SEO

Seobility

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The In-House SEO Lead v1.0 · The Agency Owner v1.0 · The Technical SEO v1.0 · The Content Strategist v1.0 · The Data Analyst v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.0 · rubric v1 · evaluated 4 Oct 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Analyst

Weighted verdict

Wants the numbers in the warehouse, not in a PDF. Cares about a documented API with published credit costs, bulk historical export, and whether three years of ranking history leaves with the customer or dies with the subscription.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Analyst

Crawling & technical audit

How this is scored

Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.

0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.

3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.

5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.

8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.

10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

Scheduled crawls with published page limits up to 100,000, JavaScript crawling, and issue categories tagged by severity with per-URL drill-down and fix instructions make this more than a link-and-tag list, and the indexing and canonical categories lean diagnostic. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison, or issues prioritised by traffic impact. 2 5

Report an error

Keyword research & content guidance

How this is scored

Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.

0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.

3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.

5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.

8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.

10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

Keyword research delivers monthly volume, competition, average CPC, intent and word-count filters, competitor gap and intersection analysis, and top-10 page metrics, in a natively German tool with adjustable country — the German side is clearly first-class. We found no public information on SERP feature detail or composition tracked over time, topic clustering, content briefs, or cannibalisation detection. 2 7

Report an error

Rank tracking & index quality

How this is scored

The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.

0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.

3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.

5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.

8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.

10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

Rankings update daily on paid plans with desktop and mobile, city-level and Local Pack tracking to position 100, and the backlink overview states a weekly refresh — update frequency is documented, which is what I look for. We found no public information on backlink index size, collection methodology, lost-and-found link detection, or whether historical rankings are retained for the life of the account. 2 8 9

Report an error

Reporting, integrations & API

How this is scored

Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.

0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.

3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.

5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.

8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.

10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

PDF and CSV export, white-label reports with the agency's own logo, weekly email reports and multi-project tiers cover the client-facing side well. The API is Ranking Monitoring data only, restricted to the Agency plan and granted on email request, explicitly excluding backlink data with only very limited on-page data; we found no public information on API rate limits or credit costs, nor on Search Console or analytics integration. 2 10

Report an error

Data portability & exit

How this is scored

Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.

0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.

3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.

5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.

8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.

10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

What is evidenced is CSV export of keyword results and PDF/CSV report export, plus a Ranking Monitoring API on the Agency plan that could in principle carry ranking history out of the tool. We found no public information on bulk export of crawl results or full ranking history, and no stated retention or grace period after cancellation — whether three years of history leaves with the customer is simply not documented. 2 7 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

The contracting entity is seobility GmbH in Nuremberg with a German register court and VAT ID, and the privacy policy names its non-EU subprocessors Cloudflare and Mixpanel, with Cloudflare's EU-US Data Privacy Framework certification noted. We found no public information on where account or crawl data is hosted, so EU hosting as standard cannot be confirmed from the captured pages. 3 4

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.

5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.

8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.

Report an error

The Data Analyst

All three tiers are priced publicly — Basis free, Premium at 59,90 € per month, Agentur at 179,90 € per month — with keyword, crawl and daily query limits, VAT treatment stated as "zzgl. UST", month-to-month cancellation, and add-on prices published including the announced September change (100 additional keywords at 7,90 € moving to 9,90 €, an additional project at 9,90 € moving to 12,90 €). We found no public information on per-seat costs for member accounts or on API credit costs, since API access is arranged on request. 2 7

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Ownership	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data residency	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Subprocessors	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 2 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

67 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
45 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Seobility? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (12)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
2 Pricing www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 16 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 2 Sep 2026 Details →
3 Imprint www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
4 Privacy policy www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
5 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
6 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
8 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
9 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap www.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
11 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap help.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
12 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.seobility.net Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →