whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Online Whiteboard

Conceptboard

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Conceptboard Cloud Service GmbH · conceptboard.com

Compare with Miro → Compare with Collaboard → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Conceptboard: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Conceptboard: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Conceptboard at a glance

Vendor
Conceptboard Cloud Service GmbH
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Starting price
“5€ / user / month Starter” (vendor’s words) source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Conceptboard 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Conceptboard is an online whiteboard from Conceptboard Cloud Service GmbH of Halle (Saale). how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 1 Nov 2026. all sources

Conceptboard alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Product Team Lead

Weighted verdict

Leads three product teams at a logistics software company in Hamburg, with developers in Poland and Portugal. The board is where story maps, quarterly planning, architecture sketches and retrospectives happen, and the outcome has to land in Jira without anyone retyping it. Wants diagrams and sticky notes on one board, a two-way sync with the tickets, an API for the team's own automation, and an export that still makes sense when the company switches tools.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Product Team Lead

Panel median The Product Team Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Product Team Lead
Canvas, templates & content 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Workshop facilitation & participation 3 of 5 3 of 5
Integrations, import & export 2 of 5 2.5 of 5
Sharing, permissions & administration 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Security, AI controls & deployment 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
European sovereignty 4 of 5 4 of 5
Pricing transparency 3 of 5 3.5 of 5

Canvas, templates & content

How this is scored

What can be put on the board and how fast: an infinite canvas, sticky notes, text, shapes and connectors, freehand drawing and pen input, frames and sections, images, files, documents and video embedded on the board, tables, mind maps, diagrams and flowcharts, a template library for workshops, retrospectives and planning, own templates for the organisation, search across boards, performance on large boards, and AI that clusters, summarises or generates content.

0 — Not a whiteboard; there is no shared canvas to put content on.

3 — A shared board with sticky notes, text, shapes and drawing; templates, embeds, diagrams and large boards are basic or not described.

5 — An infinite canvas with sticky notes, shapes and connectors, frames, images and files on the board, a template library for workshops, retrospectives and planning, own templates saved for the team, and the board usable on desktop, browser and tablet with pen input.

8 — Diagrams, mind maps, tables and kanban on the same board, embeds of live documents and video, templates managed centrally for the organisation, search across all boards, documented limits for large boards (objects, participants), and AI that clusters or summarises notes with its data use stated.

10 — A canvas a whole organisation builds on: structured data on the board (cards linked to records, custom fields), smart diagramming with shape libraries for named notations, offline work with conflict-free sync described, board performance at stated scale, and every content type exportable with its structure.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

Templates for workshops and retrospectives with a pre-built library and team templates, kanban, backlogs, sprint planning, timelines and Gantt-style views, presentation sections, and files embedded from Google Drive and OneDrive — the captured pages describe a working planning board, with concrete free limits of three active boards and one hundred objects. What my teams would still need to verify: we found no public information on sticky notes, drawing tools, shapes and connectors, mind maps, tables, search across boards, or any AI that clusters or summarises. 2 3 6 14

Report an error

Workshop facilitation & participation

How this is scored

What it takes to run a session on the board: guests who join without an account, a timer, voting and dot voting, a private or anonymous mode for notes, bringing everyone to the facilitator's view (summon, follow), a presentation or frame mode, locking objects, reactions, breakout areas, an agenda or session plan, built-in audio or video or the call apps the board runs inside, participant limits, and accessibility for participants (keyboard, screen reader, contrast).

0 — No real-time collaboration; only one person can work on a board at a time.

3 — Several people edit the same board in real time and see each other's cursors; facilitation tools and guest access are basic or not described.

5 — Guests join by link without an account, a timer, voting, bringing participants to the facilitator's view, a presentation mode through frames, locking objects, and comments with mentions.

8 — A private or anonymous mode for brainstorming, voting with results and export, breakout areas or assigned frames, a session agenda or facilitator panel, the board running inside Teams, Zoom or Webex meetings, participant limits per session stated, and an accessibility statement for the board.

10 — Facilitation that a large event runs on: hundreds of participants per board with stated limits, facilitator controls over who may edit what and when, session recordings or summaries with their data use stated, a published accessibility conformance report (WCAG), and facilitation features documented step by step.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

Live moderation, a timer and voting are named, guests get temporary external access from the Starter tier up, presentations run section by section with one click, and the board works inside Microsoft Teams and Webex calls. An accessibility statement audited by Materna in July 2025 against EN 301 549 and BITV 2.0 is published, though it reports partial compliance with no templates marked accessible. We found no public information on anonymous or private note modes, breakout areas, session agendas, stated participant limits, or object locking. 3 4 6 12

Report an error

Integrations, import & export

How this is scored

How the board connects to the work around it and whether the content can leave: apps for Teams, Zoom, Webex, Slack and Google or Microsoft files, a two-way sync with Jira, Azure DevOps or other work tools, embedding boards in Confluence, SharePoint or intranets, a documented REST API and webhooks, import from Miro, Mural or other boards and from CSV or images, and export as PDF, image, CSV of the notes or an editable file another tool can open.

0 — No integration and no export of any kind; content can only be viewed on the vendor's board.

3 — Export as image or PDF and a few named integrations; an API, imports and structured export are basic or not described.

5 — Apps for at least Teams or Zoom and Slack, an integration with Jira or another work tool, embedding a board in other tools, export as PDF, image and CSV of the notes, and a documented API.

8 — A two-way sync with Jira or Azure DevOps that keeps cards and issues aligned, a REST API with webhooks covering boards and items, import from other whiteboards documented, an export in an editable or open format, and a marketplace or app framework for extensions.

10 — Integration and exit both complete: an API that can read and write everything the board holds, a full account export in an open format that another tool imports with structure kept, SDKs or an embeddable board for own applications, and the export and deletion on termination documented.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

Jira tickets, statuses and documentation are integrated directly on the board, boards embed into Confluence via iFrame, and Microsoft Teams, Webex, Google Drive, Dropbox and OneDrive are named — the connections my teams in Poland and Portugal would actually use. What the pages do not establish: the Jira link is described as reflecting content on the board rather than a two-way sync keeping cards and issues aligned, an API is mentioned in passing but not documented, full data export is promised with no formats named, and we found no public information on webhooks, imports from other whiteboards, or an app marketplace. 2 4 7 11

Report an error

Sharing, permissions & administration

How this is scored

Who can see and change a board and how the organisation controls it: sharing by link with expiry and password, guest and external-user rules, roles per board, project and team, default sharing settings set by the admin, single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect), user provisioning (SCIM), domain capture and control of shadow accounts, audit logs, content retention and legal hold, transfer of boards when a person leaves, and admin reports.

0 — No accounts or permissions; anyone with a board's address can see and edit it, with no way to restrict it.

3 — Boards are shared with named people or by link with view or edit rights; admin controls, SSO and audit are basic or not described.

5 — Roles per board and per team, link sharing that can be restricted or switched off, guest access controlled by the admin, single sign-on with SAML, a user and board admin console, and boards transferred when a person leaves.

8 — SCIM provisioning, domain capture of existing accounts, sharing policies set centrally (no public links, guests only from allowed domains), audit logs exportable to a SIEM, retention rules and legal hold, data classification labels on boards, and admin roles split by scope.

10 — Administration that a regulated organisation can sign off: every sharing and access setting the admin controls listed with its effect, complete audit trails with a stated retention, eDiscovery and export for investigations, delegated administration across subsidiaries, and every control documented in the help centre.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

Individual access rights per file, board and project with role-based permissions are stated, SAML 2.0 single sign-on is offered for an additional fee, guest contributors get temporary external access, and audit logs plus advanced admin controls arrive at the Corporate tier. We found no public information on link sharing with expiry or password, SCIM provisioning, domain capture, centrally set sharing policies, retention rules, or what happens to boards when a person leaves. 5 6 7 16

Report an error

Security, AI controls & deployment

How this is scored

How the content of the boards is protected and where the product can run: encryption in transit and at rest, customer-managed encryption keys, a dedicated or private-cloud tenant and an on-premises edition, AI features that the admin can switch off and that do not train on customer boards, which AI providers process board content, data loss prevention, deletion of boards and accounts with stated periods, and whether individual activity (logins, contributions, time on board) is tracked and shown to managers, with a statement for works councils. Who processes the data and where, and the certifications, are scored under sovereignty.

0 — Content is not protected in transit, or boards are used for the vendor's own purposes by default with no way to opt out.

3 — Encryption is mentioned and the product is described as secure or GDPR-compliant; AI use, deletion and deployment options are basic or not described.

5 — Encryption in transit and at rest stated, AI features that the admin can switch off, a statement that customer content is not used to train AI models, deletion of boards and accounts with a stated period, and a security page describing the measures.

8 — Customer-managed keys or a dedicated tenant, a private-cloud or on-premises edition documented, the AI providers that process board content named with their location, data loss prevention or classification controls, individual activity tracking described with what managers can see, and a statement or template for works council agreements.

10 — Protection that can be verified: client-side or end-to-end encryption for boards with the method published, an on-premises or sovereign-cloud edition with feature parity stated, no AI processing outside the customer's chosen region, a published penetration test summary, and every security and AI control listed with its effect.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2 with AES-256 GCM and forward secrecy) and at rest, two-factor authentication, ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 recertified in March 2025, and a bug bounty with automated and manual penetration tests are all documented. Deployment is unusually strong: dedicated servers in a German data centre and a self-hosted Data Center Edition that even runs air-gapped, physically separated from the internet. No AI features are described anywhere, so their controls cannot be assessed, and we found no public information on customer-managed keys, data loss prevention, or stated deletion periods for boards and accounts. 5 7 8 16

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boards, files and user data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, CDN, real-time collaboration servers, AI providers, email, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; boards hold personal data of participants and often of customers, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. An on-premises or self-hosted edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (AI features, CDN, real-time servers, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard, or EU residency is an option of the top tier only.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, BSI C5, SOC 2) stated — or an on-premises edition documented that keeps every board on the customer's own servers.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor including AI, or an on-premises or open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

The contracting entity is a German GmbH in Halle (Saale) with a commercial register entry, hosting runs in Germany on named infrastructure — IONOS, AWS Frankfurt, or STACKIT — a data processing agreement is published, ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 are stated with recertification in 2025, and a subprocessor list with purposes is published, with email provider Brevo hosted at OVH in France and Germany and Google Cloud in Belgium. The documented Data Center Edition runs entirely on the customer's own servers, optionally with no internet connection. The privacy policy names some website-side providers based in third countries under standard contractual clauses, and we found no public information on the company's ownership structure. 5 9 10 15 16

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user and tier, how guests, viewers and external participants are counted, limits of the free plan (number of boards, objects, members), which features (SSO, SCIM, audit logs, EU data residency, AI credits, on-premises) cost extra, the enterprise tier's price or minimum, annual versus monthly billing, minimum seats and term.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free plan exists, but how cost scales with users, guests or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their price per user and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, EU data residency, guests, AI credits, the enterprise tier) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (members, guests, boards), free-plan limits stated, add-ons and AI credits priced, the on-premises or dedicated edition's cost or licence stated, minimum seats, term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size, guest count and feature set, with every add-on, setup, support and AI fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Product Team Lead

The pricing page publishes Starter at 5€ / user / month, Advanced from 10€ / user / month and Corporate & Government from 14€ / user / month, with minimum users per tier, twelve- and twenty-four-month terms, VAT treatment, monthly or yearly billing, and concrete free-plan limits of three active boards, one hundred objects and 250 MB storage, while the terms spell out cancellation, auto-renewal and annual inflation adjustment. What I cannot yet compute: the single sign-on and Germany-hosting options are flagged only as an additional fee without amounts, guest counting is not explained, and special plans including on-premises are on request. 4 6 11

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Questions about Conceptboard

Is Conceptboard European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Conceptboard as EU-Made.

Where does Conceptboard store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

Does Conceptboard have a free plan?

Yes. Conceptboard has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Conceptboard?

As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Miro (3.5/5), Collaboard (3.5/5) and Klaxoon (3/5) highest among the other 12 Online Whiteboard products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Collaboard (UK / wider Europe). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Conceptboard alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Conceptboard? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (18)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (meetings and workshops) conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (enterprise) conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Features page (on-premises edition) conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Pricing page conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Security / trust page conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Security / trust page (technical measures) conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Legal notice conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Privacy policy conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Terms of service conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Workshop facilitation & participation — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Workshop facilitation & participation — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Sharing, permissions & administration — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Sharing, permissions & administration — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Security, AI controls & deployment — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Security, AI controls & deployment — found from sitemap conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Data processing agreement (dpa) — found from the homepage conceptboard.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →