Time Tracking & Attendance
Papershift
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Papershift GmbH · www.papershift.com
Compare with TimeTac → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Papershift is a cloud time-tracking and attendance platform from Papershift GmbH, Karlsruhe. Strongest is the payroll export, 7 to 8: DATEV and LODAS are named, payrolls generate automatically at a chosen cutoff, night, Sunday and holiday surcharges are calculated, and a red warning triangle flags time or absence created after generation. Weakest is project and billing, a uniform 4: project times are assignable to employee, order or customer with tags and notes, but we found no public information on a billable flag, rate cards, budgets or an invoice-ready export. Working time law scores 4 to 5 — revision-secure start, end and pause records meet the duty the vendor ties to the 2022 Federal Labour Court ruling, while we found no public information on rest-period checks or a stated retention period. The widest spread is sovereignty, 4 to 6: German-entity paperwork and the pricing-page EU-hosting bullet are credited, but subprocessor names stay behind a downloadable annex. Pricing transparency is a uniform 6, and the captured pages give different figures for the per-employee entry price and the tier prices.
Speaks for it
- Payroll export scores 7 to 8, with DATEV and LODAS named, automatic generation at a chosen cutoff and automatic night, Sunday and holiday surcharges.
- Absences feed directly into shift planning with automatic schedule adjustment, keeping planning and recording in one system.
- Start, end and pauses are documented revision-secure with configurable per-employee break rules.
- App, browser and a shared tablet terminal with PIN or signature cover desk and deskless crews.
- Public pricing covers three tiers, a 39,00 € monthly base fee plus VAT, a 10 % saving on annual payment and payroll at €4 per employee and month monthly or €3 with annual payment.
Held against it
- Project and billing scores a uniform 4; we found no public information on a billable flag, rate cards, budget tracking or an invoice-ready export.
- Working time law scores 4 to 5; we found no public information on checks for daily maximum hours or the eleven-hour rest period, or on a stated retention period.
- We found no public information on a lock step before payroll transmission or on retroactive correction after the close.
- The captured pages give different figures for the per-employee entry price and the tier prices, so the annual invoice is not computable from the public pages alone.
- We found no public information naming the data-centre provider or the subprocessor chain, which sits behind a downloadable annex rather than a published page.
Best for
- You run shift operations — the vendor lists gastronomy, retail, logistics and production among its industries — and want absences, duty roster and time recording in one system with a DATEV or LODAS handoff to your tax adviser.
- You pay a German payroll and want night, Sunday and holiday surcharges calculated automatically with wage types, capping and special cases such as Kurzarbeitergeld, Baulohn and public-service pay structures.
- You need deskless and field crews to stamp via app, browser or a shared tablet terminal, with geofencing and PIN or signature identification.
- You want leave entitlement, carry-over and sickness handled automatically with approval paths and a team calendar before a roster is published.
Avoid if
- Your core need is client-facing project billing — this criterion scored a uniform 4, and we found no public information on a billable flag or an invoice-ready export, so test invoicing end to end in the 14-day free trial before buying.
- You need documented checks against daily maximum hours or the eleven-hour rest period, or a stated retention period for the time record — working time law scored 4 to 5 and we found no public information on these.
- You must see the full subprocessor chain or a named data-centre provider before contracting or a works-council review — the annex is a download, and sovereignty scored 4 to 6.
- You need to compute your exact annual invoice from public pages — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
Capture in the real workplace
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.
0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.
3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.
5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.
8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.
10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.
The Operations Lead
App, browser and a tablet-based terminal for shared clock-in are all evidenced, offline use with cloud sync is claimed, and employees can view and edit their own times while managers approve them — that covers my office, workshop and field crews. We found no public information on dedicated hardware terminals or badge readers, on bulk corrections, or on the stated limits of the GPS geofencing, so it stays one step below the top of the scale. 2 3 6 7
The Payroll Officer
App, browser and a stationary tablet terminal give desk and deskless workers a way to stamp, offline use is stated with real-time sync, and geofencing confines where bookings count. Employees can view and edit their own times with online approval and a change history on the higher plan, but I found no public information on badge readers or bulk correction, and the geofencing description names no limits. 2 3 6 7 8
The Works Council Advocate
App, browser and a shared tablet terminal where employees identify by PIN or signature, plus offline use with real-time sync to the cloud — desk and deskless are covered, and employees can view and edit their own records with approval shown. Geofencing via GPS restricts where times may be recorded, but I found no public information on what the GPS data stores or whether it can be switched off, and the change history is gated to the top plan. 2 3 6 7
The Agency Owner
App, browser and a shared tablet terminal with offline capture that syncs to the cloud, plus GPS geofencing and signature or PIN identification, cover desk, field and shift crews, and employees edit their own punches with admin approval on top. The geofencing page never states its limits, and we found no public information on bulk corrections or dedicated hardware badge readers. 3 6 7
The Field Supervisor
App, browser and a shared tablet terminal with PIN or signature are all confirmed, so a site crew can stamp without a desk, and employees can edit their own times with an approval view behind it. Offline use is claimed on the app pages, but nothing captured says what happens to a punch made without signal or when it lands, and we found no public information on bulk corrections or on the limits of the geofencing. A change history exists on the Professional plan, which is the right instinct, but the offline story is one line, not a design. 2 3 6 7 8
The Skeptic
App, browser and a tablet-based terminal are all offered, offline use is claimed with real-time cloud sync, and employees identify by PIN or signature, edit their own records and have them approved online. The stationary terminal is a tablet setup rather than vendor hardware or badge readers, the GPS geofencing claim states no limits, and the change history that would make corrections attributable sits in the Professional plan — we found no public information on bulk correction. 3 6 7 2 8
Working-time law & audit record
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.
0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.
3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.
5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.
8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.
10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.
The Operations Lead
Per-employee break rules, revision-safe documentation of start, end and breaks, and the vendor's own statement of the 2022 Federal Labour Court recording duty give me a record I can put in front of an inspector. We found no public information on warnings at the eight or ten-hour daily maximum, on eleven-hour rest-period checks, or on a defined retention period for the time records. 2 3 7 5
The Payroll Officer
Start, end and pauses are documented tamper-resistantly, break rules are configurable per employee, and the recording duty is acknowledged by name with individual reports to back it. I found no public information on daily maximum hours or the eleven-hour rest period, no stated retention period behind the generic deletion promise, and nothing on standby or travel time. 2 3 6 7 5
The Works Council Advocate
The vendor itself names the 2022 Federal Labour Court decision and stores start, end and breaks automatically and revision-secure, with employee-specific break rules and an overtime account — that is the core record. I found no public information on checks for the eight and ten-hour daily maximum or the eleven-hour rest period, and the retention statement names no period, only deletion once retention periods lapse. 2 3 7 5
The Agency Owner
Revision-secure documentation of start, end and pauses with per-employee break rules and a change history on the top plan clears the recording-duty floor that the vendor itself ties to the 2022 labour court ruling. We found no public information on warnings for the eight and ten-hour daily maxima or the eleven-hour rest period, no stated retention period for the working-time record, and no export built for an inspection — the floor, not the product. 2 3 5
The Field Supervisor
The vendor cites the 2022 labour court ruling and stores begin, end and pauses revision-secure with a change history on the Professional plan, plus configurable per-employee break rules — the core recording duty is taken seriously. We found no public information on checks against the daily maximum or the eleven-hour rest period, on documented exceptions, or on a stated retention period for the time record itself; the privacy page only promises deletion after retention periods generally. That is a record that starts well and thins out exactly where an inspector would push. 2 3 7 11 5
The Skeptic
The vendor names the 2022 Federal Labour Court decision and claims start, end and pauses are documented revision-secure, with employee-specific break rules and a change history in the Professional plan. We found no public information on daily maximum-hour or rest-period checks, the deletion clause names no retention period, and the lexicon working-time article is a generic definition rather than a mapping of features to the working-hours statute. 3 2 5 8
Absence & shift planning
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.
0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.
3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.
5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.
8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.
10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.
The Operations Lead
Entitlement, remaining leave and carry-over are calculated automatically, sick days and vacation bans are handled, and absences feed directly into a duty roster that can auto-fill and auto-adjust — planning and recording behave as one system. We found no public information on pro-rata entitlement, substitution or swap workflows, or rest-period checks when building shift templates. 2 9 10
The Payroll Officer
Entitlement, remaining leave and carry-over calculate automatically, sickness and vacation bans are handled, and absences flow directly into the duty roster with planned target hours landing in time recording — planning and recording are one system. Substitution and swap workflows, pro-rata entitlement and rest checks during scheduling are where I found no public information. 2 3 9 10
The Works Council Advocate
Holiday entitlement, remaining leave and carry-over are calculated automatically, sick days and other absences run through approval paths, and absences feed directly into shift planning with automatic adjustment — the two halves talk to each other. Employee-specific holidays and qualifications exist, yet I found no public information on substitution and swap workflows or rest-period checks before a roster is published. 2 9 10
The Agency Owner
Automatic entitlement, carry-over and sickness recording, an absence calendar, and shift planning that absences feed into directly, with automatic shift assignment, employee-specific holidays and qualification tags pushing past the basics. We found no public information on pro-rata entitlement or rest-period checks in the roster, and substitution goes only as far as backup-staff planning language. 2 9 10
The Field Supervisor
Entitlement, carry-over and sickness are computed automatically with approval paths and a team calendar, and absences flow straight into the duty roster, which then fills shifts automatically — one system, not two calendars, which is what I want before a Monday shift. Qualification tags, holiday rules and vacation bans with block periods are confirmed. We found no public information on substitution or swap workflows, pro-rata entitlement, or rest-period checks before a plan is published. 2 8 9 10
The Skeptic
Leave entitlement, residual leave and carry-over are calculated automatically, sickness and other absences run through approval paths and a team calendar, and absences feed directly into shift planning with automatic schedule adjustment. Digital shift planning, employee-specific public holidays and automatic scheduling sit in the Professional or Premium plans, and we found no public information on pro-rata entitlement, substitution or swap workflows, or rest-period checks when a roster is published. 10 9 2 8
Project, cost-centre & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.
0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.
3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.
5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.
8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.
10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.
The Operations Lead
Recorded time can carry an assignment to employee, order or customer, plus tags and notes, with custom reports available, and an hourly wage sits in the employee profile for payroll. We found no public information on a billable flag, cost centres, budget tracking or an invoice-ready export, so for client-facing billing the package is thinner than for attendance. 6 11 12
The Payroll Officer
Project times can be uniquely assigned to an employee, an order or a customer, carry tags and notes, and reports run over them, with sevdesk named for invoicing. I found no public information on a billable flag, project rates or budget tracking, so recorded time reaches the client through generic invoicing rather than as a designed bill. 1 8 11
The Works Council Advocate
Every project time can be assigned to an employee, an order or a customer, with tags and notes, an hourly wage stored per employee and reports over costs and hours offered. I found no public information on a billable flag, budget tracking or an invoice-ready export; sevdesk is named as an integration, which is where the billing path appears to end. 1 11 12
The Agency Owner
Project times can be assigned to employee, order and customer with tags, notes and a tasks add-in — the skeleton of what I bill against, but only that. We found no public information on a billable flag, client rate cards, budget warnings or an invoice-ready export; sevdesk appears as a named integration with nothing stated about what time data flows into it. 1 8 11
The Field Supervisor
Project times can be booked uniquely to a customer or order and carry tags and notes, with reports over costs, hours and metrics. But the hourly wage we see lives in the employee profile for payroll purposes, and we found no public information on a billable flag, client-facing rates or rate cards, budget tracking, or an invoice-ready export built from project time. Time gets attributed; whether it becomes revenue is not shown. 2 1 6 11 12
The Skeptic
Project times can be assigned to an employee, an order or a customer, carry tags and notes, feed individual reports, and a tasks add-in and a sevdesk connector exist in the marketplace. We found no public information on a billable flag, rate cards by role or project, budget tracking with warnings, or an invoice-ready export — the per-person hourly wage shown is a payroll setting rather than project billing. 11 8 1 12
Payroll handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.
0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.
3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.
5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.
8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.
10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.
The Operations Lead
DATEV and LODAS exports with a flexible payroll period, payroll generation automated at a chosen cutoff, night, Sunday and holiday surcharges modelled, and a warning indicator when times change after the payroll was created — that is close to a maintained handoff, with retro awareness. We found no public information on a lock step before transmission or on scoped access for the tax adviser. 2 3 12 13 14
The Payroll Officer
This handoff is designed, not exported: DATEV and LODAS by name, wage types per location with percentage rates covering night, Sunday and holiday, automatic payroll at a chosen cutoff, automatic time reconciliation with allowances, and a red warning when time or absence arrives after payroll creation — the correction after the close is at least seen. I found no public information on a lock step before transmission or a retro re-run, which keeps it off the top rung. 2 12 13 14
The Works Council Advocate
DATEV and LODAS are named, with a DATEV Detail export for the tax office, payroll generated automatically at a chosen cutoff, and Sunday, holiday and night surcharges computed automatically — a real handoff rather than retyping. A red warning triangle flags time or absence data created after payroll generation; I found no public information on a formal lock before transmission or scoped access for the tax adviser. 2 12 13 14
The Agency Owner
DATEV named repeatedly with a detail export to the tax office, LODAS and SAGE in the format list, automatic payroll generation at a chosen cutoff, and automatic night, Sunday and holiday surcharges including short-time work and construction pay — a real handoff, not a retyped spreadsheet. A red warning triangle flags time or absence data created after payroll generation, but we found no public information on a formal lock step before transmission or corrections after the close. 2 12 13 14
The Field Supervisor
DATEV has its own maintained marketplace page with a „DATEV Detail“ export to the tax office, LODAS and SAGE are named, and night, Sunday and holiday surcharges calculate automatically with wage types, capping, tariff tables and special cases like Kurzarbeitergeld. Payrolls generate automatically at a chosen cutoff date and a red warning triangle flags time entered after generation. We found no public information on a lock step before transmission or retro runs after the close, so the month is not yet sealed by design. 2 12 13 14
The Skeptic
DATEV is a named integration with a "DATEV Detail" export to the tax office, LODAS and SAGE are further named formats, and night, Sunday and holiday surcharges are calculated with payrolls generated automatically at a chosen cutoff date plus a red warning when time or absence data arrives after generation. The DATEV and LODAS export and the individual surcharge wage types are Professional-plan features with payroll priced separately per employee, and we found no public information on a lock or approval step before transmission or on retroactive correction after the close. 13 14 2 12
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.
The Operations Lead
The imprint shows a German GmbH with a Mannheim commercial-register entry and a German VAT ID, EU hosting is stated on the pricing page, and a subprocessor annex to the data-processing agreement is offered as a download. We found no public information naming the data-centre or hosting provider, and the subprocessor list is an annex download rather than a published page, so I cannot see the chain before contracting. 4 5 2
The Payroll Officer
A German GmbH with register court, address and VAT ID is confirmed, EU hosting is declared, and a subprocessor annex, technical measures annex and public processing register are downloadable. I found no public information naming the data-centre provider or the subprocessor chain itself, and the EU hosting line is a pricing-page bullet rather than a named facility. 4 5 2
The Works Council Advocate
The imprint shows a Karlsruhe company registered at the Mannheim court, and EU hosting is promised as a bullet on the pricing page — but no server location or hosting provider is named, and the subcontractor annex is a download rather than a published list. Before I co-sign anything under co-determination I need to know every processor who touches my people's times, and that question stays open. 4 5 2
The Agency Owner
A German contracting entity with register court and VAT ID on the imprint, EU hosting stated as a pricing-page bullet, and downloadable DPA annexes covering subcontractors and technical measures alongside a public processing register. The subprocessor chain stays behind a download rather than published, no data-centre provider is named, and the privacy page states no server location. 4 5 2
The Field Supervisor
The imprint names Papershift GmbH in Karlsruhe with a Mannheim commercial register entry, EU hosting is stated on the pricing page, and the privacy pages publish the data-processing agreement with annexes for subcontractors and technical measures alongside a public processing register. The hosting claim is a feature bullet, and we found no public information naming the data-centre provider or the subprocessors behind the downloadable annex. Solid German paperwork; the chain underneath sits a download away. 4 5 2
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is verifiably German — Karlsruhe address, Mannheim commercial register, German VAT identification — and a public processing register plus downloadable agreement annexes for subcontractors and technical measures exist. EU hosting appears as a pricing-page bullet with no server location, data-centre provider or certification named, and the subcontractor names sit behind a download annex rather than a published list; we found no public information on the composition of the subprocessor chain or on any on-premises option. 4 5 2 11
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.
5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.
The Operations Lead
The three tiers carry public monthly and annual prices, a base fee of 39,00 € per month quoted as plus VAT, and payroll at €4 per employee and month on monthly payment; the project pages advertise from 3,50 € per employee and month, and it is not clear from the pages how the two figures combine. We found no public prices for the marketplace add-ons and no stated minimum term, so the real annual invoice still needs a conversation. 4 2 11 14
The Payroll Officer
Tier prices with billing period and VAT treatment are public, the 39,00 € monthly base fee is stated, and the payroll module carries its own price of €4 per employee and month monthly or €3 with annual payment. Marketplace add-ons, hardware and any seat minimum are unpriced, and the captured pages give different figures for the monthly price, so a buyer cannot compute the annual invoice cleanly. 2 11 14
The Works Council Advocate
All three tiers carry monthly prices with a 39,00 € base fee excluding VAT, a 10 % saving on annual payment, and the payroll module at 3 € per employee and month on annual payment or 4 € on monthly. Terminal hardware and the report add-ons carry no public number, and the tier prices are not shown per employee while another page speaks of packages from 3,50 EUR per employee per month — the annual invoice is not computable from the pages alone. 2 11 14
The Agency Owner
Three tiers priced monthly and annually with the billing period stated, a stated base fee plus VAT, and payroll at stated per-employee rates — most of the annual invoice is computable from public pages. The captured pages give different figures for the per-employee entry point and the tier prices, marketplace add-ons carry no numbers, and we found no public information on minimum terms. 2 11 14
The Field Supervisor
Three tiers, the 39,00 € monthly base fee marked plus VAT, the annual billing note with the 10 % saving, a from-price of 3,50 EUR je Mitarbeiter/Monat and a payroll module at €3 or €4 per employee and month are all public. But the per-employee from-price and the tier prices are not mapped to each other, and marketplace add-ons such as the full-service payroll and the reports module have no price we could find, nor terminal hardware. A buyer can estimate the year, not compute it. 2 11 14
The Skeptic
Three plan prices, a stated 39,00 € per month base fee plus VAT, a 10 % annual-payment discount, a starting price of 3,50 EUR per employee and month, and payroll priced separately at 4 € monthly or 3 € annually per employee give a buyer most of the annual invoice. Marketplace add-ons such as the reports module and the full-service payroll carry no published price, terminal hardware is unpriced, and we found no public information on a minimum term or on what seat quantity the plan prices assume. 2 11 14
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | EU only ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 2 Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 30 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. The statement is a feature bullet on the pricing page rather than a contractual commitment, and the privacy/security page names no server location or hosting provider.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 41 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 14 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (14)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 11 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 30 Aug 2026 Details →
- 3 Time recording www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 30 Aug 2026 Details →
- 4 Imprint www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 6 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap help.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap www.papershift.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →