As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Gong 2/5 and Modjo 2.5/5 in Sales Enablement. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Gong scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms and Analytics, AI & seller monitoring). Modjo scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (European sovereignty, Onboarding, training & coaching and Sales content management). Provenance — Gong: Rest of world. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Gong and Modjo split this bench. Modjo is ahead on coaching and readiness (6.5 vs 4.0; six judges lean its way) and sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2; six judges lean its way), with attributes reading French legal-entity jurisdiction and EU-only data residency — though its data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act. Gong is ahead on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2; six judges), analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7; five judges to one), and pricing transparency (1.8 vs 1.0; five judges), though neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in verdicts. CRM and integrations sits even at 6.2 apiece: four ties, one lean each way. Weighted totals divide: two judges place Gong ahead (3.9 vs 3.8 and 4.6 vs 4.4), three place Modjo ahead (3.5 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 6.1); one judge's totals are not shown.
Choose Gong if
You need buyer-facing engagement such as digital sales rooms and mutual action plans; six judges lean Gong on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2), and the Modjo verdict found no public information on digital sales rooms or mutual action plans.
Your managers score and monitor calls; five judges lean Gong on analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7), with transcript-based AI scoring, visible answer snippets and scorecards reaching back 90 days documented in the verdict.
A head of sales is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 3.9 to 3.8.
A CRM integrator is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 4.6 to 4.4.
You compare vendors on pricing transparency; five judges lean Gong (1.8 vs 1.0), while neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in the verdicts.
Choose Modjo if
Coaching and readiness is your priority; six judges lean Modjo (6.5 vs 4.0).
Your data must remain in the EU; Modjo's data residency attribute reads EU-only and its legal-entity jurisdiction reads France, and six judges lean Modjo on sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2).
You are vetting subprocessors; the data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act, and the subprocessor exposure attribute reads US CLOUD Act exposure — weigh that against the six-judge sovereignty lean toward Modjo.
Your content need is a recorded-call library rather than decks or collateral; five judges lean Modjo on content management (2.7 vs 1.3), and Gong's verdict found no public information on a native library, versioning or approvals.
A data protection officer or a skeptic is leading the purchase; those judges' weighted totals favor Modjo, 4.6 to 4.1 and 6.1 to 4.1.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Skeptic
Knows that "buyer intent" means tracking named people at the customer, that "AI coaching" means scoring employees, and that "reps find content 50% faster" rests on a vendor survey. Reads for what a room records about its visitors, what a readiness score is built from, whether call recording asks everyone on the line, and how many seats the minimum contract really buys.
Gong
Modjo
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Sales content management
Gong
The captured help pages document fifteen third-party content integrations — Highspot, Seismic, Showpad and Spekit among them — rather than a library of Gong's own; I found no public information on versioning, approvals, expiry dates or brand-locked templates. What the pages show is a hub that plugs into other vendors' content tools, not a governed content repository.
Modjo
The Library is a real, categorized store — folders by topic, sales stage and objection handling, snippets with descriptions, team-wide access, even early access for new hires a week before their start date. But what it stores is recorded calls rather than decks or collateral, and we found no public information on search within the library, versioning, approvals, brand templates, language tagging or per-asset usage reporting. The pages we read describe sharing inside the organization, not with buyers.
Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms
Gong
Email tracking is documented down to the mechanism: an invisible pixel counts opens, a redirect URL counts clicks, forwarded emails keep tracking, and Gong itself states it cannot determine who opened or clicked — while warning that anyone in copy or a spam filter can trigger a count. I found no public information on anything shown to the recipient: no notice step, no consent, no per-recipient switch to limit tracking. Digital sales rooms appear only as integrations with third-party microsite tools such as Aligned, Trumpet and Dock.
Modjo
We found no public information on digital sales rooms, mutual action plans or trackable links shared with buyers. The product surface the captured pages describe is conversation capture, AI analysis, a call library, CRM sync and email follow-up — seller-facing tooling — and the tracking pixels the privacy policy documents sit in Modjo's own website forms and marketing emails, not in anything a customer opens.
Onboarding, training & coaching
Gong
Gong Academy provides courses with registration and browser-based proctoring that records test duration, response times and keystroke events from test-takers. A required course covers the recording and consent options for call capture, and automatic scorecard review scores the call host by default, applicable retroactively to the past 90 days of calls. I found no public information on role-play practice, certifications, or a retention period for recordings.
Modjo
Consent mechanics are documented in unusual detail: an opt-in page before Google Meet or Teams meetings, recording stops when anyone declines including late joiners, and decisions are logged with timestamps and exportable as CSV for audits. The library-based onboarding path, manager coaching workflows and call-level scoring — default visibility limited to participants plus managers, with a compliance article stating the score is attributed to the call and not the employee — push this well above the middle. The friction: consent applies to only one meeting provider per workspace, never Zoom, and cannot be collected when the invite was sent from the client side; no courses, certifications or role-play with feedback are evidenced.
Analytics, AI & seller monitoring
Gong
The scoring machinery is documented with rare candour: scorecard questions answered from the transcript, AI answers shown with the snippets they rest on, questions testable against a real call, and an admission that the AI has a bias to answer yes. Access is governed by permission profiles and an admin can turn automatic review off — but employees are scored as call hosts by default, scores reach back 90 days retroactively, and I found no public information on team-level aggregation limits, named model providers, or material aimed at a works council agreement.
Modjo
Every conversation is analyzed and scored against sales playbooks, and the data processing agreement states AI features "are an integral part of the product and cannot be deactivated", naming Microsoft, OpenAI and Google as subcontractors — so there is no admin off-switch at all. Credit where due: the compliance article puts AI Call Scoring in GDPR terms, says the score is attributed to the call and not the employee and assesses whether predefined elements were mentioned, default visibility is restricted and further restrictable, and AI processing is stated to be hosted exclusively within the EU. We found no public information on team-level aggregation of seller metrics, whether customer data is excluded from model training by default, or AI outputs shown with their sources.
CRM, workplace integrations & exit
Gong
Two-way native integration with Salesforce, HubSpot and Dynamics: CRM data imported, calls and emails exported back as objects, imported fields editable in Gong and synced back, and conversations searchable by CRM fields — plus an Outlook add-in, a Chrome extension and an integration directory spanning fourteen categories. The terms commit to export of all customer data, including recorded calls, within 30 days of termination. Only one CRM can be connected at a time, and I found no public information on SCIM provisioning or a documented REST API with webhooks.
Modjo
SCIM 2.0 provisioning is documented across seven identity providers covering creation, updates and deactivation, and Modjo embeds inside Salesforce and HubSpot with automatic updates to any native or custom object — genuinely deep integration work made public, alongside named APIs, webhooks, MCP and a Chrome extension. We found no public information on a SAML single sign-on statement, e-signature or CPQ connectors, or bulk export of the library and analytics. Exit rests on the data processing agreement's thirty-day window to request recordings back "in a raw file format" before destruction, and SCIM itself requires a plan whose availability is confirmed with an account manager.
European sovereignty
Gong
A data processing agreement exists, the German homepage states a data center in the EU, and Prighter Group serves as privacy representative for the EU and UK. But the provider entity is American under an Israeli parent, the privacy policy places processing in the United States, Europe, Israel and other locations, and California law governs with exclusive venue in San Francisco. I found no public information on the subprocessors — including where transcription and AI actually run — or on EU residency for customer content beyond the homepage badge.
Modjo
The contracting entity is French — RINGO trading as MODJO, registered office in Neuilly-sur-Seine — hosting is Amazon Web Services in France, and the Article 28 data processing agreement covering recordings and emails states all data under it is hosted exclusively within the EU, with standard contractual clauses or BCRs for transfers and a subprocessor list published on the trust center. The ceiling is the AI chain: Microsoft, OpenAI and Google are US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act regardless of where the servers sit, and ownership is not shown, so the end-to-end-European level is not reachable on this evidence.
Pricing transparency
Gong
The pricing page discloses structure only: licenses priced per user, a platform fee based on the number of users supported, and team-size bands from 1–50 up to 10,000+. No price figure appears on the captured pages; the terms place all fees on the Order Form, subscriptions auto-renew for one-year periods unless cancelled 60 days ahead, and payment obligations are noncancelable with fees non-refundable.
Modjo
A Pricing link exists in the site navigation, but we found no price figures on any page we read — no per-seat price, no seat types or minimums, no module or add-on prices, no term or platform fee. The only pricing signal captured is that SCIM provisioning "requires a SCIM-enabled plan" whose availability buyers confirm with their account manager, which points the real numbers to a sales conversation.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
Gong
Modjo
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Ownership
Foreign-controlled
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
US CLOUD Act reach
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Modjo higher: 2.5/5 against 2/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is Gong or Modjo European?
Gong is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Modjo’s provenance is not proven by its pages as captured. Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.
Where do Gong and Modjo store customer data?
Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Gong: Default not stated; pages mention United States, Europe and Israel. Modjo: Default not stated; pages mention France and Europe.