine correspondence the portal removes: statements, documents, meeting papers, defect reporting.

0 — No portal; every request is answered by email or post.

3 — A document download area with no per-owner scoping — everyone sees the same folder, or access is by emailed link.

5 — Per-owner login showing their own statements, documents and meeting papers, with a defect or request form that reaches the administrator.

8 — Owners and tenants scoped separately with correct visibility, meeting papers and voting available in the portal, defect reports with status visible to the reporter, and consumption or arrears shown per unit.

10 — The portal discharges the disclosure duty: every record an owner is entitled to see available on demand with an access log, tenant and owner views strictly separated, notifications for statutory deadlines, and enough self-service that routine correspondence largely disappears.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

Personal documents sit at contract level so only the parties to the contract see them, owners, tenants, advisory boards and contractors each get round-the-clock portal or app access, and a defect report can carry a smartphone photo through a structured form with status updates on ongoing matters. Voting and current circular resolutions run in the same portal, which is exactly the correspondence I want off my desk. I found no public information on arrears or consumption figures being shown live per unit. 7 8 6

Report an error

Maintenance, defects & contractors

How this is scored

The building side: defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, and the evidence trail when something goes wrong.

0 — Defects arrive by phone and live in a notebook; no maintenance schedule.

3 — A ticket or note list per property, contractors contacted outside the system, no recurring maintenance calendar.

5 — Defect records per unit or property with status and photos, contractor assignment with a work order, and a recurring maintenance schedule with reminders.

8 — Warranty and Gewährleistung periods tracked against the responsible trade, statutory inspections (lift, heating, fire safety, drinking-water) scheduled with proof of completion stored, quotes and invoices linked to the defect, and cost allocated to the correct account.

10 — A defensible operating record: every obligation, inspection and defect with its evidence and dates, contractor performance visible, budget consumption against the Wirtschaftsplan tracked live, and a history that answers the question of what the administrator knew and when.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

Defect intake is structured — predefined request forms, photo attachment from the phone — and there is case processing, task management and an app function for property inspections, with contractors reachable as portal users. I found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, on work orders to trades, or on warranty-period and statutory-inspection tracking, which is what I need before the lift and fire-safety inspections come due. 7 3 4

Report an error

Documents, retention & handover

How this is scored

The archive and the exit. A Verwalter's appointment is finite by law, and the records belong to the community — so handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.

0 — Documents live on a shared drive; no retention rules, and handover means copying folders.

3 — Central document storage per property with folders and upload, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export.

5 — Structured document management per property and unit with search, retention periods stated, and a documented export of a community's records.

8 — Full-text search across the archive, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, and a complete handover package (ledger, register, documents, master data) in open formats.

10 — Handover is a first-class feature rather than an obstacle: a complete, structured export a successor administrator can actually load, retention executed per statutory period, an access log over the archive, and no commercial friction placed in the way of a community leaving.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

The archive is genuinely structured — object, unit and contract levels, predefined categories with sub-markers, bulk upload auto-assigned to the right units, fiscal-year assignment for accounting — and the handover of all entered data for a managed object to a Nachverwalter is described as a feature, which is rare and matters to me. I found no public information on version history, on retention periods being executed, or on the format of the handover export a successor could actually load. 8 7

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the community's financial and personal records live, who the contracting entity is, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — document OCR, AI features, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — German or EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and an export that keeps the community compliant for the full retention period after the appointment ends.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

The imprint names a German GmbH with a Mannheim commercial register entry, so the contracting counterparty is domestic. Beyond that I found no public information on where community data is hosted or on a complete subprocessor list — the privacy policy names Pipedrive and references Google — and the policy itself warns that tools from the US may transfer data without an EU-comparable level of protection. 2 3

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether an administrator can compute the real annual cost for the units under management — including modules, per-community fees and setup — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every quote is a sales conversation.

3 — A per-unit or per-community headline exists, but modules, minimum terms, setup or migration fees are unstated.

5 — Per-unit or per-community prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (portal, accounting module, document storage) sits in an unpriced bundle.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-unit maths, minimum term, setup and migration costs and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of units and communities including every module, with no per-seat surprises and any exit or export fee stated outright.

Report an error

The WEG Administrator

Three named versions and a three-month free Basis tier are public, and the vendor states that a price page exists, but I found no public information on figures for Pro or Enterprise, on per-unit arithmetic, minimum terms, setup or VAT treatment — so I cannot compute a year's cost for my forty communities from these pages. The 18 to 40 Euro per unit figure quoted on the WEG page is expressly a market cost, not an etg24 price. 1 5 8 4

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about etg24? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (8)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Imprint www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy www.etg24.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Owner & tenant self-service — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Documents, retention & handover — found from sitemap etg24.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →