whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Social Media Marketing

Loomly

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Loomly · www.loomly.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Loomly: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Loomly: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Loomly at a glance

Vendor
Loomly
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Loomly 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Loomly's strongest showing is collaboration and governance, where scores cluster at 7-8: multi-tier approvals with batch monthly sign-off, custom roles, per-workspace permissions, version history, a white-label platform with custom subdomain, and OAuth connections with no stored social credentials. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 30 Sep 2026 to 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

Loomly alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Analyst

Weighted verdict

Has to compare metrics the networks define differently and report a number the board believes. Wants history retained past the platforms' own windows, normalisation documented rather than hidden, and UTM attribution that reaches web analytics.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Analyst

Panel median The Analyst This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Analyst
Publishing & calendar 3 of 5 3 of 5
Engagement & community inbox 3 of 5 3 of 5
Analytics & reporting 3 of 5 2 of 5
Approvals, roles & brand safety 4 of 5 4 of 5
Network coverage & API resilience 3 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 1 of 5 1 of 5

Publishing & calendar

How this is scored

Scheduling across networks: per-network formatting, the calendar as a working surface, bulk operations, and what happens when a post fails at 3am.

0 — One post to several networks at once with no per-network variation and no calendar.

3 — A calendar with scheduling and basic per-network text variants; failures are discovered by noticing the post never appeared.

5 — Per-network content, media and first-comment variants, drafts, a usable calendar with drag-and-drop, and failure notifications with a retry.

8 — Bulk upload and CSV import, evergreen or queue-based scheduling, link shortening with UTM rules, preview matching each network's actual rendering, and stories, reels or shorts supported where the API allows.

10 — Publishing is dependable at volume: hundreds of scheduled items across many accounts without collision, best-time recommendations from the account's own history, and every failure surfaced with the platform error and a one-click recovery.

Report an error

The Analyst

Per-channel customisation with alt text and tagging, a drag-and-drop calendar with scheduling slots, previews matching each platform's actual UI, auto-published Reels, Stories, Carousels and TikToks, and automatic link shortening with the Loom.ly tool clear the mid anchor comfortably. But we found no public information on bulk CSV import, UTM tagging rules on the shortened links, or failure notifications with a retry for the 3am miss, which keeps it short of the higher anchor. 4 5 9 10

Report an error

Engagement & community inbox

How this is scored

Comments, mentions and messages in one queue — the half of the job that is customer service wearing a marketing badge.

0 — No inbox; engagement happens in each native app.

3 — Mentions and comments listed per network with no assignment, no status and no history.

5 — A unified inbox across the connected networks with assignment, status and internal notes, and the conversation history visible per person.

8 — Direct messages included where the API allows, saved replies, SLA timers, sentiment or priority flags, spam and hidden-comment handling, and escalation to a helpdesk.

10 — The inbox is a service desk: every public and private interaction in one queue with ownership and response-time reporting, moderation rules that act automatically, and a per-person history spanning networks.

Report an error

The Analyst

A unified inbox covering Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and TikTok brings comments, mentions and DMs into one queue with assignment, read/unread/archived status, thread views, saved replies, bulk actions, and hide-or-delete moderation. We found no public information on internal notes, per-person history spanning networks, SLA timers, sentiment flags or helpdesk escalation, so it sits between the mid and high anchors. 4 6 9 10

Report an error

Analytics & reporting

How this is scored

Measurement across networks with different metrics and retention windows, plus the reporting an agency hands a client.

0 — Per-network vanity counts pulled live; no history kept.

3 — Basic post and profile metrics with a short history and no cross-network comparison.

5 — Metrics stored beyond the networks' own retention, cross-network comparison, competitor benchmarking, and scheduled exports.

8 — Custom dashboards, white-label client reporting, paid and organic combined where the API allows, UTM-based attribution into web analytics, and audience demographics over time.

10 — Reporting answers what worked and why: metrics normalised across networks with the differences documented rather than hidden, full historical retention independent of platform windows, and exports an agency can hand over unedited.

Report an error

The Analyst

Account and post-level metrics including posts published outside the tool, per-network breakdowns for Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram, demographics, PDF and CSV export, and weekly or monthly scheduled reports to up to 25 recipients are documented. We found no public information on retention beyond the networks' own windows, cross-network metric normalisation, competitor benchmarking, custom dashboards, or a UTM handoff into web analytics — the shortener reports its own click counts, sources and audience location, but we found no evidence of UTM attribution reaching external analytics. 4 7 8

Report an error

Approvals, roles & brand safety

How this is scored

How a team of several people and an agency publish to a brand account without an accident — and who can be shown to have approved what.

0 — Shared login, no roles, no approvals.

3 — Separate users with a coarse admin split and an optional single approval step.

5 — Roles per network and account, multi-step approval workflows, comments on drafts, and an activity log.

8 — Client or brand workspaces with strict separation, configurable approval chains including legal review, content locking after approval, and an audit trail of who changed and published what.

10 — Governance a regulated brand could pass an audit on: complete audit trail of edits, approvals and publications, enforced approval before anything reaches a network, granular permissions per account and action, and no shared credentials anywhere in the design.

Report an error

The Analyst

Multi-tier approval workflows with batch approval, custom roles and per-workspace permissions, conditional guards against accidental publishing, post version history and history logs, comment privacy toggles for client review, per-brand calendars, and OAuth connections without stored social credentials match the high anchor well. We found no public information on content locking after approval or configurable legal-review chains specifically. 3 4 5 8 9 10

Report an error

Network coverage & API resilience

How this is scored

Which networks are supported through official APIs, how quickly the vendor follows platform changes, and what the customer keeps when a network breaks or leaves.

0 — A few networks, some through unofficial means, with no statement about API status or platform changes.

3 — The major networks through official APIs, but feature gaps undocumented and platform changes communicated after they bite.

5 — Official API integrations across the main networks with the per-network limitations documented, and a changelog when platform behaviour changes.

8 — Broad official coverage including the newer networks, a public status page for integrations, advance notice of deprecations, and full export of the customer's own publishing and engagement archive.

10 — Platform dependency handled as an engineering commitment: official partner status where it exists, per-network capability documented and kept current, rapid response to API changes with the history to show it, and an archive that stays the customer's whatever a network does next.

Report an error

The Analyst

Eight networks including the newer Threads connect through an industry-standard OAuth process, a status page exists, and dedicated integration pages document per-network capabilities for Instagram and TikTok. We found no public information on documented per-network limitations, a changelog for platform behaviour changes, advance notice of deprecations, or full export of the engagement archive beyond a content export for offline collaboration. 3 4 9 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the archive and the community conversations are processed, who the contracting entity is, which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. Note that the networks themselves are non-EU by definition — this criterion judges the tool, not the platforms it talks to.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — AI features, analytics, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, and the handling of message content from the networks described with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that squarely addresses the personal data arriving from the networks in comments and messages.

Report an error

The Analyst

The contracting entity is Bending Spoons US Inc. of New York, infrastructure is AWS with no region stated on the captured security page, and we found no subprocessor names in the captures even though the data processing agreement points to a list at a security link. GDPR terms, Standard Contractual Clauses, Italian governing law, the Milan courts and the Italian Garante as supervisory authority give partial European scaffolding, but hosting region and the entity behind the contract keep this near the bottom of the scale. 2 3

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a team can compute the real annual invoice for their account and user count — including the tier where approvals and the inbox begin — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A per-user headline exists, but the number of social accounts included, or the tier where approvals and the inbox appear, is unstated.

5 — Per-user or per-account prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed capability (inbox, approvals, reporting) sits in an unpriced tier.

8 — Every tier priced publicly with account and user limits, feature boundaries, the cost of an extra account or seat, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of social accounts, users and client workspaces, with every add-on priced.

Report an error

The Analyst

The captured pages show a free trial referenced as two weeks and a repeated Compare Plans link, but we found no public pricing figures, no stated account or user limits per tier, and no indication of the tier where approvals and the inbox begin. A team cannot compute an annual invoice from what was captured. 5 8 10

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Questions about Loomly

Is Loomly European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Loomly is based.

Where does Loomly store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does Loomly have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Loomly?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Swat.io (3.5/5), Hootsuite (3/5) and Agorapulse (3/5) highest among the other 28 Social Media Marketing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Swat.io (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Loomly alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Loomly? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Data processing agreement (dpa) — found from the homepage www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 30 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Security / trust page — found from the homepage www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Publishing & calendar — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Publishing & calendar — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Engagement & community inbox — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Analytics & reporting — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Approvals, roles & brand safety — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Network coverage & API resilience — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Network coverage & API resilience — found from sitemap www.loomly.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →