As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Gong 2/5 and Modjo 2.5/5 in Sales Enablement. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Gong scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms and Analytics, AI & seller monitoring). Modjo scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (European sovereignty, Onboarding, training & coaching and Sales content management). Provenance — Gong: Rest of world. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Gong and Modjo split this bench. Modjo is ahead on coaching and readiness (6.5 vs 4.0; six judges lean its way) and sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2; six judges lean its way), with attributes reading French legal-entity jurisdiction and EU-only data residency — though its data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act. Gong is ahead on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2; six judges), analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7; five judges to one), and pricing transparency (1.8 vs 1.0; five judges), though neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in verdicts. CRM and integrations sits even at 6.2 apiece: four ties, one lean each way. Weighted totals divide: two judges place Gong ahead (3.9 vs 3.8 and 4.6 vs 4.4), three place Modjo ahead (3.5 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 6.1); one judge's totals are not shown.
Choose Gong if
You need buyer-facing engagement such as digital sales rooms and mutual action plans; six judges lean Gong on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2), and the Modjo verdict found no public information on digital sales rooms or mutual action plans.
Your managers score and monitor calls; five judges lean Gong on analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7), with transcript-based AI scoring, visible answer snippets and scorecards reaching back 90 days documented in the verdict.
A head of sales is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 3.9 to 3.8.
A CRM integrator is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 4.6 to 4.4.
You compare vendors on pricing transparency; five judges lean Gong (1.8 vs 1.0), while neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in the verdicts.
Choose Modjo if
Coaching and readiness is your priority; six judges lean Modjo (6.5 vs 4.0).
Your data must remain in the EU; Modjo's data residency attribute reads EU-only and its legal-entity jurisdiction reads France, and six judges lean Modjo on sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2).
You are vetting subprocessors; the data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act, and the subprocessor exposure attribute reads US CLOUD Act exposure — weigh that against the six-judge sovereignty lean toward Modjo.
Your content need is a recorded-call library rather than decks or collateral; five judges lean Modjo on content management (2.7 vs 1.3), and Gong's verdict found no public information on a native library, versioning or approvals.
A data protection officer or a skeptic is leading the purchase; those judges' weighted totals favor Modjo, 4.6 to 4.1 and 6.1 to 4.1.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Enablement Manager
Owns onboarding and wants a new hire selling in weeks, not quarters. Wants onboarding paths with certifications, practice with feedback a manager can actually give, and call recording that starts with the consent of everyone on the line, because a German customer has to agree before anything is recorded.
Gong
Modjo
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Sales content management
Gong
We found no public information on a native content library, versioning or approval workflows; the help pages show content reaching Gong only through integrations with Highspot, Seismic, Showpad and other dedicated platforms. For a new hire hunting for the approved deck, that leaves nothing to point at.
Modjo
The Library is a real asset for onboarding: a central, secure directory of best calls organized by topic, sales stage and objection handling, with snippet descriptions and team-wide access. Everything captured describes call recordings rather than decks or collateral, and I found no public information on versioning, expiry, approval before publishing, brand-locked templates or per-asset usage reporting.
Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms
Gong
Email open and link-click tracking is documented in unusual detail — invisible pixel, redirect links, openers cannot be identified — and shared spaces appear only as third-party microsite integrations such as Aligned, Dock and Trumpet. We found no public information on a recipient notice, a per-link tracking switch, or a stated retention period for visitor data.
Modjo
The captured module list — MCP, AI Sales Agent, Summary, Deals, AI Insights, CRM Filling, Call Highlights, Library, Call Reviews, Email Follow-Up, Integrations — describes a conversation-recording and coaching platform, and I found no public information on digital sales rooms, mutual action plans, or trackable buyer-facing links with view notifications. The only tracking pixels documented are on the vendor's own website and marketing emails.
Onboarding, training & coaching
Gong
Gong Academy offers courses with a required prerequisite and even browser-based exam proctoring, and a dedicated course walks admins through the recording and consent options for setting up call capture correctly — the consent conversation I want happening before a German call is recorded. Coaching runs through scorecards with AI-suggested answers, manager override, permission-governed visibility and CSV export; we found no public information on certifications, role-play practice with feedback, or a stated retention period for recordings.
Modjo
Recording consent is handled the way I need it for German calls: a consent page before the meeting starts, any participant can decline, the recording stops automatically and the host is notified, proof of consent is logged with name, decision and timestamp and exportable as CSV — with honest limitations published (Google Meet and Teams only, the host must be a licensed Modjo user, only the privacy link is customizable). Onboarding runs through the Library with access a week before a new hire's start date and a customer claim of halved ramp time, and managers get coaching insights, call reviews with comments and rep self-assessment. I found no public information on courses, certifications or role-play practice.
Analytics, AI & seller monitoring
Gong
AI scoring is documented better than most: inputs are the call transcript, the AI's bias toward yes is flagged, scorers can see the snippets behind an answer, a model update was disclosed publicly, and automatic review is a company-level setting admins can switch per scorecard with permissions deciding who sees scores. For the level above I would need the model provider or subprocessors named, a stated default that customer data is excluded from model training, and works council-facing documentation — noting that hosts are scored by default and scorecards can be applied retroactively to 90 days of calls.
Modjo
Scoring documentation reads like it was written for a works council: the score is described as an objective assessment of predefined elements on the call rather than the employee, visibility defaults to participants and their managers and can be restricted, retention is client-set, and the employer's duty to inform employees is spelled out. But the captured pages state that AI features are an integral part of the product and cannot be deactivated, running through Microsoft, OpenAI and Google — so the admin-level switch-off is explicitly not available, which caps this well below where the transparency work would otherwise take it.
CRM, workplace integrations & exit
Gong
Salesforce, HubSpot and Dynamics are documented as fully supported in both directions, with CRM fields editable in Gong and synced back, an Outlook add-in and a broad integration directory, and the terms promise export of customer data including recorded calls within 30 days after termination. We found no public information on single sign-on via SAML, SCIM provisioning or a documented public API with webhooks, and only one CRM can be connected at a time.
Modjo
Modjo works inside Salesforce and HubSpot with automatic writes to any object or field, native or custom, plus phone, video, email and calendar connectors, SCIM 2.0 provisioning documented across seven identity providers, and APIs, webhooks and MCP named in the terms. Exit is thin: thirty days after termination to request recordings back in a raw file format before destruction. I found no public information on SSO via SAML, e-signature or CPQ integrations, or bulk export of the library and analytics.
European sovereignty
Gong
A data processing agreement exists and an EU/UK privacy representative is appointed, but the provider is Gong.io Inc. under California law with an Israeli parent, and the captured pages give different signals on hosting: the German homepage names an EU data center while the privacy policy describes processing in the United States, Europe, Israel and other locations. No subprocessor list naming the transcription and AI providers was found, so I cannot tell a German customer where their recordings are processed.
Modjo
A French contracting entity (RINGO trading as MODJO, Neuilly-sur-Seine), hosting on Amazon Web Services in France, AI processing stated as hosted exclusively in the EU, an Article 28 GDPR data processing agreement covering recordings, and a published subprocessor list with fifteen-day change notice and SCC/BCR safeguards. What holds it back: the AI chain runs through Microsoft, OpenAI and Google — US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act regardless of server region — and I found no public information on the ownership behind the company.
Pricing transparency
Gong
The public pricing page discloses the shape of the model — licenses priced per user, a platform fee based on the number of users, and team-size bands — but no amounts, and the terms state all fees are set on the Order Form under subscription- or usage-based models. A buyer cannot compute even a starting annual cost from these pages.
Modjo
The captured pages show a Pricing page in the site navigation, but no price figure, seat type, minimum seat count, module bundle, platform fee or minimum term is documented in anything we captured. The one pricing-adjacent statement is that SCIM provisioning "requires a SCIM-enabled plan (contact your Modjo account manager to confirm availability)" — so a buyer cannot compute an annual cost from the public information in view.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
Gong
Modjo
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Ownership
Foreign-controlled
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
US CLOUD Act reach
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Modjo higher: 2.5/5 against 2/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is Gong or Modjo European?
Gong is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Modjo’s provenance is not proven by its pages as captured. Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.
Where do Gong and Modjo store customer data?
Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Gong: Default not stated; pages mention United States, Europe and Israel. Modjo: Default not stated; pages mention France and Europe.