DOMUS vs Karthago

DOMUS

The vendor publishes pages titled around booking the Wirtschaftsplan and creating the Hausgeldabrechnung under the WEG 2.0 reform, so the statutory cycle is clearly addressed in marketing; beyond those page titles we found no public information on distribution keys, separate trust accounting for the reserve fund, or the settlement form the courts require. I judge a product by the March settlement run, and nothing captured lets me verify a single line of it.

Karthago

A 'WEG- & Nebenkostenabrechnung' module beside double-entry bookkeeping is claimed, which is more than templates — but the captured pages never mention a Wirtschaftsplan, configurable distribution keys, separate Rücklage accounting or the post-2021 BGH settlement form, and that is precisely what I must see before the March run.

DOMUS

A homecase voting module for online owners' meetings and announced new WEG meeting functions indicate that convening and voting are product territory, which is more than storing minutes in a word processor. We found no public information on agenda handling, majority arithmetic per resolution type, or the resolution register maintained with amendment notes as the law demands — and that register is my personal duty, so I cannot credit titles alone.

Karthago

Nothing in the captured pages mentions convening, notice periods, voting or a Beschluss-Sammlung, and the module list contains no meeting component — invitations, minutes and the register would stay in Word and a folder, which is the anchor-zero situation.

DOMUS

Homecase evidently hosts online owners' meetings and lets the manager place documents online, which hints at a portal owners can reach; we found no public information on per-owner logins, owners seeing their own statements or arrears per unit, or defect reports with status visible to the reporter. Nothing captured evidences the disclosure duty being discharged through the portal.

Karthago

The vendor claims communication with owners and tenants in one solution, but no portal, per-owner login, statement download or defect form is evidenced anywhere — every record request still lands on my desk as correspondence.

DOMUS

The captured pages indicate a service-case portal and a communications platform shared with contractors and service providers, so intake and contractor contact at least run inside the vendor's world. We found no public information on recurring maintenance scheduling with reminders, statutory inspections with proof of completion, or warranty periods tracked against the responsible trade — the difference between a ticket list and an operating record I can defend.

Karthago

'Digitales Facility Management' appears in the modules list and nothing more: no defect records with status, no recurring maintenance calendar, no statutory inspection tracking with proof of completion — I could not schedule a lift inspection or a Trinkwasser check on this evidence.

DOMUS

A page on data exports and one on placing documents online in homecase suggests the archive has export paths, and the privacy policy shows a vendor that thinks in retention periods. We found no public information on version history, full-text search, retention rules for community records, or a handover package a successor administrator could actually load; handover is a statutory event, and nothing captured shows it treated as one.

Karthago

Integrated document management is confirmed, which gives central storage, but versioning, retention periods, full-text search and a defined handover export are all unevidenced — and a community's records belong to the WEG, not to my licence.

DOMUS

The contracting entity is a German AG registered in München, analytics run self-hosted on their own servers, every named third party — Google Ireland for video, TSA Solution GmbH for the shop — is European, and third-country transfers are explicitly grounded in EU adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses. But we found no public information on where the product's data is hosted, on ownership, or on a published subprocessor list, so the chain is unverified exactly where the community's records sit.

Karthago

German cloud servers are confirmed in the vendor's own words and on-premise keeps everything in my building — genuine points — but the contracting entity's jurisdiction is flagged unconfirmed, the subprocessor list is absent, and 'zertifizierter Datenschutz' is a marketing phrase, not a published certificate.

DOMUS

What is captured is a quote request within a consultation, a product configurator, and an online shop run by the sales partner TSA Solution GmbH — and the captured material shows no price figures at all. We found no public information on per-unit or per-community prices, billing period, minimum term, or setup and migration costs, so an administrator cannot compute an annual invoice from public pages.

Karthago

No price appears anywhere in the captured pages; the only pricing signal is a consultation form demanding managed units and required workstations, meaning a quote exists only after a sales conversation — the exact anchor-zero case.