Property & WEG Management
ADIVA
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH · www.adiva.de
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
ADIVA at a glance
- Vendor
- Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates ADIVA 0/5, the mean of 6 judges. ADIVA is listed under Property & WEG Management with vendor Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH, but the single captured page is a notice that the adiva.de domain stands for sale by its owner — anonymous negotiation on request, a transfer by auth-code supervised by an escrow team, payment released to the seller only after transfer, verified by SEG HOST. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
ADIVA is listed under Property & WEG Management with vendor Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH, but the single captured page is a notice that the adiva.de domain stands for sale by its owner — anonymous negotiation on request, a transfer by auth-code supervised by an escrow team, payment released to the seller only after transfer, verified by SEG HOST. No product content appears on the page. WEG accounting, assembly and resolutions, owner self-service, maintenance and defects, documents and handover, and pricing transparency all sit at 0: we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan or a Jahresabrechnung, on meeting support or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung, on an owner or tenant portal, on defect intake or maintenance scheduling, or on any public price an administrator could budget against. Sovereignty is the only criterion that moved, ranging 0 to 2. The flagged splits list recorded none, yet the split is real: one judge credited the named vendor as the only European signal; the other five scored 0 because no sovereignty attributes are on record and the hosting and processing chain is unstated.
Speaks for it
- The vendor of record is named — Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH
- The captured page describes escrow-supervised domain transfers, with payment released only after a successful transfer
- A callback service and the email address info@seghost.de are published for questions
Held against it
- We found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys, or separate handling of the reserve fund
- We found no public information on convening owners' meetings, voting arithmetic, or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung
- We found no public information on an owner or tenant portal, defect intake, maintenance scheduling, or contractor assignment
- We found no public information on document management, retention periods, or a handover export of a community's records
- No sovereignty attributes are on record, and we found no public information on hosting location or subprocessors
Best for
- None that we can evidence — with every functional criterion at 0 and sovereignty at 0 to 2, the bench's scoring favors this product in no software-buying situation
- You are buying the adiva.de web address itself rather than WEG software — the captured page offers the domain for sale with escrow, a neutral valuation, and a callback service
Avoid if
- You need WEG accounting evidenced before shortlisting — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You need an owner or tenant portal demonstrated — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must compute an annual cost from published prices before signing anything
- You require a stated hosting location and a named subprocessor chain for owners' personal and financial records
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage | 0 of 5 |
| Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung | 0 of 5 |
| Owner & tenant self-service | 0 of 5 |
| Maintenance, defects & contractors | 0 of 5 |
| Documents, retention & handover | 0 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0 of 5 |
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The statutory financial cycle: business plan, annual settlement in the form the law and the BGH require, distribution keys, and the separate handling of reserve funds held in trust for the community.
0 — General bookkeeping only; no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, reserves treated as ordinary balances.
3 — Templates that help a human produce the documents, with distribution keys entered by hand and no separation of the Rücklage.
5 — Wirtschaftsplan and Jahresabrechnung generated from the ledger with configurable distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), and reserves booked separately.
8 — Settlement in the post-2021 BGH form with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, Vermögensbericht produced, heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV integrated, owner-change apportionment mid-year handled, and Hausgeld arrears tracked with dunning.
10 — The whole financial year is discharged inside the system: multi-community bookkeeping with strict per-WEG separation, trust accounting for reserves with its own reporting, settlement documents an accountant would sign, and the arithmetic auditable back to individual postings.
The WEG Administrator
The only captured page for ADIVA is a domain-for-sale listing run through an escrow team, not a product page; we found no public information on a business plan, an annual settlement, distribution keys or the separate handling of reserve funds. Nothing in the capture evidences even general bookkeeping, so the statutory financial year is not addressed at all. 1
The Advisory Board Member
The only captured page offers the domain adiva.de for sale by its owner with escrow transfer — it contains no product content at all. We found no public information on a business plan, annual settlement, distribution keys or the separate handling of the reserve fund, so there is no arithmetic here I could follow back to a posting. 1
The Accountant
The single capture is a domain-for-sale page; we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys, or any separate booking of the Rücklage. There is no ledger in evidence to audit, so no settlement exists for an accountant to sign. 1
The Portfolio Manager
The captured page is a domain-for-sale notice verified by a hosting broker, and I found no public information on a business plan, annual settlement, distribution keys or reserve handling. There is no WEG financial product visible here at all, so nothing for a portfolio running thousands of units to evaluate. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The single captured page advertises the adiva.de domain itself for sale through an escrow service; we found no public information on a business plan, annual settlement, distribution keys or reserve-fund accounting. Nothing on the page evidences even general community bookkeeping, so the statutory financial cycle is entirely unevidenced. 1
The Skeptic
The one captured page concerns the sale of the adiva.de domain — anonymous negotiation, escrow, transfer by auth-code — and property management appears only in the vendor category line. We found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the post-2021 form, distribution keys, or separate custody of the Rücklage. 1
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Convening, running and recording the owners' meeting — including the resolution register the law requires the administrator to maintain, and the majority arithmetic that decides whether a resolution stands.
0 — No meeting support; invitations and minutes are written elsewhere and the Beschluss-Sammlung is a document somewhere.
3 — Invitation templates and a place to store minutes, but no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained resolution register.
5 — Agenda-driven invitations respecting the notice period, attendance and proxy recording, voting with the common majority types, and a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a numbered register.
8 — Quorum and majority computed per resolution type including MEA-weighted and qualified majorities, proxies and voting restrictions handled, minutes generated from the recorded votes, and the register maintained continuously with amendment and invalidation notes as § 24 (7) requires.
10 — The meeting is conducted in the system: hybrid or written circulation procedures supported with their own legal rules, contested resolutions flagged within the challenge period, the register complete and exportable as evidence, and every entry traceable to the meeting that produced it.
The WEG Administrator
Everything on the captured page concerns transferring a domain — anonymous negotiation, escrow, one hundred percent transfer success since 2011 — and we found no public information on invitations, voting, minutes or a resolution register. No meeting support is in evidence of any kind. 1
The Advisory Board Member
The captured page concerns a domain sale and says nothing about convening a meeting, voting arithmetic or a resolution register. We found no public information on meeting support of any kind, so I cannot check whether a Beschluss-Sammlung would even be kept. 1
The Accountant
We found no public information on invitations, agenda structure, majority arithmetic or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung; the captured page concerns domain escrow and anonymous negotiation of a URL. Every meeting duty would be discharged outside anything the captured page shows. 1
The Portfolio Manager
I found no public information on invitations, agenda structure, voting, majority arithmetic or a maintained resolution register. What the page does describe is anonymous negotiation, escrow and a transfer by auth-code — domain-sale logistics, not owners' meetings. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on convening owners' meetings, notice periods, voting, majority arithmetic or a maintained resolution register. The only process described in the capture is anonymous domain negotiation and transfer, which has no bearing on a meeting cycle. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on convening or running an owners' meeting: no agenda handling, no attendance or proxy recording, no voting support, and no maintained Beschluss-Sammlung. The transfer-escrow process described on the page concerns domains, not resolutions. 1
Owner & tenant self-service
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How an owner exercises their right to see the records, and how much routine correspondence the portal removes: statements, documents, meeting papers, defect reporting.
0 — No portal; every request is answered by email or post.
3 — A document download area with no per-owner scoping — everyone sees the same folder, or access is by emailed link.
5 — Per-owner login showing their own statements, documents and meeting papers, with a defect or request form that reaches the administrator.
8 — Owners and tenants scoped separately with correct visibility, meeting papers and voting available in the portal, defect reports with status visible to the reporter, and consumption or arrears shown per unit.
10 — The portal discharges the disclosure duty: every record an owner is entitled to see available on demand with an access log, tenant and owner views strictly separated, notifications for statutory deadlines, and enough self-service that routine correspondence largely disappears.
The WEG Administrator
We found no public information on an owner or tenant portal; the captured page offers only a callback service and an email address for domain-brokerage questions. Every owner request would have to be answered outside any evidenced system. 1
The Advisory Board Member
We found no public information on an owner or tenant portal; the captured page is a domain-for-sale listing whose callback service and contact concern domain buyers. Nothing indicates that statements, meeting papers or defect reports would ever reach a neighbour online. 1
The Accountant
No owner or tenant portal appears in the capture; the page speaks of discretion, escrow and a callback service for domain buyers. We found no public information on per-owner statements, meeting papers or defect reporting. 1
The Portfolio Manager
I found no public information on any owner or tenant portal, statements, documents, meeting papers or defect forms. The only support facts on record are a callback service and an email address for the domain-transfer team. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on any owner or tenant portal, per-owner scoping of statements or documents, defect reporting or an access log. Where a system would hold bank details and arrears of people who never chose the vendor, strictly separated visibility is not evidenced in any form. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on an owner or tenant portal — no per-owner statements, documents, meeting papers, or a defect form reaching an administrator. The only self-service in the capture is a callback service and a neutral domain valuation. 1
Maintenance, defects & contractors
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The building side: defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, and the evidence trail when something goes wrong.
0 — Defects arrive by phone and live in a notebook; no maintenance schedule.
3 — A ticket or note list per property, contractors contacted outside the system, no recurring maintenance calendar.
5 — Defect records per unit or property with status and photos, contractor assignment with a work order, and a recurring maintenance schedule with reminders.
8 — Warranty and Gewährleistung periods tracked against the responsible trade, statutory inspections (lift, heating, fire safety, drinking-water) scheduled with proof of completion stored, quotes and invoices linked to the defect, and cost allocated to the correct account.
10 — A defensible operating record: every obligation, inspection and defect with its evidence and dates, contractor performance visible, budget consumption against the Wirtschaftsplan tracked live, and a history that answers the question of what the administrator knew and when.
The WEG Administrator
The capture is a marketplace listing for the domain itself, and we found no public information on defect intake, maintenance scheduling, contractor assignment or evidence trails. Nothing on the building side is in evidence. 1
The Advisory Board Member
We found no public information on defect intake, recurring maintenance obligations, inspections or contractor handling. The support contact shown relates to domain valuation and transfer, not to running a building. 1
The Accountant
We found no public information on defect intake, recurring maintenance obligations or contractor assignment — the capture describes a transfer via Auth-Code, not a work order. No inspection dates, no warranty tracking, no evidence trail of any kind. 1
The Portfolio Manager
I found no public information on defect intake, recurring maintenance schedules, statutory inspections, proof storage or contractor assignment. From where I sit, nothing shows a single lift or fire-safety inspection could be scheduled with its evidence retained. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on defect intake, recurring maintenance schedules, statutory inspections, contractor assignment or evidence trails. Nothing captured addresses the building side of administration at all. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on defect intake and tracking, recurring maintenance obligations, contractor assignment, or statutory inspections with stored proof. The cited "100% Transfererfolg seit 2011" refers to domain transfers, not building operations. 1
Documents, retention & handover
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The archive and the exit. A Verwalter's appointment is finite by law, and the records belong to the community — so handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.
0 — Documents live on a shared drive; no retention rules, and handover means copying folders.
3 — Central document storage per property with folders and upload, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export.
5 — Structured document management per property and unit with search, retention periods stated, and a documented export of a community's records.
8 — Full-text search across the archive, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, and a complete handover package (ledger, register, documents, master data) in open formats.
10 — Handover is a first-class feature rather than an obstacle: a complete, structured export a successor administrator can actually load, retention executed per statutory period, an access log over the archive, and no commercial friction placed in the way of a community leaving.
The WEG Administrator
We found no public information on document management, retention rules or a handover export for communities; the only transfer described is the domain transfer via auth-code under escrow supervision. A statutory handover of records to a successor administrator is not addressed anywhere in the capture. 1
The Advisory Board Member
The captured page gives no evidence of document management, retention periods, versioning or a handover export, and we found no public information on any of it. For a community whose records belong to it by law, that leaves nothing to inspect on handover. 1
The Accountant
The capture advertises a transfer with 100% success since 2011 — for a domain, not for a community's ledger, register and archive. We found no public information on document storage, retention periods or a structured export a successor administrator could load. 1
The Portfolio Manager
I found no public information on document management, versioning, retention periods or a defined handover export. The one transfer procedure described — escrow with money released after a transfer by auth-code — concerns the website address, not a community's records. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on document management, versioning, retention periods that execute, archive access logs or a handover export for a community. The capture describes only domain escrow with payment released after transfer, which says nothing about records belonging to a community. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on document management, retention periods, versioning, or a defined handover export of a community's records. The escrow-and-transfer procedure described on the page relates solely to the sale of the adiva.de domain, not to records belonging to a community. 1
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the community's financial and personal records live, who the contracting entity is, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — document OCR, AI features, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — German or EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and an export that keeps the community compliant for the full retention period after the appointment ends.
The WEG Administrator
No sovereignty attributes are on record, and the captured page states nothing about hosting, contracting entity or subprocessors — its only named parties are the domain holder and the SEG HOST escrow team. With the whole chain unstated, I can give this no credit. 1
The Advisory Board Member
No sovereignty attributes are on record — hosting, the contracting entity behind any product and every subprocessor are unstated. The only operator the captured page names is the domain-brokerage side (SEG HOST), which tells me nothing about where a community's financial and personal records would live. 1
The Accountant
No sovereignty attributes are on record; we found no public information on hosting location, the contracting entity behind any software, or subprocessors — the only operator named is the domain verifier SEG HOST. Hosting unstated and subprocessors unnamed is what the evidence leaves me with. 1
The Portfolio Manager
No sovereignty attributes are on record, and I found no public information on hosting location, the product's contracting entity, subprocessors or certification. The capture is verified by SEG HOST and framed around a domain broker's escrow process, so my communities' financial records have no evidenced European footing. 1
The Data Protection Officer
No sovereignty attributes are on record and the capture states nothing about hosting, the processing entity, certification or any subprocessor — the support contact shown is a domain escrow operator. With personal and financial records of non-consenting people at stake and every link in the chain unnamed, this scores at the bottom. 1
The Skeptic
No sovereignty attributes are on record, and the sole capture is a domain-sale notice verified by the intermediary SEG HOST; we found no public information on hosting location, a subprocessor list, or certification. The named vendor, Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH, is the only European signal, with the hosting and processing chain entirely unstated. 1
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether an administrator can compute the real annual cost for the units under management — including modules, per-community fees and setup — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every quote is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-unit or per-community headline exists, but modules, minimum terms, setup or migration fees are unstated.
5 — Per-unit or per-community prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (portal, accounting module, document storage) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-unit maths, minimum term, setup and migration costs and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of units and communities including every module, with no per-seat surprises and any exit or export fee stated outright.
The WEG Administrator
The only pricing context in the capture is that domain negotiations run anonymously on request, with payment released through escrow after transfer; we found no public information on any licence, per-unit or per-community price for software. An administrator cannot compute any annual cost from this page. 1
The Advisory Board Member
No public prices appear on the captured page; the only transaction terms described concern domain escrow. We found no public information on licence, per-unit, setup or migration costs, so an administrator cannot compute an annual cost from public pages at all. 1
The Accountant
We found no public prices at all: the capture states the domain stands for sale by its holder but quotes no figure, and nothing about software tiers, modules, terms, setup or VAT. An administrator cannot compute an annual cost for the units under management from this. 1
The Portfolio Manager
No public prices of any kind appear for a product — not per unit, per community, module, setup or migration. The only payment language on record describes escrow for the domain purchase itself, with money released to the seller after transfer, which is not a figure I could budget against. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The only commercial content captured is a domain sale with an on-request, neutral valuation; we found no public prices for software tiers, modules, per-unit maths, terms, setup or VAT. An administrator cannot begin to compute an annual cost from what is published. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public price of any kind — not per unit, not per community, and no figure even for the domain itself. An administrator cannot compute an annual cost from public pages; the capture states only that negotiations can, if desired, run anonymously. 1
Questions about ADIVA
Is ADIVA European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where ADIVA is based.
Where does ADIVA store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does ADIVA have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to ADIVA?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Condomana (3/5), Immoware24 (2.5/5) and etg24 (2.5/5) highest among the other 18 Property & WEG Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Condomana (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: ADIVA alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (adiva.de). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (1)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.adiva.de Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →