Project Management & Collaboration
Asana
Rest of world Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Asana, Inc. · asana.com
Work management platform for teams and enterprises.
Compare with awork → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Asana is a project management and collaboration tool from Asana, Inc., a Delaware-incorporated, publicly listed company headquartered in San Francisco. It is strongest on collaboration depth and reporting, both at 8 with no spread: dependencies, milestones, drag-and-drop Workload rebalancing, Portfolios and Universal Reporting dashboards with drill-through to the underlying work are evidenced. Onboarding effort follows at 8-9, credited to a free trial with no credit card required and a first-party CSV importer from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello. The weak point is sovereignty, at 2-4, and the spread turns on how much substance to credit the paperwork — a DPA incorporated by reference and a named DPO — against an opt-in paid EU data residency on the top tier, an unstated default hosting region, and a privacy policy stating data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located. Integrations spread 7-9, the top score citing the 200-plus app catalogue and connectors, the lower pausing at no public information on webhooks. Pricing transparency sits at 5-6: headline prices are annual-billed while Enterprise is contact-sales.
Speaks for it
- Collaboration depth scored 8 with no spread, on evidenced dependencies, milestones, deadline alerts, real-time Workload views with drag-and-drop rebalancing, and Portfolios.
- Reporting scored 8 with no spread, on cross-project dashboards, a chart template library, a custom chart builder, drill-through to the underlying work, and export paths to Power BI and Looker Studio.
- Onboarding effort scored 8-9, with a free trial requiring no credit card, signup via Google or Microsoft, and a first-party CSV importer with a preview step from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello.
- Exit is documented: export and delete at the organization level, plus full-domain export automated through the API.
- The REST API is free to everyone with an Asana account, with documentation, a developer site, and a Stack Overflow channel the vendor monitors.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scored 2-4: Asana, Inc. is a Delaware-incorporated, NYSE-listed company headquartered in San Francisco, and the privacy policy states data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located.
- EU data residency is an opt-in paid feature of the Enterprise+ tier, and the region of the default hosting is not stated in the captured pages.
- Pricing transparency scored 5-6: headline prices of €10.99 and €24.99 per user, per month billed annually are annual-billed figures, Enterprise is contact-sales, the audit-logs, permissions-management and timesheets-and-budgets add-ons carry no public price, AI is metered at $0.60 per AI request billed monthly, and the page states refunds are not offered.
- Timesheets and budgets and audit logs arrive only as Enterprise add-ons, Workload and Portfolios sit behind the Business plan, and capacity measurement runs on task count alone with hours and points marked coming soon.
- Support and documentation scored 6-7, with the 24/7 priority support and 99.9% uptime commitment tied to Enterprise only and no public information on response times for lower tiers.
Best for
- You plan work across projects and need capacity views, portfolio rollups and dashboards that update without manual work.
- You are migrating from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable or Trello and want dependencies, followers and custom fields carried over with a preview step.
- You want to start without sales contact — the trial requires no credit card and the Personal tier is €0 free forever for one or two people.
- You build custom tooling on the documented REST API, free to every Asana account, and export reporting to BI tools such as Power BI and Looker Studio.
Avoid if
- You need EU data residency as a contractual default — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your procurement must know the payable cost of audit logs, timesheets or data residency before talking to sales — those capabilities sit in an unpriced contact-sales tier or add-ons.
- You need the published 24/7 priority support and 99.9% uptime commitment — both are tied to the Enterprise tier.
- You measure team capacity in hours or points rather than task count — hours and points are marked coming soon.
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Dependencies, milestones and deadline alerts sit in the core, Portfolios roll work up across the organization, and Workload gives a real capacity view with drag-and-drop rebalancing and role filtering; guests are unlimited and free on paid tiers with guest permission management at Enterprise. The free plan caps at two users and Workload and Portfolios arrive only at Business, so the span from two freelancers to a department is not one uninterrupted model. 7 8 2
The Bootstrapper
Assignments, dependencies, milestones and timeline/Gantt views form the backbone, and Portfolios plus Workload give real cross-project and capacity planning with drag-and-drop rebalancing; guests are free and unlimited on Starter, with guest-permission and view-only controls higher up. Capacity measurement runs on task count only — hours and points are marked coming soon — so the department-grade span of the top anchor is not fully evidenced. 7 8 2
The Enterprise Architect
Workload is a real-time capacity view with drag-and-drop rebalancing and role filtering, portfolios roll projects up, and guest access comes with invitation permissions at the enterprise tier plus free guests further down. Capacity is measured by task count only — hours and points are marked as coming soon — so department-level capacity planning still leans on workarounds, which keeps it off the top band. 2 7 8
The UX Purist
Assignments, dependencies, milestones, file sharing and comments are all evidenced, and team-level planning is first-class: Workload capacity views with drag-to-reschedule, Portfolios, cross-project dashboards, and unlimited free guests with Enterprise guest-invitation controls. The same model carries you from a two-person Personal plan to department-scale capacity planning; we found no public information on dedicated client-facing access beyond guests. 7 8 2 10 1
The Integrator
Workload gives a real-time capacity view with drag-and-drop rescheduling and role filtering, Portfolios roll work up across projects, dependencies and milestones are core to the product, and guests are unlimited and free on Starter — that is first-class team-level planning. Capacity still keys off task count with hours and points only announced as coming, and the workload and portfolio views sit behind the Business plan. 2 7 8
The Skeptic
Dependencies, milestones and deadline alerts, a real-time Workload capacity view with drag-and-drop rebalancing, and cross-project Portfolios are all evidenced, plus unlimited free guests on Starter and guest permission controls on Enterprise. The gripes: capacity is measured on task count alone (hours and points are listed as coming soon), and the planning layer — Workload, Portfolios, resource management — sits behind the Business tier, so first-class planning is paid for, not given. 7 8 2 1
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Universal Reporting brings cross-project, real-time dashboards covering workload, budget and timing, backed by a chart template library, a custom chart builder, filtering and drill-through to the underlying work. Export paths are credible — full-domain export via the API and BI tool support — and timesheets and budgets exist as an Enterprise add-on; I found no public information on scheduled report delivery, which keeps it below the very top band. 10 9 3 2
The Bootstrapper
Universal Reporting brings a chart template library, a custom chart builder and dashboards across projects, teams and departments carrying workload, budget and timing data that update without manual work, and full-domain export is automated through the API. Timesheets and budgets as a capability arrive as an Enterprise add-on, and we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 10 9 2 3
The Enterprise Architect
Universal Reporting builds dashboards across teams and departments carrying workload, budget and timing data, with a chart template library, a custom chart builder and drill-through to the underlying work, and the answers leave the product through BI exports and API-driven full-domain export. Budgets proper sit behind an enterprise add-on, and we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 3 2 9 10
The UX Purist
Real-time dashboards that aggregate across projects, teams and departments, a custom chart builder plus template library, drill-through from charts to the underlying work, and workload and budget information with no manual updating. Budgets and timesheets sit behind an Enterprise add-on, and we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 9 10 2 3
The Integrator
Universal Reporting builds dashboards across projects, teams and departments carrying workload, budget and timing data that update without manual work, backed by a chart template library, a custom chart builder and drill-through to the underlying tasks. Exports run to BI tools like Power BI and Looker Studio plus organization-level export and full-domain export through the API; timesheets and budgets come only as an Enterprise add-on, and we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 3 2 9 10
The Skeptic
Universal Reporting gives cross-project dashboards with workload, budget and timing data, a chart template library plus a custom chart builder, drill-through to the underlying work, and credible export paths including Power BI, Looker Studio and full-domain export through the API. Timesheets and budgets as a dedicated capability are an Enterprise add-on, though, and I found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 10 9 2 3
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
The catalogue claims 200+ apps with Slack, Teams and email covered, the REST API is documented and free with any account and monitored on Stack Overflow, and a first-party CSV importer pulls Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello. I found no public information on webhooks or automation-platform support, so I stop one step short of the top band. 11 7 12 13
The Bootstrapper
A 200+ app catalogue, Slack, Teams and email hooks, and a free, documented REST API open to anyone with an account, plus a first-party CSV importer that moves dependencies and custom fields in from Trello, Monday.com, Wrike and other competitors. We found no public information on webhooks, which is what keeps this just short of ecosystem grade. 11 12 13
The Enterprise Architect
The 200+ app catalogue, Slack and Teams hooks, and a REST API that is free to every account with documentation and a developer site cover the enterprise stack, and the CSV importer pulls real history from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello — a credible migration path with dependencies and custom fields intact. We found no public information on webhooks or dedicated automation-platform connectors, which is what holds this below the top band. 2 7 11 12 13
The UX Purist
A 200-plus app catalogue, a free documented REST API with its own developer site, a Chrome extension, Salesforce/Tableau/PowerBI connectors, and an in-house CSV importer that pulls existing work in from six competitor tools. APIs to build custom apps and full-domain export through the API cover extensibility and exit; we found no public information on webhooks or named automation-platform coverage. 11 12 13 3 9
The Integrator
The API is REST, documented, and free to anyone with an Asana account; the CSV importer pulls real history from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello including dependencies, followers and custom fields; and exit is clean with export at the organization level and full-domain export automated through the API. I found no public information on webhooks, no automation platform is named, and the 200-plus app catalogue is a count rather than a documented surface, which keeps this a step short of the top anchors. 3 11 12 13
The Skeptic
A claimed 200+ apps with Slack and Teams, a REST API that is free to every account with documentation and a developer site, and a first-party CSV importer that carries task dependencies, followers and custom fields over from Smartsheet, Monday.com, Wrike and Trello — the exit and entry paths are genuinely there. What keeps this short of the top band: I found no public information on webhooks or on automation-platform support anywhere in the captured pages, and the API still shows key-based authentication. 11 7 12 13 2
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
A free trial with no credit card required, signup through Google or Microsoft, a broad template gallery and a CSV import flow with preview and supported fields mean a team can reach real, imported work quickly. I found no public information on in-product guided setup, so I settle at this band rather than the one above. 7 14 13
The Bootstrapper
Sign up with Google or Microsoft, a free trial with no credit card required, a template gallery spanning campaigns, product launches and kanban, and an importer that previews before it commits — a small team is running inside an hour without talking to sales. The free Academy with quizzes, worksheets and a certificate teaches the deeper features as the team grows. 7 14 13 15
The Enterprise Architect
The trial requires no credit card, signup runs through Google or Microsoft, and a template gallery plus the importer gets a team from signup to a working project without paid services or a sales call. A free Academy with fifteen on-demand courses, quizzes and certificates teaches the advanced features as the team grows. 7 13 14 15
The UX Purist
Free trial with no credit card, one-click signup via Google or Microsoft, a template gallery spanning every team category, and a CSV import flow with preview that moves work in from Excel, Smartsheet, Wrike, Monday.com, Airtable and Trello. The teaching of advanced features happens in a free Academy rather than in-product guidance, which we found no public information on. 7 14 13
The Integrator
Signup runs through Google or Microsoft, the trial asks for no credit card, templates cover campaign, product launch, kanban and intake flows, and the CSV importer brings existing work in with a preview step before committing. The free Academy with fifteen on-demand courses, quizzes and worksheets teaches the deeper features as a team grows into them. 7 13 14 15
The Skeptic
Free trial with no credit card required, a free-forever tier for one or two people, signup through Google or Microsoft, a template gallery, and an importer that migrates existing projects with a preview step — signup to a working project inside an hour is credible, and the free Academy teaches the deeper features as a team grows. The free tier caps at two users, so a real team is paying from day one; we found no public information on guided in-product setup. 7 2 14 13 15
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
Asana is a Delaware-incorporated, New York-listed company, data residency in Europe is offered only as an opt-in feature of the top paid tier, and the region of the default hosting is not stated on the captured pages. The GDPR paperwork is real — a named DPO, a DPA incorporated by reference, a transfer impact assessment — yet the privacy policy states data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located, and while a subprocessor list is listed among the trust documents, the captured pages do not show which processors those are or where they sit. That is compliance language over substance: from these pages I cannot answer where a default customer's data lives. 5 2 3 6 4
The Bootstrapper
Asana is a Delaware-incorporated, NYSE-listed company headquartered in San Francisco, and EU data centers are an opt-in paid option tied to the top tier rather than a contractual default, with the default hosting region not stated in the captured pages. The DPA is incorporated by reference and a DPO is named, but the privacy policy says data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located — compliance paperwork over European substance. 5 6 3 2
The Enterprise Architect
The parent is Asana, Inc., a Delaware-incorporated, publicly listed company headquartered in San Francisco, and EU data residency exists only as data centers customers opt into on the top paid tier — the default hosting region is not stated, and which entity contracts with EU customers is not stated in the captured excerpts. The DPA is incorporated by reference into the subscriber terms, but the privacy page states data is transferred to the regions where subprocessors and partners are located, and we found no public confirmation of subprocessor jurisdictions on the captured pages. 3 2 5 6
The UX Purist
A publicly listed Delaware corporation headquartered in San Francisco; EU data centers exist but as an opt-in paid feature of the top plan, and we found no public information on the default hosting region. A DPA is incorporated by reference and GDPR language is present, yet data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located — paperwork over European substance. 5 3 6 2
The Integrator
Asana is a Delaware-incorporated, San Francisco-headquartered company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and European data residency is an opt-in extra tied to the Enterprise+ tier rather than a default. A data processing agreement is incorporated by reference into the subscriber terms and a subprocessor list exists, but the privacy policy states data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located, and the region of the default hosting is not stated. 2 5 6
The Skeptic
A Delaware-incorporated, NYSE-listed company headquartered in San Francisco owns the product, and the privacy policy states plainly that data is transferred to regions where subprocessors and partners are located. European data centers exist only as an opt-in, paid feature on the top tier, we found no public information on the region of the default hosting, and the subprocessor exposure is not confirmed on the captured pages — GDPR and ISO badges aplenty, substance thin. 5 2 6 3
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
The Help Center, a free Academy of 15 video courses with quizzes and a certificate, a community forum and a monitored Stack Overflow channel form a genuinely healthy learning surface. But the published 99.9% uptime commitment and 24/7 priority support are Enterprise-gated, and I found no public information on chat support or response times for the entry plans. 15 12 3 13
The Bootstrapper
A free Academy with fifteen courses, quizzes and a certificate, a help center, certifications, a community forum and a Stack Overflow presence the vendor monitors give a stuck user several ways up, and Enterprise buyers get 24/7 priority support with a 99.9% uptime commitment. We found no public information on chat availability or response times for the self-serve tiers, so support quality still looks plan-gated. 15 3 4 12
The Enterprise Architect
The learning surface is genuinely deep — a free Academy with fifteen courses, quizzes and certificates, a community forum and a help center — and the trust pages carry 58 FAQs across security and privacy categories. But the published 24/7 priority support and 99.9% uptime commitment attach to the Enterprise tier only, and we found no public information on chat availability or response times for the lower plans. 3 4 15
The UX Purist
A free Academy with fifteen on-demand courses, quizzes, worksheets and certificates, a Help Center, a community forum, and a vendor-monitored Stack Overflow channel for API questions — a real teaching surface that gets people unstuck on their own. But the 24/7 priority support and 99.9% uptime commitment are tied to the Enterprise tier, and we found no public information on support channels or response times for lower tiers, or on a visible changelog. 15 3 12 4
The Integrator
The learning surface is genuinely strong: a free Asana Academy with fifteen on-demand courses, quizzes, worksheets and a certificate, a community forum, certifications, and a Stack Overflow channel the vendor monitors for API questions. We found no public information on chat support or response commitments below the Enterprise tier, where 24/7 priority support and a 99.9% uptime commitment live. 3 12 15
The Skeptic
A free Asana Academy with fifteen on-demand courses, quizzes and certificates, a community forum, a help center, and a security FAQ of 58 answers make the learning surface genuinely healthy, and product announcements are publicly visible. But the published 24/7 priority support and 99.9% uptime commitment are Enterprise-only, and I found no public information on chat support or response times for customers on the lower tiers. 15 4 3 16
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
Personal, Starter and Advanced are priced publicly at €0, €10.99 and €24.99 per user, per month billed annually, with AI requests priced per request, but the headline is an annual-billed figure, the monthly difference appears only as "Save up to 18%", and tax treatment is not stated. The capabilities that decide an enterprise purchase — data residency, audit logs, timesheets and budgets — sit in an Enterprise tier without a number or in unpriced add-ons, and the page states plainly that refunds are not offered. 2
The Bootstrapper
Starter at €10.99 and Advanced at €24.99 per user per month billed annually sit plainly on the page and the yearly toggle says save up to 18%, but the free tier stops at two users and everything a 30-seat team eventually wants — data residency, compliance, permissions and timesheets/budgets — lives in Enterprise add-ons behind contact sales with no number. The AI meter at $0.60 per request billed monthly is stated per request, which is transparent as a rate but a cost I cannot predict for my team. 2 7
The Enterprise Architect
The self-serve tiers are priced on the page — Starter at "€10.99 Per user, per month billed annually" and Advanced at "€24.99 Per user, per month billed annually" — with a yearly toggle advertising savings of up to 18% and AI requests priced at "$0.60 per AI request, billed monthly". However, the headline figures are annual-billed only, tax treatment is not stated, and the audit logs, permissions management and timesheets add-ons as well as the Enterprise tiers carry no numbers, so the payable cost for two hundred seats cannot be determined before talking to sales. 2 7
The UX Purist
Three self-serve tiers are priced on the page with the billing-period difference stated as save up to 18%, but the headline numbers are annual-billed, the tax treatment and metered $0.60 per AI request cost need qualifying, and a no-refunds policy is in the fine print. Data residency and the compliance add-ons sit behind an unpriced contact-sales tier, so the real payable number for many buyers is not on the page. 2 7
The Integrator
Starter at €10.99 and Advanced at €24.99 per user, per month billed annually are printed on the page with the yearly saving stated, and the Personal plan is free forever. The headline numbers still need qualifying: they are annual-billed figures, Enterprise is contact-sales for pricing while carrying data residency, audit logs and the compliance and permissions add-ons, and we found no public information on tax treatment. 2 8
The Skeptic
The self-serve tiers are on the page — Personal at €0 free forever, Starter at €10.99 per user per month billed annually, Advanced at €24.99 per user per month billed annually, with the yearly saving stated at up to 18% — but the headline numbers are annual-billed figures, we found no public information on tax treatment, and Enterprise is contact-sales while audit logs, data residency and timesheets live as Enterprise add-ons doing real work. Add AI metered at $0.60 per AI request, billed monthly (or $0.50 per AI request, billed upfront) and a stated no-refunds policy, and the invoice is only roughly predictable from the page. 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
3 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in US ⚠ unverified | 0/3 pts | 5 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Publicly listed | 1/2 pts | 5 Report an error |
| Data residency | EU optional ⚠ unverified | 1/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 18 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. The statement covers Asana, Inc. and its subsidiaries; which of these entities contracts with EU customers is not stated in the excerpts.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. EU data centers are an opt-in paid feature (the pricing page says Enterprise+ "adds SIEM integration, data residency, audit logs and dedicated workspaces"), and the region of the default AWS hosting is not stated.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 90 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 40 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (16)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage asana.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 18 Aug 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page asana.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 +3 earlier captures: 11 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 18 Aug 2026 Details →
- 3 Trust center asana.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 18 Aug 2026 Details →
- 4 Security page asana.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 +2 earlier captures: 20 Aug 2026, 18 Aug 2026 Details →
- 5 Terms of service asana.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
- 6 Privacy policy asana.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 7 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Reporting — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Integrations — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Integrations — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Support & documentation — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 16 Support & documentation — found from sitemap asana.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →