Desk Booking & Hybrid Workplace
anny
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by anny GmbH · anny.co
Compare with Skedda → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
anny at a glance
- Vendor
- anny GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates anny 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. anny, from anny GmbH of Cologne, books desks, meeting rooms and parking on interactive 3D maps that administrators edit themselves. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 5 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
anny, from anny GmbH of Cologne, books desks, meeting rooms and parking on interactive 3D maps that administrators edit themselves. The bench scored it strongest on booking and floorplans and integration and administration: single sign-on via Entra ID, Okta or any SAML2/OIDC provider with SCIM sync, two-way Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace calendar sync, a documented Admin API with signed webhooks, and named door and display hardware drew consistent credit. It is weakest at hybrid coordination, with no public information on seeing which colleagues plan to be in, booking next to a colleague, or team days. Pricing transparency spans 6–7: per-resource prices of 5,00 €, 10,00 € and 15,00 € per month are public, but the terms add an unpublished monthly base rate, so a full annual cost is not computable from public pages. Sovereignty scored a flat 7 with hosting stated on servers in Germany; the only two-point spread, 5 to 7 on check-in and rules, tracks how judges weighed an auto-release statement that covers rooms only, and the bench recorded no notable disagreement.
Speaks for it
- Desks, rooms and employee and visitor parking bookable on interactive 3D maps edited in a self-service Map Designer, with two-way sync into Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace calendars.
- Single sign-on via Entra ID, Okta, Keycloak or any SAML2/OIDC provider, with automatic SCIM sync of users and groups.
- Occupancy dashboards with heatmaps per site or across sites, a live check-in ratio, CSV and scheduled exports, and an anonymisation mode that removes the personal reference from booking data.
- Booking rules documented in depth — limits per day, week, month or year, scoped to resources, groups and user lists, with recurring bookings counted against the limit.
- Public per-resource prices with a free Starter tier for up to five resources, unlimited users and admins in every paid plan, and a 20% annual saving.
Held against it
- Weakest scores in hybrid coordination, with no public information on a view of who plans to be in, booking next to a colleague, or team days.
- The terms describe a monthly base rate whose amount is not published, so a full annual cost is not computable from public pages, and above 50 resources an individual offer is required.
- Auto-release documented for unused rooms only, with no public information on release of unconfirmed desks, approvals for restricted areas, or fair allocation of scarce parking.
- The hosting provider behind the German servers is not named, the independently collected sovereignty fields mark data residency unconfirmed, and the SOC 2 report is expected only in Q1 2027.
- No public information on audit logs or administration delegated per site, and single sign-on sits in the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
Best for
- You manage desks, meeting rooms and employee parking across several sites and want one planner on interactive 3D maps your own team edits.
- Your estate runs on Microsoft 365 and Entra ID and you need SCIM provisioning, two-way calendar sync and a documented API with signed webhooks.
- You answer to a works council and need a German contracting entity, an offered data processing agreement, named subprocessors, and configurable anonymisation and deletion periods.
- You want to start free: the Starter plan covers up to five resources at no cost, with no credit card required to begin.
Avoid if
- Your core need is colleague-level hybrid coordination — seeing who plans to be in on a given day, booking next to a chosen colleague, or team days — the bench's weakest criterion at 4–5.
- You must compute your full annual cost from public pages before contacting sales: the monthly base rate is unpublished and above 50 resources pricing becomes an individual offer.
- You need occupancy measured by sensors, badge or Wi-Fi data: the documented analytics are built from bookings and check-ins.
- You need a SOC 2 report in hand now; it is described as in progress with the report expected in Q1 2027.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Desk, room & parking booking | 3.5 of 5 |
| Check-in, auto-release & booking rules | 3 of 5 |
| Hybrid work coordination | 2.5 of 5 |
| Occupancy analytics & employee privacy | 3 of 5 |
| Integrations, identity & administration | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Desk, room & parking booking
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What can be booked and how easily: desks, meeting rooms, parking spaces and other resources (lockers, equipment, EV chargers), interactive floor plans per site and floor, desk attributes (monitor, standing desk, accessibility), neighbourhoods and zones, hot and assigned desks, recurring and multi-day bookings, booking for colleagues and guests, room booking synced both ways with Microsoft 365 or Google calendars, room displays, booking from the web, mobile apps, Outlook, Microsoft Teams and Slack, and several languages.
0 — Books nothing for an organisation's own staff; a customer appointment tool or a facility system without self-service booking.
3 — Desks can be booked from a list or a simple plan in a web app; rooms, parking, mobile apps and calendar integration are basic or not described.
5 — Desks, rooms and parking on interactive floor plans for several sites and floors, desk attributes and assigned desks, recurring bookings, booking on behalf of colleagues, mobile apps, room bookings synced with Microsoft 365 or Google calendars, and booking from Microsoft Teams or Slack.
8 — Neighbourhoods and zones per team, an Outlook add-in that books a room and a desk together, room displays with check-in, guest and visitor bookings linked to the host's desk, resources such as lockers and EV chargers, floor plans imported from CAD or drawn in an editor, accessibility of the apps stated, and the product in German and other languages.
10 — Booking that runs a multi-country estate: every resource type above on one plan, wayfinding to the booked desk, booking from every channel with parity documented, catering and equipment with the room, and the accessibility of web and apps documented to WCAG 2.1 AA.
The Workplace Manager
Desks, rooms and parking sit on interactive 3D maps built on our own floor plans with a self-service map designer, each parking spot carries properties such as wallbox or barrier-free, and booking runs from the web, iOS and Android apps, an Outlook add-in and Microsoft Teams with two-way sync into Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. Visitor parking is managed in the same calendar as team spots, catering add-ons attach to room bookings, and the product is available in 28 languages. I found no public information on team neighbourhoods or zones on the plan, wayfinding to the booked desk, or accessibility of web and apps documented to a standard, which keeps this just short of the top level. 5 3 15 14 6 2 9
The People Lead
Desks, rooms, parking (each spot with properties like wallbox or barrier-free), equipment and even catering add-ons are bookable on interactive 3D floor plans you edit yourself in the Map Designer, from the web, Outlook, mobile apps and directly in Microsoft Teams, in 28 languages — that would make a rollout to our Hamburg and Cologne floors straightforward, with visitor parking managed in the same calendar as team spots. We found no public information on team neighbourhoods or zones on the plan, on an Outlook add-in that books a room and a desk together, or on wayfinding to the booked desk, which is the part my teams would ask for first. 14 15 5 3 6 9
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Desks, rooms and parking — including wallbox and barrier-free spots — are booked on interactive 3D maps per site with a self-service Map Designer, from the web, native mobile apps, an Outlook add-in and Teams, with two-way Microsoft 365 and Google calendar sync, booking on behalf of colleagues, catering add-ons and 28 languages. Room displays show live availability with tap check-in, and visitor parking runs in the same calendar as team spots. We found no public information on team neighbourhoods or zones, assigned desks, or documented accessibility of the apps. 2 3 5 6 9 15 19
The Works Council Member
Desks, rooms, parking, equipment and catering add-ons are bookable on interactive 3D maps that admins edit themselves in a map designer, from the web, an Outlook add-in, Microsoft Teams and native iOS and Android apps, in 28 languages. Parking sits in the same planner as desks, each spot its own resource with properties such as wallbox or barrier-free, and visitor parking shares the team's calendar. We found no public information on neighbourhoods or zones per team, which my IT committee would ask about first. 2 3 5 9 14 15
The Office Manager
Desks, meeting rooms and each of our twelve parking spots sit on an interactive 3D plan we can draw ourselves in the Map Designer, with every spot carrying properties like wallbox or barrier-free, and people book from the web, Outlook, Microsoft Teams and native iOS and Android apps with two-way sync to Microsoft 365 and Google calendars. Booking for colleagues and guests, recurring series, catering add-ons on rooms and twenty-eight languages are all documented. I found no public information on booking from Slack, on team neighbourhoods, or on a stated accessibility standard for the apps. 2 3 5 6 9 15 19
The Skeptic
Desks, meeting rooms and employee and visitor parking are bookable on interactive 3D floor plans with a self-service map editor, synced both ways with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, from the web, an Outlook add-in, Microsoft Teams and native apps in 28 languages, with recurring bookings, booking on behalf of others, room displays with tap check-in, catering add-ons and equipment rental. We found no public information on team neighbourhoods or zones, assigned desks, or wayfinding to the booked desk, which is what keeps this short of the top level. 2 3 5 6 9 14 15 19
Check-in, auto-release & booking rules
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the booking is kept honest and fair: check-in by app, QR code, NFC, room display, Wi-Fi or sensor, auto-release of desks and rooms nobody checked in to, booking rules per site, area or group (how far ahead, how many days a week, maximum duration), approvals for restricted areas, assigned and permanent desks with release when the owner is away, fair allocation of scarce parking (lottery, rotation, priority for disabled or EV drivers), capacity limits per floor, and notifications and reminders.
0 — No rules at all; any booking stands whether or not anyone arrives.
3 — A booking can be cancelled by the user; check-in, auto-release and booking rules are basic or not described.
5 — Check-in by app or QR code, automatic release of unconfirmed desk and room bookings after a set time, booking windows and limits per site or group, restricted areas for named groups, assigned desks that their owner can release, and reminders before the booking.
8 — Check-in by room display, NFC, Wi-Fi or occupancy sensor, rules per area and user group with approvals, fair parking allocation by lottery or rotation with priority spaces, capacity limits per floor, permanent desks released automatically during absence synced from the HR system, and the no-show logic documented.
10 — Rules that run themselves across an estate: every check-in method above, automatic desk assignment from team and attendance plans, policy changes rolled out per country with an audit trail, and no-show and release rates reported per site with the method stated.
The Workplace Manager
Check-in happens by QR code at a self-service terminal, by tap on the room display and in the apps, unused rooms are automatically released, and the booking rules are documented in real depth: limits per day, week, month or year, scoped to a resource, group, category or service, with block and allow lists and every appointment of a recurring booking counting against the limit. Communities give named groups their own quotas and gated access to resources, and reminders go out by email plus paid SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram. I found no public information on approvals for restricted areas, fair allocation of scarce parking by lottery or rotation, capacity limits per floor, or assigned and permanent desks released during a documented absence. 16 17 15 2 9 8
The People Lead
Check-in works via QR ticket, tablet terminal and a tap on the room display, unused rooms are released automatically, and the booking rules are genuinely configurable — limits per day, week, month or year, scoped to a resource, service or user group, with block lists and multilingual limit messages, which is the fair-and-fair-seen tone a works council wants. What I miss is any fair allocation of scarce parking (lottery or rotation), approvals for restricted areas, and check-in by Wi-Fi or occupancy sensor; the auto-release statement covers rooms, and we found no public information on release of unconfirmed desk bookings or automatic release of permanent desks during absence. 17 2 15 16 9
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Check-in runs by QR code at a self-service terminal, by tap on the room display or in the check-in app, unused rooms are automatically released, and reminders go out by email, SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram. Booking rules are documented in real depth: limits per day, week, month or year, scoped to resources, groups and user lists, block lists via a zero limit, multilingual error messages and recurring bookings counting against the limit. We found no public information on approvals for restricted areas, fair parking allocation by lottery or rotation, or check-in by sensor, NFC or Wi-Fi. 2 9 15 16 17 20
The Works Council Member
Check-in runs via QR-code terminal, a tap on the room display or the check-in app, unused rooms are released automatically, reminders go out by e-mail, SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram, and booking limits per day, week or month can be narrowed to resources, groups and named user lists. We found no public information on release of assigned desks by their owner, approvals for restricted areas, fair allocation of scarce parking by lottery or rotation, or automatic release timing for desks as opposed to rooms. 2 9 15 16 17
The Office Manager
Check-in is well built out — QR code at a tablet terminal, one tap on a room display, self check-in — and the rules engine limits how often someone may book, scoped down to a resource, a group or specific user lists, with reminders and confirmations on top. Auto-release, though, is documented for unused rooms only, and I found no public information on releasing a no-show's desk, on approval steps for restricted areas, or on a lottery or rotation to settle our Monday parking arguments. 2 15 16 17
The Skeptic
Check-in works from a QR-code terminal, a tablet app and a tap on the room display, unused rooms are released automatically, reminders go out by email, SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram, and the documented rules engine runs parallel limits per day, week, month or year narrowed to resources, services or named user lists including block lists. The auto-release statement covers rooms only, with no stated no-show method; we found no public information on desk auto-release, approval workflows for restricted areas, assigned desks released during absence, or fair allocation of scarce parking. 9 15 16 17
Hybrid work coordination
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How people plan office days together: a weekly view of who will be in the office, home office and absence, favourite colleagues and teams, team days and anchor days, booking next to colleagues, office events, attendance planning and office policies (for example two office days a week) with nudges rather than enforcement, the planner inside Microsoft Teams, Outlook or Slack, sync with absence and HR systems, and visibility settings so employees decide who sees their plans.
0 — No view of colleagues or office days; booking only.
3 — A list of who has booked a desk on a day; team planning, policies and visibility settings are basic or not described.
5 — A weekly planner of office, home and absence days, favourite colleagues and teams, booking a desk next to a colleague, team days, the planner in Microsoft Teams or Slack, notifications when colleagues plan to come in, and a visibility setting per user.
8 — Anchor days and office policies per team with nudges, office events and invitations, sync with absence and HR systems, recommendations of the best office day for a team, delegation for assistants, and visibility and privacy options documented for employees and admins.
10 — Coordination that changes behaviour and is measured: team plans that book desks and rooms automatically, policy adherence shown only in aggregate, works council-ready configuration documented, and the effect on office attendance reported with the method stated.
The Workplace Manager
The planner books office, home office and after-work event days with one click per day and plans a whole week in a few clicks, reachable in Microsoft Teams, with absences synchronised both ways to Personio and HRworks — enough for anchor days at policy level. Profiles and a person search by roles, skills and interests help people find each other, an incognito mode and deactivatable visibility give employees control over who sees them, and a role-based widget checks presence quotas as target against actual in aggregate. I found no public information on booking a desk next to a chosen colleague, explicit team days, or notifications when colleagues plan to come in. 19 18 14 6 21 20
The People Lead
There is a weekly planner — office, home office and after-work events bookable with one click per day, inside Teams — plus two-way absence sync with Personio or HRworks and an incognito mode in the community settings so employees control who sees them, which is exactly the nudge-not-surveillance posture I need. But the colleague layer is thin: profiles let you find people by roles, skills or interests, and I found no public information on a view of who plans to be in on a given day, booking a desk next to a colleague, team or anchor days, or notifications when colleagues decide to come in. 14 18 19 6 21
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
The weekly planner books office, home office and after-work days with one click per day, people are findable by roles, skills and interests, absences sync two ways with Personio and HRworks, and an incognito mode controls visibility in communities. We found no public information on seeing which colleagues plan to be in the office, favourite colleagues, booking next to a colleague, or team and anchor days — the core of planning office days together. 6 18 19 21
The Works Council Member
A weekly planner books office, home office and events with one click per day, inside Teams, with absence synced two ways through Personio and HRworks — and, importantly for us, visibility can be deactivated and an incognito mode controls who is seen within communities. We found no public information on favourite colleagues, booking next to a colleague, team or anchor days, or notifications when colleagues plan to come in, which for us is the substance of coordination rather than mere booking. 3 6 14 19 21
The Office Manager
The weekly planner books office, home office and after-work events with one click per day and runs in Microsoft Teams, absences sync two ways with Personio and HRworks, and there is an incognito setting plus a people search by roles, skills and interests. But I found no public information on favourite colleagues, on booking a desk next to a teammate, or on team anchor days with gentle nudges — the coordination feels more planner than social. 6 14 18 19 21
The Skeptic
The weekly planner books office and home-office days in a few clicks, the planner sits inside Microsoft Teams, person search finds colleagues by role, skills or interests, absences sync two ways from Personio and HRworks, and visibility can be switched off per community. We found no public information on favourite colleagues, booking a desk next to a colleague, team or anchor days, office-day policies with nudges, or notifications when colleagues plan to come in — the coordination side is thinner than the booking side. 5 6 14 18 19 21
Occupancy analytics & employee privacy
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the data is worth for a real estate decision and how it treats the people it measures: utilisation per desk, room, zone, floor and site, booked against checked-in or measured use, peak days and times, no-show rates, room size against meeting size, occupancy sensors, badge, Wi-Fi or people counting data, scenario planning for consolidation, scheduled reports and export to Excel or BI tools, and on the other side aggregation, anonymisation and minimum group sizes, configurable retention and deletion of booking records, role-based access to personal data, and documentation a works council or data protection officer can work with.
0 — No reports of any kind; only the current bookings are shown.
3 — Booking counts or a utilisation chart per site; check-in data, export, retention and anonymisation are basic or not described.
5 — Utilisation per desk, room, floor and site over time, booked against checked-in use, no-show rates, peak days, CSV or Excel export, a retention period for booking data stated or configurable, and reports that can be limited to aggregates.
8 — Occupancy sensors or badge and Wi-Fi data combined with bookings, room size against attendance, scenario or consolidation planning, a BI connector or analytics API, anonymised reports with minimum group sizes, role-based access to personal booking data, deletion periods per data type, and material for a works council agreement published.
10 — Evidence a portfolio decision can rest on: measured and booked occupancy reconciled with the method stated, data quality and sensor accuracy documented, raw data exportable in an open format, privacy by design documented down to field level, and a sample works council agreement or DPIA published.
The Workplace Manager
Utilisation is reported per resource, group and address with heatmaps on the interactive map including a 3D view per site or across sites, week-by-hour and day-by-month distributions for peak analysis, and a real-time check-in widget setting checked-in bookings against the total — the booked-versus-arrived split I need before any board decision on Munich. Dashboards export widgets to CSV and scheduled automatic exports ship bookings and customer data as CSV, role permissions govern which dashboards each admin sees, and the deletion-periods app anonymises booking data for utilisation reports while removing the personal link, with free and paid bookings configurable separately. I found no public information on occupancy sensors, badge or Wi-Fi measurement, room size against meeting size, or scenario planning for consolidation. 20 15 21 9 11
The People Lead
Dashboards deliver utilisation percentages filterable by resource, group or address, heatmaps of desk and room use per site or across sites on the 3D map, a live checked-in ratio and day-by-hour peaks, with CSV export and scheduled automatic exports — enough for an honest desk-ratio debate with facilities. On the people side, an anonymisation mode keeps booking data for utilisation reports while completely removing the personal link, deletion or anonymisation periods are configurable in weeks with free and paid bookings set separately, and dashboard visibility is permissioned per role; we found no public information on occupancy sensors, consolidation scenario planning, minimum group sizes in reports, or a DPIA or sample works council agreement. 20 21 15 9 14
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Utilisation heatmaps show desk and room use on the interactive map per site or across sites, occupancy widgets cover selectable periods up to 365 days, a check-in widget sets checked-in bookings against the total, and CSV export plus scheduled automatic exports feed downstream tools. On the privacy side, an anonymisation mode keeps booking data for utilisation reports while removing the personal reference, deletion periods are configurable with separate periods for free and paid bookings, and dashboard visibility is gated per role, with a published works council feature list. We found no public information on occupancy sensors, badge or Wi-Fi data, or scenario planning for consolidation. 9 14 15 20 21
The Works Council Member
Dashboards report utilisation per desk and room as heatmaps per site and across sites, booked against checked-in use, with CSV export and scheduled exports. On the privacy side the documentation is unusually concrete for a vendor page: anonymisation that completely removes the personal reference for utilisation reports, custom deletion and anonymisation periods, per-role visibility of dashboards and widgets, and the statement that anny as processor deletes nothing on its own. We found no public information on minimum group sizes for reports, sensors, or material for a works agreement, the default retention of at least ten years would need negotiating down hard, and the widget that checks daily bookings against presence quotas by role — for example first-aiders — is exactly the sort of function our works agreement would have to govern. 9 14 20 21
The Office Manager
Occupancy reporting is real: percentage utilisation filterable by resource, group or address, heatmaps by day-and-hour and on the 3D map per site or across sites, a live check-in ratio against total bookings, and CSV export including scheduled automatic exports. Privacy is unusually concrete, with anonymisation that keeps booking data for utilisation reports once the personal link is removed, custom deletion periods set in weeks, role-based dashboard permissions and a published works-council feature list. I found no public information on occupancy sensors, badge or Wi-Fi data, or consolidation planning. 9 14 15 20 21
The Skeptic
Dashboards give percentage utilisation filterable by resource, group, community or address, desk and room heatmaps per site or across sites in day-by-hour and day-by-month views, a live checked-in-to-total ratio, CSV and scheduled exports, and on the privacy side a documented anonymisation mode that keeps utilisation data without the personal reference, custom deletion periods down to one week, a list of the fields processed, and per-role dashboard permissions. Every figure is built from bookings and check-ins; we found no public information on occupancy sensors, badge or Wi-Fi data, reported no-show rates, minimum group sizes for anonymised reports, or scenario planning. 9 14 15 20 21
Integrations, identity & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the tool fits the company's systems and is run: Microsoft 365 and Exchange room mailboxes, Google Workspace, Microsoft Teams and Slack apps, single sign-on with Entra ID, Okta or Google (SAML or OIDC), SCIM user provisioning, HR system sync (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), access control and badge systems, room displays and sensor hardware, a documented REST API and webhooks, several sites, countries and companies in one account, roles and delegated administration per site, audit logs, bulk import of users and resources, and implementation and support.
0 — No integrations, one admin login, users and desks entered only by hand.
3 — A calendar connection and a few admin roles; single sign-on, provisioning, API and multi-site administration are basic or not described.
5 — Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace calendar sync, Teams or Slack app, single sign-on with Entra ID, Okta or Google, user import or SCIM provisioning, a documented REST API, several sites with administrators per site, and bulk import of users and resources.
8 — SCIM provisioning with groups, HR system sync, access control or badge integration, webhooks, SAML and OIDC, granular roles and delegated administration per site and country, audit logs, room display and sensor hardware supported by named models, several companies or tenants in one account, and an implementation plan published.
10 — Administration that scales across a multinational estate: every setting reachable by API with parity stated, multi-tenant administration with separate data per company, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, an open hardware policy with documented device APIs, and a named support SLA per plan.
The Workplace Manager
Identity is covered end to end — single sign-on with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping Identity, Keycloak or any SAML2/OIDC provider, and SCIM syncing users and groups automatically — while Personio and HRworks synchronise absences both ways and SAP connects through the open API and webhooks. The admin API is documented across bookings, resources, customers and billing with HMAC-signed webhooks and retry logic, existing resources and bookings import in bulk, multi-tenancy runs with row-level isolation and Gov-Cloud hosting, and room displays are supported with named models from Qbic and Roomz. I found no public information on audit logs or administration delegated per site. 7 6 23 22 8 9 14
The People Lead
Nearly everything our IT would ask for is documented: two-way calendar sync with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, single sign-on via Entra ID, Okta or any SAML2/OIDC provider with SCIM user and group sync, HR sync with Personio and HRworks, badge and lock integrations from dormakaba to Nuki, Qbic room displays named by model, a documented Admin and Customer API with signed webhooks, and multi-tenancy with row-level isolation plus a Gov-Cloud option. We found no public information on audit logs, a Slack app, or a published implementation plan, and single sign-on sits only in the Enterprise tier, which matters at our size. 6 7 8 9 14
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
For my estate this reads well: Entra ID login with SCIM sync of users and groups, SAML2 and OIDC for any provider, two-way sync between anny resources and our Microsoft 365 resource and person calendars, a Teams app and an Outlook add-in, plus named door hardware (dormakaba, EVVA AirKey, Salto KS), Qbic and Roomz room displays, and Arivo barrier control. A documented Admin API with JSON:API conventions and webhooks signed with HMAC, multi-tenancy with row-level isolation, a Gov-Cloud environment, role-based admin, and import of existing resources and bookings round it out. We found no public information on audit logs. 6 7 8 9 14 22 23
The Works Council Member
Single sign-on covers Entra ID, Okta, Keycloak and Shibboleth over SAML2 and OpenID Connect, users and groups sync via SCIM, Personio, HRworks and SAP connect through documented interfaces, and access-control vendors from dormakaba to Nuki plus named Qbic and Roomz display hardware are supported. The admin API gives full read and write access with signed webhooks, and multi-tenancy with row-level isolation and a Gov-Cloud are documented. We found no public information on audit logs or administration delegated per site and country, both of which I would want in writing before rollout. 6 7 8 9 22 23
The Office Manager
This is the strongest part for our IT: two-way calendar sync with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, single sign-on through Entra ID, Okta or plain SAML2 with SCIM user and group sync, HR links to Personio and HRworks, badge and gate integrations from dormakaba to an Arivo number-plate barrier for the parking spots, room displays from named Qbic models, a documented Admin API plus signed webhooks, and multi-tenancy with a Gov-Cloud option. I found no public information on audit logs or a published implementation plan. 6 7 8 22 23
The Skeptic
The integration surface is unusually concrete: two-way Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace calendar sync, SCIM user and group sync with named identity providers from Entra ID and Okta to Keycloak over SAML2 and OIDC, HR sync with Personio and HRworks plus SAP over open interfaces, access control from dormakaba, Salto KS, EVVA AirKey and plate-recognition Arivo, named Qbic and Roomz display models, and a documented REST API with JSON:API conventions plus HMAC-signed webhooks with retry and de-duplication, multi-tenancy and a Gov-Cloud option. We found no public information on audit logs, administration delegated per site or country, a Slack app, or a published implementation plan. 6 7 8 9 14 22 23
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where employee profiles, bookings (who sat where on which day), presence and absence plans, parking licence plates and sensor data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, email and push notifications, maps, analytics, support and payment tools, hardware and sensor clouds). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A calendar integration with Microsoft 365 or Google that the customer already runs is part of the customer's chain; the vendor's own hosting and subprocessors are what is judged.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (email and push notifications, analytics, support, payment, sensor clouds) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or an on-premise edition documented that keeps every record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or an on-premise edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Workplace Manager
The contracting entity is anny GmbH of Cologne with all data hosted on servers in Germany in the EU, a data processing agreement is offered to customers, and anny GmbH holds ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certificates with a public Trust Center, while SOC 2 is in progress with the report expected in Q1 2027. The privacy policy names subprocessors with their addresses — bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland, Pipedrive in Estonia, Stripe for payments, Framer in the Netherlands — and states that the Google, LinkedIn and TikTok tags are not used on the booking page or admin area. The hosting infrastructure itself is not named and an on-premise option appears only in a support note about data host regions, which holds this just below the top level. 10 14 12 13 11 17
The People Lead
anny GmbH in Cologne is the contracting entity, hosting is stated as servers in Germany with a data processing agreement offered to customers and a processing agreement signed with the hoster, the subprocessors I can see are named with locations (bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland, Pipedrive in Estonia, Irish entities explicitly kept off the booking and admin areas), and ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certificates are published with SOC 2 in progress and the report expected in Q1 2027. The hosting infrastructure provider itself is not named and a US subsidiary exists alongside the German entity, and the independently collected residency and hosting attributes were marked unconfirmed, which is why I stop short of the top of this band. 10 11 12 13 14 21
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
anny GmbH in Cologne is the contracting entity, all data is hosted on servers in Germany, a data processing agreement is offered, and the privacy policy lists subprocessors with locations — Framer in the Netherlands, bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland, Pipedrive in Estonia — with an EU-based inference provider as AI fallback, alongside published ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certificates and SOC 2 expected in Q1 2027. We found no public information naming the hosting provider or infrastructure behind those German servers. 10 11 12 13 14 21
The Works Council Member
anny GmbH of Cologne is the contracting entity, an order-processing agreement is offered to customers and concluded with the hoster, ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certificates name the GmbH itself, and the pages state hosting on servers in Germany with subprocessors listed by location — bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland, Pipedrive in Estonia. The captured material gives different signals on data residency — the independently collected sovereignty fields mark it as not confirmed — the hoster behind the German servers is not named, and SOC 2 is only expected in the first quarter of 2027. 10 12 13 14 21
The Office Manager
anny GmbH in Cologne signs the contract, all data is stated to run on servers hosted in Germany, a data processing agreement is offered, ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certificates are published for the GmbH, and the privacy policy names its subprocessors with addresses — Framer in the Netherlands, bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland — with tracking tools explicitly kept off the booking and admin areas. It stops short of the top level because the application's own hosting infrastructure goes unnamed in what I read, the trial site warns of tools from third countries, and a US subsidiary exists in Delaware. 10 11 12 13 14
The Skeptic
anny GmbH is registered in Cologne, the pages state hosting in Germany with a data processing agreement offered to customers and concluded with the hoster, and the privacy policy lists subprocessors with addresses — Framer in the Netherlands, bunny.net in Slovenia, MapTiler in Switzerland, Pipedrive in Estonia — stating that Google, LinkedIn and TikTok tags run on no booking or admin pages, with ISO 27001 and 27017 certificates published for anny GmbH. We found no public information naming the hosting infrastructure itself, SOC 2 is described as in progress with the report expected Q1 2027, payments run through Stripe without a stated processing location, the trial site carries its own third-country warning, and an on-prem option appears in one support note without documentation. 10 11 12 13 14 17
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by user, desk, bookable resource, site or device, what rooms, parking and analytics cost on top, which features (SSO, SCIM, HR sync, sensors, room displays, visitor management, API) need a higher tier or an add-on, hardware prices and their licences, platform or setup fees, minimum users or minimum spend, the free tier and its limits, minimum term and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, desks, rooms, sites or devices is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price unit (per user, desk, resource or site) and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (room or parking booking, SSO, analytics, displays or sensors, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule, add-ons and hardware licences priced, setup and platform fees stated, minimum users or spend stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of users, desks, rooms, parking spaces and sites, with every add-on, hardware, support and implementation fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Workplace Manager
Tiers are public with unit and inclusions: Starter free forever for five resources, Essential at 5,00€ per resource, Professional at 10,00€, Business at 15,00€, unlimited users and admins in every paid plan, a 20% annual saving, net prices plus VAT and termination on 30 days' notice in text form. Priced extras include SMS, WhatsApp and Telegram reminders at 0,12 € per message and the web assistant from 4 ct. per message, with the API in Business, extended booking rules from Professional and single sign-on in Enterprise. Enterprise itself is custom, anything beyond 50 resources requires an individual offer, the check-in terminal is on request and the monthly base rate named in the terms carries no public figure — so the annual cost of a several-hundred-desk estate is not computable from the public pages alone. 9 11 16
The People Lead
All four paid tiers are public with their unit — 5,00€, 10,00€ and 15,00€ per resource per month, custom pricing from 50 resources, unlimited users and admins in every paid plan, 20% annual saving, VAT treatment and a 30-day termination notice in text form — plus usage-priced add-ons at ab 4 ct. per chat message, ab 24 ct. per phone minute and 0,12€ per SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram reminder. Two things keep me from computing our full annual cost: the terms describe a monthly base rate whose amount is not published, and the check-in terminal is 'Auf Anfrage'; display hardware prices and any setup fee are likewise not stated. 9 11
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Tiers are public with a clean unit: Starter free up to 5 resources, Essential 5,00€ /Ressource, Professional 10,00€ /Ressource, Business 15,00€ /Ressource, Enterprise custom from 50 resources — with unlimited users, 20% annual saving, net prices plus VAT, and per-use prices such as the phone assistant ab 24 ct. / Minute and messaging at 0,12 € / Nachricht. However, the terms describe a monthly base rate for which we found no public amount, single sign-on is an Enterprise feature, the API starts at Business, and hardware and the check-in terminal are unpriced or Auf Anfrage. 9 11 14 16
The Works Council Member
Five plans carry public per-resource prices — Starter free for up to five resources, then 5,00€, 10,00€ and 15,00€ per resource per month — with unlimited users in paid plans, a twenty percent saving when billed annually, VAT treatment and thirty-day termination stated, and message-based add-ons priced per unit. The terms describe a monthly base rate whose amount we found no public information on, the check-in terminal is priced only on request, and above 50 resources an individual offer is required — so for a company our size the real annual cost is not computable from public pages alone. 9 11 16
The Office Manager
I can read most of my monthly bill straight off the pricing page: a free Starter tier for up to five resources with unlimited users, then 5,00 €, 10,00 € or 15,00 € per resource per month, 20% off when billed annually, prices net plus VAT, and priced extras like 0,12 € per SMS or WhatsApp message and the phone assistant from 24 ct. per minute. With 40 desks, three rooms and twelve parking spots I would be over the fifty-resource line where an individual offer takes over, and I found no public information on room-display hardware prices or on the amount of the monthly base fee the terms describe. 9 11 14
The Skeptic
Four of five tiers carry public per-resource prices (5,00 €, 10,00 € and 15,00 € per resource per month, 5,00 € per child resource, 20 % annual saving), the free tier's five-resource limit is stated, unit prices for SMS, WhatsApp, Telegram and the AI assistants are published, payment processing costs 5 % of the total plus 40 ct. per booking, prices are net plus VAT, and the contract runs indefinitely with 30 days' notice. The terms, however, define the fee as a monthly base rate plus the per-resource charge and we found no public information on the base rate's amount; single sign-on sits in the custom-priced Enterprise tier, the check-in terminal is on request, and above 50 resources requires an individual offer — so the full annual cost is not computable from public pages alone. 9 11 14 16
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about anny
Is anny European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies anny as EU-Made.
Where does anny store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
Does anny have a free plan?
Yes. anny has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to anny?
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates deskbird (3.5/5), Kadence (3.5/5) and Mapiq (3.5/5) highest among the other 15 Desk Booking & Hybrid Workplace products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is deskbird (UK / wider Europe). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: anny alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 5 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Hosting location, Hosting options. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 36 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 12 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (23)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (room and desk booking) anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (parking management) anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (check-in) anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (3D floor map) anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Integrations page anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Integrations page (single sign-on) anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 API documentation docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Pricing page anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Legal notice anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Terms of service anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Privacy policy anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Security / trust page trust.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Desk, room & parking booking — found from sitemap anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Desk, room & parking booking — found from sitemap anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Check-in, auto-release & booking rules — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Check-in, auto-release & booking rules — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Hybrid work coordination — found from sitemap anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Hybrid work coordination — found from sitemap anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 20 Occupancy analytics & employee privacy — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 21 Occupancy analytics & employee privacy — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 22 Integrations, identity & administration — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 23 Integrations, identity & administration — found from sitemap docs.anny.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →