whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

noCRM.io

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by You Don't Need a CRM SAS · youdontneedacrm.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows a CRM is a database of other people's personal data before it is a sales tool. Optimizes for GDPR posture: EU hosting, DPA, subprocessor hygiene, consent fields, retention and deletion that actually delete. Rejects US-default hosting and enrichment features that scrape contacts from the open web.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Statuses, tags, pipelines with steps and five custom fields (unavailable on the entry plan) give each lead a real record with automatic activity history, but we found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling, field validation or field-level permissions. As the officer for the people in those records, I note the clipper that captures contact data from LinkedIn profiles and a lead-enrichment widget — data acquired from the open web with no consent handling evidenced, which is a hygiene problem before the first note is typed. 3 6 7

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Multiple pipelines with steps, amounts with probability, and win/loss capture with closing reasons are real, and goals assigned to sales reps with manager visibility approach quota tracking — but we found no public information on required fields per stage, a custom report builder, or forecast views by team and period. What the pages evidence is prospecting analytics, not a forecast a finance department would accept. 2 3 5

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The Butler — a free no-code builder on triggers, filters and actions — runs round-robin lead distribution, real-time updates from external systems, automatic logging of step changes and lead creation from forms, with deep Zapier and Make catalogues, webhooks and open/click tracking on emails. We found no public information on delays and branching inside sequences, per-step logs or error handling, and the caps that do appear — 5,000 emails per month, Expert-only field search — climb with the tier. 2 5 6 7 8

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

A documented REST API over https with JSON payloads, revocable per-application keys, pagination and webhooks, plus genuine two-way email for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo! auto-attached to leads and 3,000-plus connections via Zapier and Make with published trigger and action lists. The 2,000 requests-per-day quota — "Personalized" on higher plans — is thin for an API treated as first-class, and we found no public information on calendar sync or OAuth applications. 2 5 7 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

EU hosting and GDPR compliance are asserted in marketing and security copy without a named hosting provider or server location, and the site pairs a French address with a "Positive Group France" copyright while ownership remains undisclosed; we found no public information on a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, retention controls or deletion that provably deletes, and payment runs through Stripe. I cannot sign off a CRM of other people's personal data whose subprocessor chain is invisible, and the LinkedIn clipper imports scraped profiles with no consent fields in evidence. 2 3 5

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

All leads export self-serve from the Admin menu in Excel or JSON, filtered by tags and statuses if needed, but the pages state that exporting first name, last name and e-mail as columns requires leads filled with the labels of the predefined fields — a brittle exit format. We found no public information on import with mapping or dry-run, migration from competitors, export of attachments or activity history, or contractual data-return terms, and the 2,000 requests-per-day API quota makes a full rebuild elsewhere slow by design. 7 9

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

All three tiers carry public per-user monthly figures with VAT treatment stated (20% for French companies and EU businesses without a valid VAT number), clear trial terms, and published limits on leads, pipelines and emails. But annual pricing is only "up to 40%", the captured pages give different figures for Starter under the yearly toggle — "€11/user/month" versus "€11/user/year" — and API access turns "Personalized" at the top, so the renewal invoice is not computable from public pages alone. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

2 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency EU only ⚠ unverified 3/3 pts 2 Report an error
Subprocessors US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified 0/2 pts 2 Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about noCRM.io? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (9)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage youdontneedacrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page youdontneedacrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.nocrm.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →