CRM

Twenty

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Twenty (open source) · twenty.com

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The Solo Seller v1.2 · The Data Protection Officer v1.0 · The Sales Ops Lead v1.0 · The RevOps Integrator v1.0 · The Migrator v1.1 · The Skeptic v1.2 · rubric v1 · evaluated 15 Sep 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Assumes the pricing page is the nicest thing the vendor will ever say. Hunts per-seat maths that explode at renewal, "unlimited" with footnotes, AI features priced by credits, dead changelogs and acquisition rumours. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The homepage's 'building blocks for a custom CRM' is a pitch, not a data model — the registry confirms nothing about objects, field types, validation, dedupe or merge. I can assume contacts exist because it's called a CRM; nothing else survives scrutiny. 1

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Total silence on pipelines, stages, required fields, forecasts or reporting — not even a kanban with amounts is evidenced, only that a CRM-shaped product exists. No finance department signs anything on this sheet. 1

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Skeptic

No triggers, sequences, routing, workflows — not even an email template — anywhere in the registry. 1 2

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The only data path on record is CSV: no two-way email or calendar sync, no native directory, no API, no webhooks in the captured facts. Open-source positioning hints at extensibility, but a sheet that can't name a single integration earns near-floor. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The evidence carries 'no sovereignty attributes on record' — no DPA, no subprocessor list, no hosting region for the cloud product — and the provenance itself flags that the Paris story may cover a US-inc'd, YC-backed entity. Self-hosting is the one honest lever that puts data on your own infra; the SaaS default is an undocumented black box. 1 2

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Skeptic

CSV import and export self-serve on every plan plus a self-hosting option is genuinely better exit posture than most vendors offer, and 'building blocks' suggests a technical audience. But nothing evidences that export covers activities, notes, files or relations, nor any migration tooling or API extract — completeness is unproven, so it lands short of rubric level 5. 1 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Pro at $9/user/month and Organization at $19/user/month with the -25% yearly split, unlimited seats and a no-credit-card trial make the self-serve invoice genuinely computable — credit where due. But VAT treatment is unstated, self-hosting's price or licence never appears, and the ladder falls off a cliff from $19/user to 'Enterprise from $50k/year', leaving everything in between a custom conversation. 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

2 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Incorporated in US	0/3 pts	3 Report an error
Ownership	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data residency	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Subprocessors	US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified	0/2 pts	4 Report an error

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. The excerpt names only the “primary” subprocessors and points to a fuller Trust Center list that was not captured, and no server regions are given for these US-headquartered providers.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

66 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
19 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
15 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
4 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Twenty? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage twenty.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
2 Vendor pricing page twenty.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
3 Terms of service twenty.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
4 Privacy policy twenty.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
5 Contact & data model — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
6 Contact & data model — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
8 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
9 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
12 Integrations & API — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
13 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap docs.twenty.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →