whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Web Analytics · head-to-head

Matomo vs Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates Matomo 4/5 and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite 3.5/5 in Web Analytics. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 6 of the 6 judges pick Matomo and 0 pick Piwik PRO Analytics Suite. Matomo scores higher on 7 of 7 criteria (Data access, export & self-hosting, Consent-free operation & data minimisation, Installation, integrations & performance, plus 4 more). Provenance — Matomo: Rest of world; Piwik PRO Analytics Suite: EU-Made. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

Matomo

Rest of world

Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Full evaluation →

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

EU-Made

Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Full evaluation →

The short answer

Matomo's means sit above Piwik PRO Analytics Suite's on the seven criteria, and no judge leans Piwik PRO anywhere — the bench's splits are ties, not opposing leans. Data ownership is the widest gap, 9.0 versus 7.3, with 6 judges leaning Matomo and 0 tying, resting on self-hosting, SQL access and export to BigQuery and Snowflake. Consent and privacy is 8.3 to 7.3 with 4 leans and 2 ties; conversions and events 7.8 to 7.0 with 5 leans; implementation 8.0 to 7.0 with 5 leans. The genuine splits are traffic reporting and pricing transparency, each 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie; pricing transparency is the lowest mean for both, 7.0 versus 6.5. Weighted totals run 7.8 to 8.4 for Matomo against 6.9 to 7.4 for Piwik PRO. Matomo's attributes list entity jurisdiction New Zealand, EU-only residency and US CLOUD Act subprocessor exposure; Piwik PRO's list EU-optional residency, the others unknown.

Choose Matomo if

  • You need SQL access to your analytics data in your own MySQL database, with warehouse export to BigQuery and Snowflake — data ownership scores 9.0 against 7.3, with 6 judges leaning Matomo and 0 tying.
  • Your deployment must run on-premise in a country of your choice, where the verdict states subprocessors are not applicable for Matomo.
  • Your reporting depends on conversion and event tracking: 5 of 6 judges lean Matomo there, at 7.8 against 7.0.
  • Your team wants a straightforward rollout: implementation leans Matomo with 5 judges, 8.0 against 7.0, with 1 tie.
  • Your data protection review asks where cloud data physically sits: the verdict states Matomo Cloud data sits on AWS in Frankfurt, stated as not transferred to the US; sovereignty leans Matomo 4 judges to 0 with 2 ties.

Choose Piwik PRO Analytics Suite if

  • Your residency requirement is captured as EU-optional in procurement: Piwik PRO's attributes list EU-optional data residency, and its verdict notes export and on-premise options, while Matomo's attribute is EU-only.
  • Your consent model must keep collecting when consent is refused: the pages state a consent-free position against named law — CNIL, TDDDG, the ePrivacy Directive — with anonymous collection when consent is refused.
  • Your analysts build their own reports: the pages document a drag-and-drop builder over more than 100 dimensions, metrics and filters with no sampling by default; on traffic reporting the bench splits 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie.
  • You want a German contracting entity: the verdict names Piwik PRO GmbH, Berlin, while Matomo's contracting entity is in New Zealand with US providers running support and payments.
  • You need published terms for a fixed footprint: Piwik PRO's Business tier is published at "Ab €36 /Monat" with up to 2 million actions, 20 domains and 25 months retention — pricing transparency splits 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie.

Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

External data protection officer for eleven mid-sized companies, three of which still ran Universal Analytics when the Austrian authority ruled on it. Reads the data policy before the feature page: which fields are stored, how a visitor is counted without a cookie, whether the IP address is cut before it is written, who the subprocessors are and where. Signs off a site without a banner only when the vendor states its reading of §25 TDDDG in writing.

Matomo

This judge's pick

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

Criterion by criterion

Traffic, sources & campaign reports

Matomo

The standard reports cover top pages and URLs, entry and exit pages, search engines (more than 800), social networks, campaigns, countries, devices and browsers, with a real-time visits log, map and visitor counter, custom segments built from over 110 conditions, custom dashboards, custom dimensions and metrics, roll-up reporting across sites, annotations, unsampled data stated, and Search Console keywords importable alongside the traffic. The captured pages give no published methodology for how visitors are counted and no configurable channel grouping, which is what keeps it off the top level.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

Custom dashboards built from over a hundred dimensions, metrics and filters, segments, a real-time view, Search Console data beside the traffic, a campaign URL builder supporting both the vendor's own and UTM parameters, and no data sampling by default put the standard reporting well beyond the basics. We found no public information on scheduled email reports, date comparisons, or roll-up reporting across the multiple domains a plan may include.

Goals, events, funnels & e-commerce

Matomo

Goals and custom events with properties, automatic tracking of file downloads, external links and 404 pages, funnels with drop-off per step, segmentation by funnel step and historical backfill, full e-commerce with plugins for WooCommerce, Magento, PrestaShop, Shopify and Shopware, multi-channel attribution, cohorts, user flow, and an advertising conversion export covering Google, Bing and Yandex. The captured pages do not compare several attribution models side by side, and we found no public information on predictive or anomaly metrics with their method stated.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

Goals, custom events with form tracking, clicks, scrolls and downloads, funnels combining page views, events and downloads, checkout funnels with shopping-behaviour reports, revenue metrics including lifetime value and average order value, multi-channel attribution and a Shopify integration are all documented. We found no public information on cohorts and retention, and no comparison of attribution models.

Consent-free operation & data minimisation

Matomo

The consent position is written against named law: CNIL recognition as usable without tracking consent, a self-assessment against the CNIL exemption criteria with the excluded features listed, and a stated §25 TDDDG reading recommending consent in Germany with log-file analytics offered as the route that touches no terminal device — plus IP anonymisation or no IP storage at all, pseudonymisation settings, configurable retention, Do Not Track, an opt-out form, and privacy-policy wording guides. What the captured pages do not give me is the published method by which a visitor is counted in cookieless mode or a field-by-field list of what is stored, so I cannot sign off a banner-free site outside the log-analytics route.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

The consent position is stated against named law: anonymised collection is claimed to satisfy the German TDDDG and the CNIL, whose consent-free use the vendor says the French authority permits, and when a visitor refuses or ignores the banner only anonymous data is collected, with IP addresses and purchase data anonymised before onward passing, withdrawable consent and auditably logged privacy requests. What no captured page documents is how a visitor is counted in the anonymous mode — the identifier and its rotation — retention settings per data type beyond the stated 25 months, or wording supplied for the site's own privacy policy.

Data access, export & self-hosting

Matomo

The data can leave with the customer and mostly already belongs to them: a GPL-licensed on-premise edition the customer runs itself with unlimited retention, reporting and administration APIs returning CSV, JSON and XML, raw data export and a warehouse connector into BigQuery and Snowflake, direct SQL access, historical Google Analytics import, cloud-to-on-premise migration in both directions, and documented deletion within 30 days of termination with backups purged within 60. We found no public information stating feature parity between the cloud and self-hosted editions, which is the one gap before full end-to-end ownership.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

A raw data export — stated as available through the API only — with unlimited data volume, JSON, CSV and XML formats, BI-tool connections, no sampling by default and a migration path from Google Analytics and Matomo is documented, and an on-premise deployment is offered that removes the vendor as processor entirely. We found no public information on an open-source licence, on return or deletion of data at the end of a paid term (only trial deletion after thirty days plus a seven-day grace is stated), or on streaming to a named data warehouse.

Installation, integrations & performance

Matomo

A JavaScript tag with documented placement, a five-minute install plus Softaculous, Installatron, a Debian package and an official Docker image, step-by-step guides for WordPress, Joomla, Webflow, Shopify, Wix and more, iOS and Android SDKs, Matomo Tag Manager and a Google Tag Manager template, SAML and LDAP single sign-on, granular multi-user access to multiple websites, and a documented first-party tracker proxy routing collection through the customer's own domain. We found no public information on script size or measured performance impact, a public status page, or published SLA and support terms tied to installation.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

Server-side collection is documented with a first-party collector and reverse proxy through the customer's own server, alongside a tag manager with template library and debug mode, server-side Google Tag Manager templates from Stape and TAGGRS, SAML and Active Directory single sign-on with permission groups, and a 99 percent SLA uptime guarantee. We found no public information on the tracking script's size, plugins or guides for named CMS systems beyond Shopify, iOS or Android SDKs, or a public status page with uptime history.

European sovereignty

Matomo

Cloud data sits on named infrastructure in Frankfurt with backups in Dublin, stated as not transferred to the US; the subprocessor list is published with locations and includes US-based processors such as Help Scout for support and Paddle for payments, governed by a published Article 28 DPA with SCCs and the New Zealand adequacy decision; an EU representative sits in Hamburg, ISO 27001:2022 is stated, and the open-source on-premise edition keeps every visitor record on servers of the customer's choosing. The contracting entity is in New Zealand and the hosting chain rests on a US-headquartered provider subject to the CLOUD Act, so European ownership end to end is not established on the captured pages.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

The contracting entity is a Berlin GmbH with a German register number, EU hosting is available on named infrastructure — ElastX in Sweden, Azure in Germany and the Netherlands — with private-cloud and on-premise options that remove the vendor as processor, a data processing agreement is offered, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are stated, and a data protection officer is reachable at a published address. We found no public information on the subprocessor chain — script CDN, collection endpoint, email reports, support and payment tools — and the group includes a New York LLC whose role the captured pages do not describe.

Pricing transparency

Matomo

The Business plan is published at 22 EUR per month excluding tax with its allowances spelled out (30 websites, 30 team members, 24-month raw data retention), overage at 5,000 hits for 2.2 EUR, annual billing giving two months free, a priced add-on connector from 5 EUR per month, prorated plan changes, a 21-day free trial without credit card, and an on-premise edition that is free to download. The captured pages show only this single tier price; the hit volume a tier includes, the other tiers, and any minimum term are not stated, so a buyer cannot yet compute the full annual cost.

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

The Business plan is published in full — "Ab €36 /Monat", up to 20 domains, 2 million actions a month, 25 months retention, four modules — with the overage stated as an extra fee per plan, a disclosed 4 percent annual increase, 30-day cancellation notice, and billing methods with who bears which fees. Enterprise starts at "Ab €366 /Monat jährliche Abrechnung" with its price factors named but not priced, so the real annual cost for an Enterprise buyer, for SLA packages, extra modules or the on-premise edition cannot be computed from the captured pages.

Sovereignty, side by side

Dimension Matomo Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Legal entity Not determined Not determined
Hosting location Not determined Not determined
Hosting options Not determined Not determined
Open source Not determined Not determined
Data processing agreement Not determined Not determined
Transfer impact assessment Not determined Not determined

Facts, side by side

Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.

Compliance · GDPR GDPR compliance1

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

DSGVO/GDPR and other privacy laws compliance2

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Pricing · Free trial yes · no3

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

free trial offered4

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Data anonymization yes5

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

yes6

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Data residency Data residency1

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Data location and hosting options selectable7

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Ecommerce analytics yes8

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

yes9

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Event tracking yes8

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

clicks · scrolls · downloads · form_fills10

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · No sampling No sampling1

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

no11

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Raw data access raw data access to data warehouses and BI tools12

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

yes6

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Realtime reports Visits log · Visitor Profile · yes13

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

yes6

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Product · Tag manager yes1

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

yes · yes9

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Questions about Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

Which is better, Matomo or Piwik PRO Analytics Suite?

As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates Matomo higher: 4/5 against 3.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 6 of the 6 judges pick Matomo and 0 pick Piwik PRO Analytics Suite. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.

Is Matomo or Piwik PRO Analytics Suite European?

Matomo is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Piwik PRO Analytics Suite is European (EU-Made). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.

Where do Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite store customer data?

Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Matomo: Default not stated; pages mention Europe. Piwik PRO Analytics Suite: its pages as captured do not say.

Do Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite have a free plan?

As of 30 Oct 2026, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite’s own pages state a free plan; Matomo’s pages as captured do not. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.