Zoho Forms

The Academic Researcher

A no-code drag-and-drop builder with over 200 templates, multi-page and card formats, calculations, custom CSS and genuinely advanced conditional logic (field rules, page skip rules, conditional option filtering, nested conditions, dynamic field-to-field comparison) is documented. For my questionnaire work, though, I found no public information on question-order randomisation, piping, hidden fields, survey translation from one master, reusable question libraries or a named accessibility standard — randomisation alone is a hard requirement for my designs, and this caps an otherwise strong builder. 1 2 8 9

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

Links, embedding and social sharing, payments inside the form, signatures, offline and kiosk collection, multi-level approval routing with delegation, proxy and one-click decisions, conditional email and SMS notifications, task assignment and webhooks on every plan including the free tier are all documented, alongside Zapier and 150-plus app integrations. I found no public information on managed invitation lists with unique links and reminder schedules, response quotas with closing rules, or a documented REST API to read and write responses — reminders matter for response rates, so this stays below the research-scale collection level. 2 9 10 11

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

Custom reports shared with the team, analytics with trends, a table view with custom filters, and exports to CSV and PDF — optionally password-protected, with encrypted fields masked — are documented. The export story stops at CSV and PDF: I found no public information on cross-tabulation, significance testing, weighting, standard scores such as NPS, or SPSS and R exports with labels intact, which is precisely what my statistical pipeline requires, so everything would be re-coded by hand. 2 9 12

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

A data processing agreement on request, a named data protection officer at Zoho Corporation B.V. in Utrecht, a conducted impact assessment, 72-hour breach notification, TLS 1.2/1.3 and AES-256, per-form encryption with an access code even admins must supply, masking of encrypted fields on export, no third-party tracking cookies by default and a published catalogue of technical and organisational measures are all documented. For my ethics submissions the gaps are concrete: automatic submission deletion is documented only on the top paid plan, and I found no public information on an anonymous mode that does not store IP addresses or a built-in consent page as part of the instrument. 3 4 5 6 14

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

The German product page states that data is stored in a data centre within the EU, and team collaboration with permissions, custom domains, removal of the vendor footer on paid plans, SAML single sign-on, multi-factor authentication and audit logs are documented, with responses exportable to CSV and PDF. I found no public information on selecting an EU-only region per account, a self-hosted edition, user provisioning or a documented migration path in and out; also, the privacy policy describes processing in the USA, the EEA and other countries, so the captured pages give different pictures of where data runs. 1 2 5 12

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

An EU data centre is claimed on the German homepage, an EU contact and data protection officer exist at Zoho Corporation B.V. in Utrecht, a DPA is available on request, and intra-group transfers are covered by EU standard contractual clauses. But the parent company sits in Chennai, no subprocessor list with locations is published (only that subprocessors were assessed), certifications are described only generically as industry standards, and the privacy policy itself describes processing in the USA, the EEA and other countries — the captured pages give different pictures of where personal data ends up, which is what an ethics board will press me on. 1 4 5 6

Report an error

The Academic Researcher

The free tier and every paid plan are documented with user counts, monthly submission limits and file storage, together with which features sit on which plan (approvals from the second tier up, HIPAA compliance, SMTP and automatic deletion only on the top plan), VAT added on top of the listed prices, card-only payment for terms under a year, a seven-day non-renewal notice and the loss of trial data unless exported or upgraded. I found no public information on add-on prices or what happens above the monthly submission limits, so the faculty's true annual cost is not fully computable from the public pages I read. 3 7

Report an error