Project Management & Collaboration
Scoro
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Scoro Software OÜ · www.scoro.com
Compare with ClickUp → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Scoro is an integrated platform for work, sales and finances, built from 8 apps for service-based businesses. Integrations are the strength, scored 8 to 9: an HTTPS/JSON API, webhooks, Zapier, SCIM, a marketplace of 40+ tools, two-way calendar syncs, Xero, QuickBooks and Sage Intacct, and native MCP for Claude and ChatGPT. Collaboration depth follows at 7 to 8, evidenced by assignments, capacity planning, a RAID log and customer portal accounts. Sovereignty is the low point at a flat 4: the contracting entity is Estonian with a published DPA and subprocessor list, but hosting runs on AWS, Stripe handles payments, the privacy policy says EU users' data may be stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, and we found no public information on ownership or contractually fixed EU residency. Judges genuinely split on onboarding effort, 4 to 7: a 14-day trial with no credit card and self-onboarding suit small teams, while the skeptic at 4 and the enterprise architect at 5 weigh hour-based paid onboarding and a 170 EUR configuration minimum. Reporting scored 5 to 7; pricing transparency 4 to 6.
Speaks for it
- Integrations scored 8 to 9 — a marketplace of 40+ tools, an HTTPS/JSON API, webhooks, Zapier, SCIM provisioning and native MCP for Claude and ChatGPT, with Xero, QuickBooks and Sage Intacct syncs.
- Collaboration depth scored 7 to 8 — assignments, capacity planning showing who is overloaded, a RAID log for dependencies, OKRs across company, team and individual levels, and customer portal accounts under granular permissions.
- Four combinations are priced publicly — Time-billing at €15 user / month, Projects & Resources and Quote to Cash at €25 user / month, End-to-end at €52 user / month — with a 14-day trial taking no credit card.
- Self-onboarding is a documented path, with guides, video tutorials, product tours and CSV/XLS import, so a small team can start without paid services.
- The contracting entity is Estonian — Scoro Software OÜ in Tallinn — with a published data processing agreement, subprocessor list, an Estonian supervisory authority, and stated GDPR compliance and ISO 27001 certification.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scored a flat 4 — hosting on AWS and Stripe in the payment path sit within US CLOUD Act reach, the privacy policy allows EU users' data to be stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, and we found no public information on ownership or contractually fixed EU residency.
- We found no public information on in-product dashboards, a report builder or scheduled reports, and cross-account consolidation is evidenced only through a third-party app landing data in Azure SQL.
- The payable number is not determinable up front — billing-period price differences and tax treatment are unstated, over 35 extras carry no public figures, commitment periods can limit termination, and above 50 people the route is "Contact us".
- Onboarding help is sold separately — an hour-based paid service, with a 170 EUR minimum for unstandardized configuration — and we found no public information on templates or guided setup.
- Support targets are aims rather than guarantees — critical resolution within one business day is a target, human support is bounded by Mon–Fri business hours — and the support policy was last updated 13 February 2024 against 13 major releases in 2024, with no public information on chat or a changelog.
Best for
- You run a consultancy, agency, IT, architecture or engineering firm of roughly 10 to 500 people and want projects, resourcing, sales and billing on one platform.
- You depend on a connected stack — Xero, QuickBooks or Sage Intacct, Google or Exchange calendars, Slack, Jira — and want an API, webhooks, Zapier and SCIM to hold it together.
- You want to start before anyone calls you: the trial runs 14 days, takes no credit card, and self-onboarding with CSV/XLS import is a documented path.
- Your clients need a bounded place in the work — customer portal accounts with limited rights under granular permissions.
Avoid if
- You need EU-only data residency or no US legal reach — the privacy policy allows EU users' data to be stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, hosting is on AWS and Stripe handles payments.
- You expect native dashboards, a configurable report builder or scheduled delivery — cross-account consolidation is evidenced only via a third-party app into Azure SQL.
- You must see the full invoice before committing — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You want guided setup or ready-made templates included — onboarding help is an hour-based paid service and unstandardized configuration starts at 170 EUR.
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Task boards with assignments, company-wide capacity planning that shows who is free and who is overloaded, dependency tracking through the RAID log, granular user permissions, and customer portal accounts for clients' representatives make team-level planning first-class, with a stated span from ten to five hundred users. We found no public information on in-task comments or discussion threads. 1 5 7
The Bootstrapper
Assignments, a team capacity view that shows who's free and who's overloaded, a RAID log that structures risks and dependencies, granular permissions, and customer portal accounts for client involvement — team-level planning is clearly first-class, positioned to run 10 to 500 people on the same platform. I found no public information on lightweight guest access outside the customer portal model, so I stop just short of the top. 1 5 7
The Enterprise Architect
Team-level planning is first-class here: tasks are created and assigned, a Resource module shows who's free and who's overloaded so time can be booked in advance, a RAID log carries dependencies with risk scoring, and OKRs roll up from individual to company level. Client-facing portal accounts with limited rights sit under granular user permissions, which is exactly what a 200-seat rollout needs. I found no public information on a cross-project timeline view, so I stop short of the top. 1 7 5
The UX Purist
Task assignment, a RAID log that explicitly tracks dependencies, and a capacity view showing who is overloaded are named modules, and customer-portal accounts plus granular role permissions give clients a defined, bounded place in the work. Planning, workload, permissions and client involvement are all evidenced across a stated 10-to-500-person span; what we found no public information on is comment threads or in-task discussion. 1 5 7
The Integrator
Task assignment boards, workload and capacity planning, and a structured RAID log covering dependencies are all evidenced, alongside granular user permissions and Customer Portal accounts that give client representatives controlled, limited access. Goals and OKRs tracked across company, team and individual levels carry planning beyond single projects. I found no public information on task-level comments or mentions, which keeps this strong but not complete. 1 5 7
The Skeptic
Assignments, capacity planning ('see who's free and who's overloaded, book people's time in advance') and customer portal accounts with limited rights are all concretely evidenced, plus company-level goals that imply cross-project visibility. I stop short of the higher level because we found no public information on task comments or a shared timeline, and the only dependency evidence is a project-level RAID log rather than task-level linking. 1 5 7
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Time, cost and margin data, budgets and billing live in the product with CSV and XLS export, and a marketplace app consolidates Scoro data into Azure SQL for Excel and BI reporting. We found no public information on an in-product report builder, scheduled delivery or named utilization reports, so answering work questions partly depends on external tooling. 4 1 7
The Bootstrapper
Time and labor-cost tracking, quote-to-budget estimating, client billing, and CSV/XLS export cover the standard questions, and a dataSights app consolidates accounts into a BI-friendly database. I found no public information on a native dashboard, a custom report builder, or scheduled report delivery, so this reads as solid standard reporting rather than configurable. 4 1 7
The Enterprise Architect
Time, labor cost and budget data are native to the platform and reachable by CSV/XLS export and a full-featured API, and the goals module tracks status across company, team and individual levels. But I found no public information on an in-product report builder, dashboards or scheduled delivery, and cross-account consolidation is evidenced only via a third-party marketplace app that lands the data in Azure SQL for BI tools. 7 4 1
The UX Purist
Time, labor cost, budgets and margin are first-class modules, everything exports as CSV or XLS, and a full API plus BI connectors can consolidate multiple accounts for Excel and BI tools. But the reporting surface itself is thinly evidenced: we found no public information on a native configurable report builder, cross-project dashboards, or scheduled delivery. 4 7
The Integrator
The data model covers time and labor cost, budgets and margins, and utilization, and the answers leave the product cleanly via CSV and XLS export, a full JSON API, and dataSights consolidating Scoro data into an Azure SQL database for Excel and BI tools. I found no public information on an in-product report builder, dashboards or scheduled delivery, so cross-project answers depend on the export paths rather than the UI. 4 1 7
The Skeptic
Time and cost tracking, budgeting and client billing are evidenced as modules and data exits via CSV/XLS and an API, so the raw numbers are there. But we found no public information on native dashboards, report builders, scheduled reports or utilization reporting — the consolidation story runs through a third-party Azure SQL app — so this stays mid-grade. 2 4 7
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
A marketplace with 40+ native apps, two-way calendar syncs, Slack, Jira and accounting connectors, a REST API with webhooks, Zapier, SCIM provisioning and a native MCP server for AI tools cover the stack broadly, with CSV/XLS import-export and competitor task syncs as real import paths. We found no public information on the depth of the API documentation, which is what keeps this short of ecosystem-grade. 4 1 7
The Bootstrapper
A marketplace with 40+ native apps, a full REST API, webhooks, two-way Zapier, SCIM provisioning, native MCP to Claude and ChatGPT, a developer program, and sync paths from Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp and Monday.com, with CSV/XLS import and export on top. The competitor imports ride on Zapier rather than a native importer, which is the only hair between this and ecosystem-grade. 4 1 7
The Enterprise Architect
This is the strongest surface: 40+ native integrations, two-way Google Calendar, iCal and MS Exchange sync, Slack, Jira, Salesforce and the accounting stack, real task and project sync paths from Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp and Monday.com, plus Zapier, webhooks, a marketplace with a developer program, SCIM provisioning and native MCP for AI tools. The API is full-featured over HTTPS/JSON with CSV and XLS import and export for a clean exit. Only the absence of evidenced API documentation depth and the operator's disclaimer of migration results keep me below the top. 1 7 4 5
The UX Purist
An app marketplace with third-party developers, a developer program, SCIM, a documented HTTPS/JSON API, webhooks, a two-way Zapier connection built by the vendor, and native MCP to Claude and ChatGPT — this is ecosystem-grade on its face. The only softness: competitor sync paths for Asana, Basecamp and ClickUp run through Zapier rather than native importers, and the terms state the vendor is not responsible for the results of data migration, import or export. 4 1 5 7
The Integrator
This is the strong suit: a documented JSON-over-HTTPS API, webhooks on logged events, native MCP support for Claude and ChatGPT, SCIM provisioning, two-way calendar syncs, a deep accounting catalogue and a vendor-built Zapier app. A marketplace with a developer program and third-party apps makes the tool extensible, and Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp and Monday.com syncs give real paths in. I stop short of the top because export completeness is described as full-featured without being itemized, and the terms place responsibility for migration and export results with the client rather than the operator. 4 1 5 7
The Skeptic
The strongest area: a real marketplace with roughly twenty connectors built by Scoro itself, two-way Google Calendar, Exchange, iCal and Zapier links, webhooks, SCIM, a developer program and native MCP to AI tools. I hold it below the top because every competitor project tool (Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp, Monday.com) connects only via Zapier, and the 'full-featured API' claim is marketing copy with no documentation depth shown, while the terms disclaim any responsibility for the results of data migration, import or export. 4 1 5 7
Onboarding effort
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
A 14-day trial without credit card, self-onboarding with guides, video tutorials and product tours, and modular app combinations let a small team start on their own. The support policy places custom fields and data import/export assistance in a separately charged configuration service with a 170 EUR minimum, and we found no public information on templates or a guided first-project path, so speed to value rests on the team itself. 3 2 5 8
The Bootstrapper
A 14-day trial with no credit card, self-onboarding as a documented path, guides, video tutorials and product tours, plus CSV/XLS import for existing data mean a small team can start without paying anyone for services. But picking among bundles of 8 modular apps asks a newcomer to choose before they know what they need, and paid configuration carries a 170 EUR minimum; I found no public information on ready-made project templates. 3 2 5
The Enterprise Architect
A 14-day trial without a credit card and a self-onboarding path exist, with guides, video tutorials and product tours published. But the captured pricing sells onboarding in tiers by headcount, Unstandardized Configuration Services start at 170 EUR, and the onboarding service is billed as a separate hour-based fee — for two hundred seats this is an implementation exercise, not an hour-to-value signup. I found no public information on templates or guided in-product first-project setup. 3 2 5 8
The UX Purist
The trial door opens exactly right — 14 days, no credit card — with self-onboarding guides, video tutorials and product tours available. But my stopwatch stops at setup: onboarding is defined as an hour-based paid service separate from the subscription, unstandardized configuration carries a 170 EUR minimum charge, and we found no public information on guided setup, templates, or importers that pull existing work in at signup. 3 2 5 8
The Integrator
The trial is genuinely self-serve — 14 days, no credit card — and self-onboarding is a named supported path with guides, video tutorials and product tours. But onboarding assistance is an hour-based paid service, unstandardized configuration carries a 170 EUR minimum, and the modular model makes a newcomer choose among 8 core apps, packages and add-ons before things work. I found no public information on in-product guided setup, templates or an importer that pulls existing projects in at signup. 2 4 5 8
The Skeptic
A 14-day trial with no credit card and self-onboarding guides are real, but first value means choosing among modular apps, packages, add-ons and custom fields a newcomer cannot judge yet — and the vendor sells the help: hour-based onboarding billed separately from the subscription and unstandardized configuration from a 170 EUR minimum. We found no public information on templates or guided setup that would get a small team to a working project fast. 3 2 5 8
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is an Estonian company with a published data processing agreement, an Estonian supervisory authority, a named data protection officer and a published subprocessor list, which is the right paperwork. But the privacy policy expressly allows EU residents' data to be transferred and stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, hosting runs on AWS within US CLOUD Act reach, and we found no public information on ownership, control, or which AWS contracting entity serves EU clients — so where EU data lives is not contractually fixed. 3 2 4 5
The Bootstrapper
The contracting entity is Scoro Software OÜ in Tallinn, the supervisory authority is the Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, a DPA appendix exists, and each client chooses its AWS region with a closest-to-registration default — yet the privacy policy itself says EU data may be transferred and stored outside the EU, e.g. the US. AWS and Stripe put data within US legal reach, a London office address appears alongside the Estonian one, and I found no public information on ownership or a contractual EU-only residency commitment; that is choice and paperwork, not a fixed promise. 3 2 4 5
The Enterprise Architect
The contracting entity is Scoro Software OÜ in Tallinn with a Data Processing Agreement appendix in the terms and a subprocessor list published on the website, so the paperwork is real. The substance is not EU-only: the privacy policy states that data of EU-located users may be transferred or stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, hosting runs on AWS, and Stripe handles payment transactions; we found no public information on ownership control or a contractually fixed EU region for EU clients. 3 4 5
The UX Purist
The contracting entity is an Estonian company with a DPA appendix and a subprocessor list published on its website — real substance, not just paperwork. But hosting sits on AWS, the privacy policy itself says EU residents' data may be stored outside the EU, e.g. the US, and we found no public information on ownership control, on which AWS contracting entity serves EU clients, or on any contractual EU-only residency. 3 4 5
The Integrator
The contracting entity is Scoro Software OÜ in Tallinn with an Estonian supervisory authority, a data processing agreement in the terms and a published subprocessor list — substance beyond compliance paperwork. Hosting sits on AWS with Stripe for payments, both US-headquartered and within CLOUD Act reach, and the privacy policy states plainly that EU residents' data may be transferred and stored outside the EU, e.g. the US. Clients can select a hosting region, yet I found no public information contractually fixing EU residency or naming the AWS contracting entity serving EU clients. 3 4 1 5
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is an Estonian company with a published DPA, an Estonian supervisory authority and a public subprocessor list, which is more than paperwork. But its own privacy policy reserves storing EU users' personal data outside the EU, e.g. the US; hosting is AWS with Stripe in the payment path — both within CLOUD Act reach; and we found no public information on ownership or where control actually sits. Region selection exists, yet nothing we captured pins residency to the EU contractually. 3 2 4 5
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
The help center is included in the subscription fee, and a published support policy defines business hours, an urgency matrix, a call-back phone line and a 99.95% availability commitment. We found no public information on chat support, a community or academy, the pages show no changelog beyond a stated 2024 release count, critical resolution within one business day is a target rather than a guarantee, and support package fees may differ by package. 2 1 5 8
The Bootstrapper
A Help Center at Com is included in every subscription, requests go through a form or a callback line, a published urgency matrix targets critical resolution within one business day, and the onboarding pages add guides, tutorials and product tours. But those targets are stated as aims rather than guarantees, support hours run Mon–Fri, and I found no public information on chat support or a visible changelog. 2 5 8
The Enterprise Architect
The Help Center at Com is included in the subscription fee and promised as a comprehensive overview of the platform's functions, requests go through a form or a call-back phone line, server availability is handled 24/7, and an urgency matrix with published target resolution times and a 99.95% availability commitment exists. But critical-incident resolution is a target of one business day rather than a guarantee, human support outside server outages is bounded by 7am-7pm UTC weekdays, support packages may carry different fees, and I found no public information on chat support or a visible changelog. 8 2 5
The UX Purist
A help center included in the subscription fee, a published support policy with a four-level urgency matrix, 24/7 handling of infrastructure issues and a 99.95% availability commitment — the skeleton is solid and dated. We found no public information on live chat, a community or academy, or a visible changelog, and the policy states target resolution times rather than guarantees. 2 5 8
The Integrator
The Help Center is contractual, included in the subscription, and the support policy publishes an urgency matrix with a one-business-day target for high-urgency issues and 24/7 handling of server availability. Support packages are fee-differentiated, the channels are a request form and call-back line within business hours, and third-party marketplace apps are excluded from operator support. I found no public information on chat support or a visible changelog. 2 5 8
The Skeptic
A help center at Com is included in the subscription and comes with a four-level urgency matrix, a call-back phone line, and 24/7 handling of server availability only. The critical-issue target of one business day is explicitly not guaranteed, we found no public information on chat support or a visible changelog, and the support policy itself carries a last update of February 2024 despite 13 major releases or versions in 2024 — the staleness pattern I exist to flag. 2 4 5 8
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
All four self-serve combinations are itemized on the pricing page with included apps and per-user prices quoted as €15 user / month up to €52 user / month. The captured pricing pages do not state which billing period those prices assume or the tax treatment, the over 35 extras and the onboarding tiers beyond Assisted carry no numbers, and the terms confirm commitment periods that can limit termination — so the headline number still needs qualifying. 2 5 8
The Bootstrapper
Four bundles are priced in the open — Time-billing at €15 user / month, Projects & Resources and Quote to Cash at €25 user / month, End-to-end at €52 user / month — with a 14-day trial and no credit card, which is what I want to see before anyone calls me. But the page is silent on taxes and on annual-versus-monthly differences, 'over 35 extras and integrations' carry no prices, the terms allow commitment periods that limit termination, and above 50 people the answer becomes 'Contact us' — the headline is real, the full invoice still needs qualifying. 2 1 5
The Enterprise Architect
Four self-serve combinations are publicly priced — Time-billing at €15 user / month, Projects & Resources and Quote to Cash at €25 user / month, End-to-end at €52 user / month — and the 14-day trial takes no card, so a rough budget is possible before anyone talks to sales. But I found no public information on monthly-versus-annual differences across the stated billing periods, tax treatment, add-on pricing for the 35+ extras, or support package fees, and teams above 50 people are directed to contact us. 2 5 8
The UX Purist
Four bundles carry public prices — €15, €25, €25 and €52 user / month — with a 14-day trial and no credit card, which is a good start. But the payable number still needs qualifying: over 35 extras and integrations are unpriced, onboarding and configuration are sold separately, support packages may carry different fees, and above 50 people pricing becomes a conversation; we found no public information on billing-period price differences or tax treatment. 2 1 5 8
The Integrator
Four named combinations are priced publicly and precisely — Time-billing at €15 user / month, Quote to Cash and Projects & Resources at €25 user / month, End-to-end at €52 user / month — with included apps listed and a trial that takes no card. The captured page does not show the difference between billing periods, tax treatment, or prices for add-ons and extras. Paid onboarding and the 170 EUR minimum for unstandardized configuration surface in the terms and policies rather than on the pricing page. 2 1 5 8
The Skeptic
Four combination prices are public at €15 user / month, €25 user / month, €25 user / month and €52 user / month, and the trial takes no card — but the payable number is not determinable up front: the monthly-versus-annual difference and tax treatment are unstated, more than 35 add-ons plus separately priced support and onboarding packages carry no public figures, and teams above 50 people are routed to 'Contact us'. The €15 user / month headline covers only tracking and invoicing, not project management. 2 5 8
European sovereignty — proven facts
2 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in EE ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 4 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Marketing footers show a London contact address, but the operator is explicitly identified as the Estonian-registered Scoro Software OÜ.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. Amazon Web Services is US-headquartered so CLOUD Act exposure applies regardless of the EU data-center regions used, and Stripe is additionally named for payment transaction security; the page does not state which AWS contracting entity serves EU clients.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 26 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 21 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 16 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 16 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (8)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +2 earlier captures: 11 Sep 2026, 20 Aug 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 20 Aug 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Security page www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Terms of service www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Subprocessor list www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Integrations — found from sitemap www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Support & documentation — found from sitemap www.scoro.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →