Condomana vs Immoware24

Condomana

The Wirtschaftsplan computes each unit's advance payments and the Jahresabrechnung is drafted from the year's bookings and apportioned by the owner's keys, with Sonderumlagen handled — that earns the middle ground. But the evidence is silent on everything I check first: no Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, no Vermögensbericht, no HeizkostenV apportionment, and not one word that the Rücklage is segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, so rubric level 5's 'reserves booked separately' is unevidenced.

Immoware24

Jahresabrechnung, Wirtschaftsplan, Rücklagenabrechnung and the Vermögensbericht are generated per §28 WEG with costs spread automatically by defined keys, dunning in the accounting module, and a BGH-conformity claim stated, which takes this beyond a mere template set. But I found no public information on the Abrechnungsspitze being shown separately, on the Rücklage being held as segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, on owner-change apportionment mid-year, or on the annual heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV beyond the automated monthly §6a consumption information.

Condomana

A real Abstimmungs-Engine where every agenda item carries its basis (per head or by ownership share) and its majority with computed results, plus a gapless, append-only Beschluss-Sammlung where challenges and corrections are annotated, never overwritten — that is the § 24 (7) register discipline. But the evidence says nothing about invitations and the notice period, proxy recording, quorum, or minutes generated from the recorded votes, which keeps it short of the 8 anchor.

Immoware24

The module creates and sends the invitation, conducts the owners' meeting including hybrid form with online voting, and generates both the minutes and the Beschluss-Sammlung, which can be signed eIDAS-conform on the device. We found no public information on quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type, on proxies and voting restrictions, or on the register being maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.

Condomana

Owners and tenants get a real portal: documents shared with exactly the entitled owners, photo defect reports whose status everyone can see, and requests that reach the Verwaltung, with tenants invited in by their owner. No evidence that an owner sees their own statement or arrears per unit, nor meeting papers or voting in the portal — the disclosure duty is not discharged on this sheet.

Immoware24

Portal24 gives tenants and owners per-login access to the contract data, statements and documents released to them, with defect reports including photo upload and a processing status the reporter can see, monthly heating-consumption information per § 6a HeizkostenV shown in the portal, and separate views demonstrated for tenants and owners. We found no public information on meeting papers or voting being available in the portal itself, or on arrears shown per unit.

Condomana

Defects tracked from open to done with photos and contractor assignment, recurring maintenance that raises its own ticket at due date, and a forward-only timeline that makes a defensible duty-of-care record. But Gewährleistung periods, statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, and quotes or invoices linked to the defect with the cost on the correct account are all silent — the difference between a list and an operating record.

Immoware24

Defects arrive through online forms with photos and a transparent processing status, become tickets in a four-step workflow, and quotes can be requested from several contractors directly out of a ticket with the order then assigned, backed by vetted craftsmen through Craftware24. We found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar with reminders, on Gewährleistung periods or statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or on cost allocation to the correct account.

Condomana

Volltextsuche over everything filed per building and unit, plus a complete CSV export in both directions and retention stated under § 257 HGB / § 147 AO at up to ten years. Version history and documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them are unevidenced, and the export is data, not a documented handover package of ledger, register and documents for a successor Verwalter.

Immoware24

The document module stores, tags and retrieves files with cloud access, AI classification of incoming documents and import of PDF, XML and ZUGFeRD, and the privacy policy names a data-portability right in a machine-readable format. We found no public information on retention periods or their statutory execution, version history, full-text search, or a defined handover export of a community's records to a successor administrator.

Condomana

German contracting entity (nelo digitalagentur GmbH & Co KG, Amtsgericht Ulm) on named infrastructure — Hetzner in Gunzenhausen — with no third-country transfers except the social-media presence, and AI processing stated as EU-only under an Art. 28 AVV. The AI subprocessor is only 'einen weiteren Auftragsverarbeiter', unnamed, and the US-based Buffer is named but without the legal basis for that transfer, so the complete published list of the 8 anchor is not met, and no certification appears.

Immoware24

Hosting is stated exclusively in ISO 27001-certified data centres in Germany with geo-redundancy, the contracting entity is a German GmbH under German law, and an AVV and external data protection officer are offered. However, the privacy policy itself names US-based tools such as Microsoft tracking with data held up to 180 days in the USA, and we found no public information on the hosting provider's name, on a subprocessor list for the product chain including the AI document recognition, or on an explained safeguard for the third-country transfers.

Condomana

I can compute the annual invoice from public pages alone: €10 per unit per year plus VAT, €2.50 for Stellplätze and Abstellräume, worked examples for 24 and 120 units, every feature in one price with no locked tiers, unlimited free users, annual billing with no automatic renewal. Only the rollout/migration service for large portfolios is unpriced — arguably genuinely custom — and there is no explicit statement that leaving or exporting costs nothing, which alone keeps it off the 10 anchor.

Immoware24

The pricing page describes the calculation basis — Verwaltungseinheiten, active users and optional Zusatzmodule — and states a twelve-month minimum term with term-length discounts, a 30-day free trial and that prices are "zzgl. MwSt."; with prices "an Ihre individuellen Anforderungen" tailored and no fixed packages, we found no public per-unit or per-community figure, so an administrator cannot compute the real annual cost from the public pages alone.