whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Learning Management (LMS)

Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365)

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Zensai International ApS · zensai.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365): AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365): AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) at a glance

Vendor
Zensai International ApS
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Learn365, formerly LMS365, is an AI-powered learning management system built into Microsoft 365 and Teams, sold by Zensai International ApS of Copenhagen. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources

Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The IT & HR Systems Admin

Weighted verdict

Runs identity and HR systems for a 600-person engineering services firm on Microsoft 365, Entra ID and Personio. Every new tool means another set of user accounts unless it supports SAML and SCIM. Wants users and departments synced from the HR system, learning inside Teams, a documented API, completions exportable for payroll and audits, and courses that leave as SCORM packages if the contract ends.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The IT & HR Systems Admin

Panel median The IT & HR Systems Admin This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The IT & HR Systems Admin
Courses, learning paths & content standards 3 of 5 3 of 5
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail 3 of 5 3 of 5
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies 3 of 5 3 of 5
Reporting, learner data & works council 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Integrations, administration & portability 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5

Courses, learning paths & content standards

How this is scored

How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.

0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.

3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.

5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.

8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.

10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

SCORM and xAPI authoring are documented, with AI turning policy documents, PDFs and videos into structured course drafts built from the approved source and mapped to a skills framework; role- and skills-based learning paths that adapt as people change roles are described, alongside thousands of off-the-shelf courses from Go1, LinkedIn Learning, OpenSesame and Udemy, and offline delivery on any device for external users. We found no public information on question pools, instructor-led or virtual sessions, multilingual course management, accessibility conformance or cmi5/LTI support, which keeps this below the top band. 2 10 11 13 17

Report an error

Compliance training, recertification & audit trail

How this is scored

Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.

0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.

3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.

5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.

8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).

10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

Mandatory courses are auto-assigned by role, team or location straight from Entra ID with new joiners enrolled automatically, expiry dates trigger recertification with automated Teams and email reminders, and the vendor promises audit-proof reports for occupational safety and data protection training with exportable audit data. We found no public information on escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, or policy attestations, so this sits in the middle band rather than inspection-grade. 4 12 13 17

Report an error

Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies

How this is scored

Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.

0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.

3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.

5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.

8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.

10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

Onboarding largely runs itself: a new hire added in Entra ID gets an AI-generated role-based plan with reusable role templates, delivered in Teams and Outlook, and frontline or field starters are onboarded without a Microsoft 365 account — Flow365 even reaches contractors and external users on any device, online or offline. We found no public information on branded external portals, self-registration, selling courses, multi-tenant academies or manager and buddy tasks, so the extended-enterprise half is unproven. 14 17 4

Report an error

Reporting, learner data & works council

How this is scored

What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.

0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.

3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.

5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.

8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.

10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

Real-time dashboards filter by team, role and location, reports can be built, scheduled, exported to Excel and shared in Teams, Power BI is integrated, managers see their teams' compliance status and learners their own progress, and a data processing agreement is published. We found no public information on configurable retention and deletion for learner records, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, switching off time or score tracking, or any works council material under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG — which for a German works agreement I would need. 17 16 6 13 9

Report an error

Integrations, administration & portability

How this is scored

How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.

0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.

3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.

5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.

8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.

10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

For my stack this is the strongest fit I have seen: automatic provisioning and single sign-on through Microsoft Entra ID with instant updates when someone joins, moves or leaves, a claimed 70+ HRIS and HCM connectors including Personio, SAP, Workday and BambooHR, learning native in Teams, Outlook, SharePoint and Copilot with a Microsoft Graph employee learning API, and learning data staying in the Microsoft 365 tenant. We found no public information on a documented Zensai REST API or webhooks, SCIM by name, a sandbox, or exporting courses as SCORM packages — that last gap matters to me when I model what leaving would cost. 3 15 18 17 19 16

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

The contracting entity is Zensai International ApS in Copenhagen, learner data stays in the customer's own Microsoft 365 tenant with GCC High available for regulated deployments, a data processing agreement with EU standard contractual clause modules 2 and 4 and a subprocessor list is published for download, and ISO 27001 with Microsoft 365 Certified App status is stated. The vendor's own website chain shows transfers to the United States (Google Analytics, a US-based email provider) under standard contractual clause safeguards, and the captured pages state no product hosting region beyond the customer's tenant, so it stops short of fully evidenced end-to-end European sovereignty. 8 9 10 16 4 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The IT & HR Systems Admin

The captured pages point only to "Request pricing" — we found no public price figures, user bands, active-user definition, trial or free tier, term or VAT treatment anywhere. Only the Grow, Scale and Transform editions with their feature inclusions, and the statement that AI is included as standard rather than metered as an add-on, are published; a buyer cannot compute an annual cost from these pages. 3 16

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365)

Is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) as EU-Made.

Where does Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

Does Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365)?

As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), LearnWorlds (3/5) and TalentLMS (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is LearnWorlds (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365)? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (20)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page (Learn365) zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (platform) zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (compliance training) zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Features page (learning in Microsoft Teams) zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Integrations page zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Terms of service zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Privacy policy zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Data processing agreement (dpa) zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  19. 19 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  20. 20 Terms of service — found from the homepage zensai.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →