whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers

tl;dv

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by tldx Solutions GmbH · tldv.io

Compare with Fireflies.ai → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

tl;dv: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai tl;dv: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

tl;dv at a glance

Vendor
tldx Solutions GmbH
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Default not stated; pages mention the EU and Europe source, captured 5 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 5 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates tl;dv 3.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. tl;dv is an AI meeting recorder and notetaker from tldx Solutions GmbH of Aachen, scored by the bench strongest on integrations and workflow at 7-8 and steady at 7 on capture and transcription and on summaries and knowledge: bot-free recording across Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, WhatsApp and Discord, real-time transcription in more than thirty languages including German, structured minutes with assignable action items, a native HubSpot connector with per-field prompt mapping, and a documented REST API, webhooks and an MCP server — the API labels itself alpha. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources

tl;dv alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Has seen "99% accuracy in 100 languages" turn a German meeting into English nonsense, a bot that joined a meeting its owner never attended and mailed the summary to every guest, and an action item no one in the room had agreed to. Asks which model wrote the summary and where it runs, whether each statement can be traced to the transcript, who told the external participants, what "we do not train on your data" covers in the DPA — and how the archive leaves.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Panel median The Skeptic This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Skeptic
Recording, transcription & languages 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Integrations, API & workflow 4 of 5 4 of 5
Consent, participant rights & works council 2 of 5 2 of 5
Retention, AI training & administration 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
European sovereignty 4 of 5 3.5 of 5
Pricing transparency 3 of 5 3 of 5

Recording, transcription & languages

How this is scored

How the conversation gets in and how faithfully it is written down: a bot that joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, botless capture from a desktop or mobile app, in-person meetings and phone calls, file upload, live transcription, speaker identification and names, the languages supported with German stated, meetings that switch language, custom vocabulary for names and jargon, timestamps linked to the recording, and editing of the transcript.

0 — Does not record or transcribe meetings; a note template or agenda tool without capture.

3 — A bot that joins one or two conferencing tools and produces a transcript; languages, speaker names, in-person capture and accuracy are basic or not described.

5 — A bot for Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, a desktop or mobile app for in-person meetings, file upload, speaker identification, German among the supported languages, timestamps linked to the recording, and an editable transcript.

8 — Botless capture documented next to the bot, Webex and phone or dialer calls, live transcription, mixed-language meetings handled, custom vocabulary, speaker names learned across meetings, and the transcription engine or its accuracy per language stated.

10 — Capture a regulated team relies on: every channel above with accuracy published per language and method, dialects and specialist vocabulary documented, on-device or customer-hosted transcription as an option, and how errors are corrected and fed back stated.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Botless capture sits next to the bot story — Zoom, Meet and Teams plus Slack, WhatsApp and Discord, and a desktop app claiming any other platform — with real-time transcription, thirty-plus languages including German, speaker recognition, file upload up to 2 GiB and custom vocabulary on Business. But the accuracy claim is a flat "over 90%" with no per-language figure, and we found no public information on Webex, phone or dialer calls or mixed-language meetings. The transcription engines surface only in the privacy policy's subcontractor list (AssemblyAI, ElevenLabs), not as a product statement with accuracy per language. 7 18 15 16 6 8 13

Report an error

Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge

How this is scored

What the tool makes of the transcript: summaries and minutes by meeting type with editable templates, decisions and action items with owners and due dates, summaries in the meeting's language or a chosen one, follow-up emails, clips and highlights, search across all meetings, questions answered over the archive with citations back to the transcript passage, shared team folders or channels, and the minutes exported to Word, PDF or a wiki.

0 — No summaries of any kind; only the raw transcript or recording.

3 — One generic summary per meeting; templates, action items, search across meetings and citations are basic or not described.

5 — Summaries with templates per meeting type, action items and decisions extracted, the summary language selectable with German available, search across meetings, questions answered over one or several meetings, and sharing or export of the minutes.

8 — Custom templates per team, action items with owners pushed to task tools, answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, topic or keyword tracking across meetings, team libraries with permissions, and the AI models used for summaries named.

10 — Meeting knowledge a company can audit: every generated statement traceable to its source passage, hallucination handling and human review documented, summary quality by language stated, and the archive queryable through an API or MCP server with the same permissions as in the app.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Custom templates with rules per meeting type, action items assigned to team members and pushed to Asana, ClickUp and Jira, topic trackers, clips and a whole week summarized at once are documented, and the Anthropic partnership names the model behind the summaries. My worry: nothing captured shows Ask AI answers citing or linking the transcript passage they rest on, and we found no public information on hallucination handling, human review or summary quality by language. Search across the library and export to Markdown via the API are there, so this sits just under the auditable level. 3 16 8 15 6 20

Report an error

Integrations, API & workflow

How this is scored

How the notes reach the place where work happens: calendar connection with rules for which meetings are recorded, CRM fields filled from the call (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics), project and task tools, Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, Notion, Confluence and SharePoint, Zapier, Make or n8n, a documented REST API and webhooks, an MCP server for AI assistants, and browser extensions and native apps.

0 — No integrations and no export; the notes stay in the app.

3 — A calendar connection and an email or Slack summary; CRM, API and task tools are basic or not described.

5 — Google and Microsoft calendars, a native CRM integration (HubSpot or Salesforce), Slack or Teams, a task or wiki tool, Zapier or Make, and a documented API or webhooks.

8 — CRM field mapping per meeting type, several CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, a full REST API with webhooks and reference documentation, an MCP server, SharePoint or Confluence export, and recording rules per calendar or meeting type.

10 — An integration layer a company builds on: every object reachable by API with rate limits and versioning stated, granular OAuth scopes, data residency kept across integrations, and the integrations administered centrally with logs.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A documented REST API with a downloadable OpenAPI specification, webhooks at user, team and organization scope with named triggers, an MCP server, Zapier, and a native HubSpot connector with prompt-per-field mapping and conditions keeping internal calls out of the CRM — that is a workflow layer a buyer can build on, with Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho, Greenhouse and calendar-driven recording rules alongside. My reservations: the API declares itself version alpha with no sandbox, organization-wide automation sits behind Enterprise, and we found no public information on SharePoint or Confluence export. 6 18 5 17 7 16

Report an error

Retention, AI training & administration

How this is scored

What the employer can govern: retention periods and automatic deletion of recordings, transcripts and summaries, whether audio and video can be discarded after transcription, sharing defaults and link permissions, customer content excluded from model training by contract, the AI and transcription providers named with their region and their own retention, encryption, single sign-on (SAML), SCIM, roles and workspaces, admin policies on auto-recording and sharing, audit logs, export of the whole archive, and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.

0 — No administration and no deletion; every user decides alone and recordings are kept indefinitely.

3 — Users can delete their own recordings and a security page exists; retention policies, model training, SSO and audit logs are basic or not described.

5 — Retention settings per workspace, customer content excluded from model training, team workspaces with roles, single sign-on, admin control over sharing and auto-recording, encryption at rest and in transit, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated.

8 — Automatic deletion by policy with audio discardable after transcription, the AI and transcription subprocessors named with region and zero retention, SAML with SCIM, granular roles, audit logs, legal hold or export of the full archive, and certifications with their scope published.

10 — Governance an auditor accepts: every retention, sharing and recording policy enforceable centrally and logged, models run on the vendor's own or the customer's infrastructure as an option, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, and the deletion of every copy, including at subprocessors, documented.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Customer content is excluded from model training in contract language, subprocessors are named with regions on the trust page, SSO with SCIM, a super-admin role, Enterprise activity logs, AES-256 at rest and SOC 2 are all documented. But retention is a fixed rule — free users three months, paying users until account deletion — rather than a centrally configurable policy, we found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, on deletion at subcontractors, or on legal hold, and the captured pages give different figures for the SOC 2 attestation (Type I on the governance page, Type II on the trust and security pages). 13 8 19 20 10 16

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where recordings, transcripts, summaries, voice profiles and account data are stored and processed, which language model and transcription providers read them and where, and who the other subprocessors are (hosting, email, support, analytics and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A conferencing platform outside Europe that the customer already uses is part of the meeting, not counted against the notetaker; where the notetaker stores and processes the conversation is.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (language models, transcription, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors including the AI providers listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, with transcription and language models run in Europe by European operators, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A German GmbH under German law with Aachen as venue, primary processing in the EEA, hosting named as Google Cloud, Hetzner and Wasabi with German locations, a published subcontractor list, a data processing agreement and standard contractual clauses — the chain is largely traceable, and Anthropic models can run via Google Vertex AI in the EU. It stops short of the top: the AI hosting region is customer-selectable between Europe and the US, Anthropic is not a European operator, and the subcontractor list names transcription (AssemblyAI, ElevenLabs), payment, support and analytics providers without stating where they process. 13 10 11 12 9

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat and tier, what counts as a seat (every invited user, only recording users), transcription minutes or credits included, storage limits, which features (CRM integrations, API access, SSO, custom retention, EU hosting, AI credits) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, monthly versus annual billing, minimum seats and VAT.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with seats, minutes or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their seat price and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, CRM integration, API, custom retention, EU hosting, minute or credit limits) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (seats, minutes, credits, storage), add-ons priced, what counts as a seat stated, overage handling stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size and meeting volume, with every add-on, overage and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Three tiers carry public seat prices — Free at €0, Pro €18 and Business €29 per seat/month billed annually — with weekly recording caps and simultaneous-recording limits published, AI-note and Ask AI quotas on the free tier, and a one-person-per-account definition of what a seat is. But "up to 40% off" annual billing is not a computable monthly-billed price, Enterprise is contact-us only, and we found no public information on VAT treatment, storage limits or add-on pricing. Fees are stated non-refundable and the weekly allowance renews weekly, which helps a buyer estimate — the gaps keep it mid-scale. 8 12 6

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about tl;dv

Is tl;dv European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies tl;dv as EU-Made.

Where does tl;dv store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention the EU and Europe as hosting locations, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.

Does tl;dv have a free plan?

Yes. tl;dv has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to tl;dv?

As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates MeetGeek (3.5/5), Noota (3.5/5) and Jamie (3.5/5) highest among the other 14 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is MeetGeek (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: tl;dv alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about tl;dv? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (20)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page (recording and transcription) tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (AI meeting minutes) tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (supported languages) tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Integrations page tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 API documentation doc.tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Help centre intercom.help Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Pricing page tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Security / trust page tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Trust center trust.tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Legal notice tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Terms of service tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Privacy policy tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  19. 19 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  20. 20 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap tldv.io Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →