whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Project Management & Collaboration

Hive

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Hive Technology, Inc. · hive.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Bootstrapper

Weighted verdict

Pays with their own card. Optimizes for price/value at 3 seats and at 30, a usable free tier, and a price page that answers instead of qualifying. Rejects hidden seat minimums and "contact sales".

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Bootstrapper

Collaboration depth

How this is scored

How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.

0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.

3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.

5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.

8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.

10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

Shared timelines with milestones and dependencies, resourcing that flags under- and overallocated users, roles and teams, role-based access for external stakeholders, and threaded comments on actions with mentions — that is first-class team planning. Client access arrives through an external user add-on at five external user licenses per purchase, with sane role-based permissions, so the span from small team to structured department looks covered. 5 6 7 2

Report an error

Reporting

How this is scored

Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.

0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.

3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.

5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.

8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.

10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

Dashboards cover workspace completion, late actions, project budgets, four financial views and utilization, with global filters, switchable widget data sources and PDF export — genuine cross-project time, budget and utilization depth. But the dashboards application is a premium add-on, several views require the Resourcing and Time apps to be enabled first, and I found no public information on report-level CSV export or scheduled delivery. 8 7 2

Report an error

Integrations

How this is scored

How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.

0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.

3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.

5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.

8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.

10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

A broad native catalogue — Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, OneDrive, GitHub, Jira, both Google and Outlook calendar feeds, QuickBooks — plus a Zapier section and a documented public API whose credentials live in the user profile. Real import paths exist from Trello, Asana, Basecamp, Smartsheet and Microsoft Project, with CSV able to merge into an existing project; I found no public information on webhooks. 9 10 12

Report an error

Onboarding effort

How this is scored

Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.

0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.

3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.

5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.

8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.

10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

Free forever with no credit card, a trial that never collects one, a quick-start guide, a template library, and importers for CSV, JSON, Trello, Asana, Basecamp and Microsoft Project — with unmatched CSV columns automatically becoming custom fields rather than dead ends. Signup to a working first project looks like an hour, not a day, and Hive University exists for growing into the deeper features. 2 11 12 5

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.

0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.

3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.

5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.

8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.

10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

Hive Technology, Inc. is a New York company whose privacy policy states personal information may be stored or processed on servers located in the United States, with Google Analytics in the mix. GDPR commitments, Data Privacy Framework certification and Standard Contractual Clauses provide the paperwork, but EU data residency is nowhere offered — for a European buyer this is compliance language, not residency. 3 4

Report an error

Support & documentation

How this is scored

Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.

0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.

3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.

5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.

8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.

10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

The help center is deep and current — a comprehensive dashboards guide dated 2026 sits alongside the getting-started collection, Hive University, webinars, a status page and an in-app question mark for reaching support on any plan. I found no public information on response times, on live chat availability by tier, or on a changelog. 8 13 11 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?

0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".

3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.

5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.

8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.

10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.

Report an error

The Bootstrapper

The pricing page answers before anyone qualifies me: "Free $0 / free forever" with no credit card, "Starter $5 / month per user", "Teams $12 / month per user", the "Yearly (save 33%)" difference stated, and flexible add-ons listed at "+$5 each" — even the seat and project caps are printed, so I know a 30-seat team lands on Teams without calling anyone. Tax treatment is not stated anywhere captured and Enterprise reads "Get in touch", which keeps the page one qualifier short of fully plain. 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Hive? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage hive.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page hive.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy hive.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 20 Aug 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Security page hive.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Reporting — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Reporting — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Integrations — found from sitemap hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Support & documentation — found from sitemap help.hive.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →