As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Gong 2/5 and Modjo 2.5/5 in Sales Enablement. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Gong scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms and Analytics, AI & seller monitoring). Modjo scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (European sovereignty, Onboarding, training & coaching and Sales content management). Provenance — Gong: Rest of world. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Gong and Modjo split this bench. Modjo is ahead on coaching and readiness (6.5 vs 4.0; six judges lean its way) and sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2; six judges lean its way), with attributes reading French legal-entity jurisdiction and EU-only data residency — though its data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act. Gong is ahead on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2; six judges), analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7; five judges to one), and pricing transparency (1.8 vs 1.0; five judges), though neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in verdicts. CRM and integrations sits even at 6.2 apiece: four ties, one lean each way. Weighted totals divide: two judges place Gong ahead (3.9 vs 3.8 and 4.6 vs 4.4), three place Modjo ahead (3.5 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 4.6, 4.1 vs 6.1); one judge's totals are not shown.
Choose Gong if
You need buyer-facing engagement such as digital sales rooms and mutual action plans; six judges lean Gong on buyer engagement (3.2 vs 0.2), and the Modjo verdict found no public information on digital sales rooms or mutual action plans.
Your managers score and monitor calls; five judges lean Gong on analytics and monitoring (5.5 vs 4.7), with transcript-based AI scoring, visible answer snippets and scorecards reaching back 90 days documented in the verdict.
A head of sales is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 3.9 to 3.8.
A CRM integrator is leading the purchase; that judge's weighted total favors Gong, 4.6 to 4.4.
You compare vendors on pricing transparency; five judges lean Gong (1.8 vs 1.0), while neither vendor publishes prices and pricing is not weighted in the verdicts.
Choose Modjo if
Coaching and readiness is your priority; six judges lean Modjo (6.5 vs 4.0).
Your data must remain in the EU; Modjo's data residency attribute reads EU-only and its legal-entity jurisdiction reads France, and six judges lean Modjo on sovereignty (7.2 vs 4.2).
You are vetting subprocessors; the data processing agreement names AI subcontractors Microsoft, OpenAI and Google, US-headquartered companies subject to the CLOUD Act, and the subprocessor exposure attribute reads US CLOUD Act exposure — weigh that against the six-judge sovereignty lean toward Modjo.
Your content need is a recorded-call library rather than decks or collateral; five judges lean Modjo on content management (2.7 vs 1.3), and Gong's verdict found no public information on a native library, versioning or approvals.
A data protection officer or a skeptic is leading the purchase; those judges' weighted totals favor Modjo, 4.6 to 4.1 and 6.1 to 4.1.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Product Marketer
Writes the decks and wants the old ones gone. Wants versioning that replaces a superseded slide everywhere it was shared, approval before a claim goes out, brand-locked templates sellers can personalise within limits, and usage per asset so content nobody sends can be retired.
Gong
Modjo
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Sales content management
Gong
The captured pages describe a revenue intelligence platform whose content story is a directory of fifteen third-party connectors — Highspot, Seismic, Showpad and others — rather than a library of its own. We found no public information on versioning, expiry, approval before publishing, brand-locked templates or usage per asset.
Modjo
There is a real central library here — a categorised directory of best calls, organised by key topics, sales stages and objection handling, open to the whole team and used to onboard new hires a week before their start date. But it is an archive of recorded conversations, not of decks and collateral, and we found no public information on search, versioning or expiry, approval before publishing, brand-locked templates, or usage per asset.
Buyer engagement & digital sales rooms
Gong
Buyer-facing engagement rests on email open and link-click tracking via an invisible pixel and redirect URLs, surfaced in Engage and the mailbox extensions, with unusually detailed documentation of its limits and false positives. Digital sales rooms appear only as integrations with third-party microsite tools, and we found no public information on a recipient notice, a consent step, or a per-room tracking switch.
Modjo
We found no public information on digital sales rooms, mutual action plans, proposals or buyer-facing trackable links. The pages we read — the homepage module list and the coaching and library pages — describe conversation capture, scoring, library and CRM workflows rather than a shared space with the customer.
Onboarding, training & coaching
Gong
Gong Academy offers courses with a recording-and-consent course required before live training, proctored tests for test-takers, and AI scorecards deliver scored feedback on real calls behind permission profiles. We found no public information on role-play practice, certifications, or consent configurable per country with external participants able to decline.
Modjo
Onboarding runs through the call library — folders organised by topics, sales stages and objection handling, with new hires granted access a week before their start date — and managers get coaching insights while reps get a post-call self-assessment. The consent machinery is unusually well documented: an opt-in page before the meeting, recording that stops when a participant declines, logged decisions that are audit-traceable and exportable as CSV. We found no public information on courses, certifications or role-play practice, and consent has structural limits — one meeting provider only (Google Meet or Teams, not Zoom), and none can be collected when the invite was sent from the client side.
Analytics, AI & seller monitoring
Gong
The AI Call Reviewer is documented down to its input (the call transcript), answer snippets visible to the scorer, questions testable against a real call, a disclosed yes-bias, and a published model update, while automatic review can be switched off at company level and access to scores is permission-gated. We found no public information naming the model provider or subprocessors, on excluding customer data from model training, or on team-level aggregation for a works council.
Modjo
The scoring story is documented more carefully than most: the score is an objective assessment of predefined elements attributed to the call rather than the employee, visible by default only to participants and managers, run on transcripts only, with AI subcontractors named (Microsoft, OpenAI and Google) and AI data stated to be hosted exclusively within the EU. What caps it is the data processing agreement's own words that AI features "cannot be deactivated" — for a system that scores what was said in every call, the absence of an admin switch is the first thing a works council will ask about.
CRM, workplace integrations & exit
Gong
Native, two-way integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics (one CRM at a time) write calls, emails and activities back to the record, CRM fields are searchable in Gong and configurable as variables, and an Outlook add-in and Chrome extension put engagement in the mailbox. Exit is covered by a 30-day post-termination export that includes recorded calls; we found no public information on single sign-on or provisioning specifics, or on webhooks.
Modjo
Modjo sits inside Salesforce and HubSpot with automatic sync that updates any native or custom object or field, connects to phone, video, email and calendar, and exposes APIs, MCP, webhooks and a Chrome extension; SCIM 2.0 provisioning is documented in detail down to the supported identity providers. Exit is thinner: after termination the client has thirty days to request its recordings back in raw file format, and we found no public information on bulk export of the library or analytics, or on SAML single sign-on.
European sovereignty
Gong
The provider is Gong.io Inc. under California law with an Israeli parent, a data processing agreement exists and prevails over the terms, and a European privacy representative is appointed; the privacy policy lists processing in the United States, Europe and Israel. No subprocessor list is published, and the captured pages leave where customer data sits unconfirmed beyond a German marketing claim of an EU data centre.
Modjo
The contracting entity is French (RINGO trading as Modjo, registered in Nanterre), hosting is on Amazon Web Services in France with AI data stated to be hosted exclusively within the EU, a GDPR data processing agreement covers the recordings, and a subprocessor list is published naming the AI providers. It stays below the top levels because ownership is not shown, we found no public information on per-subprocessor locations, and the named AI subcontractors — Microsoft, OpenAI and Google — are US-headquartered companies subject to the US CLOUD Act regardless of where the servers sit.
Pricing transparency
Gong
The public pricing page names per-user licensing, a platform fee scaled to the number of users supported, and four team-size bands, but publishes no per-seat or platform figures. Fees are set on the order form, with one-year auto-renewal on 60 days' notice, noncancelable and non-refundable payments, and VAT invoiced by Gong unless a valid exemption certificate is provided.
Modjo
A pricing page appears in the site navigation, but we found no public information on actual prices — no per-seat figure, tier price, billing period, minimum term or module price — and even which plans include SCIM provisioning is to be confirmed with the account manager. A buyer cannot compute an annual cost from anything we read.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
Gong
Modjo
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Ownership
Foreign-controlled
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
US CLOUD Act reach
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Modjo higher: 2.5/5 against 2/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick Gong and 4 pick Modjo. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is Gong or Modjo European?
Gong is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Modjo’s provenance is not proven by its pages as captured. Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.
Where do Gong and Modjo store customer data?
Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Gong: Default not stated; pages mention United States, Europe and Israel. Modjo: Default not stated; pages mention France and Europe.