CRM
noCRM.io
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by You Don't Need a CRM SAS · youdontneedacrm.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
noCRM.io is a lead-centric CRM from the French vendor You Don't Need a CRM SAS. Its strongest scores fall on automation and pricing transparency, each spanning 5 to 7, with integrations just behind at 5 to 6: the free no-code Butler runs trigger-filter-action workflows with round-robin lead assignment and automatic step-change logging, 23 simplified actions work through Zapier and Make, and native two-way email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo attaches to leads with open and click tracking. Each of the three tiers carries published prices — Starter at €11/user/month, Expert at €22/user/month, Dream at €33/user/month — with 20% VAT treatment and a 15-day free trial requiring no credit card, though the yearly discount reads only "save up to 40%" and captured pages give different figures for Starter under yearly billing. The weakest bands are sovereignty, data portability and contact management, each at 3 to 4: EU hosting is asserted without a named provider, we found no public information on a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list, and export columns depend on predefined field labels. Sales pipeline scores clustered at 4.
Speaks for it
- The Butler delivers free no-code automation on triggers, filters and actions, with round-robin lead assignment and automatic logging of step changes
- Native two-way email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo attaches to leads automatically, with open and click tracking
- Each of the three tiers carries a published per-user price — Starter at €11/user/month, Expert at €22/user/month, Dream at €33/user/month — with 20% VAT treatment and a 15-day free trial requiring no credit card
- A documented REST API version 2 offers webhooks, per-application revocable keys and a broad endpoint list
- Multiple pipelines with amounts and probabilities, closing reasons and per-rep goals give the sales pipeline real structure
Held against it
- We found no public information on a named hosting provider, a published data processing agreement or a subprocessor list
- Exporting first name, last name and e-mail as columns requires leads filled with the same labels as the predefined fields
- The Starter plan caps at 500 leads in one pipeline, keeps its five custom fields unavailable, and gates API access with the 3,000+ integrations count behind the Expert tier
- The documented API quota is 2,000 requests per day, with higher limits shown only as "Personalized"
- Yearly savings are published only as "save up to 40%", and the captured pages give different figures for the Starter price under yearly billing
Best for
- You run a small sales team and want no-code automation and round-robin lead routing without a consultant
- You sell from your inbox and want native two-way Gmail, Outlook or Yahoo email attached to the right leads
- You want published per-user prices and a 15-day free trial with no credit card required before committing
- You prefer a French vendor whose EU hosting is asserted as the default rather than sold as an upsell
Avoid if
- You must produce a published data processing agreement and a named subprocessor list for compliance sign-off
- Your finance team needs forecasts by team and period, required fields per stage or a custom report builder
- Your integration plan depends on sustained API volume beyond the documented 2,000 requests per day
- Your exit plan requires structured exports of activity history and attachments beyond lead-level Excel or JSON
The scores
Contact & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Solo Seller
The core model is deliberately lean — leads with statuses and tags, a prospect browser, client folders, and five custom fields that only appear above the entry plan, which honestly suits someone who refuses to configure an object model. Automatic activity history lands on the record without manual input. But we found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling or field-level validation, so hygiene beyond manual tidying is unevidenced. 3 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
Statuses, tags, pipelines with steps and five custom fields (unavailable on the entry plan) give each lead a real record with automatic activity history, but we found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or field-level permissions. As the officer for the people in those records, I note the clipper that captures contact data from LinkedIn profiles and a lead-enrichment widget — data acquired from the open web with no consent handling evidenced, which is a hygiene problem before the first note is typed. 3 6 7
The Sales Ops Lead
The lead-centric model with prospects, client folders, automatic activity logging and closing reasons captured with tags is real, but customization tops out at five generic custom fields that are unavailable in the entry plan. We found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or required fields, so record hygiene is not enforceable. 3 6 7
The RevOps Integrator
The model has real relations — leads, prospects, client folders, teams, steps and statuses — with activity history on the record and step changes logged automatically, which is more than a flat book. But customization tops out at five predefined custom fields gated above the Starter edition, and column-level export only works when lead fields carry the predefined labels. We found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or field-level permissions. 3 6 7 9
The Migrator
Leads, prospects and client folders relate properly, every pipeline step change is logged automatically, and closing reasons give real win/loss qualification. But the model shows only five custom fields, all of them unavailable on the Starter edition, and I found no public information on dedupe or merge tooling — the hygiene that decides whether an import comes in clean. 3 6 7
The Skeptic
The model is lead-first — prospects, client folders and tags — with five generic custom fields that the documentation itself withholds from the entry plan, so customization is cosmetic. We found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or field-level history; hygiene is left to operator discipline. 7 3 9
Pipeline & forecasting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.
0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.
3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.
5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.
8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.
10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.
The Solo Seller
Multiple pipelines (unlimited above the entry plan), amounts with probabilities, win/loss capture with closing reasons, and manager-visible goals per rep are all evidenced — enough process for a one-person shop between calls. We found no public information on required fields per stage, a custom report builder or any forecast view; reporting appears to be the canned lead performance graph. That is a pipeline that guides me but produces nothing a finance department would sign. 2 3 5
The Data Protection Officer
Multiple pipelines with steps, amounts with probability, and win/loss capture with closing reasons are real, and goals assigned to sales reps with manager visibility approach quota tracking — but we found no public information on required fields per stage, a custom report builder, or forecast views by team and period. What the pages evidence is prospecting analytics, not a forecast a finance department would accept. 2 3 5
The Sales Ops Lead
Multiple pipelines, amounts with probabilities, and win/loss capture with reasons are evidenced, and managers can assign goals per rep — but the only reporting shown is a canned lead-performance graph and a dashboard. We found no public information on required fields per stage, custom report building, or any forecast or quota-attainment rollup a finance team would accept. 2 3 5 7
The RevOps Integrator
Multiple pipelines with steps, win/loss capture with closing reasons, amounts with probabilities, per-rep goals and canned performance graphs are all evidenced. We found no public information on required fields per stage, stage gates, forecast rollups or a custom report builder — there is nothing here a finance department could compose into a forecast it signs. 2 3 5 7
The Migrator
Multiple pipelines, deal amounts with probabilities, and win/loss capture with closing reasons are real, and goals per rep plus the lost/active/won performance graph give managers standard views. I found no public information on required fields per stage, a custom report builder, or forecasts by team and period, so this reads as canned reporting rather than something finance signs off on. 2 3 5
The Skeptic
Multiple pipelines with amounts and probabilities, closing reasons tagged at qualification, per-rep goals and canned performance graphs put this above a plain kanban. We found no public information on required fields per stage, stage gates, quota tracking or forecast views by team and period — nothing here reads like reporting a finance department would sign. 2 3 5
Automation & workflows
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.
0 — No automation beyond email templates.
3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.
5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.
8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.
10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.
The Solo Seller
The Butler is a free, no-code trigger-filter-action engine with round-robin assignment, twenty-plus packaged actions on Zapier and Make, automatic logging of step changes, and webhooks — set up in an afternoon, no consultant, which is exactly what I pay for. It sits below the top because we found no public information on delays, branching sequences or per-step logs inside the product, and much of the depth rides on Zapier and Make bridges rather than native workflows. 5 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
The Butler — a free no-code builder on triggers, filters and actions — runs round-robin lead distribution, real-time updates from external systems, automatic logging of step changes and lead creation from forms, with deep Zapier and Make catalogues, webhooks and open/click tracking on emails. We found no public information on delays and branching inside sequences, per-step logs or error handling, and the caps that do appear — 5,000 emails per month, Expert-only field search — climb with the tier. 2 5 6 7 8
The Sales Ops Lead
The Butler is a free no-code assistant with trigger/filter/action workflows, automatic step-change logging, real-time lead sync and round-robin assignment, plus a deep Zapier/Make trigger and action catalog and email automation with open/click tracking. The 5,000 emails per month included is a real cap, and we found no public information on delays, branching beyond filters, sequence analytics or error handling, so it stops short of automation as infrastructure. 2 5 6 8
The RevOps Integrator
Trigger-filter-action workflows through the Butler — free rather than its own upsell — with round-robin lead assignment, twenty-three simplified actions callable from Zapier and Make, and webhook notifications on lead and status events. The caps are real: five thousand emails a month and two thousand API requests a day. We found no public information on delays, per-step logs, error handling or sequence analytics. 2 5 6 7
The Migrator
The Butler is a free no-code engine built on triggers, filters and actions, with round-robin lead distribution, automatic logging of step changes, and 23 documented simplified actions across Zapier and Make — routing that works without a consultant. I found no public information on delays or scheduled steps, sequence analytics, or workflow error handling and per-step logs, and the 5,000 emails/month allowance is a counter worth watching. 2 5 6
The Skeptic
The Butler gives a free no-code trigger-filter-action layer with round-robin assignment and automatic logging of step changes, and the 23 published simplified actions cover genuine routing. We found no public information on delays, branching or multi-step sequences inside the native builder — that depth rides on Zapier and Make — while the 5,000 emails a month included cap and the Expert-and-above gating on integrations keep limits part of the sales pitch. 5 6 8 2
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.
0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.
3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.
5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.
8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.
10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.
The Solo Seller
Two-way email send and receive for Gmail, Outlook and more with automatic attachment to leads, a documented REST API with revocable per-application keys, webhooks, and 3,000+ Zapier automations give a genuinely useful connection story. The API quota is 2,000 requests a day with higher limits marked Personalized, and API access with the integration count starts at the Expert plan. We found no public information on calendar sync. 2 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
A documented REST API over https with JSON payloads, revocable per-application keys, pagination and webhooks, plus genuine two-way email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo! auto-attached to leads and 3,000-plus connections via Zapier and Make with published trigger and action lists. The 2,000 requests-per-day quota — "Personalized" on higher plans — is thin for an API treated as first-class, and we found no public information on calendar sync or OAuth applications. 2 5 7 8
The Sales Ops Lead
A documented REST API (version 2) with webhooks, per-application revocable keys and a broad endpoint list sits alongside native send-and-receive email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo with automatic attachment to leads. The base plan allows 2,000 requests per day with limits above it shown as Personalized, and we found no public information on calendar sync or an OAuth app framework — a 40-seat sync would brush that ceiling. 2 5 7 8
The RevOps Integrator
Two-way native email is the genuine article: Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo! send and receive in-product, auto-attached to the right leads without BCC, alongside webhooks and a documented REST API whose endpoint list spans leads, activities, pipelines, client folders and more, with revocable per-application keys. But two thousand requests a day is a trickle for anything that syncs, and we found no public information on calendar sync in either direction or OAuth apps — the directory leans on Zapier for the rest of the revenue stack. 2 5 7 8
The Migrator
Native two-way email with Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo plus open and click tracking is genuinely deep, the REST API is documented across leads, users, teams, activities and webhooks, and the Zapier and Make wiring is published action by action. The 2,000 requests a day quota is the kind of metering that makes sustained syncing a crawl, and I found no public information on calendar sync or an app marketplace. 2 5 7 8
The Skeptic
A documented REST API version 2 with webhooks, per-application revocable keys, and native two-way email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo with open and click tracking is solid mid-table material. The default quota of 2,000 requests per day — with higher tiers saying only "Personalized" — is thin for anything ambitious, we found no public information on calendar sync, and the "3,000+ integrations" claim is Zapier's directory dressed up as a native ecosystem. 7 8 5 2
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.
0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.
3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.
5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.
8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.
10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.
The Solo Seller
A French entity with EU hosting asserted as the default, GDPR compliance claimed, encryption at rest and annual third-party security audits stated — the direction is right. But the hosting provider is never named, and we found no public information on a published DPA or a subprocessor list, with Stripe named as the checkout processor. I cannot tell a client exactly whose law their data sits under. 2 5 6
The Data Protection Officer
EU hosting and GDPR compliance are asserted in marketing and security copy without a named hosting provider or server location, and the site pairs a French address with a "Positive Group France" copyright while ownership remains undisclosed; we found no public information on a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, retention controls or deletion that provably deletes, and payment runs through Stripe. I cannot sign off a CRM of other people's personal data whose subprocessor chain is invisible, and the LinkedIn clipper imports scraped profiles with no consent fields in evidence. 2 3 5
The Sales Ops Lead
A French entity and address, annual third-party security audits, and an assertion that solutions are developed and hosted in the EU put this above a US-default baseline. But EU hosting is asserted only in marketing and security copy without a named provider or server location, and we found no public information on a published DPA or a subprocessor list — Stripe handles checkout and nothing else is named. 2 5 6
The RevOps Integrator
EU hosting is asserted as the default rather than an upsell, with a French address and French-named entity on the pages, encryption at rest and annual third-party security audits. But the EU-hosting claim sits in marketing copy without a named hosting provider or server location, checkout runs through Stripe, and we found no public information on a published DPA, a subprocessor list, retention controls or deletion controls. 2 5 6
The Migrator
A French entity with EU hosting asserted for everyone and annual third-party security audits is a real start. But the hosting claim names no provider or location, Stripe is the only named subprocessor, and I found no public information on a published DPA or a full subprocessor list — a DPO would be signing on marketing copy. 2 5 6
The Skeptic
A French SAS at a French address claiming solutions "developed and hosted in the EU, fully GDPR-compliant" is a decent start, but the hosting provider is never named, and we found no public information on a DPA or a subprocessor list — Stripe handles checkout and the group entity appears only in the copyright line. Marketing copy is the nicest thing a vendor will ever say; a DPO cannot sign what has no names under it. 2 5 3
Import, export & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.
0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.
3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.
5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.
8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.
10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.
The Solo Seller
Export is self-serve for all leads or filtered subsets in Excel or JSON, but getting first name, last name and email as clean columns requires leads filled with the same labels as the predefined fields — my exit quality depends on typing discipline from day one. We found no public information on import tooling, attachments or activity history in exports, and the 2,000 requests-per-day API quota would price out any scripted rebuild of a real database. 7 9
The Data Protection Officer
All leads export self-serve from the Admin menu in Excel or JSON, filtered by tags and statuses if needed, but the pages state that exporting first name, last name and e-mail as columns requires leads filled with the labels of the predefined fields — a brittle exit format. We found no public information on import with mapping or dry-run, migration from competitors, export of attachments or activity history, or contractual data-return terms, and the 2,000 requests-per-day API quota makes a full rebuild elsewhere slow by design. 7 9
The Sales Ops Lead
Self-serve export of all leads in Excel or JSON from the Admin menu, filtered or in full, beats a contacts-only CSV, but the export columns require leads filled with the same labels as the predefined fields, so exit fidelity depends on data discipline. We found no public information on import tooling, or on exporting activity history, attachments or objects beyond leads. 7 9
The RevOps Integrator
Self-serve export of all leads in Excel or JSON, with filtered subsets by tag and status, is real, and the API can retrieve account data — though the daily request cap makes a full pull a patience exercise, and name columns export only when fields carry the predefined labels. We found no public information on self-serve import with mapping, migration tooling from competitors, export of activity history and attachments, or contractual data-return terms. 7 9
The Migrator
Exporting all leads is self-serve from the Admin menu in Excel or JSON with tag and status filters, which is better than a support ticket. But structured columns for first name, last name and email only come out when leads were filled with the predefined labels, I found no public information on import or migration tooling, on exporting activity history, attachments or files, or on contractual data-return terms, and the 2,000 requests a day API quota makes a scripted exit a long project. 7 9
The Skeptic
Self-serve export of all leads to Excel or JSON exists in the Admin menu, but the help page warns that first name, last name and email come out as columns only if leads were filled with the predefined labels — exit fidelity is hostage to entry discipline. We found no public information on import tooling, attachments or activity history in exports, and the documented 2,000 requests per day quota makes any API-driven rebuild a long wait. 9 7 2
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.
5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.
8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.
10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.
The Solo Seller
All three plans carry honest per-user numbers with no seat minimum in sight — Starter at €11/user/month, Expert at €22/user/month, Dream at €33/user/month — with 20% VAT treatment and a 15-day no-credit-card trial stated plainly. Three things keep it from the top: yearly savings are only advertised as "up to 40%", the captured pages give different figures for the Starter yearly price (€11/user/month versus €11/user/year), and the API row beyond 2,000 requests a day simply reads Personalized. 1 2 8
The Data Protection Officer
All three tiers carry public per-user monthly figures with VAT treatment stated (20% for French companies and EU businesses without a valid VAT number), clear trial terms, and published limits on leads, pipelines and emails. But annual pricing is only "up to 40%", the captured pages give different figures for Starter under the yearly toggle — "€11/user/month" versus "€11/user/year" — and API access turns "Personalized" at the top, so the renewal invoice is not computable from public pages alone. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
All three tiers carry public per-seat monthly prices with the 20% VAT rule and trial terms stated, which is cleaner than most. But the yearly saving is stated only as up to 40%, API limits above the base plan read Personalized, and the captured pricing page gives Starter as €11/user/month under the monthly toggle and €11/user/year under the yearly toggle — a renewal invoice cannot be computed from that. 1 2
The RevOps Integrator
Three tiers carry public per-user figures with VAT treatment stated, limits listed — five hundred leads on Starter, five thousand emails a month — and a credit-card-free trial. The annual side stays fuzzy: the discount is advertised only as "save up to 40%", the captured pricing page shows the Starter figure as "€11/user/month" under one billing toggle and "€11/user/year" under the yearly toggle, and API rate limits are listed as "Personalized" above the base plans, so the renewal invoice is not fully computable from the pages. 1 2
The Migrator
All three tiers carry public numbers — Starter at €11/user/month, Expert at €22/user/month, Dream at €33/user/month — with the 20% VAT rule for French companies and EU businesses without a valid VAT number stated outright. But the yearly price is published only as 'save up to 40%', the Starter figure appears under both a monthly and a yearly label on the captured pages, and API access beyond the daily quota shows as 'Personalized', so the real annual invoice stays uncomputable from public pages. 1 2
The Skeptic
Three tiers priced at €11, €22 and €33 per user per month with VAT treatment stated is genuinely computable. But the captured pages give different figures for Starter under yearly billing — "€11/user/year" beside "save up to 40%" — API limits on higher plans read only "Personalized", the "5 000 emails/month included" cap comes without overage rules, and "New customers only" on Starter leaves renewal pricing unpriced. 1 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
2 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | EU only ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 2 Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 2 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. EU hosting is asserted only in marketing/security copy without naming the hosting provider or a specific server location.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. Stripe typically contracts with EU customers via its Irish entity (Stripe Payments Europe Ltd), and no hosting, email, or support-desk providers are named on any excerpt.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 19 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (9)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage youdontneedacrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page youdontneedacrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →