whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Teamgate

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Teamgate · teamgate.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Teamgate: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Teamgate: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Teamgate at a glance

Vendor
Teamgate
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Teamgate 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Teamgate is a CRM whose strongest scoring is on data portability, alongside contact management, sales pipeline and integrations: the captured pages document self-serve CSV export for companies, people and deals, activities, meetings and calls from the Organizer, files from the Files section, custom fields across leads, people, companies, deals and products with mapping on lead conversion, a forecast that multiplies deal value by stage win probability across weekly, monthly or quarterly intervals, and 22 native integrations plus Zapier and an API token. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

Teamgate alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows a CRM is a database of other people's personal data before it is a sales tool. Optimizes for GDPR posture: EU hosting, DPA, subprocessor hygiene, consent fields, retention and deletion that actually delete. Rejects US-default hosting and enrichment features that scrape contacts from the open web.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Panel median The Data Protection Officer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Data Protection Officer
Contact & data model 2 of 5 2 of 5
Pipeline & forecasting 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Automation & workflows 1 of 5 0.5 of 5
Integrations & API 2 of 5 2.5 of 5
European sovereignty 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5
Import, export & exit 3 of 5 3 of 5

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Custom fields span leads, people, companies, deals and products with select, multi-select, checkbox and date types, copy between sections and mapping on lead conversion, and activities are tracked against each lead, contact and deal. We found no public information on deduplication, required-field validation, record merge or field-level permissions, so I cannot credit the hygiene tooling that keeps a database of other people's personal data from rotting. 2 6

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The forecast view does real arithmetic — deal value multiplied by the stage's win probability, in weekly, monthly or quarterly intervals across all sales processes, with won revenue split from forecasted revenue and drag-and-drop between periods. We found no public information on required fields per stage, stage gates, a custom report builder, or quota and attainment tracking, which is the difference between a manager's dashboard and a forecast a finance department accepts. 1 5 6

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Beyond sending and receiving email inside the CRM and automatically setting a deal's value from assigned products' price, we found no public information on triggers, multi-step sequences, branching, or lead routing. As it stands, workflow here is manual by default, and any consent-based routing would have to be done by hand. 1 5

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Email can be sent and received inside the CRM, twenty-two native integrations cover Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft 365, Slack and the support and accounting stacks, and Zapier offers create actions and searches for companies, deals, activities, leads and people. We found no public information on two-way calendar sync, webhooks, or OAuth, and the API's rate limits are unstated, so external systems cannot yet be treated as first-class. 1 7 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

This is the criterion where I need the most and the captured pages give the least: we found no public information on where personal data is hosted, the vendor's legal entity, a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, consent fields, retention, or deletion. With nothing published, there is nothing a data protection officer can review, let alone sign, and every question a prospect asks under GDPR has to be answered by support ticket. 1 7

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Exit is self-serve and broader than most: CSV export for companies, people and deals with documented encoding and delimiter handling, activities including meetings and calls exportable from the organizer, files downloadable from the files section, an export history log, and bulk update of companies, leads and people via import. We found no public information on dedupe or dry-run on import, guided migration from other CRMs, or contractual data-return terms, and exports above 500 records arrive by email rather than direct download. 9 10

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The captured homepage shows a 14-day trial with full functionality and nothing else: we found no public information on tiers, per-seat prices, billing periods, or VAT treatment. A buyer cannot compute any invoice, at renewal or otherwise, from what is published. 1

Report an error

Questions about Teamgate

Is Teamgate European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Teamgate is based.

Where does Teamgate store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does Teamgate have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Teamgate?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Teamgate alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Teamgate? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →