whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Learning Management (LMS)

LearnWorlds

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd · www.learnworlds.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

LearnWorlds: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai LearnWorlds: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

LearnWorlds at a glance

Vendor
LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Outside the EU by default source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates LearnWorlds 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. LearnWorlds is an LMS from LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd of Cyprus. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources

LearnWorlds alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Customer Education Lead

Weighted verdict

Runs customer education at a software company in Amsterdam that sells to 3,000 business customers and trains 120 implementation partners. Built the first academy on a course shop and outgrew it when partners needed their own portal and certifications that expire. Wants branded portals per audience, single sign-on from the product, paid courses with invoices, completions in the CRM, and a price that does not double when the academy finally works.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Customer Education Lead

Panel median The Customer Education Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Customer Education Lead
Courses, learning paths & content standards 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail 3 of 5 3 of 5
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Reporting, learner data & works council 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Integrations, administration & portability 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 3 of 5 2 of 5
Pricing transparency 2 of 5 1.5 of 5

Courses, learning paths & content standards

How this is scored

How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.

0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.

3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.

5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.

8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.

10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

The course builder covers interactive video, 18 question types, SCORM 1.2 and 2004, LTI 1.3, HTML5 and Captivate packages, prerequisite navigation and offline white-label mobile apps — more than enough to run an academy. It stays below the top band because accessibility is addressed only through an accessiBe widget rather than a WCAG conformance statement, xAPI and cmi5 are absent from the pages, question pools are not described, and translation arrives via a third-party widget; AI authoring is real and the privacy policy states data from integrations is not used to train models, though AI credits are metered per plan. 1 3 4 7 9 12 14 15

Report an error

Compliance training, recertification & audit trail

How this is scored

Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.

0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.

3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.

5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.

8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).

10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

Retraining is genuinely built for expiring certifications: cycles triggered by certificate expiry or course due date, each repeat tracked as a separate cycle with past cycles viewable, retraining notification emails, admin certificate revocation and even paid recertification, plus rule-based assignment via smart groups and automations, attendance through the live-training integrations and scheduled compliance exports. I did not find escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, attestations or e-signatures, and the audit trail is described only as a marketing line about audit logs and tracking. 3 4 5 7 9 16

Report an error

Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies

How this is scored

Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.

0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.

3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.

5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.

8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.

10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

This is close to my model: multi-academy management with centralized control across client portals, up to 10 client groups on the Learning Center plan, custom user roles for external partners, white-label apps, SSO via SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect, and full e-commerce with subscriptions, bundles, coupons and bulk course licenses. 2 3 4 7 9 18 22

Report an error

Reporting, learner data & works council

How this is scored

What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.

0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.

3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.

5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.

8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.

10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

The Reports Center is strong: 95+ filters, custom user segments, scheduled emailed reports with per-plan quotas, exports, and unusual honesty about what is recorded — playing time only for videos, hidden tabs untracked, all SCORM activity time measured. For a works agreement there is nothing: I found no codetermination guide or template, no aggregated or pseudonymised reporting mode, no documented way to switch off time or score tracking, and visibility rests on general custom user roles rather than described manager-team scoping; retention rules are the vendor's own policies rather than customer-configurable. 4 6 13 19 20

Report an error

Integrations, administration & portability

How this is scored

How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.

0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.

3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.

5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.

8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.

10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

SSO with SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect against Azure AD, Okta or Google, a documented OAuth2 REST API covering courses, users, payments and certifications, real-time webhooks, and a native HubSpot connector would cover my completions-into-CRM need. But no HR system is named anywhere, Salesforce works only through Zapier or custom API workflows, and I found no SCIM provisioning, no sandbox, no stated rate limits and no course export as SCORM — leaving the platform means extracting records one by one rather than taking the content with me. 7 8 9 21 22

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

The contracting entity is LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd in Limassol with a published data processing agreement, subprocessors are listed by name and purpose, and transfers rely on standard contractual clauses and the Data Privacy Framework. But the captured pages give different figures for where learner data sits — the privacy policy stores it in Europe and in the U.S.A., while the security page lists US, Frankfurt, São Paulo and Singapore servers with no EU-only option stated — only the Google Cloud subprocessor carries a location (Dublin), and the captured pages state no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification. 10 12 13

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Customer Education Lead

The tier structure is public — Starter, Pro Trainer, Learning Center, High Volume and Corporate — with a 30-day trial, VAT treatment (excluded, EU VAT number exempts, reverse charge), up to 20% annual saving and no setup fees. But the captured pricing pages show no price figures for any tier, only custom pricing for Corporate, no seat or active-user definition and no scaling rule for portals or learners, so I cannot compute the annual cost for 3,000 learners and 120 partner portals — exactly the doubling risk I am trying to avoid. 3 9 11

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Outside the EU ⚠ unverified 0/4 pts 12 Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about LearnWorlds

Is LearnWorlds European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies LearnWorlds as EU-Made.

Where does LearnWorlds store data?

LearnWorlds stores customer data outside the EU by default, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

Does LearnWorlds have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to LearnWorlds?

As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and TalentLMS (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: LearnWorlds alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about LearnWorlds? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (22)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (employee training) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (customer training) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Features page (SCORM) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Features page (analytics and reports) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 API documentation www.learnworlds.dev Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Pricing page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Security / trust page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Terms of service www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Privacy policy www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Data processing agreement (dpa) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  19. 19 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  20. 20 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  21. 21 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  22. 22 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →