Supply Chain & Logistics
Mintsoft
UK / wider Europe Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Access UK Ltd · www.mintsoft.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Mintsoft at a glance
- Vendor
- Access UK Ltd
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Mintsoft 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Mintsoft, cloud-based warehouse, order and shipping software for 3PLs and ecommerce brands, comes from Access UK Ltd, part of The Access Group. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Mintsoft, cloud-based warehouse, order and shipping software for 3PLs and ecommerce brands, comes from Access UK Ltd, part of The Access Group. Inventory control and warehouse operations are strongest, scores clustering at 8: batch, serial and best-before tracking with FIFO allocation, multi-warehouse transfers, goods-in against purchase orders and ASNs, several scan-verified picking strategies, and Honeywell, Newland and Zebra scanners. Shipping and returns scores run 7-8 on rules-based courier selection, commercial invoices for most non-EU destinations and auto-created exchange orders. Freight and transport is the weakest area and the genuine split, scores ranging 1 to 4: the transport planner, at 4, credits parcel-level courier choice and SSCC pallet handling, while the remaining scores, at 1-2, read the pallet features as warehouse handling rather than transport. Integration and automation scores cluster at 5-6 on native connectors, the captured pages giving different figures for the count, and sovereignty at 4 — contracting entity and EEA storage stated, no public information on subprocessors or security certification. Prices start at "From £159 /month" and "From £375 /month".
Speaks for it
- Stock tracked by batch, serial number and best-before date, with automatic FIFO allocation, cycle counts, multi-warehouse transfers and a full audit trail of stock movements.
- Goods-in receipted against purchase orders and ASNs, with one- and two-stage putaway and multiple scan-verified picking strategies on Honeywell, Newland and Zebra scanners.
- Shipping rules select courier and service by weight, order value and destination, with commercial invoices produced for most non-EU destinations and tracking written back to connected channels.
- Returns record reason and condition, update stock automatically and can auto-create the exchange order, with named third-party returns partners ReturnGo, Loop and At Last.
- Couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems connect through integrations the vendor states are native and maintained by The Access Group, plus a courier API connector for custom links.
Held against it
- We found no public information on booking pallet, groupage or truckload freight, comparing forwarder quotes or tenders, CMR documents, or CO2 per shipment.
- We found no public information on a documented general API, webhooks, EDI, or a complete export of orders, stock and shipment history when the contract ends.
- The captured pages give different figures for the integration count — 131 standard integrations, 150+, 175+ in a customer quote, and "hundreds".
- We found no public information on a subprocessor list, a data processing agreement, the carriers' role in processing recipient data, or a security certification.
- We found no public information on pick, pack and error rates per user and shift, or on whether shipments run on own carrier contracts or vendor rates.
Best for
- You run a 3PL or multi-client warehouse and need client billing on carton and pallet rates, a client portal and multi-warehouse stock.
- You track batches, serial numbers or best-before dates and want FIFO allocation, cycle counts and a full audit trail across locations.
- You fulfil parcel orders across many sales channels and want rule-based courier selection with tracking written back automatically.
Avoid if
- You book pallet, groupage or full-truckload transport with forwarders — the transport features documented are courier parcel shipping and warehouse pallet handling.
- Your systems need a documented general API, webhooks or EDI — the public integration story is native connectors plus a courier API connector for custom courier links.
- Your teams use iOS handhelds — the mobile app is published via the Google Play Store for Android devices with Android 11 or above.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Inventory & stock control | 4 of 5 |
| Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing | 4 of 5 |
| Multi-carrier shipping & returns | 3.5 of 5 |
| Freight & transport management | 1 of 5 |
| Integrations, automation & exit | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
Inventory & stock control
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the stock figure can be trusted: every goods receipt, sale, transfer, return and correction booked as a movement, stock per location and channel, batches, serial numbers and best-before dates where the goods need them, reorder points and purchase orders, and stock synchronised to every sales channel so nothing is oversold.
0 — No stock keeping; quantities live in the shop or in a spreadsheet.
3 — A stock number per product that can be edited by hand, with no movement history, no locations and no link to purchasing.
5 — Stock per product and warehouse updated by orders and goods receipts, synchronised to the connected sales channels, with low-stock alerts and purchase orders to suppliers.
8 — Every movement booked with a reason and a user, stock per bin location, batches, serial numbers and expiry dates tracked, stocktaking (cycle or annual) supported, bundles and kits resolved to components, and reorder suggestions from sales history.
10 — The stock record is an audit-proof ledger: complete movement history exportable, inventory valuation method stated (FIFO, average cost), multi-warehouse and multi-entity stock with transfers in transit, demand forecasting documented, and the stock figure reconciled across every channel in near real time.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
A full audit trail of stock movements, bin-level locations with customisable location types, batches, serial numbers and best-before dates with FIFO allocation, cycle counting, purchase-order goods-in and PAR levels to automate reordering — that is most of what I need to trust the stock figure, and returns push stock levels back to every sales channel automatically. We found no public information on a stated inventory valuation method, kits and bundles resolved to components, or demand forecasting. 2 6 11 15
The Warehouse Manager
Stock lives per location with custom location types and a stated allocation order — expiry dates first, then default pick locations — and batches, serial numbers and best-before dates are all supported with automatic FIFO allocation for perishables and expiry warnings. A full audit trail of stock movements is claimed, plus PAR levels for reordering, purchase orders, cycle counts, multi-warehouse stock and channel updates without delay. We found no public information on an inventory valuation method, demand forecasting or exportable movement history, so I stop short of the top. 2 6 7 9 11 15
The Transport Planner
Stock lives per bin location with batches, serial numbers and best-before dates tracked, expiry-driven FIFO allocation, cycle counting, multi-warehouse support and a full audit trail of stock movements, while orders and returns push stock updates to every connected sales channel automatically and PAR levels trigger reordering. I found no public information on bundles and kits resolved to components, a stated inventory valuation method, or demand forecasting, so it sits just below the top level. 2 9 15 11 6
The Fulfilment Provider
Batches, serial numbers, best-before dates with automatic FIFO allocation, cycle counts, multi-warehouse stock with transfers, purchase-order receipts and PAR-level reordering are all documented, alongside a full audit trail of stock movements and automatic stock updates across the connected sales channels. We found no public information on a stated inventory valuation method, kits or bundles resolved to components, or demand forecasting, which keeps the stock record short of an audit-proof ledger. 2 6 7 9 11 14 15
The IT & Integration Lead
Batch, lot, serial-number and best-before tracking with automatic FIFO allocation, cycle counting, multi-warehouse stock with transfers, PAR thresholds for reordering and a full audit trail of actions and stock movements, pushed automatically to the connected sales channels — a stock position I could audit. We found no public information on an exportable movement history, a stated valuation method or demand forecasting. 2 6 9 15
The Skeptic
Stock is held per location with batches, serial numbers and best-before dates, expiry-driven and oldest-stock allocation, cycle counts, multi-warehouse transfers, PAR-level automatic reordering and a full audit trail of actions and stock movements, with levels updated automatically across the connected sales channels. We found no public information on kit or bundle resolution to components, reorder suggestions driven by sales history, or a stated inventory valuation method. 2 6 9 14 15
Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The physical work in the warehouse: goods receipt against a purchase order, putaway to bin locations, picking strategies (single order, batch, wave, zone), scanner and mobile app guidance, packing with checks, and the performance figures a warehouse lead runs the shift by.
0 — No warehouse process support; staff print the order and walk.
3 — A pick list or packing slip printed per order, with no bin locations, no scanning and no check that the right item went into the box.
5 — Bin locations, goods receipt against purchase orders, pick lists sorted by route, and barcode scanning on a phone or scanner to confirm picks and packs.
8 — Several picking strategies (batch, wave, multi-order trolley), putaway suggestions, packing with weight or scan verification, handheld scanner support named, and pick, pack and error rates reported per user and shift.
10 — A full WMS documented end to end: slotting and replenishment, cross-docking, multi-client operation for 3PLs with client billing, integration with automation (conveyors, pick-to-light, AutoStore or similar) named, and offline-tolerant mobile apps with an audit trail of every scan.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
Single-order, multi-tote and bulk batch picking plus zone-based rebin picking are documented, with route-optimised picks, one- and two-stage putaway, goods-in against purchase orders and ASNs, scan verification at goods-in, locations and pack stations, and named handheld support from Honeywell, Newland and Zebra. What I could not find is pick, pack and error rates per user and shift, which is what I would run the day on. 2 8 9 15
The Warehouse Manager
Goods in is receipted against purchase orders and ASNs with one- and two-stage putaway, picks run in location-sequence with named scanners (Honeywell, Zebra, Newland) and assignable, pausable batches across three picking strategies plus rebin by zone. Packing lists are barcode-verified with per-client packing instructions, and inbound/outbound quality control is documented. We found no public information on pick, pack or error rates per user and shift — the figures I run a shift by. 2 6 8 9 15
The Transport Planner
Goods in reconciles against purchase orders and ASNs with one- and two-stage putaway and putaway rules; single-order, multi-tote and bulk batch picking plus zone-based rebin picking run on optimised routes; and packing is barcode-verified with box packing lists, quality checks and goods-out bay directing, on named scanners from Honeywell, Zebra and Newland. 3PL client billing and a client portal round it out; I found no public information on pick and error rates per user and shift, or integration with conveyors and pick-to-light automation. 8 9 15 2
The Fulfilment Provider
Goods receipt against purchase orders and ASNs, one- and two-stage putaway, three picking methods plus zone-based rebin picking, guided routes, barcode verification at goods-in, locations and pack stations, and named scanner families (Honeywell, Newland, Zebra) are documented, with multi-client 3PL operation and client billing for carton/pallet storage and picking on top. We found no public information on cross-docking, integration with conveyors or pick-to-light automation, offline tolerance of the mobile app, or pick and error rates per user and shift. 2 4 8 9 12 13 15
The IT & Integration Lead
Goods receipt against purchase orders and ASNs, one- and two-stage putaway, guided routes, several picking strategies (single order, multi-tote batch, bulk batch, rebin by zone) with scan verification at goods-in, locations and pack stations, named scanner families — Honeywell, Newland, Zebra — and 3PL client billing on carton and pallet rates. We found no public information on pick, pack and error rates per user and shift, offline tolerance of the mobile app, or integration with conveyors and pick-to-light. 8 9 13 15
The Skeptic
Receiving against purchase orders and ASNs, one- and two-stage putaway, named scanner hardware (Honeywell, Newland, Zebra), and several picking strategies — single-order for B2B, multi-tote batch, bulk batch and zone rebin — with barcode verification at goods-in, locations and pack stations, plus 3PL invoicing and a client portal. We found no public information on wave picking, conveyor or pick-to-light integration, or pick, pack and error rates reported per user and shift. 6 8 9 15
Multi-carrier shipping & returns
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting parcels out and back: carriers connected, label creation in bulk, rules that pick the carrier and service, customs documents for non-EU destinations, tracking and the notifications the recipient sees, a returns portal, and whether the customer uses its own carrier contracts or buys labels through the vendor.
0 — No shipping features; labels come from each carrier's own portal.
3 — Labels for one or two carriers created one by one, with no rules, no tracking for the recipient and no returns handling.
5 — Several carriers connected with bulk label printing, a choice between own carrier contracts and vendor rates, tracking numbers written back to the shop, and a basic returns label flow.
8 — Shipping rules by weight, destination, value and channel choose carrier and service automatically, customs documents (CN22/CN23, commercial invoice, EORI, HS codes) generated, branded tracking pages and notifications, a self-service returns portal with reasons, and pickup points supported.
10 — Shipping runs without a person: rate comparison across carriers at label time, own contracts for every connected carrier, delivery promise and checkout options from live carrier data, returns with refund or exchange triggered on receipt, and carrier performance and cost reported per lane.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
Shipping rules by weight, value and destination with fastest/safest/cheapest/greenest auto-selection, labels printed automatically on scan, commercial invoices generated for most non-EU destinations, tracking written back to every connected channel, and a returns flow with reasons, condition marking and automatic exchange orders cover my four carriers and the Swiss paperwork. A self-service customer-facing returns portal and pickup points are not documented — returns portals are reached through named third parties such as ReturnGo, Loop and At Last. 2 10 11
The Warehouse Manager
Shipping rules choose courier and service by parcel weight, order value and destination, with automatic fastest/safest/cheapest/greenest selection, commercial invoices generated for most non-EU destinations, paperless trade, tracking written back to all connected channels and the app directing parcels to the right goods-out bay. Returns carry reasons and condition, automatically restock and can auto-create exchange orders, with named third-party returns software (ReturnGo, Loop, At Last) connected. We found no public information on CN22/CN23 forms, EORI or HS codes, pickup points, branded customer tracking pages, or whether own carrier contracts can be used instead of vendor rates. 2 10 11
The Transport Planner
Shipping rules on weight, order value and destination choose courier and service automatically, including fastest, cheapest or greenest; labels print on scan, including from the mobile app; commercial invoices are produced for most non-EU destinations; tracking is written back to every connected channel; and returns are logged with reasons and condition grades, auto-update stock and can create the exchange order, with self-service returns available through partners like ReturnGo and Loop. I found no public information on CN22/CN23 forms, EORI or HS codes, branded tracking pages, pickup points, or whether I can use my own carrier contracts or must take vendor rates, which is the first thing I would ask. 10 11 2 14
The Fulfilment Provider
Shipping rules on weight, value and destination select the courier and service, with fastest/safest/cheapest/greenest auto-selection, commercial invoices for most non-EU destinations, paperless trade, tracking written back to every channel, and a returns flow with reasons, condition marking, automatic restock and auto-created exchange orders. We found no public information on whether clients ship on their own carrier contracts or vendor rates, on CN22/CN23 and HS codes, branded tracking pages, pickup points, or a self-service returns portal for end customers. 2 10 11 14
The IT & Integration Lead
Shipping rules select courier and service by weight, order value and destination with per-product overrides, commercial invoices are produced for most non-EU destinations, paperless trade is supported on some courier integrations, tracking flows automatically back to every connected channel, and returns are processed with reasons, condition grading and automatic exchange orders. We found no public information on CN22/CN23 documents with EORI and HS codes, branded customer-facing tracking pages, pickup points, or the choice between our own carrier contracts and vendor rates. 10 11
The Skeptic
Rules on weight, order value and destination choose the courier and service automatically, commercial invoices are produced for most non-EU destinations, tracking is written back to every connected channel, and returns are logged with reasons and condition and can auto-create an exchange order. We found no public information on whether customers ship on their own carrier contracts or on vendor rates, on CN22/CN23, EORI and HS codes, or on branded tracking pages and pickup points. 10 11
Freight & transport management
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Moving goods beyond parcels: pallet, groupage, full and part truckload, sea and air freight booked with carriers or forwarders, quotes and tenders compared, transport orders and documents (CMR, eCMR, delivery notes), shipment tracking across modes, freight cost audit, and CO2 emissions reported per shipment.
0 — No freight features; pallets and trucks are booked by phone and e-mail.
3 — A form to send a booking request to one forwarder, or freight rates shown without booking, tracking or documents.
5 — Pallet and groupage shipments booked with several carriers from one place, prices compared, transport documents generated, and the shipment status tracked.
8 — Spot quotes and tenders sent to many carriers with responses compared, the customer's own freight agreements and rate tables stored, eCMR or digital delivery notes, multi-modal tracking, freight invoices checked against the agreed price, and CO2 per shipment reported to a named standard (GLEC, ISO 14083).
10 — Transport management run in the system: route and load planning, dock and yard slot booking, carrier scorecards, freight cost allocated to orders and cost centres, and a carrier network that connects by API or EDI rather than by e-mail.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
The pallet handling here is internal to the warehouse — carton and pallet management, SSCC barcodes for ASNs and full-pallet transfers between locations — with outbound goods going out through courier integrations to goods-out bays. We found no public information on booking pallet, groupage or full-truckload freight, comparing quotes or tenders, transport documents, multi-modal tracking, freight cost audit or CO2 per shipment. 10 12 13
The Warehouse Manager
The Cartons & Pallets module stores, moves, receives, picks and bills pallet-level inventory with autogenerated IDs, SSCC codes for ASNs and full-pallet picking for B2B and bulk flows — that is warehouse pallet handling, and it is genuinely useful. We found no public information on booking pallet, groupage or truckload shipments with carriers or forwarders, CMR or digital delivery notes, freight rate comparison or tendering, or CO2 per shipment. 2 12 13
The Transport Planner
This is my daily work, and what is documented is parcel-shaped: shipments go to many couriers from one place with automatic tracking, service selection by cheapest or greenest, and dispatch paperwork, while the pallet features I can see — autogenerated pallet IDs, SSCC codes for ASNs, full-pallet picking and transfers between my own locations — are warehouse handling, not booking transport. I found no public information on comparing quotes from several forwarders, storing my agreed freight rates to check invoices against, CMR or eCMR documents, sea or air freight, or a CO2 figure per shipment my sustainability report could cite, so my forty pallets and three part loads a week would stay with phone and e-mail. 10 13 12 14
The Fulfilment Provider
The freight-adjacent material is pallet and carton handling inside the warehouse — SSCC labels for ASNs, full-pallet picking and transfers, and dispatch documentation — plus a greenest-option courier choice at shipment time. We found no public information on booking pallet, groupage, truckload, sea or air freight with forwarders, comparing spot quotes or tenders, CMR or eCMR documents, multi-modal tracking, freight invoice audit, or CO2 reporting per shipment. 10 12 13 14
The IT & Integration Lead
The captured pages document pallet and carton handling inside the warehouse — SSCC barcodes for ASNs, full-pallet picking, pallet transfers between locations and carton-based storage billing — but that is warehouse stock, not transport. We found no public information on booking pallet or truckload freight with forwarders, comparing quotes or tenders, CMR or digital delivery notes, multi-modal tracking, freight invoice checking or CO2 reporting. 12 13
The Skeptic
The documented pallet and carton features are warehouse storage and picking — SSCC labels, pallet transfers and carton-based storage billing — alongside courier-connected parcel shipping, which is a different kind of tool from transport management. We found no public information on booking pallet, groupage or full-truck transport with forwarders, on spot quotes and tenders, on CMR or delivery notes, or on CO2 per shipment. 10 12 13
Integrations, automation & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the tool fits the business around it: maintained connectors to shop systems, marketplaces, ERP and accounting (DATEV and the like), a documented API and webhooks, EDI for retail and logistics partners, rules that automate order routing and status updates, and a documented export of orders, stock and shipment history when the customer leaves.
0 — No integrations; orders are typed in or uploaded by hand.
3 — A CSV import and export and one or two shop connectors, with no API and no automation.
5 — Connectors to the main shop systems and marketplaces, a public API with documentation, and rules for common automations (order status, carrier choice, notifications).
8 — A broad connector list with ERP and accounting exports, webhooks, EDI (EDIFACT or similar) supported or offered through a named partner, rule engines for order routing across warehouses, and the API rate limits and versioning documented.
10 — The tool is an open part of the stack: every object readable and writable by API, a developer sandbox, connectors maintained by the vendor with a stated support policy, and a complete data export (orders, stock movements, shipments, documents) in open formats documented for the end of the contract.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
The captured pages give different figures for the integration count — 131 standard integrations, "150+", a customer testimonial of "175+" and elsewhere "hundreds" — but marketplaces, shopping carts, couriers and accounting systems are all named, the integrations are native and maintained by The Access Group, and order import, stock updates, label printing and shipping documentation run automatically. Order rules and batch scheduling are the automation layer; we found no public documentation of a general API with rate limits and versioning, webhooks, EDI, or a documented export of orders and history when the contract ends. 1 3 4 14
The Warehouse Manager
Integrations are claimed in the hundreds across couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems — the captured pages give different figures for the count (131, 150+, 175+, "hundreds") — built native and maintained by The Access Group, with a courier API connector for custom links and a customer testimonial that integrations cost nothing extra. Shipping rules, order rules and batch scheduling automate routing and dispatch documentation. We found no public information on a documented public API, webhooks, EDI, or a documented export of orders, stock and shipment history when the contract ends. 1 3 4 10 14
The Transport Planner
The connector list is broad — the captured pages give different figures for it: 131 standard integrations, 150+, 175+ in a customer quote, and hundreds — spanning couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems, native and maintained by The Access Group, with a courier API connector for custom links and order-rule, shipping-rule and batch-scheduling automation on top. I found no public information on a documented public API, webhooks, EDI, API rate limits and versioning, or a documented export of orders, stock and shipment history at the end of the contract. 3 14 4 1 10
The Fulfilment Provider
The captured pages give different figures for the connector count — 131 standard integrations on the pricing page, 150-plus on the returns page, 175-plus in a customer testimonial and "hundreds" on the features pages — spanning couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems, and the vendor states the integrations are native and maintained in-house, with a courier API connector for custom carrier links and order-rule and batch-scheduling automation. We found no public information on a documented general API, webhooks, EDI support, or a complete export of orders, stock movements and shipment history at the end of the contract. 1 3 4 10 11 14 15
The IT & Integration Lead
The connector story is strong: 131 standard integrations spanning couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems, built natively and maintained by The Access Group, with a courier API connector for custom links plus order rules, batch scheduling and automatic shipment raising. But the plumbing I have to sign off is undocumented on these pages — we found no public information on a documented public API, webhooks, EDI for retail partners, API rate limits and versioning, or a complete data export when the contract ends. 1 3 4 14
The Skeptic
Couriers, marketplaces, shopping carts and accounting systems are connected through native connectors the vendor says it maintains itself, with order rules, shipping rules and batch scheduling automating the common flows. The captured pages give different figures for the connector count — 131 standard, 150+, and 175+ in a customer quote — and we found no public information on a documented general API, webhooks, EDI, or a complete export of orders, stock and shipment history at the end of the contract. 1 3 4 11 14
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where order, customer and shipment data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, carriers' label APIs, payment, e-mail, analytics). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; recipient addresses flow to every connected carrier, so the processing chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the service.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (support, e-mail, analytics, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered for the recipient and customer data, and the role of carriers (as independent controllers or processors) explained.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security certification (ISO 27001, SOC 2 or BSI C5) published rather than implied.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
Access UK Ltd is named as the contracting entity, incorporated in England and Wales with a company number, ownership sits with The Access Group, and the privacy policy states storage at a destination within the European Economic Area on cloud hosting the group manages itself. Beyond that the chain is dark: no subprocessor list with locations, no data processing agreement offered, no explanation of how carrier label APIs process recipient addresses, and no ISO 27001, SOC 2 or BSI C5 certification published. 4 5 7
The Warehouse Manager
The contracting entity is named plainly — Access UK Ltd, incorporated in England and Wales, company number 02343760 — and the privacy policy states storage at a destination within the EEA, on cloud hosting managed by The Access Group with encryption at rest and HTTPS transfers. We found no public information naming subprocessors, a data processing agreement, the controllership role of the connected carriers, or a published security certification. 3 4 5
The Transport Planner
The contracting entity is named and registered — Access UK Ltd, incorporated in England and Wales, with Mintsoft owned by The Access Group — and the privacy policy states personal information is stored within the European Economic Area, with encryption in transit and at rest and two-factor authentication described. I found no public information on the subprocessors behind the service, a data processing agreement covering shipment and customer data, or a security certification such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2, so the chain beyond the vendor itself is unverifiable from these pages. 5 4 7
The Fulfilment Provider
The privacy policy names Access UK Ltd, registered in England and Wales under company number 02343760, as the data controller and states that personal information is stored within the European Economic Area, with cloud hosting managed by The Access Group, encryption at rest and HTTPS transfers. We found no public information on a named subprocessor list or hosting infrastructure, a data processing agreement, the carriers' controller or processor role for recipient data, or a published security certification such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2. 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
The privacy policy names the contracting entity — Access UK Ltd, registered in England and Wales — states that information is stored within the European Economic Area, and names the company as data controller under the Data Protection Act 2018. We found no public information on a subprocessor list covering the carrier label APIs that receive recipient addresses, a data processing agreement, the role of carriers as controllers or processors, or a published security certification. 4 5
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is named — Access UK Ltd, incorporated in England and Wales, company number 02343760, owned by The Access Group — and the privacy policy states storage at a destination "within the European Economic Area" on cloud hosting managed by The Access Group. Beyond that we found no public information on named subprocessors and their locations, a data processing agreement, the carriers' role in processing recipient addresses, or a security certification. 4 5
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: subscription per tier, user, warehouse or module, the per-order, per-label or per-shipment fees, label rates and surcharges when shipping through the vendor's contracts, connector and setup fees, hardware, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but the volume fees, included orders or labels, and how the price scales are unclear.
5 — Prices per tier are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (per-order or per-label fees beyond the allowance, connectors, extra users or warehouses, onboarding) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with included volumes and the fee per order, label or shipment beyond them, add-ons and setup listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated, and whether own carrier contracts are allowed on each tier said plainly.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given order volume, warehouse count and module set, with every fee, label surcharge, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
Two starting prices are public — "From £159 /month" for eCommerce Brands & Wholesalers and "From £375 /month" for 3PL — with unlimited browser users and 131 standard integrations listed in the plan, and prices said to depend on user count and monthly order volume. But the order-volume steps, any per-order or per-label fees, the prices of optional modules such as order rules, batch scheduling and white-labelling, mobile app user licences, minimum term and VAT treatment are not published, so I cannot compute a year's cost from the pages alone. 3 14 15
The Warehouse Manager
Two plan families are public with starting figures — "From £159 /month" for eCommerce Brands & Wholesalers and "From £375 /month" for 3PLs — and main inclusions are listed, including unlimited browser users and 131 standard integrations, with prices stated to depend on user count and monthly order volume. But the order-volume fee steps, the prices of the optional modules (order rules, batch scheduling, white-labelling, advanced analytics) and of mobile app user licences, the minimum term and the VAT treatment are not priced on the captured pricing page, so I cannot compute a year's cost from it. 3 14
The Transport Planner
Two tiers are priced publicly — from £159 per month for ecommerce brands and wholesalers and from £375 per month for 3PLs — with the main inclusions named, unlimited browser users and the core warehouse, order, inventory and shipping modules, and the price said to scale with user count and monthly order volume. I found no public price for mobile app user licenses or the optional modules (order rules, batch scheduling, white-labelling, advanced analytics, rebin picking), nor included order volumes, the per-order fee beyond them, the minimum term or VAT treatment, so I cannot compute a full year's cost from the public pages alone. 3 15
The Fulfilment Provider
Two plans carry public starting prices — from £159/month for ecommerce brands and wholesalers, from £375/month for 3PLs — with the included modules, unlimited browser users and 131 standard integrations listed, and the price is said to depend on user count and monthly order volume. We found no public information on the order-volume bands, per-order or per-label fees, the price of the optional modules such as order rules, batch scheduling, white-labelling and advanced analytics, mobile app user licenses, minimum term or VAT treatment, so a real annual cost cannot be computed from the public pages alone. 3 14
The IT & Integration Lead
Two published starting prices — "From £159 /month" for ecommerce brands and "From £375 /month" for 3PLs — come with feature lists and named determinants (number of users and monthly order volume). We found no public information on the tier table itself, included order volumes, per-order or per-label fees, prices for the optional modules and mobile-app licences, minimum term, VAT treatment, or what happens to the data on cancellation. 3
The Skeptic
What is published amounts to two entry prices — "From £159 /month" for brands and wholesalers and "From £375 /month" for 3PLs — with plans "determined by the number of users and monthly order volume", the inclusions listed per plan, and a customer quote that integrations can be added "at no extra cost". What a buyer cannot compute from this: the order-volume steps, the per-order or per-label fees, mobile app licence and optional module prices, minimum term, VAT treatment, and whether own carrier contracts are allowed on each tier — we found no public information on any of these. 3 14
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Mintsoft
Is Mintsoft European?
Yes, though not from the EU. whats-best.ai classifies Mintsoft as UK / wider Europe.
Where does Mintsoft store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
Does Mintsoft have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Mintsoft?
As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Ongoing WMS (3.5/5), Shippingbo (3.5/5) and Linnworks (3/5) highest among the other 14 Supply Chain & Logistics products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Ongoing WMS (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Mintsoft alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 26 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 37 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (15)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (warehouse management) www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Pricing page www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Security / trust page www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy naming the legal entity www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Inventory & stock control — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Inventory & stock control — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Multi-carrier shipping & returns — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Multi-carrier shipping & returns — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Freight & transport management — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Freight & transport management — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Integrations, automation & exit — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Integrations, automation & exit — found from sitemap www.mintsoft.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →