whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Eudonet CRM

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Eudonet · www.eudonet.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Eudonet CRM: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Eudonet CRM: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Eudonet CRM at a glance

Vendor
Eudonet
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Eudonet CRM 1/5, the mean of 6 judges. Eudonet is a SaaS platform for public-interest organizations — public sector, associations, foundations, higher education and alumni networks — and the weighted totals span 2.2 to 2.6 with no disagreement flagged. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 27 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 27 Oct 2026. all sources

Eudonet CRM alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Assumes the pricing page is the nicest thing the vendor will ever say. Hunts per-seat maths that explode at renewal, "unlimited" with footnotes, AI features priced by credits, dead changelogs and acquisition rumours. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Panel median The Skeptic This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Skeptic
Contact & data model 1 of 5 1 of 5
Pipeline & forecasting 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5
Automation & workflows 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5
Integrations & API 2 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 2 of 5
Import, export & exit 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The captured pages name a CRM module, data centralization, and appointment-level enrichment that tracks which meetings each contact attended — and that is the entire record model on display. I found no public information on field types, deduplication, merge tooling, custom objects, or how contacts, organizations and transactions relate. 1 4

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Nothing captured shows a pipeline at all: the closest items are 'financial tracking and dashboards' inside the billing module and real-time campaign analysis, from a vendor pitching public bodies, federations and alumni networks rather than sales teams. I found no public information on stages, required fields, forecasts, quota or win/loss reporting. 1

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The homepage promises automation of recurring processes, marketing journey automation and automated event communications — capability names with nothing behind them on any captured page. I found no public information on a workflow builder, branching, delays, triggers, or any usage limits, which leaves this at simple automation claims. 1

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A two-way, real-time appointment sync with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem plus custom field mapping is genuinely evidenced, and an integration directory grouped by category exists — but the Outlook connector requires initial configuration by Eudonet's technical teams and is offered 'with customisation tailored to your organisational needs', a consultant handshake rather than a self-serve connection. I found no public information on API documentation, webhooks, email sync, or a single named third-party product in the directory. 3 4

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The legal notice names a French SAS under French law with Scaleway SAS in Paris as hoster — real European signal, though the hosting statement covers the website, and I found no public information on where the CRM data itself resides, on a published data processing agreement, or on a subprocessor list. The GDPR rights sentence in a French legal notice is the legal minimum, not evidence about processing. 2

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The only portability statement captured is the legal notice telling you that you may exercise your GDPR portability right and withdraw consent at any time — a right, not a feature. I found no public information on import, export formats, migration tooling, or what actually leaves the system when a customer exits. 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Not one figure appears on any captured page: solutions are listed unpriced, and the single pricing-adjacent statement says the Outlook integration is available with customisation and carries no published price. A buyer cannot compute any invoice, at any seat count, without a sales conversation. 1 2 4

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Eudonet CRM

Is Eudonet CRM European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Eudonet CRM is based.

Where does Eudonet CRM store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026.

Does Eudonet CRM have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Eudonet CRM?

As of 27 Oct 2026, the panel rates Bitrix24 (3/5), Pipeliner CRM (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 52 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is OnePageCRM (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Eudonet CRM alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Eudonet CRM? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (4)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.eudonet.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Legal notice — found from the homepage www.eudonet.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.eudonet.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.eudonet.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →