whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Odoo CRM

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Odoo SA · www.odoo.com

Compare with Zoho CRM → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Assumes the pricing page is the nicest thing the vendor will ever say. Hunts per-seat maths that explode at renewal, "unlimited" with footnotes, AI features priced by credits, dead changelogs and acquisition rumours. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Contacts, companies and opportunities exist and relate to one another, but linking a person to a company through CSV import is described in the vendor's own forum as a multi-pass procedure built on External IDs and an "Is a Company" flag — a workaround where a hygiene tool should be. Custom fields on contacts are evidenced, though the discussion points to a code-based method, and visibility of records runs through access-right groups rather than field-level control. We found no public information on deduplication, merge tooling or field-level history. 4 5 6 7

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Skeptic

What is evidenced is a Kanban pipeline with drag-and-drop stages, quotations and "probable revenue" insight, with record visibility governed by sales access-right groups. The only forecasting discussion we found reports that recurring subscriptions do not come back in the sales forecast and that revenues are booked as lump sums — not reporting a finance department would sign. We found no public information on required fields per stage, a report builder, quota tracking or forecast snapshots. 1 6 7

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Automated lead creation, team assignment and scheduled activities are real, but creating automated actions is restricted to admin-level users in the Administration / Settings group, and the create-versus-update distinction was deprecated into an "On Save" trigger whose official workaround is selecting the creation date as the trigger field. We found no public information on multi-step sequences, branching, delays or error handling. 1 8 9

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Email, live chat, SMS and VoIP channels with incoming mail auto-attached to the pipeline are evidenced, as is an external XML-RPC API discussed in the forums — but the pricing page lists the External API among the Custom plan's features, so a buyer below that tier is looking at an unpriced plan for their integration path. We found no public information on calendar sync, webhooks, OAuth applications or API rate limits. 1 2 13

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A Belgian entity, EU production hosting in France and Belgium, a published subprocessor list anchored on OVH, Outscale and Scaleway, EU Standard Contractual Clauses and self-service whole-database deletion put this near the top of the class. The fine print still costs: EU-hosted customers carry a Canada-based backup until Q4 2026, deleted personal data can persist in backups for up to 12 months, AWS and FullStory — trial recordings formerly processed in the United States — remain authorized subprocessors "for potential future use" though currently inactive, and Do Not Track signals are explicitly unsupported. 3

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Exit is stronger than most: a complete database backup is self-service from the control panel at any time, CSV import and export run across the suite with a validate-before-import step, and the open-core licensing means the software itself is not the cage. What holds it back: we found no public information on export formats or deduplication on import, the migration service is sold rather than included, and the pricing page parks the External API inside the unpriced Custom plan. 3 2 10 12 13

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A genuine free tier — "One App Free € 0", one app, unlimited users — plus a public savings calculator are on the table, but we found no public information on the Standard or Custom per-user price, the monthly/annual split or VAT treatment; the Custom tier is by definition a sales conversation. The renewal maths is the real story: the discount "is valid for 12 months, for initial users ordered", Odoo.sh hosting costs are "not included", and Odoo Studio, Multi-Company and the External API all sit in the Custom plan. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor product page www.odoo.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page www.odoo.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 11 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy www.odoo.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap www.odoo.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →