whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Teamgate

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Teamgate · teamgate.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Teamgate: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Teamgate: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Teamgate at a glance

Vendor
Teamgate
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Teamgate 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Teamgate is a CRM whose strongest scoring is on data portability, alongside contact management, sales pipeline and integrations: the captured pages document self-serve CSV export for companies, people and deals, activities, meetings and calls from the Organizer, files from the Files section, custom fields across leads, people, companies, deals and products with mapping on lead conversion, a forecast that multiplies deal value by stage win probability across weekly, monthly or quarterly intervals, and 22 native integrations plus Zapier and an API token. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

Teamgate alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The RevOps Integrator

Weighted verdict

Treats the CRM as one system in a revenue stack. Optimizes for two-way email and calendar sync, a real API with webhooks, and native connections to the tools money already flows through. Rejects closed ecosystems and integrations that are one-way imports in disguise.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The RevOps Integrator

Panel median The RevOps Integrator This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The RevOps Integrator
Contact & data model 2 of 5 2 of 5
Pipeline & forecasting 2.5 of 5 2 of 5
Automation & workflows 1 of 5 1 of 5
Integrations & API 2 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5
Import, export & exit 3 of 5 2 of 5

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Leads, People, Companies, Deals and Products exist as related sections, and custom fields stretch across all five with conversion mapping and copy-between-sections support, plus activity history on the records. We found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or field-level permissions, which caps the model short of the rich end. 2 6

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Weighted forecasting is real and documented: deal value multiplied by stage win probability across weekly, monthly and quarterly intervals covering every sales process, with drag-to-reschedule and a pop-up splitting won revenue from forecasted revenue. We found no public information on required fields per stage, stage gates, win/loss reasons, quota tracking or a custom report builder, so the process is guided rather than enforced and the reporting leans on canned Insights views. 1 5 6

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

We found no public information on native workflows, triggers, sequences, branching or lead routing — the captured structure and workflow pages describe sections and activity planning, not automation. The only automation on record is Zapier, and the documented actions and searches cover record creation and lookup only, with no Teamgate-side triggering of anything outbound. 6 8

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Email can be sent and received from inside the CRM via Gmail, Outlook and Microsoft 365, and the 22-item native directory reaches the money stack with QuickBooks, Xero, MailChimp and Intercom, with an API token and an open invitation to build apps. We found no public information on two-way calendar sync, webhooks, OAuth apps or documented API limits, and the Zapier connection is create-and-search only — useful glue for writing data in, but not yet a first-class ecosystem. 1 7 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

The captured vendor pages record nothing on legal entity, hosting region, DPA, subprocessors or GDPR posture — we found no public information on any question a European buyer's DPO would ask. With nothing published to review, this is effectively the weakest footing available, tempered only by the fact that a US entity is likewise unconfirmed. 1

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Exit is genuinely documented: CSV export for Companies, People and Deals with delimiter and encoding spelled out step by step, activities, meetings and calls exportable from the Organizer, files downloadable from the Files section, and bulk update of Companies, Leads and People via import. Import guidance covers QuickBooks and Xero customer lists, but we found no public information on dedupe or dry-run on import or on preserving relations and notes intact, so leaving is achievable with effort rather than a weekend. 9 10

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

The only commercial fact published is a 14-day full-functionality trial; we found no public information on tier prices, per-seat costs, billing periods, VAT treatment or renewal rules. A buyer cannot compute any invoice from the captured pages, which places every price into a sales conversation. 1

Report an error

Questions about Teamgate

Is Teamgate European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Teamgate is based.

Where does Teamgate store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does Teamgate have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Teamgate?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Teamgate alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Teamgate? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.teamgate.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →