Learning Management (LMS)
Easy LMS
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Easy LMS B.V. · www.easy-lms.com
Compare with TalentLMS → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Easy LMS at a glance
- Vendor
- Easy LMS B.V.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Easy LMS 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Easy LMS is a learning management system from Easy LMS B.V. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Easy LMS is a learning management system from Easy LMS B.V. of Delft built around slide-based courses, exams and customer academies. Sovereignty is the standout, scored 8 with the lowest and highest scores both 8: a Dutch contracting entity, hosting on AWS with servers and databases physically in Frankfurt, four subprocessors listed in Germany, Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands, a published data processing agreement under Dutch law, and ISO 27001 certification held since 2024. Onboarding and academies follow at 5-6, with as many branded academies as needed, per-academy administrator access levels and results kept separate per customer. Integration and portability is the weak point at 2-3, where one judge scored 2 and ruled the product out for a company of 2,000 employees until proven otherwise. Compliance training split 3-4, one judge calling the compliance use sketched rather than evidenced; pricing transparency split 5-6, the lower scores stressing that the annual cost of a multi-academy setup is not computable from public pages. We found no public information on an unalterable audit trail, versioning or manager escalation.
Speaks for it
- Sovereignty scored 8, resting on a Dutch contracting entity in Delft, AWS hosting with servers and databases physically in Frankfurt, four listed subprocessors — AWS in Germany, Intercom in Ireland, MailerSend in Belgium, Verifalia in the Netherlands — a published data processing agreement under Dutch law, ISO 27001 certification held since 2024, and a stated position that no personal data is transferred outside the EEA.
- Onboarding and academies scored 5-6, with as many white-label academies as needed, each with a custom URL, per-academy administrator access levels, content duplicated across customers, and results kept separate per academy with real-time customer access.
- Courses and content scored 4, covering a slide-based builder with text, image, video, audio, PDFs and SCORM import up to 5GB, learning paths that control the order of course completions, and certificates carrying validity, expiry and a unique number.
- Both tiers are publicly priced — Basic "€ 70 per month" and Advanced "€ 200 per month" as a flat fee with unlimited participants — with a 14-day free trial, free onboarding and "2 months free on plans billed yearly".
- Reports show completions, pass/fail rates, scores, per-question answer percentages and time per slide, with progress reports per group, reminders to participants falling behind and Excel export.
Held against it
- Integration and portability scored 2-3, the lowest area on the bench, with no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a REST API, webhooks or any named HR-system connector.
- We found no public information on rule-based assignment by role or legal entity, due dates with manager escalation, attestations, course versioning or an unalterable audit trail — what auditors ask for.
- We found no public information on a mobile app, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility conformance, or content standards beyond SCORM such as xAPI, cmi5 or LTI.
- Extra academies, admin seats and storage go through a custom offer — the pages say "Request custom pricing" — and we found no public information on what happens above the caps of 3,000 and 10,000 exams or courses started per month, so the cost of a scaled setup is not computable from public pages.
- Time is tracked per slide with no public information on a switch to turn it off, and we found no public information on aggregated or pseudonymised reporting or works-council material.
Best for
- You train customers, franchisees or partners and need as many white-branded academies as needed, each with its own custom URL, its own administrators and results kept separate — the bench's strongest functional area at 5-6.
- You need a documented European chain for learner data — a Dutch contracting entity, AWS servers and databases physically in Frankfurt, four listed EU subprocessors and a published data processing agreement.
- Your training is self-paced slide-based courses and exams that fit inside the stated monthly caps of 3,000 or 10,000 exams or courses started, at the published flat fee with unlimited participants.
Avoid if
- You depend on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a documented API, webhooks or sync with your HR system — integration and portability scored 2-3 and we found no public information on any of these.
- You must evidence mandatory training to an auditor with rule-based assignment, due dates, manager escalation and an unalterable audit trail — we found no public information on any of these.
- Your learners need a mobile app, courses and interface in several languages, or a content standard beyond SCORM such as xAPI, cmi5 or LTI.
- You must budget a large multi-academy setup up front — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Courses, learning paths & content standards | 2 of 5 |
| Compliance training, recertification & audit trail | 2 of 5 |
| Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies | 2.5 of 5 |
| Reporting, learner data & works council | 2 of 5 |
| Integrations, administration & portability | 1.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 4 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Courses, learning paths & content standards
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.
0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.
3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.
5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.
8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.
10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.
The Onboarding Lead
A slide-based course builder with video, audio, PDFs and SCORM upload up to 5GB, learning paths with strategically controlled course order, question import from Excel and automatic customisable certificates are all documented. Beyond that, we found no public information on instructor-led or virtual sessions, a mobile app, accessibility conformance, or courses and interface in several languages — and I need German, Czech and English across three plants. 1 3 6 11 15
The Compliance Officer
A slide-based course builder with text, image, video, audio, presentations, PDFs and SCORM import up to 5GB, exams with question categories, automatic certificates with rich customisation, and learning paths where the order of course completion is controlled are all documented. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI, an offline mobile app, a multilingual interface, accessibility conformance or AI-assisted authoring on the captured pages, which keeps this below the fuller content-standard level. 1 3 6 11 15
The Customer Education Lead
The slide-based builder with video, images, audio, PDFs, practice questions and question categories, SCORM upload up to 5GB, learning paths that control the order of course completions, and certificates with validity periods and unique numbers cover most of what I need to build partner training. We found no public information on instructor-led or virtual sessions, a mobile app, multilingual courses and interface, WCAG conformance, or anything beyond SCORM such as xAPI, cmi5 or LTI. 1 3 5 6 11 15
The Works Council Member
Slide-based courses with text, image, video and audio, SCORM import up to 5GB, learning paths that control the order of course completions, and custom certificates with expiry, validity and a unique number are documented. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI, a mobile app or offline access, multilingual courses, accessibility, or AI-assisted authoring, so the evidence sits between the basic and mid levels. 1 3 5 6 11 15
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The slide-based builder covers text, image, video, audio, presentations, PDFs and SCORM packages up to 5GB, with question categories, Excel question import, automatic grading and custom certificates carrying validity periods; learning paths let me control the order of course completions. We found no public information on instructor-led or virtual sessions, a mobile app, courses and interface in several languages, or standards beyond SCORM such as xAPI, cmi5 or LTI, so this sits below what I would call a full course platform. 1 3 6 11 15
The Skeptic
A real slide-based course builder with images, video, audio, PDFs and SCORM packages up to 5GB, learning paths with controlled course order, auto-graded exams and certificates carrying issue date, validity and expiry. The captured pages stop at SCORM: we found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI, multilingual interface and courses, WCAG conformance, AI authoring, or a mobile app — the terms describe modern browsers only. 3 6 11 15 8
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.
0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.
3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.
5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.
8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).
10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.
The Onboarding Lead
Compliance training and yearly renewals are named use cases, certificates can carry expiration dates, validity and a unique number against fraud, and pass/fail, completion and certificate status are reported with an Excel export. The pages show reminders sent manually to participants falling behind, and we found no public information on assignment by role, department or location, due dates, escalation to managers, attestations, or an audit trail showing who completed which version. 3 5 11
The Compliance Officer
Compliance training and yearly renewals are named use cases, certificates carry issue date, validity and a unique number to prevent fraud, reminders can be sent to participants who are behind, and detailed data is exportable to Excel. We found no public information on rule-based assignment by role or legal entity, due dates, escalation to the manager, course versioning recording who completed which version, or an unalterable audit trail — precisely the evidence our last BaFin audit asked for and that took us a week to assemble by hand. 3 5 11
The Customer Education Lead
Compliance use is sketched rather than evidenced: a line about tools for compliance training and yearly renewals, certificates with or without expiration dates, and progress reports with reminders to participants who are behind. We found no public information on due dates, assignment by role or department, escalation to managers, attestations, course versioning or an audit trail. 3 5 11
The Works Council Member
Compliance training and yearly renewals are a stated use, certificates carry expiration dates and a unique number to prevent fraud, and per-group progress reports, reminders to participants falling behind and Excel export are documented. We found no public information on rule-based assignment by role or legal entity, due dates with escalation to managers, course versioning, attestations, or an unalterable audit trail — which is what we would need to prove instruction obligations in an inspection. 3 5 11
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Compliance training and yearly renewals are named use cases, and certificates can carry a validity period, expiration dates and a unique number to prevent fraud, with progress reports per group, reminders to participants falling behind and Excel export. We found no public information on rule-based assignment by role, department or legal entity, due dates with escalation to the manager, policy acknowledgements, course versioning or an unalterable audit trail, which is what I would need to prove mandatory training to an auditor. 3 5 11
The Skeptic
Certificates can carry an issue date, validity period, expiry and a unique number, the vendor markets tools for compliance training and yearly renewals, group progress reports drive reminders, and report data exports to Excel. We found no public information on rule-based assignment by role or legal entity, escalation to managers, policy acknowledgements, course versioning or an audit trail, so this reads as recertification basics rather than inspection-proof evidence. 11 3 5
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.
0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.
3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.
5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.
8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.
10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.
The Onboarding Lead
The academy side is genuinely strong: as many white-label academies as needed, each with its own URL and branding, administrators assigned per academy with access levels, and courses duplicated per customer with results kept separately. Onboarding itself is a single line about automating the process with tools, instructions and checklists; we found no public information on enrollment triggered from the HR system on day one, manager and buddy tasks, self-registration, or any login path for the third of my people on shifts without a company email. 1 6 14 15 16
The Compliance Officer
Unlimited branded academies, each with its own custom URL, logo, colours and administrators at different access levels, content duplicated and reused per customer, and real-time progress views separated per academy are well documented. Onboarding appears only as automation with checklists in a marketing article, and we found no public information on HR-triggered enrolment, self-registration for external learners, login without a company email, or course sales with checkout, subscriptions and coupons. 1 6 14 15 16
The Customer Education Lead
This is the strongest area for my partner-academy problem: unlimited academies, one per customer, fully white-label with custom URLs, administrators with different access levels assigned to their own academies, content duplicated across customers with results kept separate per academy, and real-time progress access for each customer. We found no public information on self-registration or single sign-on for external learners, checkout or invoicing for paid courses (the terms only permit offering content for a fee), or onboarding triggered from an HR system. 1 6 8 15 16
The Works Council Member
The extended-enterprise side is well evidenced: as many branded academies as needed, one per customer, administrators assigned to their own academies, white-label portals with custom URL, and results clearly separated per academy with real-time access for the customer. Onboarding appears only as one line about automating the process with step-by-step instructions and checklists; we found no public information on HR-triggered enrolment, manager tasks, self-registration, login without company email, or course sales with checkout. 1 8 14 15 16
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Multiple branded academies — one per customer, franchisee or organisation, each with its own URL, administrators with per-academy permissions and duplicated content — plus separated results with real-time customer access are well documented and can be added as needed. We found no public information on self-registration for external learners or course checkout with payment (only a contractual permission to charge participants a fee), and onboarding automation appears solely as a knowledge-centre mention of tools, step-by-step instructions and checklists. 1 6 8 14 15 16
The Skeptic
The academy story is documented in depth: as many customer-branded portals as needed with custom URLs, per-academy administrator access levels, content duplicated across customers, and results kept separate per academy so each customer sees only their own participants' progress in real time. We found no public information on onboarding triggered from an HR system, self-registration for externals, frontline login without email, or a built-in checkout — the terms permit charging participants a fee, and we found no public information on built-in payment handling, subscriptions or coupons. 15 16 1 6 8
Reporting, learner data & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.
0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.
3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.
5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.
10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.
The Onboarding Lead
Completion, pass/fail, scores, per-question answer statistics, time spent per course and slide, and per-group progress reports with Excel export are documented, alongside a privacy policy with retention periods and a published data processing agreement. We found no public information on scheduled or custom reports, manager visibility restricted to the manager's own team, switching off time tracking, or any material for a works council — and with 1,400 employees in Germany I cannot take codetermination on trust. 3 5 9 10 15
The Compliance Officer
Per-course and per-exam statistics showing who completed, pass/fail rates, scores, certificate status and even time spent per slide, group progress reports, and export to Excel are documented, and the privacy policy states retention periods for account data and correspondence. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery, manager visibility restricted to their own team, switching off time or score tracking, deletion configurable by the customer, or works council material such as a works agreement template. 3 5 9
The Customer Education Lead
Per-course and per-exam statistics — completions, pass/fail, scores, answer percentages by question and category — plus group progress reports, unlimited reports with Excel export and time-per-slide tracking give a usable picture of what is recorded per learner. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery, roles limiting managers to their own team, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, configurable retention and deletion, a learner data export, or works-council material; the retention periods stated are the vendor's own. 3 5 8 9 18
The Works Council Member
The pages describe exactly what a works council must assess before go-live: per-person completions, pass/fail rates, scores, answers per question and category, and how long each participant engages with each slide — and we found no public information on a switch to turn time tracking or scoring off, on aggregated or pseudonymised reports, on customer-configurable deletion, or on a works-agreement template, DPIA or codetermination guide. A data processing agreement exists and admin access levels are set per academy, but nothing here lets us draft a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG from public pages. 3 5 6 8 9 10 15
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Per-course and per-exam statistics show completion, pass/fail rates, scores, certificate status and answer percentages, the progress report per group drives reminders, everything exports to Excel, and time spent per slide is tracked. Retention terms are stated in the privacy policy, customer control over stored data is described and a data processing agreement is published, but we found no public information on scheduled delivery, manager visibility restricted to their own team, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, switching off time tracking, or any works-council or codetermination material I would need for a works agreement. 3 5 9 10 18
The Skeptic
Reports are concrete: per-course completion, pass/fail and certificate status, per-exam scores with per-question answer rates, group progress with reminders, Excel export, and time tracked per slide — which a works council will ask about. We found no public information on scheduled delivery, on manager visibility restricted to a team beyond admin access levels, on switching off time tracking, or on any codetermination material; the retention figures come from the vendor's own privacy policy rather than customer-configurable rules. 5 3 9 6
Integrations, administration & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.
0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.
3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.
5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.
8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.
10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.
The Onboarding Lead
Reports export to Excel, questions import from Excel, ownership of content stays with the customer, and after termination there is a ten-day request window and a three-day access period to extract and delete content. We found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a REST API, webhooks, Microsoft Teams, or any connector to an HR system such as Personio or SAP SuccessFactors — so I cannot confirm the day-one enrollment from HR that I need for 200 hires a year. 5 6 8
The Compliance Officer
The captured pages show export of detailed report data to Excel, customer ownership of created content, and a post-termination window of three days to extract and delete content after an account is blocked. We found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a REST API or webhooks, connectors to HR systems, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing, or export of courses as SCORM packages; the terms state the service is hosted on the vendor's own servers, with no self-hosted edition. 5 8
The Customer Education Lead
The captured pages show report export to Excel, question import from Excel, customer ownership of content, and a post-termination window of three days to extract and delete content. We found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a REST API or webhooks, HR-system or CRM connectors, or export of courses as SCORM — the exact integration points a product-embedded academy depends on. 5 6 8
The Works Council Member
We found no public information on single sign-on, a REST API, webhooks, SCIM provisioning, or sync with any HR system — for a company of 2,000 employees that alone rules the product out until proven otherwise. Documented are report export to Excel, import of SCORM packages and Excel questions, two-factor authentication, and a narrow exit window: request within ten days after blocking with all fees paid, then three days of access to extract and delete the content. 3 5 6 8
The IT & HR Systems Admin
From my Microsoft 365, Entra ID and Personio perspective this is the weak point: we found no public information on SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, an HR-system connector, a Teams or Slack integration, or a documented API with webhooks. Documented portability is SCORM import up to 5GB, Excel question import, Excel report export, customer ownership of content, and a contractual right to extract and delete content in a three-day window after the account is blocked — the service itself runs on servers owned or used by the vendor. 1 3 5 6 8
The Skeptic
We found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, a REST API, webhooks or any named HR, Teams, Slack or CRM connector — the documented surface is SCORM upload, Excel question import and Excel report export. The terms do say you own your content and, if the account is blocked, grant a ten-day request window and a three-day access period to extract and delete content, conditional on all fees being paid. 6 3 5 8
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Onboarding Lead
Easy LMS B.V. of Delft is the contracting entity and processor, hosting runs on Amazon Web Services with servers and databases physically in Frankfurt, and the published data processing agreement lists every subprocessor with a location — AWS in Germany, Intercom in Ireland, MailerSend in Belgium, Verifalia in the Netherlands. ISO 27001 certification is stated and the privacy policy says no personal data is transferred outside the EEA; the certification's scope is not published and no parent or ownership chain is stated, which holds it a step short of the fullest documented sovereignty. 7 9 10 17 18
The Compliance Officer
The contracting entity is Easy LMS B.V. in Delft, servers and databases run on AWS physically located in Frankfurt, the published data processing agreement lists four subprocessors with their locations (AWS Germany, Intercom Ireland, MailerSend Belgium, Verifalia Netherlands) under Dutch governing law, and the vendor states GDPR compliance and ISO 27001 certification held since 2024, with a downloadable certificate. Every link in the documented chain sits inside the EEA; the captured pages do not show the certification's scope, so I stop just short of the top level. 7 9 10 17
The Customer Education Lead
A Dutch contracting entity in Delft, hosting on AWS in Frankfurt, a published data processing agreement under Dutch law listing four subprocessors by purpose and location — all inside the EU — a stated position of not transferring personal data outside the EEA, and ISO 27001 certification stated since 2024. Certification scope and the ownership structure are not published on the captured pages, so this is a fully European hosted chain but not documented end to end. 7 9 10 17 18
The Works Council Member
This is the strong side: a Dutch contracting entity, hosting on AWS with servers and databases physically located in Frankfurt, four subprocessors listed with locations in Germany, Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands, a published data processing agreement under Dutch law, and ISO 27001 certification. The service is vendor-hosted with no self-hosted edition, and we found no public information on the ownership chain or the certification's scope. 7 8 9 10 17
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The chain is European and named: Easy LMS B.V. of Delft as contracting entity and processor, hosting and email on AWS with servers in Frankfurt, and four subprocessors listed with locations — AWS in Germany, Intercom in Ireland, MailerSend in Belgium, Verifalia in the Netherlands — alongside a published data processing agreement, a statement that no personal data is transferred outside the EEA, and GDPR compliance plus ISO 27001 certification with a downloadable certificate. We found no public information on the certification's scope or a parent company, which is what separates this from a fully evidenced sovereign chain. 7 9 10 17 18
The Skeptic
The chain is named end to end: Easy LMS B.V. in Delft as contracting entity and processor, servers and databases physically on AWS in Frankfurt, a published data processing agreement listing four subprocessors with locations (AWS Germany, Intercom Ireland, MailerSend Belgium, Verifalia Netherlands), and ISO 27001 held since 2024 with a downloadable certificate. The privacy policy states no personal data is transferred outside the EEA, anonymised data to non-EEA processors runs under model contract clauses and the payment provider sits in the Netherlands; we found no public information on ownership structure or the ISO certificate's scope. 7 10 17 9
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Onboarding Lead
Both plans are public — Basic € 70 per month and Advanced € 200 per month — as a flat fee with unlimited participants, with stated caps of 3,000 and 10,000 exams or courses started per month, 500 and 1,000 simultaneous participants, 1GB and 5GB of storage, a 14-day trial, two months free on yearly billing, free onboarding, and VAT responsibility on the customer. Beyond the single included academy and admin seat, extra academies, admins and storage go through a custom offer, so I cannot compute the annual cost of a setup with several administrators from the public pages alone. 3 6 8
The Compliance Officer
Two plans are publicly priced at "Basic € 70 per month" and "Advanced € 200 per month" as a flat fee with unlimited participants, together with monthly limits on exams and courses started, simultaneous participants, file storage, academies and admin seats, a 14-day free trial, "2 months free on plans billed yearly", VAT responsibility and the no-refund and auto-renewal terms. Additional academies or admin seats go to a custom offer on request, and what happens above the monthly limits and the price of extra storage are not stated, so the annual cost of a larger multi-academy setup cannot be computed from public pages alone. 6 8
The Customer Education Lead
Basic at € 70 per month and Advanced at € 200 per month are published with a flat fee and unlimited participants, monthly exam/course-start caps of 3,000 and 10,000, simultaneous-participant caps of 500 and 1,000, storage of 1GB and 5GB, a 14-day trial, free onboarding, two months free on yearly billing, and VAT as the customer's responsibility. But additional academies and admin seats — the two costs that drive my bill — are a custom offer on request, and extra storage is purchasable at an unstated price, so the real annual total is not computable from public pages alone. 3 6 8
The Works Council Member
Two tiers are public — Basic "€ 70 per month" and Advanced "€ 200 per month" — as a flat fee with unlimited participants, stated caps of 3,000 and 10,000 exams or courses started per month, 1GB and 5GB of storage, monthly or yearly billing with "2 months free on plans billed yearly", VAT responsibility on the customer, a 14-day free trial and free onboarding included. We found no public information on the price of additional academies, admin seats or extra storage — the pages say "Request custom pricing" — or on what happens above the caps, so our real cost across multiple locations is not computable from public pages. 1 3 6 8
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Both tiers are public — Basic at € 70 per month and Advanced at € 200 per month, flat fee with unlimited participants — with stated limits of 3,000 versus 10,000 exams or courses started per month, 500 versus 1,000 simultaneous participants, 1GB versus 5GB storage, one academy and one administrator seat included, free onboarding, a 14-day free trial and two months free on yearly billing. Extra academies or administrators require a custom offer on request, extra storage is purchasable at an unstated price, VAT is the customer's responsibility, and we found no public information on what happens above the monthly exam or course cap. 3 6 8
The Skeptic
Basic € 70 per month and Advanced € 200 per month are public, flat-fee with unlimited participants, and the real limits are printed — exams or courses started per month 3,000 versus 10,000, simultaneous participants 500 versus 1,000, storage 1GB versus 5GB — alongside a 14-day free trial, two months free on yearly billing, VAT resting on the customer and no refund on mid-term cancellation. Extra academies, admin seats and storage go through 'Request custom pricing', and we found no public information on what happens above the monthly limits, so the full annual cost of a scaled setup is not computable from public pages alone. 6 8 3
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Easy LMS
Is Easy LMS European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Easy LMS as EU-Made.
Where does Easy LMS store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.
Does Easy LMS have a free plan?
Yes. Easy LMS has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Easy LMS?
As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and LearnWorlds (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Easy LMS alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Transfer impact assessment, Legal entity, Hosting location. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 33 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (18)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (courses) www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (academy) www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (reports) www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Pricing page www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Security / trust page (GDPR and ISO 27001) www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Terms of service www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Privacy policy www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Data processing agreement (dpa) with subprocessor list www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap www.easy-lms.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →