whats-best.ai

Time Tracking & Attendance

Timeular

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Timeular GmbH · timeular.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The panel's verdict

Timeular is time tracking and attendance software for project-based teams. Its strongest areas are time capture and project and billing at 4 to 6, and absence and planning at a uniform 4: terminal, app, PC, tracker and NFC capture, leave types with per-user quotas and owner or admin approval, workspace-wide holidays, and time budgets with percentage- and time-based alerts are documented. Working time law scores 2 to 3, the lowest of the product criteria: overtime runs as a balance with three compensation types and a mandatory note, but the judges found no public information on break rules, daily maximum hours, rest periods or retention behind the DACH compliance line. Time capture spreads from 4 to 6 — higher scores credit the hardware capture options and designed desktop offline handling, lower ones weigh the mobile app's missing offline mode and no documented correction audit trail. Payroll export holds at a uniform 3 on generic CSV, XLSX and PDF output, and pricing transparency scores 0 to 1 with no published price beyond a 30-day trial with no credit card required.

Report an error

Speaks for it

  • Leave is handled end to end, with custom leave types, per-user quotas, pending requests approved by owners or admins on Team/Enterprise plans, and workspace-wide company and public holidays placed on every calendar automatically
  • Time budgets with percentage- and time-based alerts, budget groups, and filtering by folder, activity, tag, member and billable status give documented project controls
  • Overtime runs as a time account based on working hours or total time tracked, with pay-out, time off in lieu or carry-over and a mandatory note when owners or admins adjust a balance
  • Capture methods list terminal, app, PC, tracker and NFC beside documented desktop and mobile apps, and the desktop app handles offline capture with sync notifications and conflict resolution
  • Exports come as CSV, XLSX and PDF with selectable columns and hours-minutes-seconds or decimal time formats, a public API is offered, and leaves export to PDF or subscribe as a calendar in Google, Apple or Outlook

Report an error

Held against it

  • Judges found no public information on break rules, daily maximum hours, rest periods or record retention behind the marketing line that all DACH legal requirements are fulfilled
  • Corrections carry no documented approval workflow or change history, and a time entry can be deleted from the mobile app with a confirmation
  • Offline capture is desktop-only and calendar-only, entries made before going offline are locked until reconnection, and the mobile app has no offline mode
  • The payroll path shown is a generic CSV, XLSX or PDF export, and judges found no public information on a named payroll system, a defined payroll format, or night, Sunday and holiday surcharges
  • Sovereignty evidence is an EU server location promised in homepage marketing copy plus ISO 27001, with no contractual terms on whether the EU location is the default, legal-entity jurisdiction and ownership unknown, no subprocessor named, and the pages running under the Timeular, EARLY and TimeTac names

Report an error

Best for

  • You run a project-based team in the stated 20 to 200+ employee range and want billable hours, leave and overtime in one system
  • You steer client work with time budgets and want percentage- and time-based alerts before a project exceeds its budget
  • You administer absence with custom leave types, per-user quotas and approval by owners or admins, plus workspace-wide holidays on every calendar

Report an error

Avoid if

  • You need offline capture on phones — the vendor states offline time tracking is available only in the desktop app, not the mobile app
  • You need a tamper-evident record — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
  • Your payroll consumes a named system such as DATEV or defined surcharge handling — the documented output is a generic file someone maps by hand

Report an error

The scores

Capture in the real workplace

Show reasoning
How this is scored

How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.

0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.

3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.

5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.

8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.

10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Terminal, NFC and the physical tracker sit alongside PC and mobile apps, which is what my workshop floor and crews would actually touch, and the desktop app treats offline as a designed state with sync notifications and conflict resolution. But the vendor itself states offline capture is desktop-only and not available in the mobile app, and we found no public information on GPS or geofenced check-in, or bulk corrections with an audit trail of who changed what. 1 2 3 4

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

Desktop and mobile apps are documented with live tracking, manual entries, editing and deletion, a physical tracker, and offline capture in the desktop app with sync notifications and conflict prompts; Terminal and NFC also appear in a marketing list of tracking methods. But offline works only on desktop and only in the calendar, with pre-sync entries locked and new trackers unusable, and mobile has no offline mode at all. I found no documentation of terminals beyond that word list, no GPS or geofence statement, and corrections carry no approval step or audit trail — deleting on mobile takes two taps. 1 2 3 4

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

The vendor lists five capture methods — terminal, app, PC, tracker, NFC — and documents offline capture as a designed state in the desktop app, complete with sync notifications and conflict resolution when offline entries overlap online ones. The same help pages state offline capture is currently unavailable in the mobile app, however, and we found no public information on a correction workflow with approval or any record of who changed what. The homepage also sells automatic tracking of apps and documents as "100% private" while saying nothing about what is actually stored or who can read an individual's day — exactly the sentence I would need answered before any works agreement. 1 2 3 4

Report an error

The Agency Owner

Terminal, app, PC, tracker and NFC are all listed as capture methods alongside desktop and mobile apps, and the desktop app tracks offline with sync notifications and conflict resolution on reconnect. But offline is calendar-only on the desktop and stated as unavailable in the mobile app, and we found no public information on GPS or geofenced check-in, or on a bulk correction workflow with an audit trail of who changed what. 2 1 3 4

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

The vendor lists terminal, NFC and a hardware tracker beside app and PC, and the desktop app records offline with sync notifications and conflict handling on reconnect — but the vendor's own help pages state offline capture exists only in the desktop app, only in the calendar, earlier entries are locked until you are back online, and the mobile app is left out entirely. That is offline as a degraded state, not a designed one, and I found no public information on how a terminal behaves when the line is down. Corrections are user edits on a phone; I found no public information on an approval workflow or a trail of who changed what. 2 3 4

Report an error

The Skeptic

Desktop and mobile apps are documented in real detail — manual entries by long-press, editing, deletion with confirmation, a live tracking drawer — and the desktop app does capture offline, though only in the calendar view, with entries locked until reconnection and conflicts resolved by hand. The only hint of shared capture is a one-word marketing list reading Terminal, App, PC, Tracker, NFC, with nothing behind it, and we found no public information on GPS or geofenced check-in, or on an approval step when a correction is made. 1 2 3 4

Report an error

Working-time law & audit record

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.

0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.

3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.

5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.

8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.

10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Overtime gets real treatment — calculation bases, three compensation routes including pay-out and carry-over, and a mandatory note when an admin adjusts a balance — and the imprint claims all DACH legal requirements are fulfilled. That claim carries no substance in what we saw: we found no public information on break rules, daily maximum or eleven-hour rest checks, a retention period, or an export shaped for an inspection, which is what a BAG-duty record actually needs. 1 2 5

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

Overtime is managed as a balance per folder with pay-out, time off in lieu or carry-over, adjustments restricted to Owners and Admins with a mandatory note, and leave automatically reduces the day's tracked working hours — that is a time account, at least. But I found no public information on break handling, the 8/10-hour daily maximum, the 11-hour rest period, record retention, or any positioning toward the German recording duty; ISO 27001 speaks to security, not working-time law. 2 5 6

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

What is documented is a time-account: overtime calculated on working hours or total time tracked, compensated by pay-out, time off in lieu or carry-over, adjusted only by Owners/Admins with a mandatory note. Around the ArbZG itself we found no public information — nothing on break handling, the 8/10-hour daily maximum, the 11-hour rest period or a retention period — and the line "All legal requirements in the DACH region fulfilled" is marketing copy that maps no feature to any statute. A time entry can be deleted from the mobile app with a confirmation, and we found no public information on change history or tamper-evidence, so I could not co-sign this record for an inspection. 2 3 5

Report an error

The Agency Owner

Overtime is calculated against working hours with three compensation routes and a mandatory note when Owners or Admins adjust a balance, and the imprint claims all legal requirements in the DACH region are fulfilled. We found no public information on break rules, daily maximum or 11-hour rest-period checks, retention periods or an inspection-ready export, so the German recording duty is asserted rather than evidenced. 5 2 1

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

Working hours and overtime are real here — calculation based on working hours or total tracked, three compensation types, and balance adjustments restricted to owners and admins with a mandatory note — and the vendor claims all DACH legal requirements are fulfilled. But I found no public information on break rules, daily maximum hours, rest periods or a retention period, and a marketing line is not a record that survives an inspection. 1 2 5

Report an error

The Skeptic

The compliance claim is a single marketing line — all legal requirements in the DACH region fulfilled, ISO 27001 certified — and it names no feature that makes it true. What the pages do show is overtime calculated against working hours with three compensation types and a mandatory note, plus leave entries automatically reducing the day's working hours; we found no public information on break rules, the daily maximum, rest periods, retention, or tamper-evident history — and the mobile instructions describe deleting a time entry outright. 2 3 5 6

Report an error

Absence & shift planning

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.

0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.

3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.

5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.

8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.

10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Leave is handled properly — pending requests with approval by owners and admins, per-user quotas, carry-over of time off in lieu, workspace-wide company and public holidays, and working hours auto-reduced by a leave day. But quotas are set by hand with an unlimited default rather than automatic entitlement, holidays are entered manually rather than per-location calendars, and we found no public information on any shift or duty roster, which for my operation is the half of attendance that decides everything. 5 6 7

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

Leave requests with approval on Team/Enterprise plans, custom leave types with per-user quotas, workspace-wide company and public holidays, PDF export and a subscribable leave calendar — and time off in lieu can be carried over with quota adjustments in days. Entitlements are entered by hand with unlimited as the default quota, and I found no public information on a sickness workflow or any shift and duty roster; approval notifications are as close as the evidence gets to planning. 5 6 7

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

Leave is genuinely built in: typed entries with per-user quotas, a pending/approved workflow reserved to Owners/Admins, workspace-wide company and public holidays, and working hours automatically reduced when a full-workday leave is booked. Quotas default to unlimited and are entered by hand rather than calculated, carry-over appears only as time-off-in-lieu balances adjusted in days, and we found no public information on sickness recording or on any shift and duty rostering. Absence yes, planning no. 5 6 7

Report an error

The Agency Owner

Leave requests carry pending status, admin approval and notifications, quotas are set per member or as a workspace default, workspace-wide public and company holidays can be published, and time off in lieu can be carried over with balance adjustments. We found no public information on shift or duty rostering, substitution workflows or per-location holiday calendars, so the planning half of attendance is missing. 6 7 5

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

Leave is genuinely handled: custom leave types, quotas, pending entries with approval by owners or admins on team plans, workspace-wide company and public holidays landing on every calendar automatically, and leave entries automatically reducing the day's working hours. Carry-over appears only as manual balance adjustments and quotas are entered by hand. I found no public information on any shift or duty rostering, so a foreman planning a week has nothing to work with here. 5 6 7

Report an error

The Skeptic

Leave is genuinely handled: types are customizable, quotas set per user, requests pend until an owner approves them, carry-over of time off in lieu is adjusted in days, and workspace-wide public and company holidays land on every member's calendar automatically. But entitlement stays a number an admin types — the default is an unlimited quota — and we found no public information on shift or duty rostering, sickness recording, substitution or swap workflows, or per-location holiday calendars. 5 6 7

Report an error

Project, cost-centre & billing

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.

0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.

3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.

5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.

8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.

10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Billable flags, folders with activities and tags, filtered reporting and time budgets with percentage and time-based alerts give a services team a working spine. The budgets are time budgets only — we found no public information on rate cards by person or role, money-based budgets, billing approval, or an invoice-ready handoff, so revenue still gets rebuilt outside the tool. 1 3 8 10

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

Time entries carry a billable flag, report by folder, activity, tag and member, and time budgets with percentage and time-based alerts plus budget groups give genuine project controls. But I found no public information on rates of any kind, cost centres, or an invoice-ready export — the outputs are generic CSV, XLSX and PDF — so the time never becomes revenue inside the product. 1 3 8 9 10

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

Entries carry a billable flag, are filterable by folder, activity, tag, member and billable status, and time budgets with percentage- and time-based alerts monitor client and project profitability — that is real per-project reporting. We found no public information on rates or rate cards, no cost-centre dimension, and the documented exports are column-selectable CSV, XLSX and PDF rather than anything invoice-ready. The "3000+ tools" integrations claim names no accounting or invoicing system. 1 8 10

Report an error

The Agency Owner

Folders, activities, tags, a billable flag and per-project insight filters exist, and time budgets with percentage- and time-based alerts warn before a client project runs over, which I genuinely value. But we found no public information on rate cards of any kind — per person, role or project — nor on a cost-centre level or an invoice-ready export, so turning tracked hours into a client invoice happens outside the tool. 1 8 10 9

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

Recorded time carries a billable flag and rides on folders, activities and tags, with saved filters, per-folder and per-person views, and time budgets with percentage and time-based alerts that flag a project at risk. But I found no public information on rates per person or per project, a cost-centre level, or an invoice-ready export — the outputs are CSV, XLSX and PDF reports with a logo, not a billing handoff. 3 8 10

Report an error

The Skeptic

Folders, activities, tags and members give entries a real allocation structure, a billable flag survives into the Insights filters and every export, and time budgets with percentage- and time-based alerts monitor client and project profitability. What we found no public information on is rates of any kind — nothing per person, role or project — nor monetary budgets, cost centres, or an invoice-ready handoff; the 3000+ integrations count is marketing arithmetic, not a named accounting bridge. 1 3 8 10

Report an error

Payroll handoff

Show reasoning
How this is scored

How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.

0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.

3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.

5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.

8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.

10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The payroll story is generic files and a promise: CSV, XLSX and PDF exports with selectable columns, plus a claim that payroll-relevant data is prepared exactly as payroll needs it. We found no public information on a named payroll system such as DATEV, a defined payroll format, surcharge handling for nights, Sundays and holidays, or a lock step before transmission. 1 2 10

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

The captured pages promise payroll-relevant data prepared exactly as payroll needs it, yet the only concrete path is a CSV or XLSX export with selectable columns and a decimal or hours-minutes-seconds time format. No payroll system is named, no defined format exists, and I found no public information on night, Sunday or holiday surcharges, a lock step before transmission, or corrections after the close — the pay-out option on overtime is the one payroll-shaped detail. This is the spreadsheet someone retypes. 2 5 10

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

The only payroll statement is that "payroll-relevant data is prepared exactly as payroll needs it", while the documented path is a general export to CSV, XLSX or PDF with selectable columns and time-format options — a file someone else maps by hand. We found no named payroll system such as DATEV, no defined payroll format, and no public information on night, Sunday or holiday surcharges. Pay-out exists as one of three overtime compensation types, which is a balance concept, not a transmission. 2 5 10

Report an error

The Agency Owner

Exports come as CSV, XLSX or PDF with selectable columns in hours-minutes-seconds or decimal formats, and the vendor claims payroll-relevant data is prepared exactly as payroll needs it. We found no public information on any named payroll system such as DATEV, a defined payroll format, surcharge handling for nights, Sundays and holidays, or a lock step before transmission, so the month leaves as a generic file someone maps by hand. 2 10 5

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

The claim is that payroll-relevant data is prepared exactly as payroll needs it, and the reality is generic CSV, XLSX and PDF exports with selectable columns and decimal or hour-minute-second formats. I found no public information naming a payroll system such as DATEV, a defined payroll format, surcharge handling for nights, Sundays and holidays, or a lock step before transmission. As far as the pages show, the month leaves as a file someone maps by hand. 2 10

Report an error

The Skeptic

Payroll readiness is asserted in one sentence — payroll-relevant data prepared exactly as payroll needs it — naming no payroll system, no format and no surcharge handling. The documented path out is a generic CSV, XLSX or PDF export with selectable columns, and we found no public information on DATEV or any other named provider, night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time-account transfer, or a lock step before transmission. 2 10

Report an error

European sovereignty panel opinion

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The imprint promises an EU server location and ISO 27001 certification, which is the right direction. But that is marketing copy with no confirmation it is the contractual default for every customer, and we found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction or a single named subprocessor — for a 200-person workforce's time data that is not a chain of custody. 2

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

An EU server location is asserted in marketing copy alongside ISO 27001 certification, but I found no contractual terms confirming it as the default, and neither the contracting entity's jurisdiction nor its ownership is stated anywhere across the Timeular, EARLY and TimeTac names. No subprocessor list is published. That is EU hosting as a promise with everything else unknown. 2

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

EU server location and ISO 27001 certification appear in homepage marketing copy, with no contractual terms establishing whether the EU location is the default for every customer, and we found no public information on the data-centre provider. We found no public information on subprocessors, ownership or the contracting entity's jurisdiction, and the captured pages run under three names — Timeular, EARLY and TimeTac — with new sign-ups directed to TimeTac, so who the data-processing party actually is remains open. For a works council that must know who can read an employee's day, this is thin ground. 1 2

Report an error

The Agency Owner

The imprint states an EU server location and ISO 27001 certification, which fits a DACH client base. But the captured pages give no contracting-entity jurisdiction, no data-centre provider and no subprocessor list, and the EU location appears in marketing copy without contractual detail on whether it is the default for every customer. 2 1

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

EU server location and ISO 27001 are promised in homepage marketing copy, but I found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction, the ownership, or a single named subprocessor. For crews on German sites I want that in contractual terms, not in a slogan. 2

Report an error

The Skeptic

The whole sovereignty case is one line of homepage marketing — server location in the EU, ISO 27001 certified — with no statement on whether EU hosting is standard for every customer or who runs the data centres. We found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction, ownership, or a single named subprocessor; the imprint link in the footer is the only additional European signal on the page. 1 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.

5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

We found no public prices at all — plan names like Personal, Personal Pro and Team appear in the help pages, but no per-user figure, billing period or price for the tracker or terminals. A 30-day trial with no credit card is courteous, but it does not let me compute an annual invoice for 200 people. 1 2 8

Report an error

The Payroll Officer

Not a single price is public: plan names surface only through budget limits and feature scopes, the visible commercial terms are a 30-day trial with no credit card, and a claim of no hidden costs sits on pages that show no costs at all. A buyer cannot begin to compute an annual invoice from what is published; the number arrives in a sales conversation or a demo booking. 1 2 8

Report an error

The Works Council Advocate

We found no public price at all — no per-user rate, no billing period, no minimum term, no VAT treatment — so a buyer cannot compute any invoice for any headcount. What is published is a 30-day trial with no obligation and no credit card, plus the words "No hidden costs", while plan names surface only indirectly through feature scopes such as one budget on the Personal plan and up to 50 on Personal Pro or Team. 2 8

Report an error

The Agency Owner

The captured pages give a 30-day free trial with no credit card and no obligation, and plan names appear in help articles, but we found no public prices for any tier, module or hardware. With booking a demo as the visible buying path, I cannot compute an annual invoice for a forty-person agency from what is published. 2 8 1

Report an error

The Field Supervisor

I found no public prices at all — the captured pages show a 30-day free trial with no credit card required and the words 'No hidden costs', and plan names like Personal, Personal Pro and Team appear only inside feature limits such as budget counts. A buyer cannot compute any annual invoice from this. 2 8

Report an error

The Skeptic

The only public pricing facts are a 30-day free trial with no obligation and no credit card required, next to a no hidden costs promise. Not one figure exists for the plans the help articles themselves name — Personal, Personal Pro, Team — nor for billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment, and the physical tracker goes unpriced; the promise does the work numbers should do, so a buyer can compute nothing from these pages. 1 2 6 8

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency EU only ⚠ unverified 3/3 pts 2 Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page timeular.com Checked 22 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Imprint — found from the homepage early.app Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap support.early.app Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →