SEO
Seobility
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Seobility GmbH · www.seobility.net
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Seobility, an SEO suite from seobility GmbH of Nuremberg, scores highest on pricing transparency at 7, with keyword and content and rank and index data each holding at 6; the lows are data portability between 3 and 4 and sovereignty at 4. Judges credit a pricing page that names every tier — Basis free, Premium 59,90 € per month, Agentur 179,90 € per month — with per-tier keyword, crawl, project and daily-query limits, and rank tracking that updates daily on paid tiers and weekly on the free one, desktop and mobile, to position 100 with city-level and Local Pack tracking. Weaknesses repeat across the rationales: the documented API carries ranking-monitoring data only, on the Agency plan, without backlink data; we found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history or on retention after cancellation; and we found no public information on where account and crawl data are hosted, though the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel as US website partners. Spreads are modest — technical audit 4 to 6, reporting and API 5 to 6 — with no disagreements flagged.
Speaks for it
- Every tier priced publicly — Basis free, Premium 59,90 € per month, Agentur 179,90 € per month — with keyword, crawl, project, competitor and daily-query limits stated per tier, plus a 20% annual discount.
- Add-on prices published on the page: 100 additional keywords at 7,90 € and an additional project at 9,90 €, with the rises to 9,90 € and 12,90 € from 18 September disclosed.
- Rankings update daily on paid tiers and weekly on the free one, desktop and mobile, to position 100, with city-level and Local Pack tracking and a weekly backlink refresh.
- Natively German keyword research with monthly volume, competition, average CPC, intent filters and gap analysis against up to two competitor domains.
- Recurring audits daily, weekly or monthly up to 100,000 pages with JavaScript crawling, 300+ checked factors per page, severity-tagged issues and fix instructions.
Held against it
- The documented API serves ranking-monitoring data only, on the Agency plan, with no backlink data, only very limited on-page data and no published limits or costs.
- We found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, or on any retention period after cancellation.
- We found no public information on where account and crawl data are hosted; the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel, both US, with Cloudflare covered by the EU-US Data Privacy Framework.
- Member accounts are offered without a published per-seat price, so the invoice is not fully computable.
- Technical issues are prioritised by severity tag rather than traffic impact, and we found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison.
Best for
- You target the German market and want keyword research with volume, competition and average CPC in a natively German tool, plus gap analysis against up to two competitors.
- Your agency needs white-label PDF and CSV reports carrying your own logo, weekly email summaries and up to 15 projects.
- You want a computable invoice — every tier and add-on priced publicly, VAT stated as excluded, cancellation to month end and a 14-day free trial.
- You need daily desktop and mobile rank tracking to position 100 with city-level and Local Pack coverage on paid plans.
Avoid if
- Your workflow depends on API access to the whole account — the documented API covers ranking-monitoring data only, on the Agency plan, without backlink data.
- You must export a multi-year archive — the pages document CSV and PDF export of current views, and we found no public information on bulk history export or retention after cancellation.
- Your compliance review requires a stated location for account and crawl data — we found no public information on hosting, and the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel as US partners of the website.
- You need audits ranked by traffic impact or log-file and Search Console comparison — the captured pages show severity-tagged issue lists, and we found no public information on those comparisons.
The scores
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
Scheduled audits (daily, weekly, monthly), JavaScript crawling, a stated crawl cap of up to 100,000 pages, issue categories including indexing and canonical link errors, severity tagging and fix instructions per issue — that is solid mid-market coverage. I found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, structured-data validation, or any log-file or Search Console comparison, so the findings remain a well-sorted list rather than a traffic-impact diagnosis I could turn into developer tickets. 5 2
The Agency Owner
Crawls can be scheduled daily, weekly or monthly up to 100,000 pages per crawl with JavaScript rendering, 300+ checked factors, issue categories including indexing and canonical errors, severity tagging and fix instructions — solid for routine client work. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison, or structured-data validation. Nothing published prioritises issues by traffic impact, so the output reads as a prioritised list rather than a diagnosis. 2 5
The Technical SEO
Scheduled crawls at published page limits from 1,000 to 100,000 pages, JavaScript crawling on the paid plans, 300+ factors per page, issue categories tagged by severity with fix instructions per URL — that is a real audit, not a broken-link checker. What would make it diagnostic rather than a list is absent from the captured pages: no Core Web Vitals per template, no log-file or Search Console comparison against what Google actually fetched, no structured-data validation, no crawl-budget analysis, and no regression detection between crawls; prioritisation is by severity tag, never by traffic impact. 5 2
The Content Strategist
Scheduled daily, weekly or monthly crawls up to a stated 100,000-page cap, JavaScript crawling, severity-tagged issue categories covering indexing and canonical errors, and fix instructions for every issue — a real audit rather than a link list. It stops short of diagnosis: issues are prioritised by severity tags rather than traffic impact, and we found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison, or structured-data validation. 2 5
The Data Analyst
Scheduled crawls with published page limits up to 100,000, JavaScript crawling, and issue categories tagged by severity with per-URL drill-down and fix instructions make this more than a link-and-tag list, and the indexing and canonical categories lean diagnostic. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison, or issues prioritised by traffic impact. 2 5
The Skeptic
The crawler commitments are checkable: recurring audits daily, weekly or monthly against stated caps of 1,000 to 100,000 pages, JavaScript rendering, parallel crawlers per tier, and issues tagged by severity across indexing, canonical and content categories with fix instructions. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals measurement, log-file or Search Console comparison, so this stays a well-limited checklist rather than a diagnosis. 2 5
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.
3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
The German-first research tool gives volume, competition and CPC per keyword, a search-intent filter, autocomplete, questions and similar-keyword categories, a gap analysis against up to two competitor domains, top-10 analysis with per-page traffic, domain rating and backlinks, plus WDF*IDF content optimisation — real depth for the German market, which is what I care about. I found no public information on topic clustering, content briefs with entity coverage, cannibalisation detection or SERP feature detail in the research view, which keeps it below the top band. 7 2
The Agency Owner
The keyword tool is natively German with volume, competition and average CPC, intent and short/longtail filters, question and autocomplete categories, adjustable country, and a genuine gap analysis against up to two competitor domains, with per-page traffic, domain rating and backlink counts for the top ten. The WDF*IDF tool adds term-level content guidance. We found no public information on topic clustering, SERP feature composition over time, content briefs or cannibalisation detection. 2 7 8
The Technical SEO
Volume, competition and CPC with search-intent and long-tail filters, autocomplete, question and related-terms categories, and the strongest piece — competitor gap and intersection analysis with per-page top-10 metrics for traffic, domain rating and backlink count. I found no public information on topic clustering, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, or cannibalisation detection; the WDF*IDF tool is the only on-page content guidance shown, and nothing in the captures documents the depth of the German-language data itself. 7 2
The Content Strategist
Keyword research delivers volume, competition and average CPC with intent and word-count filters, a competitor gap analysis, and per-page monthly traffic, domain rating and backlink counts for the current top ten — enough to size an opportunity against what actually ranks, with German-language tooling that is native rather than translated. We found no public information on topic clustering, content briefs with entity coverage, or cannibalisation detection, so cannibalisation still has to be caught by hand. 2 7 8
The Data Analyst
Keyword research delivers monthly volume, competition, average CPC, intent and word-count filters, competitor gap and intersection analysis, and top-10 page metrics, in a natively German tool with adjustable country — the German side is clearly first-class. We found no public information on SERP feature detail or composition tracked over time, topic clustering, content briefs, or cannibalisation detection. 2 7
The Skeptic
Volume, competition, CPC and an intent filter sit in a German-native research tool with autocomplete, questions, related-searches and related-terms categories, plus gap and intersection analysis against up to two competitor domains and a WDF*IDF tool for content work. We found no public information on topic clustering, content briefs or cannibalisation detection, and the top-10 composition view is point-in-time rather than tracked over time. 7 8
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.
3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.
5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.
8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
Daily Google rankings for desktop and mobile, tracking to position 100, local-pack and city-level tracking, per-keyword and per-landing-page change history, plus a weekly-updated backlink overview give me numbers I can at least cite. But the vendor documents no backlink index size, no update methodology, no lost-and-found link detection and no retention guarantee for historical rankings — precisely the documentation I need when our numbers disagree with Search Console. 8 9 2
The Agency Owner
Rankings update daily on desktop and mobile (weekly on the free tier) down to position 100, with local-pack and city-level tracking, side-by-side competitor comparison and AI Overview attribution, and the backlink monitoring states a weekly refresh. We found no public information on backlink index size, how the data is collected, historical retention for the life of the account, or lost-and-found link detection. 2 8 9
The Technical SEO
Daily desktop and mobile rankings to position 100 with city-level local and Local Pack tracking, position changes per keyword and landing page, and a weekly-updated backlink overview — cadence and granularity are stated plainly. But the vendor documents no index size, no collection methodology, no lost-and-found link detection, and nothing about how long historical rankings are retained; AI Overview visibility is a feature, not accountability for their own data. 8 9 2
The Content Strategist
Daily desktop and mobile rankings on Google, city-level and Local Pack tracking, top-100 depth, competitor comparison per keyword, and a weekly backlink refresh cadence the vendor states outright. Beyond that, we found no public information on backlink index size, lost-and-found link detection, retention of historical rankings, or how the rankings and links are collected. 2 8 9
The Data Analyst
Rankings update daily on paid plans with desktop and mobile, city-level and Local Pack tracking to position 100, and the backlink overview states a weekly refresh — update frequency is documented, which is what I look for. We found no public information on backlink index size, collection methodology, lost-and-found link detection, or whether historical rankings are retained for the life of the account. 2 8 9
The Skeptic
Frequencies are in print, which I credit: ranking updates daily on paid tiers and weekly on the free one, split desktop and mobile, to the top 100, with city-level tracking, Local Pack positions and a weekly backlink refresh. We found no public information on index size, collection methodology, lost-and-found link detection or how long historical rankings are retained, so the vendor is only partly accountable for its own data. 2 8 9
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.
3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.
5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
White-label ranking reports with our own logo, PDF and CSV export, weekly email summaries, team accounts and up to 15 projects cover the agency basics, and an MCP integration for AI assistants is in beta. The documented API is ranking-monitoring only, restricted to the Agency plan on request, excludes backlink data and carries only very limited on-page data; I found no public information on Search Console or analytics integrations, API limits or credit costs. 2 9 10
The Agency Owner
White-label reports carry my own logo into client PDFs, weekly email summaries go out automatically, and the top tier holds fifteen projects with member accounts — the agency basics. The API is ranking-monitoring data only, Agency-plan only, excludes backlink data and offers 'very limited' onpage data, with access granted by email and we found no public information on its limits or costs. We found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration or data-warehouse export. 2 9 10
The Technical SEO
PDF and CSV export including white-label reports with the agency's own logo, weekly email reports, member accounts and up to 15 projects give an agency the basics to hand a client. The API is ranking-monitoring data only, gated behind an email request for Agency-plan users, explicitly excludes backlink data and offers very limited on-page data, with no stated rate limits or per-endpoint costs; I found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, customisable dashboards, or any data-warehouse export. 2 10 9
The Content Strategist
White-label PDF and CSV reports carrying the agency's own logo, up to fifteen projects with team accounts, weekly scheduled email summaries and a beta MCP integration cover the client hand-off well. The API is thin: it serves ranking monitoring data only, for users on the Agency plan, excludes backlink data and holds only very limited on-page data, and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration or published per-endpoint limits. 2 7 9 10
The Data Analyst
PDF and CSV export, white-label reports with the agency's own logo, weekly email reports and multi-project tiers cover the client-facing side well. The API is Ranking Monitoring data only, restricted to the Agency plan and granted on email request, explicitly excluding backlink data with only very limited on-page data; we found no public information on API rate limits or credit costs, nor on Search Console or analytics integration. 2 10
The Skeptic
The agency basics hold: white-label PDF and CSV reports with the customer's own logo, weekly email digests, and member accounts across up to 15 projects. The API is the tell — access by email, top plan only, no backlink data and only very limited onpage data, with no published limits or credit costs per endpoint — and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration or data-warehouse export. 2 9 10
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.
3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.
5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
What is evidenced is CSV and PDF export of current views, plus a ranking-monitoring API for Agency-plan users. I found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, on any retention period after cancellation, or on a grace period during which the archive stays retrievable — for a multi-year subscription that gap matters. 2 7 10
The Agency Owner
Export means PDF and CSV of reports and current keyword lists; we found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history. The documented API scope excludes backlink data and is described as 'very limited' for onpage data, so it cannot mirror the account. We found no public information on retention or a grace period for the archive after cancellation. 2 7 10
The Technical SEO
CSV and PDF export exist, and an Agency-plan ranking-monitoring API offers one programmatic path to the rankings — but the captured pages say nothing about bulk historical export of rankings, keywords or crawl results, and nothing about retention after cancellation. The API's stated exclusions — no backlink data, very limited on-page data — narrow that path further. 7 2 10
The Content Strategist
CSV and PDF export of reports and keyword result lists is documented, and an API restricted to the Agency plan can pull ranking monitoring data. We found no public information on bulk export of historical rankings or crawl results, on a retention period after cancellation, or on any grace period, so the fate of the multi-year archive at exit is unclear. 2 7 10
The Data Analyst
What is evidenced is CSV export of keyword results and PDF/CSV report export, plus a Ranking Monitoring API on the Agency plan that could in principle carry ranking history out of the tool. We found no public information on bulk export of crawl results or full ranking history, and no stated retention or grace period after cancellation — whether three years of history leaves with the customer is simply not documented. 2 7 10
The Skeptic
CSV export exists for keyword results and reports, and ranking-monitoring data can leave through an API — but only on the top plan, while we found no public information on bulk export of crawl history or on any retention period after cancellation. What a multi-year subscription accumulates is not shown to leave with the customer. 2 7 10
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The contracting entity is seobility GmbH in Nuremberg with German register court and VAT ID, and the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel (both US) as partners, with the EU-US Data Privacy Framework stated for Cloudflare and deletion timelines given. I found no public information on where account and crawl data are actually hosted, nor on a DPA covering the crawl data the tool ingests, so the chain beyond the vendor's own website is unverified. 3 4
The Agency Owner
The contracting entity is seobility GmbH in Nuremberg with a German register court and VAT ID, and the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel as US subprocessors, with Cloudflare covered by the Data Privacy Framework. We found no public information on where the account and crawl data is hosted. We also found no public information on a DPA or certification covering the crawl and ranking data the tool ingests. 3 4
The Technical SEO
A German contracting entity with a published imprint, and a privacy policy naming Cloudflare and Mixpanel — both US — with a Data Privacy Framework claim and deletion within hours to days for Cloudflare. The deciding gap: the captured pages give no statement on where the account and crawl data are hosted, so EU hosting as standard is unconfirmed, and the Mixpanel web analytics handling appears without an equivalent safeguard explained. 3 4
The Content Strategist
The contract partner is a German GmbH in Nuremberg with a GDPR policy naming Cloudflare and Mixpanel as US website partners, Cloudflare covered by the EU-US Data Privacy Framework with deletion within three days. We found no public information on where the account and crawl data themselves are hosted or on subprocessors of the product rather than the marketing site. 3 4 10
The Data Analyst
The contracting entity is seobility GmbH in Nuremberg with a German register court and VAT ID, and the privacy policy names its non-EU subprocessors Cloudflare and Mixpanel, with Cloudflare's EU-US Data Privacy Framework certification noted. We found no public information on where account or crawl data is hosted, so EU hosting as standard cannot be confirmed from the captured pages. 3 4
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is unambiguously German — seobility GmbH, Nürnberg, HRB 26545, VAT DE 272712190 — and the privacy policy names Cloudflare and Mixpanel as US subprocessors, citing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework for Cloudflare. Where account and crawl data are hosted is the part we found no public information on, and there is no product-side subprocessor listing or published certification beyond the website policy. 3 4
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.
5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
All three tiers are priced publicly — Basis free, Premium 59,90 € per month, Agentur 179,90 € per month — with keyword, crawl-page, project, tool-query and competitor limits stated, add-ons priced (100 additional keywords 7,90 €, shown rising to 9,90 € from 18 September; additional project 9,90 €), a 20% annual discount, VAT stated as excluded, and month-end cancellation. The pieces I cannot compute from the pages are additional team seats and any API usage, both unpriced while the API is request-gated for Agency users. 2 10
The Agency Owner
The pricing page is genuinely computable: every tier public (free, 59,90 € and 179,90 € per month) with crawl, keyword, project, competitor-monitoring and daily-query limits, addon rates of 7,90 € per 100 extra keywords and 9,90 € per extra project, VAT treatment stated as excluded, monthly terms with cancel-to-month-end, and a stated 20% annual discount. Two items keep the annual invoice from being fully derivable: we found no public information on per-seat pricing for member accounts or on the ranking API's cost, and API access runs through a contact email. The dated price change to 9,90 € and 12,90 € is disclosed on the page itself. 2 7 10
The Technical SEO
Every tier is priced publicly with the limits that drive the invoice — keyword counts from 10 to 1,500, crawl depth from 1,000 to 100,000 pages, projects, competitor monitoring and daily tool queries — plus VAT treatment stated as zzgl. UST, monthly terms cancellable to the month's end, a 20% annual saving, and add-on prices of 7,90 € per 100 additional keywords and 9,90 € per additional project with announced increases. What keeps the invoice from being fully computable: no public price for the member accounts the plans mention, and API access is a contact-us conversation rather than published credits or limits. 2 7 10
The Content Strategist
Every tier is public — Basis free, Premium at 59,90 € per month, Agentur at 179,90 € per month — with keyword, crawl, project, competitor and daily-query limits, a 20% annual saving, VAT stated as excluded, month-end cancellation, and priced add-ons of 7,90 € for 100 additional keywords and 9,90 € for an additional project including 100 keywords. The invoice is not fully computable: member accounts are named without a per-seat price, and the ranking monitoring API is gated to the Agency plan with no published credit costs. 2 7 10
The Data Analyst
All three tiers are priced publicly — Basis free, Premium at 59,90 € per month, Agentur at 179,90 € per month — with keyword, crawl and daily query limits, VAT treatment stated as "zzgl. UST", month-to-month cancellation, and add-on prices published including the announced September change (100 additional keywords at 7,90 € moving to 9,90 €, an additional project at 9,90 € moving to 12,90 €). We found no public information on per-seat costs for member accounts or on API credit costs, since API access is arranged on request. 2 7
The Skeptic
Unusually computable for this category: every tier priced, keyword, crawl, project, competitor and daily-query limits stated per tier, VAT explicitly excluded, monthly terms with cancellation to month end, and add-on unit prices published — 100 additional keywords at 7,90 € with a stated rise to 9,90 € from 18 September, an additional project at 9,90 € rising to 12,90 €. The two holes in the invoice are per-seat costs for member accounts and API credit costs, and we found no public information on either. 2 10
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 2 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 67 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 45 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (12)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 16 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 2 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Imprint www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap help.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →