Project Management & Collaboration
Smartsheet
Rest of world Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Smartsheet Inc. · www.smartsheet.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Smartsheet, a project management and collaboration vendor, scores highest on support & documentation and collaboration depth, lowest on sovereignty, pricing transparency and onboarding effort. Team planning is judged first-class: five permission roles from Viewer to Owner, unlimited guests and contributors on Business, portfolio reports across portfolios and programs, editable multi-project timelines — though capacity planning sits in a separate Resource Management plan and board view cannot edit dependencies or run automations. Pricing transparency holds flat at 5: Pro at 8 € and Business at 17 € per Member/month are public but billed yearly only, with Enterprise custom-priced. Integrations rest on a documented REST API with downloadable OpenAPI specifications, webhooks across Commercial US, EU and AU, and Entra ID/Okta provisioning on the Enterprise plan; we found no public information on calendar, chat or file-storage integrations. Sovereignty scored lowest: the controller is Smartsheet Inc. in Washington state, primary processing stated as the United States, default hosting on AWS East, EU hosting opt-in via Smartsheet Regions (AWS Germany/Ireland). Score spreads never exceeded two points; no significant disagreement emerged.
Speaks for it
- Cross-project reporting aggregates across portfolios and Control Center programs with filter, group, summarize and sort, and timeline reports feed dashboard widgets.
- Permission roles run from Viewer to Owner, with unlimited guests and contributors on the Business plan at 17 € per Member/month billed yearly.
- A public REST API ships downloadable OpenAPI specifications, with webhooks available from the Pro tier across Commercial US, EU and AU environments.
- Directory integrations with Entra ID and Okta automate provisioning, deprovisioning and profile sync on the Enterprise plan.
- Base Support covers all plan types with 24x7 phone and chat, backed by help-center documentation in English and German.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scores sit at 3-4: primary processing is stated as the United States, default hosting is AWS East, and EU hosting is an opt-in via Smartsheet Regions.
- Published prices are billed yearly only, Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are custom-priced, Dynamic View is an add-on from 120€/month, and we found no public information on tax treatment.
- Getting started carries prerequisites — board view needs a single-select dropdown, contact list or symbol column, and in that view dependency editing, automations and publishing are not available.
- Capacity and workload planning sits in a separate Resource Management plan rather than the core product.
- The under-two-hour first-response SLA belongs to the Premium Support Package, an add-on for Business and Enterprise.
Best for
- You run multi-project programs and need portfolio reports and editable timelines that aggregate across portfolios and Control Center programs.
- You build against a documented API with webhooks and manage users through Entra ID or Okta directory provisioning.
- You want unlimited guests and contributors on a self-serve plan — Business at 17 € per Member/month billed yearly.
- You count on 24x7 phone and chat support from the base tier and documentation in English and German.
Avoid if
- You need EU data residency as the default — primary processing is stated as the United States and EU hosting on AWS Germany/Ireland is opt-in via Smartsheet Regions.
- You expect capacity and workload planning inside the core plan — Resource Management is its own plan tier.
- You must pin the full cost before a sales conversation — the published figures are billed yearly only and Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are custom-priced.
- You rely on board view for dependency edits, automations or publishing — the help article marks them not available in that view.
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Boards update in real time with cards grouped by status, assigned person or team, permission levels run from Viewer to Owner, and paid plans include unlimited guests, while cross-portfolio reports give team-level planning across projects. The gaps are visible on the captured pages — board view refuses dependency edits and automations, and I found no public information on workload or capacity views. 6 4 2 8
The Bootstrapper
Permission levels from Viewer to Owner, cards grouped by assigned person, dependency editing, and timeline reports combining multiple sources into one editable timeline make this real multi-person planning, and the Business tier throws in unlimited guests and contributors. Capacity and workload show up only as Resource Management, which is its own plan tier, so a 30-seat team is pushed a pricing step up for that part. 2 4 6 8 9 12 15
The Enterprise Architect
The captured pages show first-class team planning: editable timeline reports spanning multiple projects, portfolio reports that aggregate across portfolios and programs, dependencies with predecessor values, grouping by assignee or team, and unlimited guests on the Business plan, all under a five-level permission model from Viewer to Owner. We found no public information on capacity or workload views, which is what a two-hundred-seat rollout would lean on. 6 8 9 2 4
The UX Purist
Multi-person work is genuinely modeled: five distinct permission roles from Viewer to Owner, unlimited guests and contributors on the Business plan, live co-editing in board view, and portfolio reports that aggregate projects across portfolios and programs. But capacity evidence lives in a separate Resource Management tier, dependencies surface only as an aside in the view documentation, and board view supports at most 14 fields per card — cross-project planning shows seams rather than one clean model. 2 4 6 8
The Integrator
Team-level planning is genuinely first-class: portfolio reports aggregate across portfolios and Control Center programs, timeline reports combine data from multiple projects into one editable timeline, predecessor dependencies are editable by role, and paid plans ship unlimited guests and contributors under five distinct permission levels. Capacity work sits in a separate Resource Management plan rather than the core model, and the card and board views carry documented restrictions, which keeps it short of the full span. 2 4 6 8 9 12
The Skeptic
Granular sharing roles from Viewer to Owner, unlimited guests and contributors on Business, cross-portfolio reports and editable multi-sheet timelines add up to genuinely first-class team planning. Capacity planning appears only as a separate Resource Management plan tier, though, and the board-view help article lists only duplicate, activity log and export as available operations there, with automations, dependency editing and publishing marked not available in that view — real workarounds. 2 4 6 8 9 12
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Portfolio reports aggregate across portfolios and programs with filter, group, summarize and sort, timeline reports combine multiple sheets into one editable timeline, and dashboards can consume them as widgets. I found no public information on time, budget or utilization depth, nor on scheduled delivery or a custom report builder, so this reads as strong aggregation without that layer. 8 9 6
The Bootstrapper
Cross-portfolio reports with filter, group, summarize and sort, timeline reports feeding dashboard widgets, and exportable activity logs are genuinely configurable cross-project reporting. We found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, which is exactly what I would need before trusting the tool with my numbers. 4 8 9
The Enterprise Architect
Cross-project reporting is genuinely configurable — portfolio reports with filters, grouping, summarizing and sorting across portfolios and Control Center programs, timeline reports surfaced as dashboard widgets, and exportable activity logs. We found no public information on budget, time or utilization reporting, nor on report export formats, which a buyer planning two hundred seats would still need to verify. 8 9 4 15
The UX Purist
Portfolio reports aggregate across portfolios and Control Center programs with filters, grouping, summarizing and sorting, timeline reports combine multiple sheets into a single editable timeline that feeds dashboards, and logs are exportable. We found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, and the timeline view drops summarize and sort and is absent from mobile — the answer engine narrows at the edges. 4 8 9
The Integrator
Cross-project reporting is configurable — portfolio reports aggregate across portfolios and programs with filter, group, summarize and sort, timeline reports feed dashboard widgets, and event reporting covers over a hundred event types with exportable logs. The Resource Management API exposes projects and user assignments programmatically, but we found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting or on scheduled delivery, which is what separates solid from first-class here. 4 8 9 15
The Skeptic
Cross-project aggregation is genuinely evidenced: portfolio reports pull across portfolios and programs with filters, grouping, summarize and sort, and timeline reports feed dashboard widgets and can be copied. We found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, and the timeline view itself drops summarize and sort and is unavailable in the mobile app or published reports. 6 8 9 15
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
A REST API with a downloadable OpenAPI specification, webhooks consolidated on a single domain across US, EU and AU environments, MCP-enabled connections to external AI tools, and Okta and Entra ID directory provisioning with deprovisioning form a well-documented connective layer. The captured pages show little of a broader native catalogue, and I found no public information on import paths from competitors. 10 15 2 11 4
The Bootstrapper
The plumbing is solid: a REST API with a downloadable OpenAPI specification, webhooks available from the Pro tier across US, EU and Australia environments, MCP-enabled connections to external AI tools, and SSO with major identity providers. We found no public information on a native catalogue for calendar, Slack/Teams or file storage, on automation-platform coverage, or on import paths from competitors, and the directory integrations are listed for the Enterprise plan. 1 2 10 11 15
The Enterprise Architect
The API is documented down to downloadable OpenAPI specifications, webhooks run on a consolidated domain across US, EU and AU environments with IT-facing firewall guidance, and directory integrations for Okta and Entra ID cover provisioning, deprovisioning and profile sync — exactly the user-lifecycle automation I buy for. MCP-enabled AI connections are a plus; we found no public information on automation-platform coverage or import paths from competing tools. 4 10 11 15 2
The UX Purist
The API reference is downloadable as an OpenAPI specification in JSON or YAML — exactly the self-serve density I want to see — webhooks run across US, EU and AU environments behind one documented domain, MCP hooks connect external AI tools, and directory integrations with Okta and Entra ID automate provisioning end to end. We found no public information on a native integrations catalogue, automation-platform coverage, or import paths from competitors, which caps the ecosystem story. 2 10 11 15
The Integrator
This is where I live, and it holds up: a public developer API, webhooks consolidated behind a single domain with stated plan availability across Commercial US, EU and AU, downloadable OpenAPI specifications in JSON and YAML, MCP-enabled connections to external AI tools, and directory integrations that automate provisioning, deprovisioning and profile sync through Entra ID and Okta. We found no public information on a broader native catalogue or on import paths from competitor tools, and directory integrations are listed for the Enterprise plan, so ecosystem grade stays out of reach. 1 2 10 11 15
The Skeptic
The API surface is real and documented: REST with a downloadable OpenAPI specification, webhooks consolidated behind a single domain across all commercial regions, MCP connections to external AI tools, and directory integrations for Entra ID and Okta. We found no public information on calendar, chat or file-storage integrations, automation-platform coverage, or import paths from competing tools, which is what would justify going higher. 1 2 10 11 15
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
A free trial, a self-serve Pro tier for one to ten members and a getting-started learning track exist, and the pages captured say nothing about payment details being required for the trial. The first board, though, presupposes structural choices a newcomer cannot yet judge — the evidence must contain a single-select dropdown, contact list or symbol column — and trial access to the Resource Management API requires contacting Support. 7 2 6 12 15
The Bootstrapper
A free self-serve trial exists and learning tracks walk a team in, which is the right start. But prerequisites appear throughout the evidence — board view needs a single-select dropdown, contact list or symbol column in place first, portfolio reports require Portfolio Admin or Program Lead roles, and further capability sits behind the Enterprise line — and we found no public information on guided setup, templates, or whether the trial asks for payment details. 2 6 7 8 12
The Enterprise Architect
A free trial and demo are offered, learning tracks cover onboarding a team, and board view lights up in any project that has a single-select dropdown, contact list or symbol column. We found no public information on guided setup, trial terms or importers that pull existing work in, and hands-on help routes through an account representative and consulting services. 7 6 12 15
The UX Purist
A self-serve free trial and self-serve priced plans exist, and guided Pro Desk coaching is included rather than sold — but coaching being a headline inclusion tells you the first project expects a guide. Views demand structural prerequisites before anything renders (a board needs a single-select dropdown, contact list or symbol column; a timeline needs a date column), and we found no public information on guided setup or importers pulling existing work in. 2 6 7 9 14
The Integrator
A free trial exists and the help center carries getting-started learning tracks, but every captured path shows configuration before value: board view requires a single-select or symbol column, timeline reports need at least one date column, portfolio reports require Portfolio Admin or Program Lead roles, and trial users must contact support to request API access. We found no public information on trial payment details, guided in-product setup, or importers pulling existing work in. 6 7 8 9 12 15
The Skeptic
A free trial, self-serve Pro and Business plans, a getting-started learning track and included Pro Desk coaching sessions are all public. But we found no public information on whether the trial requires payment details or on guided setup and importers, trial-plan API access means contacting Support, and the board view requires a qualifying single-select column before it works at all. 2 6 7 12 15
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
The controller is Smartsheet Inc. headquartered in Washington state, hosting defaults to AWS East, and primary processing sits in the United States — a public data processing addendum, standard contractual clauses and Data Privacy Framework certification exist, but that is paperwork over substance while the default data location is the US. An EU environment on AWS Germany/Ireland exists only as an opt-in via Smartsheet Regions rather than a contractual guarantee, it still runs on a US-headquartered hyperscaler, and personal data may be kept up to seven years after last contact. 3 4 5
The Bootstrapper
The vendor is a US company with default hosting on AWS East and primary processing in the United States, and EU residency exists only as an opt-in via the regional offering on AWS EU (Germany/Ireland). The paperwork is genuinely there — a Data Processing Addendum, Standard Contractual Clauses, a published subprocessor list — so this reads as compliance language over European substance rather than a European setup. 3 4 5
The Enterprise Architect
This is a US company with primary processing in the USA and default hosting on AWS East; an EU environment on AWS Germany or Ireland exists only as an opt-in via Smartsheet Regions. The compliance paperwork is real — a Data Processing Addendum, Standard Contractual Clauses, DPF participation and a published subprocessor list — but we found no public information on ownership or contractually fixed EU residency, so the substance sits in the paperwork rather than the defaults. 3 4 5
The UX Purist
This is a US company headquartered in Washington state, processing primarily in the United States and hosted by default on AWS East in Virginia/Ohio, under Data Privacy Framework commitments enforced by the US Federal Trade Commission; EU hosting on AWS Germany or Ireland exists only as an opt-in choice via Regions. The paperwork is present — a data processing addendum, standard contractual clauses, a public subprocessor list — but the defaults sit under US jurisdiction. 3 4 5
The Integrator
The compliance paperwork is thorough — a data processing addendum, SCCs with the UK addendum, DPF certification, a published subprocessor list, a BAA — but the substance is American: a Washington-state controller with primary processing stated as the United States and default hosting in AWS East, Virginia/Ohio. An EU environment on AWS Germany/Ireland exists only as an opt-in via Smartsheet Regions, so European residency is a choice the customer must actively make rather than the default posture. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
A US company processing primarily in the United States, hosting customers by default in AWS East Virginia/Ohio; the EU option is opt-in via Regions and still runs on AWS, a US-headquartered provider within CLOUD Act reach. The DPA, SCCs and Data Privacy Framework certification are paperwork over substance — disputes run through JAMS with FTC enforcement and a 45-day complaint response window. 3 4 5
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
The help center is deep and current in English and German, a community forum handles feature requests, and support runs 24x7 by phone and chat with an AI-powered in-app chat marked included. The sub-two-hour first-response SLA and Pro Desk coaching belong to the Premium support package, and I found no public information on a visible product changelog. 14 12 15 9
The Bootstrapper
Base Support covers every plan type with 24x7 phone and chat plus an included AI in-app chat, the help center articles I can see are deep and current, and a community forum handles peer help. The sub-two-hour first response SLA and Pro Desk coaching sessions belong to the higher packages, and we found no public information on response times for the entry-level base tier. 10 12 14 15
The Enterprise Architect
Help-center documentation runs deep in multiple languages, including onboarding learning tracks and a downloadable API reference, there is a user community with feature requests, and support offers 24x7 phone and chat with in-app AI chat. Support is tiered — the under-two-hours first-response commitment sits in the Premium package that Business and Enterprise buy as an add-on — and we found no public information on a visible changelog. 14 12 15 10
The UX Purist
Documentation is deep and localized, with learning tracks, community forums and an API reference complete enough to download as a spec, while support runs 24x7 by phone and chat on a base tier for every plan. The under-two-hour first-response promise and Pro Desk coaching sit in the premium packages, and we found no public information on a visible product changelog. 6 12 14 15
The Integrator
Documentation is deep and honest, in English and German, down to per-view limitations and an API reference with downloadable OpenAPI specs, backed by 24x7 phone and chat on all plan types, in-app AI chat, a community forum, a sub-two-hour first-response commitment and a 99.9% availability SLA. That first-response speed belongs to the Premium package, and premium features sit as add-ons to Business and Enterprise, so support depth does depend on the tier. 4 6 12 14 15
The Skeptic
Deep, current help-center articles with structured learning tracks, API documentation with downloadable specs, a community forum, and 24x7 phone and chat support advertised across plan tiers. The under-two-hour first-response SLA sits in the premium package that Business and Enterprise must buy as an add-on, and we found no public information on a visible product changelog. 6 12 14 15
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
Pro at 8 € per Member/month and Business at 17 € per Member/month are printed with billing period and seat minimums, and the Dynamic View add-on is disclosed at from 120€/month. Both self-serve numbers are billed yearly only, tax treatment is unstated on the page, and Enterprise and Advanced Work Management remain custom-priced tiers that real buyers will need. 2 7
The Bootstrapper
Pro at 8 € per Member/month and Business at 17 € per Member/month are printed with yearly billing stated and seat ranges visible, so both a 3-seat and a 30-seat buyer can read their number before talking to anyone. But the headline is annual-only, Enterprise (10+ Members) and Advanced Work Management are custom pricing, Dynamic View is an add-on from 120€/month, and we found no public information on tax treatment. 2 7
The Enterprise Architect
Both self-serve tiers carry public prices with seat ranges — Pro at 8 € per Member/month for 1-10 Members and Business at 17 € per Member/month for 3+ Members, each billed yearly — and even the Dynamic View add-on is shown From 120€/month. The captured prices are yearly-billing figures with no monthly figure or tax treatment stated, and Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are custom-priced, so the number a buyer needs still depends on the tier mix. 2 7
The UX Purist
Both self-serve plans carry a stated per-member price — "8 €" Pro and "17 €" Business — with the yearly billing period named on the page, but that is an annual-only headline with no tax treatment stated, and both Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are opaque "Custom pricing" tiers while real capability such as directory integrations sits behind Enterprise. An add-on also surfaces separately at "From 120€/month", so the headline is not the invoice. 2
The Integrator
Pro at "8 € per Member/month Billed yearly" and Business at "17 € per Member/month Billed yearly" are public with seat minimums and guest terms stated. But the headlines are annual-only, tax treatment is not stated, Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are both custom-priced, and Dynamic View enters as an add-on "From 120€/month" — a buyer still cannot pin the full payable cost before a conversation. 2 7
The Skeptic
Two self-serve tiers carry public numbers — Pro at "8 € per Member/month Billed yearly" and Business at "17 € per Member/month Billed yearly" — and a free trial is offered. But the headline is annual-only, tax treatment is never stated, Enterprise and Advanced Work Management both sit at "Custom pricing", and the Dynamic View add-on is quoted only "From 120€/month". 2 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 30 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 23 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 14 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (15)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +2 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 20 Aug 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Trust center www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 20 Aug 2026 Details →
- 5 Legal notice de.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations — found from sitemap www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Integrations — found from sitemap www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Support & documentation — found from sitemap www.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Support & documentation — found from sitemap help.smartsheet.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →