Collaboration depth
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Integrator
Dependencies with automated updating, subtasks and recurring tasks come in at the mid self-serve plan, and the workload view (their words, a variation of the Gantt view) shows individual availability, days off and capacity, with Client and Client+ roles for guest access and Member+ variants for permissions. Cross-project surfaces like the Assignments Dashboard pull opened versus completed tasks and estimates versus tracked time into one place. The catch is that workload management, capacity planning and utilization are listed on the top plan, so a small team pays the top price for the deepest planning. 2 4 5 7 10