As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates Matomo 4/5 and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite 3.5/5 in Web Analytics. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 6 of the 6 judges pick Matomo and 0 pick Piwik PRO Analytics Suite. Matomo scores higher on 7 of 7 criteria (Data access, export & self-hosting, Consent-free operation & data minimisation, Installation, integrations & performance, plus 4 more). Provenance — Matomo: Rest of world; Piwik PRO Analytics Suite: EU-Made. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Matomo's means sit above Piwik PRO Analytics Suite's on the seven criteria, and no judge leans Piwik PRO anywhere — the bench's splits are ties, not opposing leans. Data ownership is the widest gap, 9.0 versus 7.3, with 6 judges leaning Matomo and 0 tying, resting on self-hosting, SQL access and export to BigQuery and Snowflake. Consent and privacy is 8.3 to 7.3 with 4 leans and 2 ties; conversions and events 7.8 to 7.0 with 5 leans; implementation 8.0 to 7.0 with 5 leans. The genuine splits are traffic reporting and pricing transparency, each 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie; pricing transparency is the lowest mean for both, 7.0 versus 6.5. Weighted totals run 7.8 to 8.4 for Matomo against 6.9 to 7.4 for Piwik PRO. Matomo's attributes list entity jurisdiction New Zealand, EU-only residency and US CLOUD Act subprocessor exposure; Piwik PRO's list EU-optional residency, the others unknown.
Choose Matomo if
You need SQL access to your analytics data in your own MySQL database, with warehouse export to BigQuery and Snowflake — data ownership scores 9.0 against 7.3, with 6 judges leaning Matomo and 0 tying.
Your deployment must run on-premise in a country of your choice, where the verdict states subprocessors are not applicable for Matomo.
Your reporting depends on conversion and event tracking: 5 of 6 judges lean Matomo there, at 7.8 against 7.0.
Your team wants a straightforward rollout: implementation leans Matomo with 5 judges, 8.0 against 7.0, with 1 tie.
Your data protection review asks where cloud data physically sits: the verdict states Matomo Cloud data sits on AWS in Frankfurt, stated as not transferred to the US; sovereignty leans Matomo 4 judges to 0 with 2 ties.
Choose Piwik PRO Analytics Suite if
Your residency requirement is captured as EU-optional in procurement: Piwik PRO's attributes list EU-optional data residency, and its verdict notes export and on-premise options, while Matomo's attribute is EU-only.
Your consent model must keep collecting when consent is refused: the pages state a consent-free position against named law — CNIL, TDDDG, the ePrivacy Directive — with anonymous collection when consent is refused.
Your analysts build their own reports: the pages document a drag-and-drop builder over more than 100 dimensions, metrics and filters with no sampling by default; on traffic reporting the bench splits 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie.
You want a German contracting entity: the verdict names Piwik PRO GmbH, Berlin, while Matomo's contracting entity is in New Zealand with US providers running support and payments.
You need published terms for a fixed footprint: Piwik PRO's Business tier is published at "Ab €36 /Monat" with up to 2 million actions, 20 domains and 25 months retention — pricing transparency splits 3 lean Matomo and 3 tie.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Public-Sector Site Owner
Web editor for a district administration whose site serves 400,000 residents, from vehicle registration to daycare places. The state data protection authority publishes guidance on analytics, and the council will not show a cookie banner on a public service. Needs to know which pages people search for and where forms are abandoned, with data that stays in Germany or on the municipal data centre's own servers, and a contract the procurement office can sign.
Matomo
This judge's pick
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Criterion by criterion
Traffic, sources & campaign reports
Matomo
The standard reports list top pages, entry and exit pages, referrers across more than 800 search engines and social networks, countries, devices, browsers and campaigns, with a real-time map and counter, custom segments from over 110 conditions, custom dashboards, scheduled email reports, annotations, roll-up reporting across many sites and Search Console keyword import, and an explicit statement of no data sampling. I found no published methodology for how visitors are counted and no configurable channel grouping, so it stays just below the top level.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Audience, acquisition and behaviour reports come with real-time views, a drag-and-drop report builder over one hundred dimensions, metrics and filters, custom dashboards and segments, and sharing inside the organisation; campaign URLs are built for both their own and UTM parameters, and Google Search Console and Google Ads data can sit beside the traffic. Sampling is off by default with an option to enable it, and a plan covers up to twenty domains. We found no public information on annotations, configurable channel grouping or roll-up reporting across those sites.
Goals, events, funnels & e-commerce
Matomo
Goals, events covering clicks, video plays, downloads and form submissions, automatic download and outbound-link tracking, and a funnels product with per-step drop-off, segmentation by funnel step, validation and historical backfill are documented, alongside e-commerce analytics with plugins for WooCommerce, Magento, PrestaShop, Shopify and shopware, multi-channel attribution, user cohorts and a Form Analytics feature showing where visitors leave forms — the abandonment view our public service forms need. The captured pages do not show conversions being sent back to ad platforms server to server, which keeps it below the very top level.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Goals, custom events, form tracking and virtual page views are out of the box, with clicks, scrolls, downloads and form fills captured and funnels that can mix page views, custom events and downloads — close to what I need for spotting where daycare forms are abandoned. E-commerce goes deep with checkout analyses, shopping-behaviour reports, revenue, average order value, customer lifetime value, a Shopify integration and multi-channel attribution, plus user flows and individual user journeys. We found no public information on cohort or retention analysis, a comparison of several attribution models, or conversions passed back to ad platforms server-to-server.
Consent-free operation & data minimisation
Matomo
Banner-free operation is thoroughly documented: cookieless tracking with all cookies disableable, IP anonymisation or no IP storage at all, a no-PII configuration, customer-configurable retention, Do Not Track, an opt-out iframe and form, a one-click CNIL exemption configuration with a published self-assessment, CNIL approval to collect without tracking consent, and guides for privacy notice wording. I must flag two captured facts for German practice: the vendor recommends consent before cookieless or cookie-based tracking under German law, and the BfDI guideline requires consent for the bodies it supervises — though log-file analytics without terminal-device access is offered as a consent-free alternative with a limited report set.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
For a council that will not show a cookie banner this is the strongest area: the French authority CNIL is cited as permitting use without any consent, tracking runs anonymously when consent is ignored or refused, and anonymisation of IP addresses and purchase data is positioned against TDDDG and CNIL, with six selectable tracking methods, an opt-out and 25 months' retention on the Business plan. Data subject requests for deletion, modification and transfer are handled through the product, and the full request history can be shown to a data protection authority. We found no public information on how anonymous visitors are actually counted, per-data-type retention settings, or supplied wording for our privacy policy.
Data access, export & self-hosting
Matomo
The On-Premise edition is open source under the GPL licence, free forever, runs on our own MySQL database with no storage limits, and subprocessors are explicitly not applicable to it; the APIs return visitor-level data in CSV, JSON and XML, raw data can flow to BigQuery or Snowflake or be queried in SQL, historical Google Analytics data can be imported, migration works in both directions, and the data processing agreement promises deletion within 30 days of termination with export rights during that window. In the Cloud plan raw data is kept 24 months while report data is kept forever, which I note for long-range planning.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
A reporting API and a raw data export feed a data warehouse or BI tools in JSON, CSV or XML, sampling is off by default, historical data can be migrated from Google Analytics or Matomo, and the pricing page states raw data access is via API only. An on-premise deployment inside our own security perimeter is offered, with the vendor removable as data processor entirely, alongside a no-lock-in commitment and a dedicated database per customer. We found no public information on a named warehouse or BI target, an open-source licence, or data return and deletion terms at contract end beyond trial accounts.
Installation, integrations & performance
Matomo
A five-minute install with one-click options for Softaculous, Installatron and a Debian package, official plugins for WordPress, Joomla, TYPO3, Drupal and the major shop systems, official iOS and Android SDKs, LDAP and SAML login, a Docker image with GPG-signed releases, and a thoroughly documented first-party tracker proxy with authentication and subdomain guidance give a realistic path inside the municipal data centre. I found no published script size, no status page with uptime history and no SLA, and single-page-app support is not explicitly named on the captured pages.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Server-side tracking with a first-party collector and reverse proxy is documented in detail, with ready-made templates for the server-side Google Tag Manager and the partners Stape and TAGGRS, plus a tag manager with an extensive template library requiring no JavaScript. Single sign-on via SAML or Active Directory/LDAP, multi-level user permissions, a 99% SLA uptime guarantee and a Shopify integration are stated. We found no public information on the tracking script's size, mobile SDKs, plugins for CMSs like WordPress or TYPO3, or a public status page with uptime history.
European sovereignty
Matomo
For the cloud edition the hosting is named — AWS in Frankfurt with backups in Dublin, with the vendor stating no data is transferred to the US — plus an EU representative in Germany, a published Article 28 DPA, ISO 27001 certification and a published subprocessor list; but the contracting entity is InnoCraft Ltd in Wellington, New Zealand, and the support and payment chain includes Help Scout in the USA, Paddle in the UK and USA, and US-based Twilio, Atlassian and HubSpot. What secures this level for my procurement office is the documented On-Premise edition: open-source, on our own servers in the country of our choice, with subprocessors declared not applicable, so every visitor record stays on the municipal chain.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
The contracting entity is Piwik PRO GmbH of Berlin with registry court and number published, a data processing agreement is offered, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications are stated, and EU hosting is named: Azure Germany or the Netherlands, ElastX in Sweden for the Business plan, or an on-premise deployment that removes the vendor as processor entirely — workable for our municipal data centre. We found no public information on subprocessors and their locations, which matters because the visitor-data chain counts as a whole, and the group also includes a Polish and a New York entity. Signable for procurement, but the chain is not fully evidenced.
Pricing transparency
Matomo
Most figures are public: 22 EUR per month excluding tax for the Business plan, additional hits at 5,000 for 2.2 EUR excluding tax, two months free on annual billing, prorated plan changes, 30 websites and 30 team members included, the Data Warehouse Connector from 5 EUR per month, and a free GPL download for the self-hosted edition. I found no full tier ladder, no minimum term and no prices for the premium plugins on the captured pages, so the annual cost for our traffic is not fully computable.
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
The Business plan is unusually well documented: from €36 per month for up to 2 million actions and 20 domains with all four modules, 25 months' retention, a stated overage policy, an automatic 4% annual increase, auto-renewal with 30 days' notice, and payment methods with who bears the fees. Enterprise starts at €366 per month billed annually and a free entry plan exists, but Enterprise pricing is individual, depending on modules, action limit, hosting option and SLA package. We found no public information on the overage fee amount, SLA package prices, the on-premise edition's cost or VAT treatment, so a real annual total for our traffic volume is not computable from public pages alone.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
Matomo
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Hosting location
Not determined
Not determined
Hosting options
Not determined
Not determined
Open source
Not determined
Not determined
Data processing agreement
Not determined
Not determined
Transfer impact assessment
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
Questions about Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Which is better, Matomo or Piwik PRO Analytics Suite?
As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates Matomo higher: 4/5 against 3.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 6 of the 6 judges pick Matomo and 0 pick Piwik PRO Analytics Suite. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is Matomo or Piwik PRO Analytics Suite European?
Matomo is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Piwik PRO Analytics Suite is European (EU-Made). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.
Where do Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite store customer data?
Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Matomo: Default not stated; pages mention Europe. Piwik PRO Analytics Suite: its pages as captured do not say.
Do Matomo and Piwik PRO Analytics Suite have a free plan?
As of 30 Oct 2026, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite’s own pages state a free plan; Matomo’s pages as captured do not. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.