whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Learning Management (LMS)

LearnWorlds

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd · www.learnworlds.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

LearnWorlds: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai LearnWorlds: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

LearnWorlds at a glance

Vendor
LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Outside the EU by default source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates LearnWorlds 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. LearnWorlds is an LMS from LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd of Cyprus. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources

LearnWorlds alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Onboarding Lead

Weighted verdict

Head of people development at a manufacturer with 1,400 employees across three plants in Germany and the Czech Republic, a third of them on shifts and without a company email address. Hires around 200 people a year, apprentices included. Wants new starters enrolled the day HR creates them, a path that works on a phone in German, Czech and English, tasks for the manager and the buddy, and to stop chasing completions by spreadsheet.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Onboarding Lead

Panel median The Onboarding Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Onboarding Lead
Courses, learning paths & content standards 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail 3 of 5 3 of 5
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies 3.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Reporting, learner data & works council 2.5 of 5 3 of 5
Integrations, administration & portability 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 3 of 5 2 of 5
Pricing transparency 2 of 5 2 of 5

Courses, learning paths & content standards

How this is scored

How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.

0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.

3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.

5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.

8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.

10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

SCORM 1.2 and 2004 packages import with scores flowing into a gradebook, learning paths can enforce prerequisites, live sessions run over Zoom and Teams, and there is a white-label mobile app with offline support, with the interface offered in German, Spanish and Greek — which covers two of my three plant languages. The evidence tops out below the highest bar: we found no public information on xAPI or cmi5, question pools, or a WCAG conformance statement beyond an accessiBe accessibility widget; SCORM progress is tracked per package rather than per sub-module; and we found no public information on Czech as an interface language, which my Czech plant would need. AI authoring is documented with Microsoft Azure and OpenAI named as the processors and a statement that data from integrations is not used to train general models. 14 15 4 7 9 13 12

Report an error

Compliance training, recertification & audit trail

How this is scored

Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.

0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.

3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.

5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.

8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).

10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

Recurring training is the strongest-documented area: retraining cycles triggered by certificate expiry or course due date, grace periods, automatic reminder emails, each repeat tracked as a separate cycle with past cycles visible per learner, and scheduled compliance exports — that would replace my recertification spreadsheet. Assignment runs through automated group-based learning paths and smart groups. For proving it to an auditor, we found no public information on escalation to managers, policy acknowledgements, course versioning or an unalterable audit trail — the audit-log claim sits in a marketing comparison table — and the named use cases are AML, KYC and HIPAA examples, with no public information on occupational safety instruction regimes. 16 3 5 14

Report an error

Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies

How this is scored

Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.

0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.

3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.

5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.

8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.

10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

The automation engine with triggers, conditions and delays and step-by-step journeys is documented, and the external-academy side is strong — white-label portals, up to ten client groups on the Learning Center plan, self-registration, and a full commerce stack with subscriptions, bundles, coupons and course licenses. For my internal case, though, the native HR sync claim names no HR system, and we found no public information on manager or buddy tasks, onboarding checklists, or login for shift workers without a company email address, since the documented sign-up paths run through email forms and payment pages. This is the criterion that decides a rollout for me, and the day-one, HR-triggered path with a phone login in the worker's own language is not evidenced. 9 2 3 4 17 18

Report an error

Reporting, learner data & works council

How this is scored

What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.

0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.

3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.

5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.

8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.

10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

The Reports Center is deep and well documented — 95+ filters, custom user segments, scheduled email reports with per-plan quotas, XLS exports and a per-course trainer dashboard — enough to stop chasing completions by spreadsheet. What I need for the works council is thinner: we found no public information on restricting managers to their own team's data, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, switching off time tracking or scoring, or any works-agreement material under German codetermination law. The retention rules we found are the vendor's own terms, such as deletion within nine months after the service ends, rather than configurable by the customer. 19 20 6 13 11 4

Report an error

Integrations, administration & portability

How this is scored

How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.

0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.

3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.

5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.

8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.

10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

Single sign-on via SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect against Entra ID, Okta or Google, a documented OAuth2 REST API with webhooks covering users, courses and certifications, and native Zoom, Teams, Webex and HubSpot connectors are all public. The gaps matter for us: we found no public information on SCIM provisioning or a connector for a named HR system such as Personio or SuccessFactors — the native SSO and HR sync claim names no system — and the security page states customer data is hosted on Google Cloud rather than on the vendor's premises, with no self-hosted edition documented and no public information on exporting courses as SCORM packages. 7 8 21 3 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

The contracting entity is European — LearnWorlds (CY) Ltd of Cyprus, with a published data processing agreement that lists its subprocessors — and a Frankfurt region exists on Google Cloud. The captured pages give different pictures of where learner data sits: the privacy policy says personal data is stored on Google Cloud servers in Europe and in the U.S.A., the security page lists US, Frankfurt, São Paulo and Singapore, and the data processing agreement names the hosting subprocessor as Google Cloud EMEA in Dublin. We found no public information on an EU-only hosting option, on the locations of most other subprocessors, or on ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification. 12 10 13

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Onboarding Lead

Public and clear: a 30-day free trial with core features, up to 20% saved on annual billing, prices excluding VAT with reverse charge for EU VAT-registered businesses, 14-day refund terms, and named add-ons (branded mobile app, extra emails, AI credits) with per-plan AI credit allowances. But the captured pricing material names the plans — Starter, Pro Trainer, Learning Center, High Volume, and a custom-priced Corporate — while we found no public information on the actual price of any plan, on user limits, on how cost scales with learners, or on what the add-ons cost. As a buyer I could not compute the annual cost for 1,400 employees from these pages. 9 11 12

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Outside the EU ⚠ unverified 0/4 pts 12 Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about LearnWorlds

Is LearnWorlds European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies LearnWorlds as EU-Made.

Where does LearnWorlds store data?

LearnWorlds stores customer data outside the EU by default, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

Does LearnWorlds have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to LearnWorlds?

As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and TalentLMS (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: LearnWorlds alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about LearnWorlds? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (22)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (employee training) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (customer training) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Features page (SCORM) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Features page (analytics and reports) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 API documentation www.learnworlds.dev Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Pricing page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Security / trust page www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Terms of service www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Privacy policy www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Data processing agreement (dpa) www.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  19. 19 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  20. 20 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  21. 21 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  22. 22 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap support.learnworlds.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →