Desk Booking & Hybrid Workplace
Seatti
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Seatti GmbH · www.seatti.co
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Seatti at a glance
- Vendor
- Seatti GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Seatti 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Seatti, from Seatti GmbH registered at the Munich court, is desk, room and parking booking that runs natively in Microsoft Teams. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Seatti, from Seatti GmbH registered at the Munich court, is desk, room and parking booking that runs natively in Microsoft Teams. The bench scored it strongest on booking and floor plans, occupancy analytics and sovereignty, with scores clustering at 6-7: occupancy analytics rests on IP-based presence that captures real attendance — including people who are not Seatti users — without sensors, feeding lease and redistribution decisions, with anonymisation claimed verifiable by contract. The weakest reading is check-in and rules, where scores sit at 4 amid no public information on how a booking is confirmed or whether unused desks are released automatically. Hybrid coordination spreads 4 to 6, the widest range recorded: lower scores cite no published weekly planner of office, home and absence days and an office-policy feature marked coming soon. Integration and administration holds at 6 — deep Entra ID and Teams rollout, no public information on audit logs or webhooks. Pricing transparency scores 5-6: four of six tiers carry public per-user prices; both Enterprise tiers are individually quoted.
Speaks for it
- Desks, rooms and parking book natively in Microsoft Teams on interactive floor plans, with desk and parking in one step, catering bookable with the room, and on-site touchscreen room booking
- Occupancy analytics run without sensors, using IP-based presence that includes people who are not Seatti users, feeding lease and redistribution decisions
- The privacy posture is documented for works councils: no monitoring, an opt-out, only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID processed, and anonymisation claimed verifiable by contract
- Identity and rollout sit in the Microsoft stack — automatic provisioning from Entra ID, central deployment via the Teams Admin Center, Outlook and Exchange integration, Google Workspace and an HRIS integration named — and the terms commit to 99% average availability on weekdays 06:00–23:00 CET
- Four of six tiers carry public per-user prices — Workspace Essentials 'ab 1,90 € User/Monat', Workspace Pro 'ab 2,90 € User/Monat', Intelligence Essentials 'ab 1,00 € User/Monat', Intelligence Pro 'ab 2,00 € User/Monat' — with the annual flat fee and six months' notice to the contract-year end stated in the terms
Held against it
- We found no public information on how a staff desk or room booking is confirmed or whether unclaimed bookings are released automatically; check-in is described only for the visitor-management add-on
- The office-policy feature is announced only as coming soon, and we found no public information on a weekly planner of office, home and absence days or on per-user visibility settings
- The captured pages give different figures for hosting: the terms license use in Seatti's data centre while an integrations page offers on-premise hosting
- Only website analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar appear as named subprocessors, and we found no public information on the hosting infrastructure or the product's own subprocessor chain
- Both Enterprise tiers and the visitor-management add-on are priced only as individual quotes, and we found no public information on minimum user numbers, so a complete annual cost is not computable from public pages
Best for
- You run Microsoft 365 and want desk, room and parking booking inside Teams with automatic Entra ID provisioning and central rollout through the Teams Admin Center
- You need occupancy figures for lease and redistribution decisions without deploying sensors, including presence data on people who are not Seatti users
- You answer to a works council: German law with exclusive Munich jurisdiction, a data processing agreement, a named external data protection officer, an opt-out, only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID processed, and EU servers with ISO 27001 claimed on several pages
- You coordinate hybrid teams that already live in Teams — one team booking reserves every member's desk and favourite colleagues are notified when someone books
Avoid if
- Your contract governance cannot absorb annual advance billing, six months' notice to the contract-year end, and a unilateral yearly increase of inflation plus one percentage point
- Your teams book outside Microsoft Teams — the modules are documented as native in Teams with no separate app or additional login
- Your works agreement bars individual attendance visibility — the captured pages describe usage reports showing who comes in, when and how often
- You must compute a complete annual cost from public pages alone — both Enterprise tiers and the visitor-management add-on are priced only as individual quotes
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Desk, room & parking booking | 3.5 of 5 |
| Check-in, auto-release & booking rules | 2 of 5 |
| Hybrid work coordination | 3 of 5 |
| Occupancy analytics & employee privacy | 3.5 of 5 |
| Integrations, identity & administration | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Desk, room & parking booking
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What can be booked and how easily: desks, meeting rooms, parking spaces and other resources (lockers, equipment, EV chargers), interactive floor plans per site and floor, desk attributes (monitor, standing desk, accessibility), neighbourhoods and zones, hot and assigned desks, recurring and multi-day bookings, booking for colleagues and guests, room booking synced both ways with Microsoft 365 or Google calendars, room displays, booking from the web, mobile apps, Outlook, Microsoft Teams and Slack, and several languages.
0 — Books nothing for an organisation's own staff; a customer appointment tool or a facility system without self-service booking.
3 — Desks can be booked from a list or a simple plan in a web app; rooms, parking, mobile apps and calendar integration are basic or not described.
5 — Desks, rooms and parking on interactive floor plans for several sites and floors, desk attributes and assigned desks, recurring bookings, booking on behalf of colleagues, mobile apps, room bookings synced with Microsoft 365 or Google calendars, and booking from Microsoft Teams or Slack.
8 — Neighbourhoods and zones per team, an Outlook add-in that books a room and a desk together, room displays with check-in, guest and visitor bookings linked to the host's desk, resources such as lockers and EV chargers, floor plans imported from CAD or drawn in an editor, accessibility of the apps stated, and the product in German and other languages.
10 — Booking that runs a multi-country estate: every resource type above on one plan, wayfinding to the booked desk, booking from every channel with parity documented, catering and equipment with the room, and the accessibility of web and apps documented to WCAG 2.1 AA.
The Workplace Manager
Desks, rooms and parking are all bookable — desk and parking even in one step — on interactive floor plans showing who sits where, with fixed desks, booking for others, group bookings, equipment filters, catering bookable with the room and kiosk booking on site. Zones and team areas give me the neighbourhoods I need per team across sites, and everything runs natively in Microsoft Teams with Outlook sync and a Google Workspace integration named. We found no public information on room displays with check-in, lockers or EV chargers, floor-plan import from CAD, or accessibility of the apps, which keeps this short of the top levels. 1 3 4 8 14 20
The People Lead
Desks, rooms and parking are all bookable natively in Microsoft Teams on interactive floor plans that show who sits where, with fixed desks, repeat-last-week, equipment filters, booking for colleagues, group bookings and zones per team, plus desk and parking in one step and catering booked with the room. That is exactly the low-friction experience my people would actually use. The captured pages stop short of a floor-plan editor or CAD import, the touchscreen kiosk is described for booking rooms rather than check-in, and I found no public information on lockers, EV chargers, wayfinding or accessibility of the apps. 2 3 4 8 14
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Desks, rooms and parking are all bookable on interactive floor plans directly in Microsoft Teams, with equipment filters, fixed desks, booking for others, group bookings and prioritised bookings, a visitor-management add-on with guest self-booking, on-site kiosk room booking, and catering, setup times and seating bookable together with the room. We found no public information on mobile apps, Slack, a floor-plan editor or CAD import, or accessibility of the apps, so the channel reach is narrower than I need across six sites. 1 2 3 8 14
The Works Council Member
Desks, rooms and parking spaces are booked natively in Microsoft Teams on interactive floor plans, with assigned desks, repeat of last week's bookings, booking on behalf of others, equipment filters, and catering and technology ordered with the room; zones and team areas, touchscreen room booking on site and a visitor management add-on are also described. We found no public information on importing floor plans from CAD or drawing them in an editor, on lockers or EV chargers as bookable resources, on separate mobile apps, or on accessibility of the apps. 1 2 3 4 8 14 15
The Office Manager
Desks, rooms and my twelve parking spaces are all bookable on interactive floor plans directly in Microsoft Teams, with fixed desks, equipment filters, repeat-last-week, booking for colleagues and groups, catering booked with the room, a visitor add-on with guest seat assignment, and zones for team areas — the site appears in German and English. We found no public information on booking from Slack, standalone mobile apps, or room displays with check-in. 2 3 4 8 14
The Skeptic
Desks, rooms and parking are all bookable, with interactive floor plans, equipment filters, assignable fixed desks, repeat bookings, booking for others, catering and setup booked with the room, touchscreen booking on site, and desk-plus-parking in one step inside Teams; zones and team areas are managed centrally and the pages are published in German and English. We found no public information on separate mobile apps, Slack, or how floor plans get into the system. 1 2 3 4 7 8 14 15 20
Check-in, auto-release & booking rules
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the booking is kept honest and fair: check-in by app, QR code, NFC, room display, Wi-Fi or sensor, auto-release of desks and rooms nobody checked in to, booking rules per site, area or group (how far ahead, how many days a week, maximum duration), approvals for restricted areas, assigned and permanent desks with release when the owner is away, fair allocation of scarce parking (lottery, rotation, priority for disabled or EV drivers), capacity limits per floor, and notifications and reminders.
0 — No rules at all; any booking stands whether or not anyone arrives.
3 — A booking can be cancelled by the user; check-in, auto-release and booking rules are basic or not described.
5 — Check-in by app or QR code, automatic release of unconfirmed desk and room bookings after a set time, booking windows and limits per site or group, restricted areas for named groups, assigned desks that their owner can release, and reminders before the booking.
8 — Check-in by room display, NFC, Wi-Fi or occupancy sensor, rules per area and user group with approvals, fair parking allocation by lottery or rotation with priority spaces, capacity limits per floor, permanent desks released automatically during absence synced from the HR system, and the no-show logic documented.
10 — Rules that run themselves across an estate: every check-in method above, automatic desk assignment from team and attendance plans, policy changes rolled out per country with an audit trail, and no-show and release rates reported per site with the method stated.
The Workplace Manager
Extended booking rules headline the Pro tier, parking quotas can be set per group, prioritised and anonymous bookings are listed, and reminders arrive automatically in Microsoft Teams — but we found no public description of any check-in method or of automatic release when nobody shows up. On a full Tuesday, when half of Munich books and does not come, that silence is expensive. We found no public information on booking windows, approvals for restricted areas or capacity limits per floor either. 2 8 14 15
The People Lead
The Pro tier is sold with extended booking rules, parking quotas can be defined by group, and reminders arrive automatically in Teams — but what the rules actually are (booking windows, weekly limits, approvals) is not described on any page I read. I found no public information on check-in by app or QR code, or on automatic release of desks and rooms nobody uses. Before I sign anything I would need exactly that in writing, because ghost bookings are what sank our last pilot. 8 14 15
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Workspace Pro includes extended booking rules, parking quotas can be defined by group, prioritised bookings exist, role-based permissions decide which groups may book which resources, and reminders arrive automatically in Teams — a genuine rules layer. We found no public information on check-in by app, QR code, room display or sensor, on automatic release of unconfirmed bookings, or on approvals, which is the machinery that keeps forty room mailboxes honest. 8 14 15
The Works Council Member
The pages name extended booking rules in the Pro tier, role-based control over which user groups may book which resources, parking quotas by group, and automatic reminders in Microsoft Teams, but we found no public information on how a check-in is performed, whether unclaimed desks and rooms are released automatically, on booking windows, approvals or capacity limits. For a works agreement I need exactly these honesty mechanisms spelled out, and here they are not documented. 2 8 14 15 21
The Office Manager
Workspace Pro is named as the tier with extended booking rules, parking quotas can be set by group with real-time utilisation for facility management, and reminders arrive automatically in Teams — useful for the parking argument — but the rules themselves are not spelled out. We found no public information on check-in for staff, automatic release of desks when nobody shows up, or approvals; check-in is only described for the visitor add-on. 3 8 14 15
The Skeptic
The rule features that are named are real — extended booking rules, parking quotas by group, prioritized bookings, assignable fixed desks, Teams reminders — but we found no public information on how a desk or room booking is confirmed, no app, QR-code or display check-in, and none on automatic release of a booking nobody uses. The IP-based presence that feeds the analytics is not documented as a release mechanism, so a no-show's desk appears to stay booked. 2 3 8 14 15
Hybrid work coordination
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How people plan office days together: a weekly view of who will be in the office, home office and absence, favourite colleagues and teams, team days and anchor days, booking next to colleagues, office events, attendance planning and office policies (for example two office days a week) with nudges rather than enforcement, the planner inside Microsoft Teams, Outlook or Slack, sync with absence and HR systems, and visibility settings so employees decide who sees their plans.
0 — No view of colleagues or office days; booking only.
3 — A list of who has booked a desk on a day; team planning, policies and visibility settings are basic or not described.
5 — A weekly planner of office, home and absence days, favourite colleagues and teams, booking a desk next to a colleague, team days, the planner in Microsoft Teams or Slack, notifications when colleagues plan to come in, and a visibility setting per user.
8 — Anchor days and office policies per team with nudges, office events and invitations, sync with absence and HR systems, recommendations of the best office day for a team, delegation for assistants, and visibility and privacy options documented for employees and admins.
10 — Coordination that changes behaviour and is measured: team plans that book desks and rooms automatically, policy adherence shown only in aggregate, works council-ready configuration documented, and the effect on office attendance reported with the method stated.
The Workplace Manager
Favourite colleagues trigger notifications when they book, office news and events, a team charter and one-click team bookings that reserve every member's desk are documented, usage reports show who comes in how often, and the planner sits inside Microsoft Teams with an HRIS integration named on the integrations page. The office policy that would turn team days into measurable practice is explicitly marked coming soon. We found no public information on a weekly office-home-absence view, best-office-day recommendations or per-user visibility settings. 2 16 17 20
The People Lead
Favourite colleagues get a notification when someone books a place, the floor plans show who sits where so people can sit with their team, one team booking reserves every desk at once, and office news and events are included — all inside Teams with no second app or login, which is precisely the nudging-not-policing setup I want. The office-policy feature that would turn team days into measurable practice with no mandate is explicitly marked coming soon. I found no public information on absence or HR sync, assistant delegation, or a per-user visibility setting beyond anonymous bookings. 14 16 17 20
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Employees are notified when favourite colleagues book a place, can see where colleagues sit and book next to them, one team booking reserves desks for the whole team, office news and events are provided, and usage reports show who comes in when — coordination living natively in Teams. The office-policy feature is explicitly announced as coming soon, and we found no public information on a weekly office, home and absence view, per-user visibility settings, or absence and HR sync for planning. 16 17 20
The Works Council Member
Favourite colleagues with a notification the moment they book, sitting next to colleagues, one team booking that reserves every desk at once, office news and events, and a Team Charter — all inside Microsoft Teams; an office-policy feature with nudges instead of mandates is announced only as coming soon. We found no public information on a weekly home-office and absence planner, on visibility settings per user, or on delegation for assistants. 8 14 16 17 20
The Office Manager
Team days reserve every desk in one booking, employees are notified when favourite colleagues book a place, people can see where colleagues sit and join them, and there are office news and events plus a team charter — all inside Teams. The office-policy feature is only announced as coming soon, and we found no public information on a weekly planner of office, home and absence days or per-user visibility settings. 16 17 20
The Skeptic
Employees see where colleagues sit, get notified when favourite colleagues book, can reserve every desk for the team in one booking, and there are office news and events, team charters, team analytics and a team-days page — with office policies announced as coming soon. We found no public information on a weekly planner of office, home and absence days, sync with absence systems, or per-user visibility settings. 2 16 17 20
Occupancy analytics & employee privacy
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the data is worth for a real estate decision and how it treats the people it measures: utilisation per desk, room, zone, floor and site, booked against checked-in or measured use, peak days and times, no-show rates, room size against meeting size, occupancy sensors, badge, Wi-Fi or people counting data, scenario planning for consolidation, scheduled reports and export to Excel or BI tools, and on the other side aggregation, anonymisation and minimum group sizes, configurable retention and deletion of booking records, role-based access to personal data, and documentation a works council or data protection officer can work with.
0 — No reports of any kind; only the current bookings are shown.
3 — Booking counts or a utilisation chart per site; check-in data, export, retention and anonymisation are basic or not described.
5 — Utilisation per desk, room, floor and site over time, booked against checked-in use, no-show rates, peak days, CSV or Excel export, a retention period for booking data stated or configurable, and reports that can be limited to aggregates.
8 — Occupancy sensors or badge and Wi-Fi data combined with bookings, room size against attendance, scenario or consolidation planning, a BI connector or analytics API, anonymised reports with minimum group sizes, role-based access to personal booking data, deletion periods per data type, and material for a works council agreement published.
10 — Evidence a portfolio decision can rest on: measured and booked occupancy reconciled with the method stated, data quality and sensor accuracy documented, raw data exportable in an open format, privacy by design documented down to field level, and a sample works council agreement or DPIA published.
The Workplace Manager
This is close to board-ready: real-time occupancy by floor, area and location with trends over time, IP-based presence showing actual use even from non-Seatti users rather than bookings alone, Signals down to the individual table, and need, lease, redistribution and redesign decision support. Privacy is documented too — only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID processed, aggregate and anonymised evaluations developed with data protection officers and works councils, an opt-out, a custom export and a stated retention approach. We found no public statement of no-show rates, minimum group sizes for anonymisation, export formats, or the accuracy of IP-based measurement. 5 6 8 11 18 19
The People Lead
Occupancy is reported per office, floor, department and workspace from anonymised booking data, with trends over time and no sensors required, and the paid Intelligence tiers add IP-based presence, usage per area and desk, and redistribution or lease decisions. The works-council page is unusually direct: no monitoring, an opt-out, only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID processed, and all evaluations anonymised and verifiable by contract. I found no public information on minimum group sizes, no-show rates or export in an open format, and the captured pages describe both anonymised evaluations and usage reports showing who comes in, when and how often — a distinction our works council would demand settled before rollout. 5 6 8 18 19
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Occupancy is reported per desk, area, floor and location with trends over time, Seatti Signals gives usage per area and table, IP-based presence shows real utilisation even for non-Seatti users, and the top Intelligence tier accepts access, sensor and HR data sources for redistribution and lease decisions. All evaluations are aggregated and anonymised, the product was developed with data protection officers and works councils and a works-council page states only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID is processed; we found no public information on minimum group sizes, no-show rates, a BI connector or the export format. 5 8 18 19
The Works Council Member
Utilisation is reported per office, floor, area and, with Seatti Signals, per desk, with IP-based presence showing real occupancy against bookings, and the vendor states all evaluations are aggregated and anonymised with no performance evaluation, developed together with data protection officers and works councils — there is even a dedicated works-council page stating no monitoring, an opt-out, and that only a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID is processed. However, we found no public information on minimum group sizes in reports, deletion periods for booking records, or export formats, and the captured pages also describe usage reports showing who comes in, when and how often — before any works agreement we would have to pin down who may see those individual attendance figures. 5 6 8 14 18 19
The Office Manager
Occupancy is reported by office, floor, department, area and individual desk with trends over time, IP-based presence captures real attendance including people who do not use Seatti, and the top Intelligence tier can bring in access, sensor and HR data; everything is aggregated and anonymised, developed with works councils, with an opt-out, data minimisation to user ID and email, and a dedicated works-council page. We found no public information on minimum group sizes, no-show rates or a BI connector. 5 8 12 18 19
The Skeptic
The occupancy figures are built from booking data set against IP-based presence — including people who are not Seatti users — per floor, area, desk and site, explicitly without sensors, feeding lease and redistribution decisions, with anonymisation claimed to be verifiable by contract, an export function, and a works-council page stating opt-out and a pseudonymised Microsoft user ID. We found no public information on minimum group sizes, deletion periods per data type, or the accuracy of IP-based presence; sensors and access data only enter at the top tier as bring-your-own. 5 6 8 11 18 19
Integrations, identity & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the tool fits the company's systems and is run: Microsoft 365 and Exchange room mailboxes, Google Workspace, Microsoft Teams and Slack apps, single sign-on with Entra ID, Okta or Google (SAML or OIDC), SCIM user provisioning, HR system sync (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), access control and badge systems, room displays and sensor hardware, a documented REST API and webhooks, several sites, countries and companies in one account, roles and delegated administration per site, audit logs, bulk import of users and resources, and implementation and support.
0 — No integrations, one admin login, users and desks entered only by hand.
3 — A calendar connection and a few admin roles; single sign-on, provisioning, API and multi-site administration are basic or not described.
5 — Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace calendar sync, Teams or Slack app, single sign-on with Entra ID, Okta or Google, user import or SCIM provisioning, a documented REST API, several sites with administrators per site, and bulk import of users and resources.
8 — SCIM provisioning with groups, HR system sync, access control or badge integration, webhooks, SAML and OIDC, granular roles and delegated administration per site and country, audit logs, room display and sensor hardware supported by named models, several companies or tenants in one account, and an implementation plan published.
10 — Administration that scales across a multinational estate: every setting reachable by API with parity stated, multi-tenant administration with separate data per company, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, an open hardware policy with documented device APIs, and a named support SLA per plan.
The Workplace Manager
The Microsoft stack is deep — native Teams, Outlook and Exchange, automatic Entra ID provisioning, central rollout through the Teams Admin Center — with Google Workspace and HRIS integrations named, API access and multi-tenant administration in the Enterprise tier, and an admin panel covering users, roles, zones and locations with bulk upload. The terms commit to 99 percent availability during stated operating hours, and an on-premise option appears on the integrations page. We found no public information on SCIM provisioning, SAML or OIDC details, webhooks, audit logs, or supported room-display and sensor hardware. 2 7 8 10 20 21
The People Lead
The Microsoft path is genuinely deep: rollout through the Teams Admin Center, users auto-provisioned from Entra ID, Outlook and Exchange sync, Google Workspace and an HRIS connection listed on the integrations page, and an admin panel with roles, zones, bulk upload and configurable permissions across locations. API access and multi-tenant administration sit behind the Enterprise tier, which is individually quoted. I found no public information on audit logs, webhooks, SCIM group provisioning or supported room-display models; the terms do commit to 99% average availability during business hours. 7 8 10 14 20
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
This sits close to my stack: a native Teams app with automatic user provisioning from Entra ID and central rollout through the Teams Admin Center, Outlook and Exchange integration alongside Google Workspace and HRIS, bulk uploads, role-based permissions across zones and locations, multi-tenant administration with guest access in Workspace Enterprise, API access in that tier, and 99% availability during stated operating hours. We found no public information on audit logs, webhooks, SCIM or SAML/OIDC as named protocols, or published REST API documentation — the audit-log gap alone gives my security team pause. 2 7 8 14 20 21
The Works Council Member
Native Microsoft Teams, Outlook and Exchange sync, Entra ID user management with bulk upload, Google Workspace and HRIS integrations, role-based permissions, zone and location administration, multi-tenant administration in the Enterprise tier, API access, and central rollout via the Teams Admin Center; the terms even commit to 99 percent availability during business hours. We found no public information on SCIM provisioning with groups, on SAML or OIDC single sign-on specifics, webhooks, audit logs, or named room-display hardware models. 7 8 10 14 20 21
The Office Manager
Entra, Exchange, Outlook, Google Workspace and HRIS integrations are listed, users and resources come in by bulk upload with automatic Entra ID sync and role-based permissions, multi-tenant administration exists at the Enterprise tier, an API comes with it, and the terms promise 99% average availability on weekdays 06:00–23:00 CET. We found no public information on SCIM, webhooks, audit logs or a Slack app, and the captured pages give different figures for hosting options, one describing on-premise hosting and the terms describing the Seatti data centre. 7 8 10 20 21
The Skeptic
Identity and provisioning run through Microsoft Entra ID with automatic user provisioning, bulk upload, role-based permissions down to which group may book which resource, and a central rollout via the Teams Admin Center; Exchange, Outlook and Google Workspace are named alongside an HRIS integration, and the top tier adds multi-tenant administration, guest access and API access. We found no public information on SCIM, SAML or OIDC, webhooks, audit logs, or a documented API specification, and per-site delegated administration is not described. 2 7 8 14 20 21
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where employee profiles, bookings (who sat where on which day), presence and absence plans, parking licence plates and sensor data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, email and push notifications, maps, analytics, support and payment tools, hardware and sensor clouds). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A calendar integration with Microsoft 365 or Google that the customer already runs is part of the customer's chain; the vendor's own hosting and subprocessors are what is judged.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (email and push notifications, analytics, support, payment, sensor clouds) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or an on-premise edition documented that keeps every record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or an on-premise edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Workplace Manager
The chain looks European where I can see it: Seatti GmbH registered at the Munich court with German law and exclusive Munich jurisdiction, EU servers with ISO 27001 stated on several pages, processing by default in Germany or EU member states with standard contractual clauses as the third-country basis, an external German data protection officer, a data processing agreement whose existence is stated, and a trust centre with certificates. Website analytics run through Google Analytics and Hotjar, with truncated IPs and pseudonymised profiles given as safeguards. The hosting infrastructure is unnamed beyond EU servers, the product-side subprocessor chain — email, push, support, payment — is not listed, and no SOC 2 is mentioned, so the top level is out of reach on this evidence. 9 10 11 12 13
The People Lead
Seatti GmbH is registered at the Munich local court, contracts under German law with exclusive jurisdiction in Munich, and states EU servers with ISO 27001 across several pages; a data processing agreement exists, an external German data protection officer is named, and the privacy policy places processing in Germany or the EU with standard contractual clauses for third countries. What keeps me short of full confidence: the hosting infrastructure is not named, the subprocessors named in the privacy policy cover the marketing website (Google Analytics with truncated IPs, Hotjar) rather than the product chain, and certifications are stated without scope. The terms grant use only in Seatti's data centre while the integrations page also offers hosting data yourself on-premise — the captured pages give different pictures there. 4 9 10 11 12 20
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Seatti GmbH is registered at Amtsgericht München (HRB 266542) under German law with exclusive jurisdiction in Munich, processing is stated to take place in Germany or EU member states with EU standard contractual clauses as the third-country basis, an external data protection officer is named, EU servers with ISO 27001 are claimed and a data processing agreement is referenced. Only the website tools Google Analytics and Hotjar appear as named subprocessors and the hosting infrastructure itself is not named; the captured pages also give different pictures of hosting, with an on-premise option offered on the integrations page while the usage terms license the software on Seatti's data-centre systems. 4 9 10 11 12 20
The Works Council Member
Seatti GmbH is registered at the Munich local court with German governing law and Munich jurisdiction, processing of personal data is stated to take place in Germany or EU member states with EU servers and ISO 27001 certification, an external data protection officer is named, and a data processing agreement exists. But the hosting infrastructure is not named beyond the vendor's own data centre, the subprocessor list for the service itself is not published — the privacy policy names only website tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar — and the captured pages give different pictures on hosting: the terms describe the vendor's data centre while the integrations page mentions an on-premise option without documenting it. 5 9 10 11 12 20
The Office Manager
Seatti GmbH is registered in Munich with German law and exclusive jurisdiction in Munich, the pages repeatedly state EU servers with ISO 27001 certification, a data processing agreement is described, an external data protection officer in Berlin is named, and processing normally takes place in Germany or EU member states with standard contractual clauses for exceptions. The hosting infrastructure itself is not named, and only website analytics subprocessors such as Google Analytics and Hotjar are listed, so the product's own subprocessor chain is not itemised. 7 9 10 11 12
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is Seatti GmbH, registered at the Munich court and bound by German law with exclusive jurisdiction in Munich; an external data protection officer in Berlin is named, a data processing agreement exists, processing is stated to take place in Germany or EU member states with standard contractual clauses for third countries, and EU servers plus ISO 27001 are claimed with a trust centre behind them. We found no public information naming the hosting infrastructure, a product subprocessor list with locations, or the scope of the ISO 27001 certification, and the vendor's own website runs Google Analytics and Hotjar. The captured pages give different figures for hosting options: the terms describe use in Seatti's data centre, while one integrations page offers on-premise. 4 9 10 11 12 13 20
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by user, desk, bookable resource, site or device, what rooms, parking and analytics cost on top, which features (SSO, SCIM, HR sync, sensors, room displays, visitor management, API) need a higher tier or an add-on, hardware prices and their licences, platform or setup fees, minimum users or minimum spend, the free tier and its limits, minimum term and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, desks, rooms, sites or devices is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price unit (per user, desk, resource or site) and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (room or parking booking, SSO, analytics, displays or sensors, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule, add-ons and hardware licences priced, setup and platform fees stated, minimum users or spend stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of users, desks, rooms, parking spaces and sites, with every add-on, hardware, support and implementation fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Workplace Manager
Tiers are public with their unit and inclusions — "ab 1,90 € User/Monat" and "ab 2,90 € User/Monat" for the workspace tiers, "ab 1,00 €" and "ab 2,00 €" for intelligence — with the annual flat fee defined per active user, billed annually in advance, net prices with VAT on the customer, a six-month notice to the end of the contract year, and a stated day rate of EUR 1.000 for extra services. The two Enterprise tiers are individually quoted, the visitor management add-on carries no price, and beyond the from-prices we found no scaling rule, minimum user count, hardware licence or setup fee published — so I cannot yet compute a 900-user annual cost from the pages alone. 8 10 11
The People Lead
Four of six tiers are public with their unit and inclusions — Workspace Essentials 'ab 1,90 € User/Monat', Workspace Pro 'ab 2,90 € User/Monat', Intelligence Essentials 'ab 1,00 € User/Monat', Intelligence Pro 'ab 2,00 € User/Monat' — and the terms publish what most vendors hide: an annual flat fee per active user with that term defined, net prices plus VAT, annual advance billing, six-month notice to the contract year, extra services at a day rate of EUR 1,000 with setup excluded by default, and a unilateral annual increase of inflation plus one percentage point. Both Enterprise tiers and the visitor-management add-on are individually quoted, so I cannot compute a full annual cost for a 250-person rollout from public pages alone. 8 10
The Microsoft 365 Administrator
Per-user monthly prices are public — Workspace Essentials 'ab 1,90 € User/Monat', Workspace Pro 'ab 2,90 € User/Monat', Intelligence Essentials 'ab 1,00 € User/Monat', Intelligence Pro 'ab 2,00 € User/Monat' — and the terms publish annual advance billing per active user (anyone who logs in once during the term), net prices plus statutory VAT, an unlimited term terminable on six months' notice to the contract-year end, a 'Tagessatz von EUR 1.000' for extra services and a unilateral annual increase of inflation plus one percentage point. Both Enterprise tiers are priced 'Individuell' and the visitor-management add-on and API access carry no public price, with no minimum user count stated, so a complete annual cost is not computable from public pages alone. 8 10
The Works Council Member
Four tiers are public with from-prices per user and month — Workspace Essentials ab 1,90 € User/Monat, Workspace Pro ab 2,90 €, Intelligence Essentials ab 1,00 €, Intelligence Pro ab 2,00 € — while both Enterprise tiers are individual quotes. The terms add an unusually concrete scaling rule (annual flat fee per active user, active meaning logged in at least once during the term), net prices with statutory VAT added, a EUR 1,000 day rate for extra services, and a unilateral annual increase of inflation plus one percentage point; the visitor management add-on and hardware prices are unpriced, and we found no public information on minimum users or spend. 8 10
The Office Manager
The pricing page shows tiers with their per-user price unit and main inclusions — Workspace Essentials "ab 1,90 € User/Monat", Workspace Pro "ab 2,90 € User/Monat", Intelligence Essentials "ab 1,00 € User/Monat", Intelligence Pro "ab 2,00 € User/Monat" — and the terms state net prices plus statutory VAT, annual payment in advance, an indefinite term with six months' notice to the contract-year end, extra services at EUR 1,000 per day, and a free trial. The Enterprise tiers and the visitor management add-on are priced only as "Individuell", billing is annual rather than monthly, and no minimum user count is stated. 3 8 10
The Skeptic
Four of six tiers carry public per-user prices — Workspace Essentials "ab 1,90 € User/Monat", Workspace Pro "ab 2,90 € User/Monat", Intelligence "ab 1,00 €" and "ab 2,00 €" — with inclusions listed, and the terms are unusually explicit: an annual flat fee per active user, where anyone who logs in once counts, billed yearly in advance, net prices with VAT on top, extra services at a day rate of EUR 1,000, six months' notice to the contract year end, and a unilateral yearly increase of inflation plus one percentage point. Both Enterprise tiers and the visitor-management add-on are priced only on individual quote, and we found no public information on minimum user numbers or the trial's limits. 8 10
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Cloud service only ⚠ unverified | 0/1 pts | 10 Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Seatti
Is Seatti European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Seatti as EU-Made.
Where does Seatti store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026.
Does Seatti have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Seatti?
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates deskbird (3.5/5), Kadence (3.5/5) and Mapiq (3.5/5) highest among the other 15 Desk Booking & Hybrid Workplace products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is deskbird (UK / wider Europe). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Seatti alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 5 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Hosting location, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Hosting options. Aussage stammt nur aus den SaaS-Nutzungsbedingungen, nicht aus einer ausdrücklichen Darstellung der Hosting-Optionen auf der Website.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 72 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 12 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (21)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (desk booking) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (room booking) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (parking booking) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (workplace analytics) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Integrations page (Microsoft 365) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Features page (administration) www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Pricing page www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Legal notice www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Terms of service www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Privacy policy www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Data protection page www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Security / trust page www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Desk, room & parking booking — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Desk, room & parking booking — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Hybrid work coordination — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Hybrid work coordination — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Occupancy analytics & employee privacy — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Occupancy analytics & employee privacy — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 20 Integrations, identity & administration — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 21 Integrations, identity & administration — found from sitemap www.seatti.co Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →