Supply Chain & Logistics
Shippo
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Shippo Inc. · www.goshippo.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Shippo at a glance
- Vendor
- Shippo Inc.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Shippo 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Shippo is a parcel-label API, and the scoring reflects that scope. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Shippo is a parcel-label API, and the scoring reflects that scope. Shipping and returns is the strength — scores cluster at 6 — built on purchase of up to 10,000 labels in a single API request, a one-call automation that applies the rule, selects the rate and buys the label with a free dry run, and scan-based return labels charged only when used, though returns work only with the same carrier as the outbound shipment and only for USPS, FedEx and UPS. Inventory control, freight and transport and sovereignty each sit at 0, with warehouse operations at 0 to 1: no public information was found on stock, warehouse processes, freight booking, or the contracting entity, hosting location and subprocessors. The genuine split is integration and automation, 4 to 6: some credit a documented API — token authentication, free test tokens, an MCP server, per-merchant platform billing — while others find the missing shop connectors, webhooks, EDI and end-of-contract export decisive, with the Automations API in beta. Pricing transparency runs 1 to 2; no price figures appear on the captured pages.
Speaks for it
- Bulk purchase of up to 10,000 shipping labels in a single API request
- One automation request applies the rule, selects the rate and buys the label, with a free dry-run preview of the chosen rate
- Scan-based return labels are free to print and charged only when used
- Test-token calls to the API are free
- A platform setup handles per-merchant billing, carrier accounts and reporting for businesses shipping through your integration
Held against it
- Return labels work only with the same carrier as the outbound shipment and only for USPS, FedEx and UPS
- We found no public information on inventory or warehouse processes — inventory control scored 0, warehouse operations 0 to 1
- We found no public information on shop or marketplace connectors, webhooks, EDI, or an export of orders and shipment history when a contract ends
- The Automations API is in beta, not yet covered by the version header, and returns 403 unless enabled for the account
- We found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction, hosting location or subprocessors, though recipient addresses flow to carrier label APIs
Best for
- You ship parcels at volume and want up to 10,000 labels created and purchased in a single API request
- You build a platform on which other businesses ship, and need per-merchant billing, carrier accounts and reporting
- Your returns ride USPS, FedEx or UPS with the same carrier as the outbound parcel, and you want labels that cost nothing until scanned
- You want to test the whole label flow without charge first, using free test tokens and free dry runs
Avoid if
- You need return labels on carriers other than USPS, FedEx and UPS, or with a carrier different from the outbound shipment
- You need a stable API contract now — the Automations API is in beta, not yet covered by the version header, and returns 403 unless enabled for the account
- You book pallet, groupage or truckload freight — the only carriers named on the pages are the parcel carriers USPS, FedEx and UPS, and freight and transport scored 0
- You need stock synchronized across your sales channels to prevent overselling — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Inventory & stock control | 0 of 5 |
| Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing | 0.5 of 5 |
| Multi-carrier shipping & returns | 3 of 5 |
| Freight & transport management | 0 of 5 |
| Integrations, automation & exit | 2 of 5 |
Inventory & stock control
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the stock figure can be trusted: every goods receipt, sale, transfer, return and correction booked as a movement, stock per location and channel, batches, serial numbers and best-before dates where the goods need them, reorder points and purchase orders, and stock synchronised to every sales channel so nothing is oversold.
0 — No stock keeping; quantities live in the shop or in a spreadsheet.
3 — A stock number per product that can be edited by hand, with no movement history, no locations and no link to purchasing.
5 — Stock per product and warehouse updated by orders and goods receipts, synchronised to the connected sales channels, with low-stock alerts and purchase orders to suppliers.
8 — Every movement booked with a reason and a user, stock per bin location, batches, serial numbers and expiry dates tracked, stocktaking (cycle or annual) supported, bundles and kits resolved to components, and reorder suggestions from sales history.
10 — The stock record is an audit-proof ledger: complete movement history exportable, inventory valuation method stated (FIFO, average cost), multi-warehouse and multi-entity stock with transfers in transit, demand forecasting documented, and the stock figure reconciled across every channel in near real time.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead not rated — no public information
I found no public information on inventory or stock control in the vendor page or the batch, returns, automations and quickstart documentation I read — nothing on stock movements, bin locations, purchase orders or synchronisation to sales channels. For my shop and two marketplaces, where overselling is the daily risk, I cannot judge whether the stock figure would be trustworthy from anything captured here. 1 2 3 4 5
The Warehouse Manager not rated — no public information
The captured pages are all about label creation, rates and API automation; we found no public information on stock movements, stock per location, batch or best-before dates, reorder points or stock synchronisation to sales channels. 1 2 3 4 5
The Transport Planner not rated — no public information
The captured pages are about labels, returns and API automation; I found no public information on stock figures, goods receipts, movement history, bin locations or batch and serial tracking. Stock control is undocumented on every page I read. 1 2 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider not rated — no public information
I found no public information on stock keeping in the captured pages: nothing on goods movements, bin locations, batches or serials, purchase orders, or stock synchronised to my clients' sales channels. Everything I read concerns label purchase, returns labels and API automation. 1 2 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
Every captured page describes label purchase, batch label creation, rate-rule automation and parcel returns; we found no public information on stock movements, stock per location or channel, batches, serials, reorder points or purchase orders. As far as these pages show, the stock figure would have to live in whatever system hands Shippo its shipments. 2 3 4
The Skeptic not rated — no public information
The captured pages document label purchase, batch label creation, returns labels and rate-rule automation — a parcel-shipping tool. I found no public information on stock figures, movement history, bin locations, batches or channel synchronisation in any of the pages I read. 1 2 3 4 5
Warehouse operations: receiving, picking & packing
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The physical work in the warehouse: goods receipt against a purchase order, putaway to bin locations, picking strategies (single order, batch, wave, zone), scanner and mobile app guidance, packing with checks, and the performance figures a warehouse lead runs the shift by.
0 — No warehouse process support; staff print the order and walk.
3 — A pick list or packing slip printed per order, with no bin locations, no scanning and no check that the right item went into the box.
5 — Bin locations, goods receipt against purchase orders, pick lists sorted by route, and barcode scanning on a phone or scanner to confirm picks and packs.
8 — Several picking strategies (batch, wave, multi-order trolley), putaway suggestions, packing with weight or scan verification, handheld scanner support named, and pick, pack and error rates reported per user and shift.
10 — A full WMS documented end to end: slotting and replenishment, cross-docking, multi-client operation for 3PLs with client billing, integration with automation (conveyors, pick-to-light, AutoStore or similar) named, and offline-tolerant mobile apps with an audit trail of every scan.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead not rated — no public information
The pages I read are entirely about parcel labels and return labels; I found no public information on goods receipt, putaway, picking strategies or scanner guidance. There is nothing here I could run a warehouse shift by, so I cannot score it. 1 2 3 4 5
The Warehouse Manager not rated — no public information
Nothing in the captured pages covers goods receipt against purchase orders, bin locations, putaway, picking or packing; we found no public information on warehouse floor processes, scanner guidance or pick and error rates. 1 2 3 4 5
The Transport Planner not rated — no public information
I found no public information on goods receipt against purchase orders, putaway, picking strategies, scanning or packing checks in the captured pages. Everything documented concerns label generation and API calls, not the physical work in the warehouse. 1 2 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider not rated — no public information
Nothing in the captured pages describes goods receipt, putaway, picking strategies or packing checks. The only scanning mentioned is scan-based return labels, which is a carrier billing mechanism, not warehouse scanning. 1 2 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
The documented workflow reaches the packing bench — batches of up to 10,000 labels purchased in a single call, plus scan-based pay-on-use return labels — and stops there. We found no public information on goods receipt against purchase orders, putaway, bin locations, picking strategies or scan verification of picks and packs. 2 3
Multi-carrier shipping & returns
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting parcels out and back: carriers connected, label creation in bulk, rules that pick the carrier and service, customs documents for non-EU destinations, tracking and the notifications the recipient sees, a returns portal, and whether the customer uses its own carrier contracts or buys labels through the vendor.
0 — No shipping features; labels come from each carrier's own portal.
3 — Labels for one or two carriers created one by one, with no rules, no tracking for the recipient and no returns handling.
5 — Several carriers connected with bulk label printing, a choice between own carrier contracts and vendor rates, tracking numbers written back to the shop, and a basic returns label flow.
8 — Shipping rules by weight, destination, value and channel choose carrier and service automatically, customs documents (CN22/CN23, commercial invoice, EORI, HS codes) generated, branded tracking pages and notifications, a self-service returns portal with reasons, and pickup points supported.
10 — Shipping runs without a person: rate comparison across carriers at label time, own contracts for every connected carrier, delivery promise and checkout options from live carrier data, returns with refund or exchange triggered on receipt, and carrier performance and cost reported per lane.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
Label production is genuinely strong: up to 10,000 labels purchased in one API call with a validation step in between, and the automations endpoint applies my rule, selects the rate and buys the label in a single request, with a dry run that shows the chosen rate at no charge. Returns are scan-based, free to print and charged only when used, but they exist for USPS, FedEx and UPS only and only with the same carrier that carried the outbound parcel. I found no public information on customs documents for non-EU destinations, branded tracking pages, a self-service returns portal or using my own carrier contracts — and a live purchase simply charges the Shippo account — which is exactly what I need for Swiss parcels and the January returns rush. 2 3 4
The Warehouse Manager
Label output is genuinely industrial: up to 10,000 labels created and purchased in a single API call, and an automation request that applies the rule, selects the rate and buys the label, with a dry run that shows the chosen rate before anything is charged. Returns run on scan-based, pay-on-use labels that are free to print and charged only when used, though the pages state they work only with the same carrier as the outbound shipment and only for USPS, FedEx and UPS. We found no public information on customs documents, branded tracking pages, pickup points or a self-service returns portal on the captured pages. 2 3 4
The Transport Planner
Bulk purchase of up to 10,000 labels in one request and an automation that applies your rule, selects the rate and buys the label in a single call are solid, as are pay-on-use return labels that are free to print and charged only when scanned. The returns side is restricted to the same carrier as the outbound shipment and to USPS, FedEx and UPS, and I found no public information on customs documents, branded tracking for the recipient or a self-service returns portal with reasons. 2 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider
This is the tool's core: one API call can apply my rule, select the rate and buy the label, batches purchase up to 10,000 labels in a single request, and a dry-run mode shows which rate the rule picks with no charge. Returns are pay-on-use scan-based labels, free to print until used — but only with the same carrier as the outbound leg and only for USPS, FedEx and UPS, and I found no public information on customs paperwork, branded tracking pages, a returns portal or tracking numbers written back to the shop. 2 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
Bulk label creation for up to 10,000 shipments in one request, automated rate selection by rule with a free dry-run that previews the chosen rate, and pay-on-use scan-based return labels are all documented, with per-merchant carrier accounts described for platforms. The returns pages state plainly that return labels work only with the same carrier as the outbound shipment and only for USPS, FedEx and UPS. We found no public information on tracking pages and recipient notifications, customs documents or pickup points. 2 3 4 5
The Skeptic
Bulk purchase of up to 10,000 labels in one API call, a rule engine that selects the rate and buys the label with a dry-run preview, and scan-based pay-on-use return labels are all documented — though returns are documented for USPS, FedEx and UPS only and only for the same carrier as the outbound shipment. I found no public information on customs documents, branded tracking pages, pickup points or a self-service returns portal with reasons, and no stated choice between own carrier contracts and vendor rates, which caps the score below the higher levels. 2 3 4
Freight & transport management
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Moving goods beyond parcels: pallet, groupage, full and part truckload, sea and air freight booked with carriers or forwarders, quotes and tenders compared, transport orders and documents (CMR, eCMR, delivery notes), shipment tracking across modes, freight cost audit, and CO2 emissions reported per shipment.
0 — No freight features; pallets and trucks are booked by phone and e-mail.
3 — A form to send a booking request to one forwarder, or freight rates shown without booking, tracking or documents.
5 — Pallet and groupage shipments booked with several carriers from one place, prices compared, transport documents generated, and the shipment status tracked.
8 — Spot quotes and tenders sent to many carriers with responses compared, the customer's own freight agreements and rate tables stored, eCMR or digital delivery notes, multi-modal tracking, freight invoices checked against the agreed price, and CO2 per shipment reported to a named standard (GLEC, ISO 14083).
10 — Transport management run in the system: route and load planning, dock and yard slot booking, carrier scorecards, freight cost allocated to orders and cost centres, and a carrier network that connects by API or EDI rather than by e-mail.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead not rated — no public information
The captured pages cover parcel labels and scan-based returns only; I found no public information on pallet or groupage booking, freight quotes and tenders, transport documents such as CMR, freight invoice checks or per-shipment emissions. I cannot judge freight capability from this material. 1 2 3 4 5
The Warehouse Manager not rated — no public information
Every captured page deals with parcel labels and returns; we found no public information on pallet, groupage or truckload booking, freight quotes and tenders, transport documents, multi-modal tracking or emissions reporting. 1 2 3 4 5
The Transport Planner not rated — no public information
I book pallets and part loads every week, and the captured pages say nothing about pallet, groupage, full or part truckload booking, forwarder quote comparison, CMR or eCMR documents, freight invoice checking or CO2 per shipment. I found no public information on freight and transport management; the documentation covers parcel labels and their automation. 1 2 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider not rated — no public information
I found no public information on pallet, groupage or truckload freight, forwarder quotes, transport documents such as CMR, multi-modal tracking or emissions in the captured pages. The carriers named appear only in the parcel returns context. 1 2 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
The only carriers named on the captured pages are the parcel carriers USPS, FedEx and UPS, and that in the context of return labels. We found no public information on pallet, groupage or truckload bookings, forwarder quotes and tenders, CMR or eCMR documents, freight invoice checks or emissions reporting. 2 3
Integrations, automation & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the tool fits the business around it: maintained connectors to shop systems, marketplaces, ERP and accounting (DATEV and the like), a documented API and webhooks, EDI for retail and logistics partners, rules that automate order routing and status updates, and a documented export of orders, stock and shipment history when the customer leaves.
0 — No integrations; orders are typed in or uploaded by hand.
3 — A CSV import and export and one or two shop connectors, with no API and no automation.
5 — Connectors to the main shop systems and marketplaces, a public API with documentation, and rules for common automations (order status, carrier choice, notifications).
8 — A broad connector list with ERP and accounting exports, webhooks, EDI (EDIFACT or similar) supported or offered through a named partner, rule engines for order routing across warehouses, and the API rate limits and versioning documented.
10 — The tool is an open part of the stack: every object readable and writable by API, a developer sandbox, connectors maintained by the vendor with a stated support policy, and a complete data export (orders, stock movements, shipments, documents) in open formats documented for the end of the contract.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
There is a documented public API with token authentication, a versioning header for the stable endpoints, a free test mode and even an MCP server for AI agents, and the automations endpoint collapses rule, rate and purchase into one call with a dry run. But I found no public information on connectors to shop systems or marketplaces, webhooks, rate limits, or a documented export of my orders and shipment history at the end of the contract — and for a shop plus two marketplaces that connector picture is the first thing I check before anything else. 4 5
The Warehouse Manager
There is a documented public API with token authentication and a free test token, batch label calls, a rule engine where one request selects the rate and purchases the label, an MCP server for AI agents, and a platform setup with per-merchant billing and carrier accounts. We found no public information on shop-system or marketplace connectors, webhooks, EDI or a documented export of order and shipment history, and the automation endpoints are in beta where response shapes may change without the usual notice period. 2 4 5
The Transport Planner
There is a documented public API with a free test token, an endpoint that collapses rule-based rate selection and label purchase into one request, batch label creation, an MCP server for AI agents, and a platform setup with per-merchant billing and carrier accounts. The automations API is in beta and not yet covered by the version header, and I found no public information on shop or ERP connectors, webhooks, EDI or a documented export of data when the contract ends. 2 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider
The public API is genuinely documented — authentication headers, error codes, free test tokens, a versioning header, an AI-agent MCP server — and the platform setup handles per-merchant billing, carrier accounts and reporting, which is the shape I would need for twenty-two client brands. But I found no public information on maintained shop-system connectors, ERP or accounting exports, webhooks, EDI, rate limits, or a documented data export at the end of a contract. 2 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
The API is properly documented — token authentication with stated 401 and 403 behaviour, an Automations API that applies a rule, selects the rate and buys the label in one request, a batch endpoint for 10,000 labels, free test tokens, an MCP server for AI agents and a platform workflow with per-merchant carrier accounts and billing — though the same page states the Automations API is in beta and not yet covered by the version header. We found no public information on maintained connectors to shops, marketplaces, ERP or accounting exports, webhooks, EDI, or a documented export of orders and shipment history when a contract ends. For my stack that gap is decisive: this documents an API, not the connective tissue around it. 2 4 5
The Skeptic
A documented public API with token authentication, a free test token, batch endpoints, an MCP server and a rules endpoint that can be dry-run without charge — though the Automations API is in beta, not yet covered by the version header, and every endpoint returns 403 unless enabled per account. A platform setup with per-merchant billing and carrier accounts is also described. I found no public information on shop or marketplace connectors, webhooks, EDI, rate limits, or a documented export of order and shipment history when a customer leaves, which keeps it short of the higher levels. 4 5
European sovereignty
panel opinion
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where order, customer and shipment data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, carriers' label APIs, payment, e-mail, analytics). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; recipient addresses flow to every connected carrier, so the processing chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the service.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (support, e-mail, analytics, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered for the recipient and customer data, and the role of carriers (as independent controllers or processors) explained.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security certification (ISO 27001, SOC 2 or BSI C5) published rather than implied.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead not rated — no public information
The pages I read state nothing about the contracting entity's jurisdiction, where order and recipient data are hosted, the subprocessors behind the service, or a data processing agreement. I found no public information on European sovereignty, and with recipient addresses flowing to carrier label APIs on every single shipment, that is a silence I could not clear before signing. 1 2 3 4 5
The Warehouse Manager not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the contracting entity, parent company, hosting location or the subprocessors behind the service, including how recipient addresses flow to carrier label APIs; the vendor page itself states none of this. 1 2 3 4 5
The Transport Planner not rated — no public information
I found no public information on the contracting entity, hosting location, subprocessors or a data processing agreement in the captured pages. When recipient addresses flow out to carrier label APIs I want that chain named, and the pages I read name none of it. 1 2 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider not rated — no public information
Every sovereignty dimension is marked unknown, and nothing in the captured pages names the contracting entity, the hosting location of order and recipient data, or a single subprocessor. The role of the carriers that receive my clients' customer addresses is not characterised either, so I cannot weigh the processing chain at all. 1 2 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead not rated — no public information
None of the captured pages states the contracting entity's jurisdiction, where order, customer and shipment data are hosted, or who the subprocessors are — including the carrier label APIs that recipient addresses flow to — and we found no mention of a data processing agreement. We found no public information bearing on European sovereignty on any page we read. 1 2 3 4 5
The Skeptic not rated — no public information
The captured pages say nothing about the contracting entity's jurisdiction, where order and shipment data are hosted, or which subprocessors sit behind the service; no privacy policy or data processing agreement facts were captured. Every sovereignty dimension is unknown to me, and recipient addresses flowing to carrier label APIs makes that silence matter — but unknown is not non-European, so I score nothing rather than assume. 1 2 3 4 5
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: subscription per tier, user, warehouse or module, the per-order, per-label or per-shipment fees, label rates and surcharges when shipping through the vendor's contracts, connector and setup fees, hardware, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but the volume fees, included orders or labels, and how the price scales are unclear.
5 — Prices per tier are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (per-order or per-label fees beyond the allowance, connectors, extra users or warehouses, onboarding) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with included volumes and the fee per order, label or shipment beyond them, add-ons and setup listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated, and whether own carrier contracts are allowed on each tier said plainly.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given order volume, warehouse count and module set, with every fee, label surcharge, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The E-Commerce Operations Lead
The charging mechanics are documented: a live purchase charges the Shippo account for the selected rate and refunds go through the Refunds API, return labels are free to print and charged only when used, and test-mode API calls are free. But I found no public information on subscription tiers, per-label rates, surcharges or included volumes, so I cannot begin to compute what three hundred parcels a day would cost me. 3 4 5
The Warehouse Manager
The pages do document when money moves: live requests charge the account for the selected rate, dry runs and test-token calls are free, and scan-based return labels are free to print and charged only when used. Beyond that we found no public subscription tiers, per-label rates, surcharges, minimum terms or cancellation terms, so a real annual cost cannot be worked out from the captured pages. 3 4 5
The Transport Planner
The captured pages document only when money moves: test calls are free, a live purchase charges the Shippo account and refunds go through the Refunds API, and return labels are free to print and charged only if used. I found no public information on subscription tiers, per-label or per-shipment fees, included volumes, setup costs or contract terms, so no annual cost can be worked out from these pages. 3 4 5
The Fulfilment Provider
The captured pages tell me when money moves — test-token calls are free, a live purchase charges my account for the selected rate and is only reversible through the Refunds API, and return labels cost nothing unless scanned into use. But I found no public price figures for subscriptions, label fees or surcharges, minimum terms or what happens to data on cancellation, so I cannot compute an annual cost. 3 4 5
The IT & Integration Lead
The pages document the charging mechanics — a live purchase charges the Shippo account for the selected rate and can only be reversed through the Refunds API, test calls are free, and return labels are pay-on-use, charged only when scanned — but no subscription prices, tiers, included volumes or per-label figures appear on the captured pages. We found no public information on connector, setup or minimum-term costs, so an annual cost is not computable from what is published here. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
The only cost facts on the captured pages describe when money moves: a live request charges the account for the selected rate and cannot be undone through the same API (refunds go through a separate refunds API), return labels are free to print and charged only when used, and test-mode calls are free. The pages show no tier prices, per-label or per-order fees, included volumes, minimum term or data-return terms, so no buyer can compute an annual cost from them. 1 3 4 5
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Shippo
Is Shippo European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Shippo is based.
Where does Shippo store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
Does Shippo have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Shippo?
As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates Ongoing WMS (3.5/5), Shippingbo (3.5/5) and Mintsoft (3/5) highest among the other 19 Supply Chain & Logistics products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Ongoing WMS (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Shippo alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (goshippo.com, docs.goshippo.com/shipments/batch-label-creation, docs.goshippo.com/shipments/returns, docs.goshippo.com/automations/automations, docs.goshippo.com/guides/api-quickstart). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- We could not confirm any compliance information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. Know more? Tell us
- 38 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 15 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (5)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.goshippo.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Multi-carrier shipping & returns — found from sitemap docs.goshippo.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Multi-carrier shipping & returns — found from sitemap docs.goshippo.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Integrations, automation & exit — found from sitemap docs.goshippo.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Integrations, automation & exit — found from sitemap docs.goshippo.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →