AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers
Leexi
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Leexi SA · www.leexi.ai
Compare with Fathom AI Notetaker → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Leexi at a glance
- Vendor
- Leexi SA
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Europe source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Starting price
- “Starter -20% A first introduction to Leexi 12€/month 15€ Per licence per month. Annual invoice, excl. VAT.” (vendor’s words) source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Leexi 3.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Leexi is a Belgian AI notetaker. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Leexi is a Belgian AI notetaker. It scored 8 on integrations and workflow and on sovereignty: it joins ten conferencing tools including Teams, Google Meet, Zoom and Webex, feeds eleven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, documents a public REST API and an OAuth-secured MCP server, stores recordings on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, runs OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit alongside Mistral, and lists ten subprocessors with regions. Capture and transcription scored 7, summaries and knowledge 7 to 8, data control and administration 7. The clear weakness is consent and codetermination at 4-5: participants must be informed before recording and the EU AI Act duty is cited, but we found no public information on a participant opt-out, works-agreement template or DPIA support, and Leexi Coach's scorecards are per-person analytics with no documented switch-off. Pricing transparency scored 5-6: Starter 12€/month, AI-Meeting 23€/month and Business 39€/month are public per licence per month on annual invoice excluding VAT, while Enterprise is priced only on contact. Disagreement never exceeded a single point.
Speaks for it
- A public REST API with reference documentation, plus a read-only, OAuth-secured MCP server that respects the account's existing permissions.
- A named AI chain — OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit, Mistral, Gladia, ElevenLabs and Azure Speech — with ten subprocessors and their regions published under a public DPA.
- Storage and processing in France on AWS Paris, with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes for stricter sovereignty, though the vendor notes AWS is a US company theoretically subject to the Cloud Act.
- Two-year default retention reducible by the client in platform settings, SSO with SCIM, eight roles, audit logs, and ISO 27001:2022.
- Starter 12€/month, AI-Meeting 23€/month and Business 39€/month published per licence per month, annual invoice excluding VAT, with a seven-day free trial and volume discounts from 10 licences.
Held against it
- Consent and codetermination scored 4 to 5, the lowest of the seven criteria, and we found no public information on a participant opt-out, a works-agreement template or DPIA support.
- The no-training commitment is documented in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ rather than as a clause of the data processing agreement.
- Single sign-on, SCIM, audit logs and the governance module sit in the Enterprise tier priced only on contact.
- The Leexi Coach module sells evaluation scorecards and performance analysis, and we found no public information on switching them off for an organisation.
- Whole-history export is manual rather than one click, and the vendor itself states SecNumCloud qualification and health-data certification are not yet held.
Best for
- You run a sales or consulting team on Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive or Dynamics and want notes, decisions and tasks written to the CRM record automatically.
- Your developers need a documented public REST API and a read-only MCP server to query calls and summaries from your own tooling.
- Your procurement requires a European paper trail before signing — a Belgian contracting entity, storage and processing in France on AWS Paris, named subprocessors and a public DPA.
- You want to pilot before committing — a seven-day free trial with full Leexi One suite access, no setup cost, and published per-licence prices on three tiers.
Avoid if
- You need single sign-on, SCIM, audit logs or retention governance at a published price — those sit in the Enterprise tier priced only on contact.
- A works council or data protection officer must sign off before the first recording — consent and codetermination is the lowest-scoring criterion at 4 to 5, with open questions on participant opt-out, coaching scorecards and DPIA support.
- You require SecNumCloud-qualified or health-data-certified hosting — the vendor states these are not yet held.
- You need the no-training commitment inside the data processing agreement itself rather than in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Recording, transcription & languages | 3.5 of 5 |
| Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge | 3.5 of 5 |
| Integrations, API & workflow | 4 of 5 |
| Consent, participant rights & works council | 2 of 5 |
| Retention, AI training & administration | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 4 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Recording, transcription & languages
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the conversation gets in and how faithfully it is written down: a bot that joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, botless capture from a desktop or mobile app, in-person meetings and phone calls, file upload, live transcription, speaker identification and names, the languages supported with German stated, meetings that switch language, custom vocabulary for names and jargon, timestamps linked to the recording, and editing of the transcript.
0 — Does not record or transcribe meetings; a note template or agenda tool without capture.
3 — A bot that joins one or two conferencing tools and produces a transcript; languages, speaker names, in-person capture and accuracy are basic or not described.
5 — A bot for Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, a desktop or mobile app for in-person meetings, file upload, speaker identification, German among the supported languages, timestamps linked to the recording, and an editable transcript.
8 — Botless capture documented next to the bot, Webex and phone or dialer calls, live transcription, mixed-language meetings handled, custom vocabulary, speaker names learned across meetings, and the transcription engine or its accuracy per language stated.
10 — Capture a regulated team relies on: every channel above with accuracy published per language and method, dialects and specialist vocabulary documented, on-device or customer-hosted transcription as an option, and how errors are corrected and fed back stated.
The Management Consultant
The assistant joins Teams, Meet and Zoom among ten conferencing tools including Webex, records in-person workshops from an iOS or Android app with no room hardware, and pulls calls from eleven VoIP services — every channel my week produces. Diarization, a company dictionary for jargon, acronyms and project names, accent adaptation, and live notes through a web extension and dashboard captioning are documented, and the speech-to-text providers are named. What I miss as a German-reading buyer: the pages claim over a hundred languages without naming German or publishing accuracy per language. 1 2 3 9 10 11 17
The Sales Team Lead
The assistant joins Teams, Zoom, Google Meet and Webex, VoIP services like Aircall and Ringover bring in phone calls, and the mobile app plus upload covers in-person and file capture — everything my eight reps need. Speaker diarization, a company dictionary for jargon and over 100 automatically detected languages are documented, and the speech-to-text engines are named (Gladia, ElevenLabs, Azure Speech), though we found no public information on per-language accuracy, mixed-language meetings or an editable transcript. 1 3 2 10 12 9 16
The Works Council Chair
The assistant joins ten conferencing services including Teams, Zoom, Google Meet and Webex, records in-person meetings from an iOS or Android app or the room's audio, captures VoIP calls, handles over 100 automatically detected languages, and runs speech-to-text through named providers (Gladia, ElevenLabs, Microsoft Azure Speech) with a company dictionary for jargon, acronyms and accents. We found no public information on botless capture, mixed-language meetings, per-language accuracy, or editing of the transcript. 1 2 3 6 9 10 11
The Data Protection Officer
The notetaker joins Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Webex, records calls from eleven telephony services, and captures in-person meetings from an iOS or Android app with no room hardware; live captioning appears in the dashboard, a web extension takes live notes, and file upload is listed in the Starter plan. A company dictionary and accent adaptation cover jargon and proper names, and the speech-to-text providers are named, though we found no public information on accuracy per language, mixed-language meetings, or editing of the transcript. 1 2 3 6 10 11 12 17
The IT Lead
Capture covers everything my users touch: Teams, Meet, Zoom and Webex plus eleven telephony sources, an iOS/Android app for in-person meetings needing no room hardware, file upload, live captioning in the dashboard, diarization with speaker naming, and a company dictionary for our jargon, with the speech-to-text engines named (Gladia, ElevenLabs, Azure Speech). We found no public information on accuracy per language, mixed-language meetings, or editing of the transcript, so I stop short of the top band. 1 2 3 6 9 10 11
The Skeptic
A bot documented for Meet, Teams, Zoom, Webex and more, VoIP calls from Aircall to Teams Phone, a mobile app for in-person meetings, live captioning, a company dictionary for jargon, and speech-to-text engines named as Gladia, ElevenLabs and Azure Speech. We found no public information on accuracy per language, mixed-language meetings, or editing the transcript, so I stop below the top level. 1 2 3 9 10 11
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the tool makes of the transcript: summaries and minutes by meeting type with editable templates, decisions and action items with owners and due dates, summaries in the meeting's language or a chosen one, follow-up emails, clips and highlights, search across all meetings, questions answered over the archive with citations back to the transcript passage, shared team folders or channels, and the minutes exported to Word, PDF or a wiki.
0 — No summaries of any kind; only the raw transcript or recording.
3 — One generic summary per meeting; templates, action items, search across meetings and citations are basic or not described.
5 — Summaries with templates per meeting type, action items and decisions extracted, the summary language selectable with German available, search across meetings, questions answered over one or several meetings, and sharing or export of the minutes.
8 — Custom templates per team, action items with owners pushed to task tools, answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, topic or keyword tracking across meetings, team libraries with permissions, and the AI models used for summaries named.
10 — Meeting knowledge a company can audit: every generated statement traceable to its source passage, hallucination handling and human review documented, summary quality by language stated, and the archive queryable through an API or MCP server with the same permissions as in the app.
The Management Consultant
Minutes adapt by meeting type — steering committee, workshop, interview — with customizable templates, and the AI extracts decisions, tasks with suggested owners and deadlines, which is exactly the protocol I write by hand each night. Ask Leexi searches the archive, minutes go out by email and export to Word, Google Docs or PDF, and the language models behind them are named. We found no public information on answers that cite the underlying transcript passage, nor on selecting the summary language. 1 2 12 13 16 18
The Sales Team Lead
Summaries adapt per meeting type with our own templates and formats, decisions and tasks come out with suggested owners, Ask Leexi searches the archive for commitments, minutes export to Word, PDF and Google Docs, audio excerpts can be shared, and the summary models are named (Azure OpenAI, Mistral). We found no public information on a follow-up email draft or on answers that cite the transcript passage they rest on, and both matter for my follow-up discipline. 2 1 6 12 13 9
The Works Council Chair
Summaries adapt to meeting type using the organisation's own templates, decisions, tasks with suggested owners and deadlines are extracted, Ask Leexi searches across meetings, minutes export to Word, Google Docs or PDF and land by email or on the CRM record, and the AI providers behind summaries (Mistral, Azure OpenAI) are named. The archive is queryable through the MCP server under the account's existing permissions; we found no public information on choosing the summary language or on answers citing the transcript passage they rest on. 1 2 6 12 13 15 19
The Data Protection Officer
Minutes adapt to meeting type with organization-defined templates, decisions and actions are extracted with suggested owners and synced into CRM and task tools, and Ask Leexi searches the whole archive, with the MCP server exposing the same calls under the organization's own permission boundaries and the language models named. We found no public information on choosing the summary language, per-language summary quality, or documented hallucination handling and human review. 1 2 6 9 12 13 15
The IT Lead
Summaries adapt by meeting type with our own templates and Studio formats, decisions and tasks come out with suggested owners plus a TaskManager, Ask Leexi searches the archive, chapters link back to the recording segment, and minutes export to Word, PDF or Google Docs with an approval workflow for formal meetings. The language models are named (OpenAI via Azure France, Mistral), though we found no public information on answers citing the passage they rest on or on selecting the summary language. 1 2 6 9 12 16
The Skeptic
Templates adapt per meeting type and are customizable, decisions, actions with suggested owners and deadlines are extracted, Ask Leexi searches the archive, minutes export to Word, PDF or Google Docs, and the summarizing models are named — OpenAI via Azure France and Mistral in the subprocessor list. We found no public information on selecting the summary language with German, nor on answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on. 1 2 9 12 13 19
Integrations, API & workflow
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the notes reach the place where work happens: calendar connection with rules for which meetings are recorded, CRM fields filled from the call (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics), project and task tools, Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, Notion, Confluence and SharePoint, Zapier, Make or n8n, a documented REST API and webhooks, an MCP server for AI assistants, and browser extensions and native apps.
0 — No integrations and no export; the notes stay in the app.
3 — A calendar connection and an email or Slack summary; CRM, API and task tools are basic or not described.
5 — Google and Microsoft calendars, a native CRM integration (HubSpot or Salesforce), Slack or Teams, a task or wiki tool, Zapier or Make, and a documented API or webhooks.
8 — CRM field mapping per meeting type, several CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, a full REST API with webhooks and reference documentation, an MCP server, SharePoint or Confluence export, and recording rules per calendar or meeting type.
10 — An integration layer a company builds on: every object reachable by API with rate limits and versioning stated, granular OAuth scopes, data residency kept across integrations, and the integrations administered centrally with logs.
The Management Consultant
Google, Outlook and on-premise Exchange calendars drive automatic joins, eleven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive and Dynamics receive notes automatically, and Slack, Notion, Google Docs, SharePoint, Zapier and Make are documented alongside webhooks. A public REST API with reference documentation and a read-only, tenant-scoped MCP server with OAuth close the loop for our own tooling. We found no public information on API rate limits or versioning, and CRM field mapping per meeting type is not described. 1 3 4 13 15
The Sales Team Lead
This is the part I care about most and it is documented: notes and tasks sync to HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive and Dynamics with automated CRM field population, Slack, Notion and SharePoint receive minutes, Zapier, Make and webhooks connect the rest, and a documented REST API plus an MCP server are public. The gap is that per-meeting-type CRM mapping and recording rules per calendar or meeting type are only partially described. 3 12 6 4 15 13 1
The Works Council Chair
Calendars from Google, Outlook and on-premises Exchange drive automatic joining with manual invitation as an alternative, eleven CRMs including HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive and Dynamics receive notes, Slack, Notion, Google Docs and SharePoint take the output, and a public REST API with reference documentation plus a read-only MCP server with scoped access are documented. Rate limits, API versioning and central administration of integrations are not described. 2 3 4 13 15
The Data Protection Officer
Calendars including Exchange on-premise trigger auto-join, eleven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive and Microsoft Dynamics receive notes with automated field population, and Slack, Notion, SharePoint, Zapier and Make sit alongside a documented public REST API with reference pages, webhooks and an OAuth-secured MCP server with defined scopes. We found no public information on API rate limits and versioning, or on centrally administered integrations with logs. 1 3 4 6 12 14 15
The IT Lead
This is the deep part: Outlook, Google and Exchange on-premises calendars, a dozen CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Pipedrive with automated field population, Slack, Notion and SharePoint delivery, Zapier, Make and webhooks, a documented public REST API with reference pages and key management, and a well-specified MCP server with OAuth scopes — more than I need to wire into Microsoft 365. Rules for which meetings the assistant joins are described at the level of connected-calendar settings; we found no public information on rules per calendar or meeting type. 2 3 4 6 12 13 15
The Skeptic
Calendars including Exchange on-premise, a wide CRM list among them Dynamics and Pipedrive, Slack, Notion, SharePoint, Zapier, Make, webhooks, a public REST API with reference documentation, and an MCP server with OAuth scopes and read-only tools — a layer a builder can start from. We found no public information on API rate limits, versioning, or data residency maintained across integrations. 1 3 4 6 13 15
Consent, participant rights & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether every person in the meeting knows and can decide, and whether the tool can be introduced under German co-determination: a recording notice to all participants including external guests, consent or opt-out before the recording starts, a visible bot or a stated notice for botless capture, rules for when the assistant joins automatically, stopping and deleting a recording on request, per-person analytics (talk time, sentiment, engagement scores) off by default or switchable per organisation, material or a template for a works agreement (Betriebsvereinbarung, § 87 (1) no. 6 BetrVG), and support for a data protection impact assessment.
0 — Built to record people without their knowledge, or sells covert recording or individual performance scoring as a feature.
3 — A general privacy statement and a bot that appears in the participant list; notices to guests, opt-out, per-person analytics and works councils are basic or not described.
5 — A recording notice to participants by chat message, email or the bot's name, a way for a participant to stop the recording or opt out, admin rules for when the assistant joins, recordings deletable on request, and per-person analytics described with how to switch them off.
8 — Consent collected before recording starts for external participants, per-person analytics off by default or switchable per organisation, botless capture with its notice method documented, a works-council information pack or works-agreement template published, DPIA support, and the EU AI Act classification stated.
10 — Co-determination built into the product: every analytic and its granularity documented for the works council, consent and opt-out logged per participant, configuration changes logged, minimum group sizes for any team statistics, and references of works-council-approved rollouts published.
The Management Consultant
Dedicated pages walk through recording law — participants must be informed before recording begins, CNIL bars permanent systematic recording, the AI Act transparency article is cited, and admins control when the assistant joins automatically. That is a real basis for a Betriebsrat conversation. But we found no public information on a participant opt-out mechanism, a works-agreement template or DPIA support, and the coaching module's evaluation scorecards and performance analysis are precisely the per-person analytics a works council will interrogate, with no documented way to switch them off. 2 6 12 16 17 18
The Sales Team Lead
The vendor states participants must be informed before recording begins, cites the EU AI Act transparency duty, lets admins control when the assistant joins, and recordings are deletable on request — but we found no public information on a notice to external guests, an opt-out mechanism, works-council material or DPIA support. The coaching module sells evaluation scorecards and performance analysis, and we found no public information on per-person analytics being off by default, which is exactly what I do not want hung over my team. 12 18 16 17 2 6 9
The Works Council Chair
The pages state plainly that participants must be informed before recording begins, that the vendor enforces default consent and the EU AI Act transparency duty, and that the CNIL rules out permanent systematic recording — useful lines for a works agreement — and joining can be governed by admin settings. But we found no public information on a participant opting out or stopping a recording, no statement that the Coach module's evaluation scorecards and performance analysis are off by default or can be switched off for the organisation, and no works-agreement template; the compliance dossier covers hosting, subcontractors and certifications only. 2 6 12 16 17 18
The Data Protection Officer
The GDPR pages state that participants must be informed before recording begins, cite the EU AI Act transparency obligation, and give users rights to object and to erasure — but we found no public information on a stop-recording or opt-out mechanism for participants, on defaults and switch-off for the Leexi Coach evaluation scorecards and performance analysis, or on any works-council information pack or works-agreement template. Before a first recording under co-determination I would need every one of those answered in writing. 2 6 9 12 16 18
The IT Lead
The compliance pages are candid about the law: participants must be informed before recording, the EU AI Act Article 50 duty is explained, default consent is enforced, and admins control when the assistant joins and who may see minutes. For my works council I still miss the rest: we found no public information on a technical opt-out for participants, consent captured from external guests before recording, how to switch off the per-person coaching scorecards and performance analysis, or any works-agreement template or DPIA support. 2 6 9 12 16 18
The Skeptic
The vendor states participants must be informed before recording begins and cites the EU AI Act Article 50 transparency duty, calendar-connected auto-join is configurable, and deleted files are irrecoverable. We found no public information on an opt-out or stop control for the person being recorded, on whether the individual scorecards and AI coaching in Leexi Coach are off by default or switchable per organisation, or on a works-council pack or DPIA support. 2 6 13 16 18
Retention, AI training & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the employer can govern: retention periods and automatic deletion of recordings, transcripts and summaries, whether audio and video can be discarded after transcription, sharing defaults and link permissions, customer content excluded from model training by contract, the AI and transcription providers named with their region and their own retention, encryption, single sign-on (SAML), SCIM, roles and workspaces, admin policies on auto-recording and sharing, audit logs, export of the whole archive, and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.
0 — No administration and no deletion; every user decides alone and recordings are kept indefinitely.
3 — Users can delete their own recordings and a security page exists; retention policies, model training, SSO and audit logs are basic or not described.
5 — Retention settings per workspace, customer content excluded from model training, team workspaces with roles, single sign-on, admin control over sharing and auto-recording, encryption at rest and in transit, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated.
8 — Automatic deletion by policy with audio discardable after transcription, the AI and transcription subprocessors named with region and zero retention, SAML with SCIM, granular roles, audit logs, legal hold or export of the full archive, and certifications with their scope published.
10 — Governance an auditor accepts: every retention, sharing and recording policy enforceable centrally and logged, models run on the vendor's own or the customer's infrastructure as an option, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, and the deletion of every copy, including at subprocessors, documented.
The Management Consultant
The promise I want in writing is there: no training on conversations on any account, stated in the privacy policy, the compliance FAQ and a dedicated no-training attestation, though the commitment sits outside the DPA text itself. Retention defaults to a maximum of two years, reducible by the client in platform settings, with per-plan audio limits, single sign-on with SCIM, eight roles, audit logs, encryption in transit and at rest, and ISO 27001:2022, plus ten named subprocessors with their regions. Whole-archive export is manual rather than one click, and the vendor itself states SecNumCloud and health-data certification are not yet held. 6 13 16 18 19
The Sales Team Lead
Retention defaults to a maximum of two years and can be reduced by the client, a governance module brings SSO with SCIM, eight roles, retention policy and advanced audit logs, encryption in transit and at rest is stated with ISO 27001:2022, and the commitment not to train on conversations is stated in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ rather than as a clause of the data processing agreement. We found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, SOC 2 or legal hold, and support confirms there is no one-button export of the whole history. 19 13 6 9 16 7
The Works Council Chair
Retention is governable: a two-year default reducible by the client in platform settings, plan-specific periods, a Governance module with retention policy, eight roles, SSO with SCIM and audit logs, and deleted recordings unrecoverable. The ten subprocessors are listed with their regions, the DPA is public with 24-hour breach notification, audit rights and return-or-deletion at contract end, and no training on conversations is promised — though that commitment is documented in the privacy policy and FAQ rather than as a DPA clause. We found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, legal hold, or zero retention at subprocessors. 6 9 13 18 19
The Data Protection Officer
The ten subprocessors are named with their region — the reading language model is OpenAI executed via Azure France in a closed circuit plus Mistral in the EU, and speech-to-text runs through Gladia, Eleven Labs and Azure Speech — with a two-year default retention reducible in platform settings, encryption in transit and at rest, ISO 27001:2022 in the DPA, SSO with SCIM and eight roles at Enterprise, audit logs, and return or deletion at contract end. Two things hold me back: the captured pages place the no-training commitment in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ rather than in the data processing agreement itself, and we found no public information on voice profiles, zero retention at the AI providers, discarding audio after transcription, or SOC 2. 6 9 13 15 16 17 18 19
The IT Lead
The core for my rollout is there: SSO with SCIM, eight roles, centrally set retention (two-year default, reducible per the data processing agreement and a Governance module, with plan-level figures published), advanced audit logs, ISO 27001:2022, encryption in transit and at rest, a public DPA with audit rights and 24-hour breach notice, and contract-end return or deletion. Two things hold me back: the non-training commitment is documented on the privacy policy and compliance pages rather than inside the data processing agreement itself, and we found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, SOC 2, or exporting audit logs to a SIEM. 6 9 13 15 18 19
The Skeptic
A Governance module carries retention policies (two-year default reducible in settings, six months on Starter), audit logs, SSO with SCIM and eight roles; ten subprocessors are named with regions, encryption in transit and at rest is stated, ISO 27001:2022 is certified, and at contract end the archive is returned or deleted. The DPA review itself notes the non-training commitment lives in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ rather than in that contract, and we found no public information on discarding audio after transcription or zero retention at the AI and transcription subprocessors. 6 13 18 19
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where recordings, transcripts, summaries, voice profiles and account data are stored and processed, which language model and transcription providers read them and where, and who the other subprocessors are (hosting, email, support, analytics and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A conferencing platform outside Europe that the customer already uses is part of the meeting, not counted against the notetaker; where the notetaker stores and processes the conversation is.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (language models, transcription, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors including the AI providers listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, with transcription and language models run in Europe by European operators, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Management Consultant
A Belgian company with its seat in Brussels hosts recordings, transcripts and minutes on AWS in Paris, with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes for buyers wanting an operator beyond extraterritorial reach. The language model is OpenAI run via Azure France in a closed circuit, Mistral serves as a European model, speech-to-text goes to Gladia, ElevenLabs and Azure Speech, and ten subprocessors are published with locations next to a public DPA. The compliance FAQ itself notes AWS is a US company theoretically subject to the Cloud Act, so the chain is European-hosted end to end but not European-operated in every layer. 8 9 16 18 19
The Sales Team Lead
Leexi SA is a Belgian company, recordings, transcripts and minutes sit in France on AWS Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, and ten subprocessors are listed with locations, including Mistral and Azure OpenAI in the EU, with the OpenAI model run via Azure France in a closed circuit. A public data processing agreement, a written Cloud Act notification policy and ISO 27001 are documented; we found no public information on SOC 2, and the vendor itself notes AWS is theoretically subject to the Cloud Act while offering Scaleway for strict sovereignty. 8 18 17 19 9 16
The Works Council Chair
Leexi SA is a Belgian public limited company in Brussels; recordings, transcripts and minutes are stored and processed on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, and the language model runs as OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit alongside Mistral in the EU. All ten subprocessors are listed with locations in the EU, Europe or the UK, a public data processing agreement exists, and ISO 27001:2022 is stated. The default host is a US company theoretically subject to the Cloud Act and the fully sovereign Scaleway option is conditional on licence volume, which keeps this short of the top level. 8 9 16 17 18 19
The Data Protection Officer
Leexi SA is a Belgian company contracting from Brussels, recordings, transcripts and minutes are stored on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option for stricter sovereignty, every subprocessor is listed with an EU or Europe location, and the data processing agreement is a public document available before account creation. The OpenAI models run through Azure France but OpenAI is not a European operator, the vendor itself notes AWS is theoretically subject to the Cloud Act and that SecNumCloud qualification is not yet held, so a fully European end-to-end chain is not evidenced. 8 9 17 18 19
The IT Lead
Leexi SA is a Belgian company with storage and processing in France on AWS Paris, a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes for strict sovereignty, OpenAI models run via Azure France in a closed circuit, Mistral as a European alternative, and all ten subprocessors listed with their regions, under a published data processing agreement. The Cloud Act caveat on AWS is disclosed openly; transfers outside the EU are said to be possible under standard contractual clauses, and the contact form runs on a US CRM. 8 9 17 18 19
The Skeptic
Belgian contracting entity in Brussels, recordings and transcripts on AWS Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, OpenAI's model run via Azure France in a closed circuit, Mistral and Gladia in the EU, a public DPA version 2.0, ISO 27001, and a ten-entry subprocessor list with locations. The vendor itself concedes AWS is theoretically subject to the US Cloud Act and points to Scaleway for strict sovereignty; we found no public information on European ownership beyond the registered share capital, and the contact-form CRM is a US-law tool. 6 8 9 15 18 19
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat and tier, what counts as a seat (every invited user, only recording users), transcription minutes or credits included, storage limits, which features (CRM integrations, API access, SSO, custom retention, EU hosting, AI credits) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, monthly versus annual billing, minimum seats and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with seats, minutes or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their seat price and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, CRM integration, API, custom retention, EU hosting, minute or credit limits) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (seats, minutes, credits, storage), add-ons priced, what counts as a seat stated, overage handling stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size and meeting volume, with every add-on, overage and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Management Consultant
Three tiers carry published per-licence monthly prices — twelve, twenty-three and thirty-nine euros, discounted twenty percent from fifteen, twenty-nine and forty-nine — on annual invoice excluding VAT, with minimum users stated, volume discounts from ten licences and a seven-day free trial. But single sign-on, SCIM and the governance module sit in the Enterprise tier priced only on contact, and the sovereign Scaleway switch and the consultant service carry no public price. What counts as a seat beyond 'per licence' and overage handling are not described. 1 6
The Sales Team Lead
Three tiers are public at 12, 23 and 39 euros per licence per month with annual invoicing excluding VAT, plus a seven-day free trial, minimum user counts, volume discounts from ten licences and unlimited meetings and summary storage on the paid tiers. The Enterprise tier is priced on request, and we found no public information on monthly billing, on what counts as a seat beyond "per licence", or on the price of add-ons such as SSO, the governance module or French cloud hosting. 6 1 13
The Works Council Chair
Three of four plans carry public licence prices — Starter 12€/month (15€ regular), AI-Meeting 23€/month (29€), Business 39€/month (49€), each per licence per month on annual invoice excluding VAT — plus volume discounts from ten licences, minimum user counts, a seven-day free trial and no setup cost. The Enterprise tier is price-on-request, what counts as a seat is not stated, and monthly billing and per-plan storage are not fully described, so a buyer cannot compute the complete annual cost from the pages alone. 1 6 13
The Data Protection Officer
Three tiers are published at "12€/month", "23€/month" and "39€/month" per licence on annual invoice excluding VAT, with minimum users, volume discounts from ten licences, no setup cost and a seven-day trial stated. Single sign-on, SCIM and custom retention sit in an Enterprise tier priced only on contact, and we found no public information on what exactly counts as a seat or on minute and storage limits in the lower tiers. 1 6
The IT Lead
Three of four tiers carry public per-licence prices — "12€/month", "23€/month" and "39€/month", per licence per month, annual invoice, excl. VAT, with volume discounts from 10 licences and minimum users stated — but everything I actually need at 400 seats (SSO, SCIM, audit logs, enhanced retention) sits in the Enterprise tier priced only on contact. We found no public information on what counts as a seat or on monthly billing. 1 6 13
The Skeptic
Tiers are public — Starter 12€, AI-Meeting 23€, Business 39€ per licence per month, annual invoice excluding VAT, with a seven-day free trial, minimum users of 1 or 3, and volume discounts from 10 licences. Enterprise — which holds SSO, SCIM, audit logs and retention governance — is priced only on contact, and we found no public information on monthly billing, included minutes or credits, or overage handling. 1 6 13
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Leexi
Is Leexi European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Leexi as EU-Made.
Where does Leexi store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Europe as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
Does Leexi have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Leexi?
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates MeetGeek (3.5/5), Noota (3.5/5) and Jamie (3.5/5) highest among the other 14 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is MeetGeek (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Leexi alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 5 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Hosting location, Hosting options, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 25 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (19)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (AI notetaker) www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Integrations page www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 API overview www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Documentation docs.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Pricing page www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Security / trust page www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Legal notice www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Privacy policy www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Consent, participant rights & works council — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Consent, participant rights & works council — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap www.leexi.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →